No chemotherapy, should I be concerned?

Options
Anonymous
Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376

I was just diagnosed with TN but my onc recommended a pass on chemotherapy since my tumor was very small. I did agree that the risk of chemotherapy complications are not worth the minimal benefit of preventing recurrence but now that I see many TN cancers receive chemotherapy, I am feeling less comfortable. I am three weeks into Tomotherapy. I received approval for Tomo because the tumor is located on the upper inner quadrant of my right breast (close to heart). After rads, close monitoring. I would love to hear from anyone who had a similar situation and how they are doing after treatment.

«1

Comments

  • TEK2009
    TEK2009 Member Posts: 62
    edited May 2011

    Not sure this will help but for the record I went through chemo then rads after a lumpectomy and all nodes removed all bad, Finished it all 30 Dec 2009, so a year and 3 months on saw signs of a recurrence which has  been confirmed. Clearly went through losing hair, sickness etc for very little benefit, so chemo not always a benefit although in many cases I guess it is.Sounds like you are getting a different treatment which is probably a good thing. Honestly do not think any treatment is guaranteeed.

    T

  • starling
    starling Member Posts: 76
    edited May 2011

    Debbie:

    I had similar dx as you, except mine was grade 2. My onc told me after my lumpectomy that if i did nothing else - no chemo, no rads, just the surgery- I had a 90% chance of no recurrance. Adding chemo and rads gave me another 5%, so 95% chance of no recurrance. I took the chemo and rads. Just didnt want to be one of those 5 out of 100.I finished chemo in November 2010, and finished rads in December 2010. So far have had a clean mamo and a clean MRI. I just wnated to throw everything I could at the beast. I don't want to have to do this ever again. Can only hope, and try and live healthy.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited May 2011

    Debbie..I'm glad your tumor was found very, very early..that is such a good thing...even though TN is very, very aggressive...I find it hard to believe that a very tiny tumor could spread cells outside the breast so quickly..but then again you never know...Looking at some studies...tn's seems to have larger tumors at diagnosis...

    It's hard to say..we have some TN ladies with smallish tumors that have had mets..and then we have had some ladies with larger tumors that haven't had mets...you just never know with TN

  • luvmywife
    luvmywife Member Posts: 60
    edited May 2011

    As a caregiver who lost my wife to TN only 14 months after orig diagnosis, I hope you don't mind me telling our experience. Our onc told us if we had good margins and found no LN with cancer we'd just do lumpectomy and radiation. Our second opinion dr, said we must have miss understood our primary. Our second opinion- said w TN, he would never let us get away w/o chemo. As it turned out, we had three of 11 positive LN's and did the chemo. Our onc did no reg scans after first scan after completion of radiation, 12 months from orig diagnosis, (4 moth after completing radiation) we found mets to brain, lungs, and spinal fluid. I promised my wife (together) I would share her exp so others may have best chance at beating this disease. 14 months after orig diag, my Angel was in heaven.



    It took 4 opinions to locate the real source of my wifes headaches when it came back. Please get at least one or more opinions.



    June 7, I'll place my beautiful wife's ashes in the ocean where she loved to fish for tarpon and next to a Capt Guide we put to rest there from two cancer two yrs ago!



    I don't mean to scare you anymore than you already must be. Sounds like you have caught it very early.



    Get those opinions and demand regular scans after treatment.

  • LRM216
    LRM216 Member Posts: 2,115
    edited May 2011

    I think the standard they go by is less than 3mm (or some docs use 5mm) they forego chemo.  Other oncs give it no matter the size.  I had no choice as mine was 1.2 cms so I went as agressive as possible.  Please remember, you only get one shot at this - I would hit it as hard as possible - no matter what the size, but as Titan said above, it's all a crap shot.  None of us know whether we are cancer-free for the remainder of our life or not.  One thing for sure - this TN crap follows no rules whatsoever.  I wish you the all the best.

    Linda 

  • Dogbiskit
    Dogbiskit Member Posts: 23
    edited May 2011

    This is my second BC. First time was 17 years ago and they did not test for the three markers at that time but I had two negative so chances are it was actually TN. The tumor 17 years ago was 1.6cm stage 1 and I received lumpectomy and radiation. Chemo was optional and I declined it. Lymph nodes were removed but clear. I feel I made the right decision at the time because this second cancer is considered new, not recurrence. My current onc, however, finds it odd that I didn't receive chemo at the time as he would have definitely ordered it. This time around the tumor was close to 8cm - TN. Obviously had chemo but it's tough and I do worry about possible future complications although chances are low - heart disease, leukemia. Don't know if that helps you but it was my experience. PS the chemo has practically obliterated the current tumor. It is no longer palpable.

