Insurance problems for LCIS patients

Options
Krisc
Krisc Member Posts: 33

This question is for those who have been diagnosed with LCIS and are being monitored with annual MRI and digital mammograms.  I had my first annual MRI for LCIS in July.  My oncologist ordered the MRI.  Yesterday I recieved a letter from BCBS insurance saying "request for coverage has been denied; not medically necessary."  Has anyone else had problems with your insurance company denying coverage of MRI?  I called the reimbursement specialist at the cancer center but she has not returned my call yet.  Any advice on what I need to do to appeal the decision by BCBS?  I am hoping that a letter from the oncologist may be enough.  I did read on line that the American Cancer Society says women with approximately 20 to 25 percent or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer should have access to MRI, etc. for early detection. It does go on to state that there are several risk subgroups with insufficient data to recommend for or against MRI and "in stu" carcinoma falls in that subgroup.  I believe my oncologist said my over all lifetime risk is 30 %. 

Comments

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited August 2010

    I haven't asked for an MRI (yet), though my onc gave me the 'about 30%' lifetime risk too.  (I have classic LCIS, and dense, but not very dense breasts.)  A 2nd opinion from an NCI-certified provider opined 'I have too much scar tissue <from my breast excision,the only one I've had> to have screening MRIs, even as a baseline.'  Its probably what I get for asking the breast surgeon to 'make sure I don't have ILC' before excision; it didn't occur to me that this would cause scar tissue.  I couldn't even get this NCI-certified institution to send a copy of their recommendation to my oncologist.  I tried at least 5 times, including 3 in person requests. I think they lost the record. Other departments in this NCI-center are fine though. I'm changing oncs this fall, since my present onc is retiring.I don't know how my new onc will feel about MRIs.

    Do you have a significant family history?  Some women here have (after many appeals) gotten MRI coverage if they had a first degree relative with bc, or many second degree relatives on the same side of the family.

    Certain specific family history patterns are associated with an increased risk for deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Both maternal and paternal family histories are important. For non-Ashkenazi Jewish women, these patterns include 2 first-degree relatives with breast cancer, 1 of whom received the diagnosis at age 50 years or younger; a combination of 3 or more first- or second-degree relatives with breast cancer regardless of age at diagnosis; a combination of both breast and ovarian cancer among first- and second-degree relatives; a first-degree relative with bilateral breast cancer; a combination of 2 or more first- or second-degree relatives with ovarian cancer regardless of age at diagnosis; a first- or second-degree relative with both breast and ovarian cancer at any age; and a history of breast cancer in a male relative.

    For women of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, an increased-risk family history includes any first-degree relative (or 2 second-degree relatives on the same side of the family) with breast or ovarian cancer.

    About 2 percent of adult women in the general population have an increased-risk family history as defined here. Women with none of these family history patterns have a low probability of having a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes.http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf05/brcagen/brcagenrs.htm

    Since an MRI isn't mandated by the ACS guidelines for LCIS alone, many insurance companies will probably balk at paying, of course to save money.   I'm sure you know this.

    Port's paper is the last one I know about LCIS + MRI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17206485  There's a slightly longer abstract here. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p755k56248g052n7/

    I can't figure out how to attach a copy of the .pdf.  If you PM me with your email address, I may be able to send you an attachment.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2010

    Krisc---I have LCIS and family history (mom had ILC) and have been having yearly breast MRIs since 2006. It took a long time to finally convince my oncologist to go for it, but the insurance was no problem-----the first 4 paid in full; but this year our new insurance  (BC/BS) sent me a letter saying part of it would not be paid for as it was "experimental in nature and not medically necessary". I got my oncologist to send in the necessary medical documentation and they ended up paying 90% of it. (when I mentioned my mom's bc, the insurance person on the phone said " since you have family history too and the LCIS, it will probably be covered"). Do you have any  family history? If so, make sure you tell them and get the doctor to send in documentation as well, as it can make a difference in whether they will cover it or not. 

    anne

  • lciscarroll
    lciscarroll Member Posts: 91
    edited October 2010

    I also have LCIS and ALH.  My doctor ordered an MRI, which I just had today.  I have BC / BS and if they dare deny this I will rake them over the coals.  I have spent hours, literally, reading about others experiences with LCIS, ALH and other BC types..  Also, I have spent hours reading medical journals, studies, research etc.   I feel like an expert on the subject.  Cancer is not something to fool around with.  I am totally convinced after all my research that LCIS IS CANCER.    I have decided for some time that I am getting  BMX with nipple sparring, DIEP or some similiar procedure.  And I for one, will fight with the insurance company all the way even if I must obtain legal representation.  In my mind if would be foolish not to get an MRI.  We need to utilize whatever tools are available to us, to manage this disease.

    What about all those women that will follow behind us? 

    Laurie

    Laurie

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2010

    Laurie---I just PM'd you.  please let us know how the MRI turns out. Praying you get good clear results.

    Anne

  • zap
    zap Member Posts: 2,017
    edited October 2010

    Hi:

    I am stage 2 and also have BC/BS insuance.  I get an annual mri (be sure it has been a full year) because the mammo  never picked up the cancer and my breasts are dense (risk).  I never have had a problem.  I do have BC/BS HMO and I have to always get the referral from the primary, but again never a problem.  Could it be the stage difference?  I would have your doctor pursue this.  Good luck!

