Trouble making a decision

Options
dexxy
dexxy Member Posts: 229

hello Ladies, I hope you are well, and or managing the day to day struggles of just knowing you have BC.  Hoping you can all chime in and let me know your thoughts.  I'm 43, no family history of any cancers. DS IDC, 8mm, stage 1b, grade II, ER/PR +, HER2 -, 0/1 nodes, BRAC1 and 2 -, Oncotype score 22.  So the MO is suggesting 4 rnds of TC plus rads and Tamoxifen for 5 years.  So my problem is the chemo, I've always been against taking drugs, or manufactured pills for any sickness.  I've relied on herbs, supplements, and acupuncture for many problems over the years. The reason why they are suggesting chemo is because I'm young and the grade II.  Is there anyone out there that didn't do chemo that has a similar DS? would love to hear from you.

thanks for your thought and input

«134

Comments

  • susan_02143
    susan_02143 Member Posts: 7,209
    edited June 2011

    I am going to be frank.... grade 2, I would be doing the chemo. There is an alternative forum to discuss other ways you might want to deal with this.

    Family history is irrelevant at this point. Once _you_ have had cancer, you are more likely to get other cancers. Just means your body knows how to mutate. Nothing you did, just is.

    Anecdotally, I have had four friends that chose to do surgery and nothing more. Three of them are no longer with us. The problem with this crap is no one can guess who needs the "extra" treatment and who doesn't.

    Good luck making your decision.

    *susan* 

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited June 2011

    dexxy, I would agree with you Dr's if you are young do everything you can to fight it now. My diagnosis is very similar to yours, but I am 58 not young. Do the chemo, and then do the other things to try to heal and never get it back.

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    Thanks for the input ladies, I love to hear what you all think

    Its been so hard getting a 2nd opinion, trying to get into UCSF but the Dr I want to see is going on vaca. That's 2 Dr's away on vacation now. If anyone knows a MO at UCSF chime in

  • shells43
    shells43 Member Posts: 1,022
    edited June 2011

    Hi Dexxy,

    I was also 43 last year when dx'd. My tumor was large so there was no question about doing chemo. I just wanted to tell you what my onc said about breast cancer. He said the reason it kills people is because it is very good at finding its way to other parts of the body. I will never forget that. Chemo is rough, but doable. At our age, we have a lot to live for. Blessings!

  • cycle-path
    cycle-path Member Posts: 1,502
    edited June 2011

    Dexxy, the MOs at UCSF are Christopher Benz, Michelle Melisko, Mark Moasser, Pamela Munster, John Park, and Hope Rugo.

  • fightn4fam
    fightn4fam Member Posts: 48
    edited June 2011

    Hi dexxy,

    I'm exactly in your shoes right now.  I'm 43 also.  My diagnosis was LCIS & ILC, grade 3, 2.7 cm, stage 2a, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-.  No history.  BRCA 1 & 2 neg.  My onco score came back RIGHT on the line of low & intermediate.. yup... it was an 18... ughhh.  The doctor recommends chemo due to my age, tumor grade & size.  I know chemo has some awful side effects and I really don't wanna lose my hair, but I also don't wanna be thinking what "IF".  So confused right now, I'm just getting headaches.  I'm just sittin on the fence...ughhh.  

  • coraleliz
    coraleliz Member Posts: 1,523
    edited June 2011

    The decision would not be automatic for me either with 22 being an intermediate score. Would love to here what UCSF tells you. There is a study/clinical trial called the TailorX & this is hoping to provide answers to women in situations like yours. The study is closed,not accepting new participants & unfortunately the results are too far down the road to help you. UCSF is a place I considered for a 2nd opinion, as is Stanford. A 6hr drive & DH against it. Most of what I've read up on is grade 1 because that's what I have, but I think some of it may apply to grade 2. It is a tough dcision!

  • judyfams
    judyfams Member Posts: 148
    edited June 2011

    I had a different dx - IDC stage 1, ER?PR+  and HER- onco score of 20.  I am 68 yrs. old and did chemo because if bc mets it is usually in the lungs, liver, brain and bones and I just didn't want to take a chance with those organs!

    Drink lots of liquids, and eat small meals every 2hrs that have lean protein and naturally lots of fruits and veggies and it is doable.  I had 6 rounds of TC last year.

    It is a hard decision, but I didn't want to regret NOT doing chemo if bc ever comes back.

    judy

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    Fightn4fam-

    Right there with u sister! But with all the research I've done as a stage 2, grade II, I know you don't want to hear this, you might want to consider it.

