Neratinib Clinical Trials

Options
12930313335

Comments

  • geewhiz
    geewhiz Member Posts: 1,439
    edited November 2011

    How did everyone fare with hotflashes/night sweats?

    All of a sudden I am waking up at night just drenched! I am on tamoxifen, but thought I was through most all the flashing!! Did anyone have it flare up again?

  • negirly
    negirly Member Posts: 318
    edited November 2011

    I have to admit, I took a little break from the tamox while in this trial bc I'm pretty sure i'm on the drug.  I figured that the neuratinib should get any stray cells.  I also found my tissues were dry.  SInce taking a break, the dryness hasn't changed a lot so Im going back on the tamox.

  • geewhiz
    geewhiz Member Posts: 1,439
    edited November 2011

    I saw my trial onc and nurse today. I sure didn't come away with the warm fuzzies on the direction of this trial.

    It seems that their opinion is that the Pfizer is losing Lipitor this week to generic status and next year will lose Viagra, most of their bottom line profits.

    So, they elected to clear the slates and get rid of a few trial drugs. By selling it off, they retain some royalties on any future sales. It is hugely expensive to get a drug through the fda process and to market and the larger companies have more stringent reporting requirements. It is thought that smaller companies, IF they can fund it, fare better.

    We will not see any followup data for 3-4 years. The trial is being redesigned since this one is not "useful" because the amount of the drug tested, at 6 pills and 240 mg, was widely not acceptable and unsuccessful. For a drug to be considered successful, the trial has to be designed at the correct tolerated dosage. So for the results of this trial to be used to forward this drug to market, it would have had to have been designed at 3 or 4 pills. My onc said that the word on the street was 3 was the most commonly tolerated dosage. So more than likely we will see more folks enrolling in 2012 in a new trial at 120 mg, or 3 pills. Followup care on this current trial has also been reduced from 5 years to 2.

    I am almost halfway through my trial. I have poured over the trials of this drug from around the world. I am no longer so sure that I want to stick with this. I am not so sure that I am not doing more harm than good. My bloodwork is just OK, the numbers are lower than what I usually am registering. Maybe I will get to the first of the year and make a decision then.

    I'd love to hear any thoughts on this!!

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited November 2011
    Hi geewhiz, I follow your drift on that one, my blood works are at its lowest since chemo, and was even better on Herceptin, so I feel the same way, but I am sure it is a combination of D control and the toxicity of the drug on my plummeting WCC. Thanks for the interesting information, re: where Pfizer went on this one and where this mono-therapy study arm ended up in the trash ! also no news for 3 or 4 years !!! goes to show you cant believe everything you read, I am still interested in the data on the dual study arm. I was dose reduced a few weeks ago to 5 pills, and already I can feel a difference, I was also thinking in the same direction as you and have been for a while now, can you share any other info ? Thanks again     
  • Twiceasnice
    Twiceasnice Member Posts: 117
    edited November 2011

    Does anyone know if white blood cell counts drop the longer you are on the trial? I don't know whether I am on the drug or not--but in the last couple of months, my white blood counts have slowly but steadily dropped. Wondering if that is any indication that I'm on the drug? And, should I examine other levels in my latest blood test that might help me figure out if I'm on the drug? Thanks

  • cbm
    cbm Member Posts: 475
    edited November 2011

    Well, that is interesting, geewhiz.  The Puma press release does say that they will be focusing on the population with mets, who have had Herceptin previously, which does suggest they are not bringing it to market for prevention of recurrence, which was the track first taken by Herceptin.  

    I am about 4 weeks from my last does, and my neuropathy has moved back into the burning and tingling phase, which my pt says means it's improving.  I was not a victim of the big D, but I had gotten used to being able to "go" on demand. Not so much anymore; I have even had a few bouts of constipation since stopping, and I am using that yogurt pro-biotic thingy to stay regular.  I have a good bit more energy; I had not realized how much fatigue I was enduring.

    All in all, I still am quite sure I had the Neratinib.  I did not have low white counts, though, and I did have the 6 pill regiment through the whole year.

    I think it is fascinating how different we all are.  

    Thanks for the good info on what is going on with the trial.

    Cathy 

    Edited to add--re hot flashes, mine are much much reduced since the trial.   The first few weeks the difference was amazing, but they have moderated a bit more, kind of back to normal.

