Canadians Pan Mammography for Women in Their 40s

Moderators
Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
edited June 2014 in Advocacy

Canadians Pan Mammography for Women in Their 40s
November 21, 2011
A Canadian task force has recommended that routine screening mammograms should start at age 50 instead of age 40. Read more...

Sign up for our Email Updates to get BCO's newsletter featuring all our Research News stories each month, as well as other happenings at BCO.

Comments

  • Bernicky
    Bernicky Member Posts: 461
    edited November 2011

    There is a great Op Ed in the Globe and Mail this morning by Dr. Martin Yaffe on just this subject to summarize: the recommendations are wrong based on data from old imaging techniques and treatment protocols.

    Read it for yourself at

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/conditions/cancer/breast-cancer/why-i-reject-most-of-the-new-breast-cancer-screening-recommendations/article2252072/?utm_medium=Feeds: RSS/Atom&utm_source=Life&utm_content=2252072

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited November 2011

    Isn't this just a rerun of what the U.S. Task force recommended two years ago?  

    Bottom line here is that U.S. insurance companies did not heed it enough to cut coverage of screenings at 40.  Canadian healthcare could be of another disposition, and if they are then future repercussions may be felt in U.S. coverage as well.

  • Bernicky
    Bernicky Member Posts: 461
    edited November 2011

    It shouldn't have any effect on actual practice. Patients and physicians make their own choices (contrary to what is sometimes reported south of the border). Generally speaking screening is automatic at 50 in Canada - my wife who is end stage and in palliative care received a form letter from the health ministry last Friday reminding her that it was time to get her to schedule first mammogram as she turned 50 in June.

  • steelrose
    steelrose Member Posts: 3,798
    edited November 2011

    NOOOOOO! I was waiting for 50... making my own choice sure enough... here in the US and was diagnosed Stage IV at 45. i suspect the tumor had been there a couple of years before that. To hell with the guidelines... only wish I hadn't been quite so naive.

  • jojoxoxo
    jojoxoxo Member Posts: 34
    edited November 2011

    Bernicky,

    My experiences with the Canadian healthcare system have not been so positive.

    I am afraid that doctors will use those new guidelines to deny younger women a mammograph even if the woman herself wants it, because "statistically" it is of no benefit.

    I speak from experience -- having recently moved back to canada from the U.S. and am having no luck even getting an appointment with an oncologist for follow-up.  And having a general practitioner refuse to refer me for a colonoscopy even though at age 50 and with my health history I am supposed to have one.

  • Bernicky
    Bernicky Member Posts: 461
    edited November 2011

    Time to find a new GP. What you are describing is no more uncommon in the US with private insurance. Start your search here

    http://www.ratemds.com/filecache/SelectDoctor.jsp?sid=58&searchBy=City&letter=B&startRow=1400

    All the doctors in the Burlington, ON area. Getting a colonoscopy shouldn't be difficult. Three words - intermittent tarry stool. Done.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2011
    I can't believe BCO is still trumpeting the 'mamograms are vital' story. It is well known that NONE of these recommendations apply to people with histories of cancer or at high risk. While individuals may benefit greatly, the evidence simply doesn't  support routine mammography either as "prevention" or as a road to a cure in younger women. I have good reason to believe my tumor was discovered by me because I hit my breast against a heavy hard object and this may have moved the lump, making it easy for me to feel. Do I then defend accidents with dollies as a diagnostic tool? Don't think so. Wink
  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited December 2011
    1Athena1,  Drawing the line is so hard.  The line had been drawn at 40 years of age for some time.  Now they would like to redraw it at 50.  Wonder where the line will be drawn between "high risk" and non-high risk women?  There is always going to be someone who falls thru' the cracks.
  • Myleftboob
    Myleftboob Member Posts: 1,469
    edited January 2012

    I live in Canada and had just found a new GP.  I was just about to turn 49.  As my old GP gave up her practice due to illness, she wanted me to get a BL  mammo along with all of the other routine bloodwork etc.  Thank God I figured I would start with the mammo just to get it out of the way! After the initial visit, I got a recall to revisit the left breast, US, then a core needle biopsy. All within 3 weeks.  The path report came in and yep, DCIS with lot of microcalcifications.  My surgeon recommended MX and scheduled me in 4 days later. That was 12/14/11.  While I will be reviewing the full path report with the oncologist 1/18/12, he said the margins were very good with no node involvement. Had I waited another year, this would be a whole different story.  No family history either and I have ALOT of female relatives!

  • GG27
    GG27 Member Posts: 2,128
    edited January 2012

    I asked my Dr about this.  He said that it is only screening mammography that the age is being changed, not diagnostic mammography.  He told me if one of his patients wanted a mammogram he would be happy to order one for her.  He said this was based on a large study that showed that women who have no screening have lower incidents (or may have been deaths, I can't remember) of breast cancer than the ones who have regular screening.

Categories