    What was the actual size of your tumor?

    And did you have a yearly mammo, so it happened in 1 years time?

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited June 2011

    I'm stage IV.  It's not a fantastic place to be.  I am currently writing down my memories for my young son and talking to HR about the best way to get my life insurance to my family.  I'm "getting my affairs in order" and that doesn't mean calling Brad Pitt on the phone.  

    If you have a shot at avoiding being where I am, I think that you should take it.   

    I understand your objection but this could be a life or death situation.  If you were a vegetarian but were starving to death, would you eat chicken, or would you die?  If you had a moral objection to wearing man-made fibers but had nothing but polyester - would you wear it or go naked?  Sometimes, you have to throw those beliefs aside and do what is physically best for yourself as well as everybody around you.

    By the way, many chemos are made out of natural plants.  The newest one that I start tomorrow is made from a periwinkle plant.  So, you might still be taking herbs in a way. 

    For the record, chemo is not as bad as you imagine it to be and it's nothing like the movies make it out to be.  You will, for the most part, live a normal life during it, and it's over for you early stagers quickly.   You are young, a few months is nothing.  Your hair will fall out but it grows back in.  You can work, go on vacation, chaperone field trips or do whatever it is you always do. You might get a bit tireder than normal but it's not forever and recovery is swift.

    I wish you luck whatever you decide.

    Edit:  I wanted to add that I've been on this board long enough to see plenty of women with your small tumor and intermediate grade end up on the stage IV board.  Don't think it can't happen to you.  

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    Just talked my current MO and she leveled with me. She said she suggests tamoxifen and rads but her collegue was the one suggesting chemo. She did also say I was so on the fence she wouldn't know what she would either if she were me.

    What do you do with that?

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    Wow coolbreeze-

    I don't even know what to say. I truly do know that I'm lucky as far bc goes.

    When you we're DS in 2009 did you do chemo?

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited June 2011

    I want to add my opinion as one who wasn't able to finish chemo. If there were any chance I could have finished it I would have. At this time I'm fine but I will always be looking behind my back wondering if the beast will return.  My Oncotype score was 24 smack dab in the gray area. What the f. Just to add I'm 57, so not young.

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited June 2011

    I did do chemo - I did six rounds of taxotere and carboplatin and a year of herceptin.  And, it still got me - only five months after my last herceptin.

    I had no nodes either.  

    I am HER2 and I had a larger, fast-growing tumor that we now know is extremely aggressive.  But, like I said, I see many women on this board who end up where I am.  Browe the Stage IV board and see what the initial diagnoses of these women were.  You'll be astonished at how many had <1cm tumors and Grade 1.  

    Breast cancer is sneaky and you never know what it will do.  I wouldn't take chances, but that's me.  I  didn't and here I am.  

    That's just me and you have to make a decision based on your doctor's advice and your own intuition.  But, I do want you to know that chemo is not that bad.  I thought I'd be puking in bed for days but not at all.  They have really good preventatives now and there are lots of ways to deal with side effects that are natural.  Water is the best one. 

    It is your decision and I know it's tough.  I wish you luck. 

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited June 2011

    Since your doctor and her colleague disagree, why not get a third opinion or have your case presented to a tumor board.

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    Coolbreeze u did everything right. Do you think the other tumors were there all along?

    Voraciousreader- working on the 2nd opinion, just all the docs r on vaca

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited June 2011

    You mention her colleague... Was that a second opinion? You can request that your doctor present your case to a tumor board where several doctors review your case.

  • kittymama
    kittymama Member Posts: 139
    edited June 2011

    Hi dexxy,

    My diagnosis is very similar to yours: 9mm idc, grade 2, ER/PR+, HER2-. I'm 46 years old. However, my oncotype score was 8 (6% chance of distant recurrence). My onc recommended no chemo. I was nervous about not doing chemo. It just seems like I should because I had cancer, but my onc convinced me that in my situation, chemo would probably of little, if any benefit. She explained to me that chemo works on fast-growing, aggressive cells and if the cancer is not of that nature, it would do little to counteract it's growth. I'm still a bit nervous though.

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    voraciousreader - actually that was from the tumor board. - one said yes - 2 said no as far as the MO goes.

    kittymama - I'd throw a big party if I was you! congrats!!! :)

  • Sherryc
    Sherryc Member Posts: 5,938
    edited June 2011

    Dexxy I am similar to you.  I was 48 at diag last year and my onco score was 23.  I had two MO's tell me no chemo.  The problem with being in the intermediate area is they really do not know if it even benefits you.  The second MO told me I would only get about a 2-3% benefit and the side effects would be way worse.  My KI67 was also under 10%.  The 2nd MO did say that will all of my stats had it been over 10% he would have recommended chemo.  He still left it up to me and I just could not see that there would be enough benefit. My tumor was 1.6cm, no family history and BRCA neg but history of ADH.