  • geewhiz
    geewhiz Member Posts: 1,439
    edited November 2011

    Good to hear you came through it well CBM. Gemini, my wbc is lower than when I first came out of chemo, and now I am having lots of hotflashes out of the blue. Nothing else has changed in my diet or routine.

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited November 2011

    I will try to find that Puma press article cbm is it a reputable writer through them ? My heart sinks when the suggestion is that they are now NOT bringing it to the market as a preventable of recurrence for ( erbB-2 ) drug, what are we doing this for !!! so the feedback data is not so great !!! well that saddens me as I just finished re-reading my histopathology report for the zillions-th time, about surgical cut margins of my breast tumour. Can anyone say what is classified as a clear surgical margin that is considered good ?

    When I looked at Pfizers Neratinib ( NKI-272 ) data drug description, I saw that it was listed as a Cytotoxic oral drug, so that stands to reason of thinking that It may effect normal cell production, hence our WCC being first in the firing line. If others have no problems with there white cells then it is probable due to the Diarrhea control on the bodies ability to absorb nutrients enough for normal cell formation, basically I must be malnourished. When I put this cytotoxic question to my study team, the answer was a " well it is sort-of-not-really cytotoxic", meaning Im not telling you, Mmmm.

    My chances of recurrence is high on a general level, and wish for some good news, thanks all for your input, any info is goodUndecided

  • cbm
    cbm Member Posts: 475
    edited November 2011

    Hi, KCFS, the press release is posted by RKR on October 8, page 31, of this thread.  From the PR Newswire; which I assume is Puma itself.

    I wouldn't conclude that Neratinib doesn't work as a preventor, only that it may not be cost-effective as a choice, or that it doesn't adequately outperform Herceptin.  The prevention of brain mets--its superior effect--would have to be balanced by the large number of subjects who got bad side effects.  If only a few would have progressed in exactly the way that the drug defeats, it might be too tough a sell to all of the insurers, oncologists, and women who already had a year or more of Herceptin.  

    In my own case, I am glad that I got the year and that I got the screening tests coming into the trial, which for me included a few I would not have gotten.  Feeling sure I got the drug, and knowing it works on mets, I'm comforted that I had three years of recurrence prevention (two of Herceptin and one of Neratinib) instead of only one.  I only have two more years in the recurrence window for Her2 (and then like eight or ten or something on the ER/PR+ component.  I loathe Femara, and my doctor says I don't get to stop after 5 of that). 

    I don't know about margins; I had mastectomies, but I do know about reading and re-reading the path report.  I think sometimes that I expect it to reveal Truth and Light, but it's always the same, and I don't understand it any better. 

    Warmly,

    Cathy 

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited November 2011

    Much thanks to you Cathy for your well defined answer, I do appreciate and acknowledge the direction taken when we all are trying to understand where its going ! I do apologize that my last response was included in a down moment, as you mentioned, re-reading reports, yes a bad idea when on a low point, sorry about that.

    Femara sounds like a horrid drug to be on, as I have heard in the past from others also, but at least there is something for ER/PR+ ladies out there, thats for sure.

    Screening test are a bonus with the trial yes, and I am also grateful for this, but I think sometimes if my tumour markers, say for instance increased while on the trial, I am not so sure if I would get the alarm bell notification from the trial team, sounds blunt, but I think in some cases they are only looking for the stats rather than looking out for your well-fare !!! a strong reminder of the difference between a trial team and your oncologist ! If you have both working together ! thats great, but if you have just the one, it seems a solo effort on your own yet again. Still this is a comparison of the private and public health system in our diverse countries political heath racemes, and I do have to remind myself that line our individual cases, include our nations individual heath care systems, so diverse,and thankful for the social health support media connection around the world, its amazing, again ThankYou Cathy, cyber hugs to youSmile     

       

  • leighannmarie
    leighannmarie Member Posts: 100
    edited November 2011

    KakaCath - I am a cytologist and I work in a pathology lab in a hospital.  I can explain that report if you'd like.  I can also ask one of our pathologists.  As I understand it, Neratinib and all the tinibs are not cytotoxic in the way many chemotherapies are.  Chemo drugs kill fast dividing cells as well as normal cells.  The normal cells can rebound better.  Neratinib blocks the actions of enzymes that effect the proliferation of cancer cells.