  • Meggy
    Meggy Member Posts: 530
    edited June 2011

    In my humble opinion...well not so humble...I would not listen to those doctors.  Your life is too valuable and that is a huge risk.  Just becuase the tumor is small doesn't mean some didn't slip into the body.  Chemo cleans you up....it is our very best offense and it has to be done up front.  If it shows up later in the body I have been told it is by definition incurable.  Easier to cure you now...impossible to cure you later.  I hope you do chemo sister.  It is very doable.  The drugs are so great that handle the neasea...such a short time in your life in order to save your life.

    Don't listen to those doctors.  Get a second opinion.  Get some chemo.  Two doses of AC squashed my tumor like a grape under my shoe.  At the end of chemo, all of the cancer was gone from my breast.  Chemo is wonderful.  We are very lucky that science has given us chemo to use. 

  • ksmatthews
    ksmatthews Member Posts: 812
    edited June 2011

    I agree with Meggy!  My tumor was small and my dr ordered neo chemo, which I am still doing.  Chemo is doable, I have been very fortuante and have had very low SE.

  • scrappy_survivor
    scrappy_survivor Member Posts: 149
    edited June 2011

    Personally I think witha  triple negative tumor taking no chemo is a HUGE risk... it is the one thing that has beeen shown to be most effective in killing this beast! HUGS on your decision.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited June 2011

    I have been on here for two years and I can recall just one lady NOT getting chemo for TN..that's it..

  • brca1babe
    brca1babe Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2011

    I had a 0.5cm TN IDC removed at bil mx for what I thought was DCIS and am BRCA1+. 

     I think the docs don't know what to do with small TN tumors and I have rec'd conflicting recommendations... However, I am leaning towards chemo and will decide this week.

    the more I read, the more I learn that TN is really a diverse group of tumors that we need to see studied more, more markers and treatments developed.  TN is tricky and as some mentioned don't always play by the rules.  Some TN is more agressive or chemo resistant than others but they don't have ways of reliably identifying this right now.

    to deebieEW- how small is your small tumor? 

     what is tomotherapy?

  • jloon
    jloon Member Posts: 30
    edited June 2011

    If I could do it all over again and find my tumor that small I would definitely do the chemo. TN is so, so agggressive. Chemo SUCKS but it's better than progressing to stage iv. At least if you do the chemo you KNOW that you've done everything you could to stop it from coming back or spreading. I would definitely get a second opinion at the very least. Good luck.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited June 2011

    Debbie.what have you decided?  You do have a choice...and like those above it is YOUR choice...I know of just one lady that didn't have chemo with TN and she is still doing ok..I see her around these boards....I think she was concerned also.

    Do some research..know what triple negative actually means..make sure your oncs know too...just make a informed decision.

    If you go through chemo..we will be hanging out with you the whole time..ok?

  • brca1babe
    brca1babe Member Posts: 75
    edited June 2011

    my update...

    I am starting DD AC next week for my 0.5cm TN tumor.

    going to throw everything at that little sucker.

    cheers

  • Sugar77
    Sugar77 Member Posts: 2,138
    edited June 2011

    brca1babe - good luck with your treatment. I'm glad to hear you opted for chemo. Mine was small, too, and I opted in for chemo as well. 

  • Malady
    Malady Member Posts: 32
    edited July 2011

    I did not have chemo and It has been 41/2 years since my surgery and all is okay.   

  • Malady
    Malady Member Posts: 32
    edited July 2011

    I did not have chemo and It has been 4 years since my surgery and all is okay.    

    Diagnois:   8/30/2007, IDC>1cm, Stage 1, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER-/RP-, HER2-  

  • AnnNYC
    AnnNYC Member Posts: 4,484
    edited July 2011

    The link patzee9 posted is not to a news story, but to a blog written by Dr. Chris Teo, a retired professor of botany who provides herbal remedies to cancer patients.

    Dr. Teo's own website says: "We do not substitute medical doctors. We advise you to seek proper medical help."

    The story linked to by patzee9 says that it involves "wrong diagnosis" -- giving chemotherapy and herceptin when not indicated by a correct diagnosis is indeed a serious medical mistake and injury.  But that's an entirely different issue from the indicated use of chemo and other adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments based on a correct diagnosis!

  • Suze35
    Suze35 Member Posts: 1,045
    edited July 2011

    patzee9 - I would gently suggest you refrain from posting anti-chemo "articles" on the Triple Negative board.  You are not TN, and don't appear to have a good understanding about the very unique nature of our diagnosis and the benefit of chemo for us.  It is literally all we have.

    brca1babe - on a positive note, there is evidence to suggest that BRCA+ women with TN do particularly well with chemo and have better than average outcomes.  Best of luck to you with your treatment.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited July 2011

    Wow..Suze..you are alot kinder than I would have been!  Good for you!