    Susan

  • Minnesota
    Minnesota Member Posts: 923
    edited March 2011

    Well this strikes me as crazy! My insurance covered my PM on the non-cancer side, as well as DIEP reconstruction. The nurse practioner at my clnic siad that they have never had trouble with insurance covering PM for LCIS. If they will cover surgery to remove and reconstruct a noncanerous breast, based on a 30% risk you might get cancer in it, why would they deny coverage just to provide surveillance of the at-risk breasts?! That's waaaaay cheaper! 

  • KellyMaryland
    KellyMaryland Member Posts: 350
    edited March 2011

    Yes, like Minnesota said, my insurance company paid for the PBM but it was questionable for how long they would pay for the 2 MRIs and 2 mammos prescribed to me each year.

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited March 2011

    Just heard a podcast about medical insurance.  The speaker, an Ivy league doc trained in psychiatry and a health policy analyst about concers about the Hippocratic oath.  Things (machines, meds) get put on the market before they have been shown to be truely beneficial.

     He says there's "a tiny, tiny advantage that you can gain in lots of cases by doing an MRI to assess the risk of breast cancer compared to doing a mammogram yet doing an MRI can cost upwards of a thousand dollars." (at about 15 minutes 15 seconds into the podcast) http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=134568775&m=134569139  I doubt if he knows much about ILC, or PLCIS, or LCIS.

    Maybe that's true for the 'average' woman.  I certainly agree with him that MRIs cost a LOT more than mammograms. My core biopsy cost abut $3K.  (I had 'suspicious calcifications' so they were caught by mammogram anyway.) I've never had a breast MRI.

    I think he makes some good points-  (not the points I cited though!)

    However, I don't think he would feel MRIs are a waste of money if he was BRCA positive, or had a horrible family history, or if he had PLCIS, or if he had plain classic LCIS, and opted not to have BPMs. Obviously, if someone had only a few more years to live for some other reason, then it would not be cost effective.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2011

    I have been "under heavy monitoring" for the last 6 years for LCIS.  I have had MRI's and mamograms every 6 months, alternating (so one per year).  I never had a problem until last year when BC/BS denied my MRI.  Because I had been "clear" for about 3 years, I let it go.  Big mistake.  I had another 3 lumps found in the last month and had to undergo needle biopsies.  I found a new BS who said there was no way she would take no for an answer on MRI's given my risk factors.  All that being said, I'm thinking of going for PBM because all the waiting, testing, worrying, needle biopsies have taken there toll. But, I do think you can challange and win on the MRI with a dx. of LCIS.

  • Minnesota
    Minnesota Member Posts: 923
    edited April 2011

    Rehm046,

    Well there is something to be said for being able to put all this behind you and get on with your life vs. always waiting and worrying that the other shoe will drop. I get it. I hear you!

  • WellnessWoman
    WellnessWoman Member Posts: 12
    edited April 2011

         I was just diagnosed with LCIS, and the MRI seems to be OK with BCBS for the more intensive screening. Perhaps checking with the insurance company prior to each one would be the safest way to go, just to make certain they have have all the information they need for the approval.

         We really do have enough stress dealing with the extra screening measures.  We don't need the added worry of opening up letters implying that we may now be responsbible for a test possibly costing over 1K.  

         My experience with BCBS is that a call in advance to them, prior to a procedure or test, can help to make certain all required authorizations are in place.  This has eliminated any subsequent surprise bills, and increased my confidence in their system.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2011

    When BCBS wouldn't approve my MRI, I didn't have it.  I always get a pre-cert.  I should have pushed it more (the BS's office did the precert) because, as someone here said, a LCIS dx. should be enough to get the MRI certified. 

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited April 2011

    BC&BS of MA had denied several things during my treatment. First they denied the TE placement part of my BMX. Ended up they wanted a specific code.

    They denied the blood draw for my BRCA test (but covered the testing). Not sure how but I did finally get them to cover that.

    Now BC&BC of IL I get my estrogen levels checked and they deny the $11 blood draw (but not the test) again. There are 2 codes. BC&BC excepts the secondary code but not the first. WTF. So every 3 weeks I get a bill and have to fight it.

    My point is make sure the proper coding is in place.  BC&BS seems to be extremely picky these days. Seems they'll do anything to delay payment or wear you out so you won't push to get it corrected.

  • WellnessWoman
    WellnessWoman Member Posts: 12
    edited April 2011

    Great idea, Iago.  Coding counts. Not all providers may be aware of the need for certain codes for the coverage.  Reminding them in advance may help save some future aggravation.

    For Rehm0486, it's a shame you didn't get the MRI due to the insurance denial. If you still would prefer to have the test, maybe it's worth asking the provider if the right coding was used.  You deserve to have the best care possible.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2011

    Wellness woman, I have regretted that decision many times-and changed BS because of it.  I will never know, I've only had one other needle biopsy-and it was okay, but I'm having a PBMX in 3 weeks because of the uncertainty. Before I had made that decision, my new BS said she would absolutely get an MRI scheduled and precertified.  My last BS, while I loved him, had a very different approach, and frankly, it didn't serve me well.  Be careful about being lulled into (perhaps what we all want) false complacency.  It's not a good thing.  While everyone has to make their own decisions, I'm, after 6 years, no longer willing to take a chance. 

Categories