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited November 2011
    ThankYou leighanmar I would really appreciate that, I do somewhat understand the workings of conventional chemotherapy, and also understand the supposed action of neratinibs targeting, EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors pathway, thats exactly what I was confused about when I saw it listed as BNF cat, cytotoxic drug (08.01), anyone can have a look at there data available to the public. It was listed under Pfizer data, neratinib drug chemical description, and also ''what is neratinib'' by google, maybe not a reputable sight I know, but it would be really great to hear your work colleagues analogies of it, thats for sure, and its a healthy discussion by all involved, and I thankyou for that. As I mentioned the probable cause of WCC depletion is more likely to be a result of food nutritional absorption, or the lack of, Thanks again for your input Smile 
  • cbm
    cbm Member Posts: 475
    edited December 2011

    Hello Friends.  I am almost two months from having completed the trial.My only side effects were neuropathy in both feet that came on very suddenly at about day 7 or 8, and severe diarrhea when taking Keflex.  I just wanted to report that I am taking a full course of Keflex and have not even a hint of the D, and that my neuropathy is starting to resolve.  I'm in the burning, itching, tingling phase of nerve regeneration and my physical therapist confirms this is most likely a return to normal or near normal.  

    Let me add, I had not realized how tired I had become toward the end of the trial.  I feel much much better.

    My oncology team was not sure if the neuropathy was reversible, but in my case it is improving every day now.

    Warmly,

    Cathy 

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited December 2011

    Hi ladies,

    anybody heard anything relevant out of San Antonio yet ? I have read the findings of some other trials but not neratinib ! lots of interesting research happening, mostly good, some not...

    also Herceptin TDM-1... Genentech needs to get it to the FDA again ! a terrible tragic event the day they rejected this life saving wonder drug from passing through, a drug like that comes around as a rare event, and some of us will most likely in the future need it at some stage,  sign the petition online, as apart of the rally in Boston on Wed 7th, go on-line and check it out, its worth it Wink   

  • geewhiz
    geewhiz Member Posts: 1,439
    edited December 2011

    Hi there!

    There was some info released, not on our trial but on a few others that were slightly promising. Neratinib was used in tandem with another drug...so its hard to compare. In the arm that got only neratinib there was some slight benefit. I still wonder if I am doing more harm than good with this. I am half way through it. Go check out the clinical trials thread....I believe I saw it there. Hope you have been doing well and are enjoying the holiday season!!

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited December 2011

    Thanks geewhiz, I fear and thinking the same, am 4 mths in, on 5 pills, and almost want out ! Thanks will check out the thread.

    Merry Christmas to you all, and a very Happy, Happy safe, healthy New Year ******$%&@#******

    XOLaughing

  • leighannmarie
    leighannmarie Member Posts: 100
    edited December 2011

    Saw my oncologist and research coordinator today.  She told me about the trial ending and that I would only be followed for 8 more months.  My onc said, "you were on the drug arm, right?" I told him I didn't know.  He said I will eventually be getting a letter telling me if I was on the placebo or the drug!  He said they are required to tell us.  He didn't have a lot of info about what Puma would do with the drug but, was dissapointed that he trial ended.  He said without a long term study they won't really be able to say the drug prevents recurrance or just delays it.  Anyone still in the trial know if you will discontinue taking the pills?

  • negirly
    negirly Member Posts: 318
    edited December 2011

    Kaka and gee whiz - I've been on 5 pills for the last few months too - I'll be done in March - 80% of the time its not too bad but recently I've had bad D - I've had a little cold and not on my normal diet of bananas etc...

    It will be interesting to see what happens with all of the rumors - I'm going up to Boston in January and will let you know if I hear anything

  • geewhiz
    geewhiz Member Posts: 1,439
    edited December 2011

    Thanks kward. I am curious. I wonder if its because pertuzamab has had such great results? I know they cant push forward with this trial as designed because they started with too high of a dosage...they have to do a trial with 3 or 4 pills to get it furthered along. I have been a bit slack taking those pills honestly...especially right around the holidays!

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited December 2011
    Hi ladies, has every one keyed in " neratinib at San Antonio symposium " ! well, well, well there is alot of reading there, and speculations as to the side effects of the way TOO HIGH dosage outweighing the benefits for this single-arm study, Mmmmm, geewhiz Im getting your drift....you make me smile, as I can so relate, Please all take care over Christmas and New YearLaughing
  • Kngpinkgirl
    Kngpinkgirl Member Posts: 4
    edited December 2011

    Hello ladies. First off kudos to you all for taking part in the trial. Hopefully what we are doing will help others in the future. I started the trial in October. saw the research nurse 12/9/11 to sign new consent form since follow-up changed from 5 to 2 years. Nothing was said about trial ending so I continue to take my 6 pills. Anyone heard anything new on this?