    That is great news Malady! 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Suze35, thank you for saying it kindly.  I couldn't find any "kind" words after I read that.

    And to AnnNYC - for keeping the truth flowing...seems to be a never ending battle.

    I wish the OP would come back, so I could make sure she knows about the TNBC foundation. 

    http://www.tnbcfoundation.org/

    Expect all of the women in this Forum do.  Didn't want to intrude, but saw this on the Active thread.

  • wan2bwell
    wan2bwell Member Posts: 22
    edited July 2011

    I am scheduled for my exchange next week.  I am 60 years old TN and nobody has said a word to me about chemo.rad or anything.  The oncologist said they would x-ray my lungs before the year was up- am I nutty or in the wrong place?  Now I am so confused:(

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    wan2bwell: Chemo is not recommended for non invasive cancer like yours. Rads may not have been suggested if you had a mastectomy and the tumor was sufficiently far removed from your chest wall so as to make cancer spread there very unlikely.

    Sorry about the lungs - what prompted the doctor to suggest an x-ray could be something else that showed up in an exam or your medical history. It is not a routine procedure for your BC dx. You should ask him/her.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited July 2011

    Debbie..alot of med. facilities have standard of care..I'm not sure if I would have had chemo if my tumor was under 1 cm...I think then I may have had a choice...Standard of care at the Cleveland Clinic is recommended chemo over 1 cm...

  • brca1babe
    brca1babe Member Posts: 75
    edited July 2011

    About standard of care...

    Nccn guidelines say consider chemo if tumor is 0.6 cm to 1 cm

    For less than or equal to 0.5th there hasn't been enough study to say for sure, though my mo said people are looking back at series of pts that did get chemo for such small tumors and seeing benefit. Some are trying to characterize which typeof tns benefit most from which regimen.



    Bc I was grade 3, tn and other bad indicators on pathology, my mo rec chemo and expects a reduction by about one half in risk of death at ten years from the benefit of chemo. The risk itself is not high to begin with given small tumor.... Say it's 8% and chemo gets me to 4% . That is enough benefit for me.



    The cut off in terms of tumor size is completely arbitrary and the limit has moved down over time and the MO says he expects it will move down further. I trust him, he is one of the nccn guideline authors.

  • mwd053011
    mwd053011 Member Posts: 2
    edited July 2011

    Hi Debbie,

    My tnbc diagnosis was the same as yours, except that when the lumpectomy was done, the tumor was acutally 1.1 cm, not the less than 1 cm as originally viewed. I have elected to get chemo and your question about should you or not is normal. My first treatment is scheduled for July 18th and a bit scared I am, but I know one thing for sure, I never want to go through this again. Although not a guarantee, I never want to look back and think I did not do everything possible to save myself.  Good luck hun.

  • tibet
    tibet Member Posts: 545
    edited July 2011

    Suzi35

    you mentioned that BRCA1 responds better to Chemotherapie. Do you have that article says so as i am BRC 1 positive and like to Read about it. Thanks.

  • Suze35
    Suze35 Member Posts: 1,045
    edited July 2011

    newalex - my apologies, the article below doesn't specifically say responds better to chemo, but does suggest improved outcomes for BRCA+ TNs.  It was a small study, but promising...

    http://www.ascopost.com/articles/november-2010/better-outcomes-seen-for-triple-negative-breast-cancers-if-brca-mutation-is-present/

  • bsbroth
    bsbroth Member Posts: 15
    edited July 2011

    I lost my wife to this terrible disease two years ago when she was 38.  She was diagnosed at age 33, found it early, did chemo, bi-latteral mast and was clean for 2.5 years.  Came back, did chemo and avastin, clean for 1.5 years.  3rd time came back in lungs and brain.  In my humble opinion, after having done so much reading on the topic over the years (I currently have children ages 9,11,and 13), I would get the chemo and have the bi-lat mastectomy.  Even though it didn't save my wife, we took no chances and did everything we could to kill the beast.  I can't even imagine sitting here today wondering what could have been had we not oopted for chemo and bi-lat mast.   

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited July 2011

    Hi bsbroth and luvmywife,

    Condolences to you and your children.  I'm so sorry you've been through such unimaginable grief and tragic loss.

    Thank you so much for sharing your story here and continuing to visit us!  Your perspective and advice are especially meaningful here where so many are struggling with difficult choices.  I hope time is helping to soothe your pain, but I know her memory lives on strong in you and your children.

    Hugs to you all!

    ETA - Oh my gosh, I just saw luvmywife's post above, so editing my post to include both!

Categories