  • imbell
    imbell Member Posts: 659
    edited June 2011

    Do the chemo. My oncologist told me, "we have removed your lump but if even one cell got away it will travel and grow". The chemo is to hunt down those cells and to destroy them. Better 4 now rather than a recurrence.

  • kittymama
    kittymama Member Posts: 139
    edited June 2011

    Dexxy, thank you for the encouragement! I'm just nervous because I wanted to throw everything at it. Also, I'm not sure how the oncotype scoring works. It seems that based on our pathologies, that you and I should have similar oncotype scores. However, our scores are more divergent than expected. I think that my scores on the oncotype report were ER 9.3, PR 9.8, HER2 9.0, nothing remarkable one way or the other.

  • momand2kids
    momand2kids Member Posts: 1,508
    edited June 2011

    for what it is worth-I was 48 at dx-- 27 oncotype, which was intermediate at the time.  I went with 4tx of chemo, radiation, hormonal therapy.  As coolbreeze said, it was not as I imagined. I thought I would be laying on the bathroom floor-- instead, I was putting on my wig, taking my young kids to school and going off to work.... almost every single day--didn't always feel great- but good enough to get up and live my life.  

    This is your decision--I can only say that for me, I had to know that I could sleep at night with my decision-and for me, I knew that not doing chemo would keep me up nights.  Had 2 opinions, 2 different hospitals-both the same-- that, plus the oncotype, plus my own gut instinct about my own situation got me to chemo.  Lots of other people in my situation have decided to forego chemo and that is completely their choice.  It really is up to you.  

    Best of luck

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited June 2011

    I want to add one thing - my advice is based on your statement that you didn't like drugs.  If your doctors recommend no chemo, than you should listen to them.  I am not up on the meaning of oncotypes since, being HER2, there was no question that I would have chemo.  Not having it was not an option for me.

    I just don't want anybody to skip a recommended, life-saving treatment because they prefer to get their remedies from Vitamin World.  

    There is a place for herbal treatments and there is a place for aggressive treatments.  Cancer is the place to be aggressive.  But, only if it is medically indicated.

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    voraciousreader - actually that was from the tumor board. - one said yes - 2 said no as far as the MO goes.

    kittymama - I'd throw a big party if I was you! congrats!!! :)

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    thanks again ladies, just popping back in after sushi, yum!

    kittymamma- its crazy how different cancer is, mine ER was 9.5 PR 6.7 HER2 8.9

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited June 2011

    Dexxy......hoping the sushi was delish.  Enjoying the first real summer day here.

    In your shoes, I would do chemo.  Normally, I am for "less is more" but you get one shot to do this right.  You need to send that ratbastard to kingdom come.

    I am now at the other end, and my life really is better than ever (other than my bruised, swollen ankle as wiped out on my bicycle).  I am about to enter a new exciting chapter in my life.

    You will get there.  Good luck. - Claire

    p.s. Case in point.  I was reviewing my job search strategy with a male friend of mine today.  He told me not to put my (very toned) arms over my head as too distracting in my tank top.

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    I don't if I ever was tested for KI67, where would I find this?

  • dexxy
    dexxy Member Posts: 229
    edited June 2011

    well keep your fingers crossed I can get into UCSF this week or next.  If I'm going to do this its gonna be there.  I'm meeting with my homeopathic Dr, tomorrow who can at least help build up my immune system, and support white blood cell counts, help with depression, sleep you name it.

     Coolbreeze I don't disagree with anything you've said, you are correct in so many ways.  I do think that unfortunately on this board we don't hear from the woman "who got away from the cancer enough" they move on and try to forget this horrible thing happened.  Its unfortunate seeing the could be very uplifting for a lot fo us but I don't blame them.

  • sandy115
    sandy115 Member Posts: 172
    edited June 2011

    I just had surgery 2 weeks ago lumpact and biopsy sental node.One node came back only suspicious my Dr said.More surgery take out more nodes and have Rads and chemo as there could be some cells floating around even though they got all clear margins for the Lump.I dont even take aspirin if I can get away with it.I dont want to have chemo either but I know I should.the dr said if I was 70 years old she would'nt sugest chemo but because of my age and a 41 % recurence rate she recomends it.

Categories