    Geewhiz, thank you about posting re hot flashes. Never had them before but 3 days into the trial, I'm suddenly boiling in my skin!

    Hope everyone has a good Xmas.

  • Twiceasnice
    Twiceasnice Member Posts: 117
    edited January 2012

    Happy New Year ladies!

    So, I've had better December's than the one that just ended.  I mentioned last month about my WBC dropping below "Normal" levels (3.8 is considered low; mine was 3.1) 

    December kicked off w/the stomach flu (which was preceded by a severe UTI), followed by a cold that blossomed into an ear and sinus infection and strep.  That came on the heels of a fibroid extraction surgery. 

    Even on chemo--I have never had so much infection going on in my body. Since September, I've been on antibiotics almost non stop.  Can this be the Neratinib? I have a follow up appointment this month and I intend to ask about it. 

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited January 2012

    Oh my god, I am so the same, everything seems to be infected, and non stop, with a flow on effect to the next infection, where-ever that might land !!! San Antonio write up about us, the mono-therapy single arm study results say the side effects out-weigh the benefits, but over-all has a very promising outlook, Im reading this drug needs to be refined or reduced to a safe level for the WCC to turn-over normally, and achieve the Pathological Complete Response Rate at the same time.

    Any body see Barbara Haley MD & Joyce O'Shaughnessy MD speak about the 40% chance of having Brain Mets ! I hung on every word they said, and repeated it over and over again ! and just about shit my paints afterwards with that thought !!! Well I guess thats why where all here doing the same thing, desperately trying not to reach stage IV and or with brain mets.

    But with a low WCC for a long period may lead to other undesirables, then again others do not seem to experience the same outcome, so that brings us back to square one again, Hoe-Hum.

    *** HAPPY NEW YEAR *** to you too gh, and all, Thanks for posting..................

  • leighannmarie
    leighannmarie Member Posts: 100
    edited January 2012

    I would think the 40% brain mets may apply to stage 4 women not early stage.  Our risk of any mets is lower than 40%.

  • Twiceasnice
    Twiceasnice Member Posts: 117
    edited January 2012

    I'm not a statistician but I believe this is correct.  We have varying degrees of relapse (based on node involvement etc)  For me I believe my risk of recurrence is somewhere around 25-30%.  Maybe you mean, out of that 30%, about 40% risk brain mets???

     But again, I'm not a statistician....

  • KakaCathFreeSpirit
    KakaCathFreeSpirit Member Posts: 100
    edited January 2012
    Yes, sorry I will rephrase that, not ''our'' chances, but most likely mine, and the topic of there discussion and research finding, was with regards to stage IV leighannmar you are correct, Thanks I will watch my phrasing next time...
  • Boo307
    Boo307 Member Posts: 222
    edited January 2012

    Hello Ladies,  I finished the drug in May and saw my research oncologist a couple weeks ago.  She said that even though the trial is being wound down that I will continue to be followed for the the five year period. 

    My understanding of the issue of brain mets and HER+ is that more often if cancer metastizes it more often goes to the brain.  The thinking seems to be that Herceptin doesn't cross the brain-blood barrier, but Neratinib may cross.  My hope in entering the trial was to perhaps reduce my risk there.

    Boo 

  • heathermcd
    heathermcd Member Posts: 142
    edited January 2012

    Boo - I spoke to my oncologist last week about the Her2 brain mets link. He indicated that its not that Her2 generally metastisizes to the brain more, but that current treatment for Her2 is so effective in the rest of the body that the brain is often the only place it can come back. Interesting take on the brain mets conundrum. I guess its both a blessing and a curse.

  • leighannmarie
    leighannmarie Member Posts: 100
    edited February 2012

    Hormone update.  My OB did FSH and estradiole levels on me and says I am post menopausal.  I had a normal cycle in Dec.  He wants to do an edometrial biopsy.  I declined.  Anyone else in their mid 40's or younger experience this?  

  • Ca1Ripken
    Ca1Ripken Member Posts: 1,254
    edited February 2012

    I was pulled from the study for prolonged QT on my last EKG...not pooping as regularly since then...maybe I was on the drug!! The clinical trial rep says prolonged QT is RARE (otherwise my echo remains normal... EF>64%).

Categories