My Fellow Deletees and The Cyberbullied Sisters
Comments
-
Blue .. I think I would pursue this. Since it's the internet, you need to call the Feds. Maybe call the Mounties too just for good measure!
love ya,
Bren
-
Who on earth would even want to hack into a BC support site anyway? Sounds more like a case of mistaken self-importance on the side of the alleged hackees. And/or a mismanaged site.
-
It was all done elsewhere. I asked for an apology, but did not get it.
-
I am broke as a joke - but this site is important to me too. Besides, I'd probably just spend the money on booze and cigarettes anyway
..........,just kidding - kinda, so I'm in for a small donation. E -
Althena: It's Monday and you still seem to be able to post. Did everything work out with you ok? Just wondering since everything is so topsy-turvy these days on the thread.
-
Hey...why don't you call the Ghostbusters or better still, Barney Fife?
-
I just might. hehe! You don't think libel is serious? Who knew!
-
Oh, okay...so I guess that blaming certain individuals of being DELEETERs would also be considered a serious offense such as "libel"?
(Edited: Thanks for the clarification, R.)
-
Bananas and oranges. Only thing in common is you can peel them.
-
I don't think there is anything funny about people on a public website using the word illegal to describe actions which they think someone committed. Before anyone points out that people on this site have been accused of doing different things, please remember that there is a big difference between illegal and dishonest. If I was wrongly accused, I would be extremely upset.
-
Laura
A deletee is one who is deleted.
-
As far as I know, there is no law against deleting posts. There are laws against hacking.
-
It's pretty easy to prove who the DELETEES are ... just look for all the "Removed by the Community" signs slapped where their posts used to be.

Everybody really needs to read the link River Rat posted on page 2. We all need to realize that we own anything we write on the internet. Once you post it ... it is there forever. Sure you can delete. But delete just means hidden ... it's not gone.
I'm a good example ... I had Madalyn and all her posts deleted. Now go to the Search button. Type Madalyn in Member Name ... then watch as snippets of my posts show up. They are still there and easily retrievable by anybody willing to go to the trouble of doing so.
Think before you 'speak' and you will be fine.
blue ... I saw some of that crap directed at you too ... on here even. Can't blame you for being angry. But we love you and know you would never do such a thing.
-
(((Blue)))
-
I suggest that you contact the Department of Justice here in the U.S...........Eric Holder is on top of everything like closing Gitmo and bringing the Masterminds of 9-11 to justice......
Did speak to my Lawyer neighbor and just asking about libel.....stating that I had some friends accused of deleting posts by members of a discussion board by name and screen names and she stated that "accusing" someone of deleting would not be a case of libel.....that you would have to state that you know for sure that someone did an act when in fact you just have a suspicion....otherwise she said that a lot of wives would be accused of libel in accusing their husbands of having affairs when in fact they don't have any evidence just a feeling that their husbands are cheating...........
but regardless good luck.....maybe it will be an avenue to find out who really did hack the other website......shokk
-
White Rabbit: This gets scary then with our posts if deleting something does not protect us from trouble. First of all, "if" anyone wrote something in anger that could be libelous but then realized they had gone too far, the fact they reconsidered and deleted the post would mean to me that they should not be held responsible for that particular post. I don't think it could be legal to hold them responsible for something they deleted just because it stays in the brain of the computer. What you are stating means posting on the computer never allows one to even say they are sorry for anything they post. I do not like this idea at all since we all have emotions and at times may state things wehalater want to throw in the trash. I guess there are no trash cans in this electronic brain. Thanks for wising me up to things and the reality of what I am dealing with here.
-
Shokk: Whew! That makes more sense! The law should not be able to hold someone accountable for accusing a person but they should have to have proof that person "did" the action. There has to be some protection from others accusing us of things we did not do or the crazies would have a field day with people on the internet (even more than they do now!). I think Blue has a right to know for his own personal sake, who is accusing her but if someone leads her to an innocent person because they want to get that person in trouble, then Blue should have to have proof, imo.
-
Once again - accusing someone of doing something dishonest and/or underhanded is a far cry from accusing someone of commiting a felony. I'm no lawyer, so this is just my opinion.
-
Thanks shokk....good to know.
Edited to add....did you ask your lawyer friend about someone accusing someone else of being a hacker? And shokk, I thought we were good friends?
-
I think people are confusing several things.
Shokk, of course the deleting of posts is not, by itself, libel and Blue is not claiming that. She is talking about a completely different topic.
The deleter/deletee problems are separate, Laura.
It's easy to get confused, though, because the problems are related in that some of the same people are discussing more than one topic, and you could argue that the various issues may be part of a single narrative of real or perceived conflict.
Buit for the record, it is important to specify the difference between:
1) Violations of BCO rules (which are internal and at BCOs discretion) regarding deletions of posts
2) Issues that are actionable from a civil perspective (eg: the concept of suing for libel)
3) Possible federal crimes (may include cyberbullying/stalking)
There are several parallel "stories" or "narratives" here (and by calling them that I do not mean to trivialize them). These are all somewhat related, but it's important not to confuse them. However, they are being discussed interchangeably. Some of these issues I know and understand nothing about, and I think I'd like too keep it that way.
-
Frankly I think that the "hacking accusation" on the other site is just a red herring.
Interesting that people are consulting lawyers isn't it?
(((((((((((blue))))))))))
Sandy
-
I find it very interesting that the very same people who are so up in arms that anyone would ever dare report any post for any reason are the same ones who are now encouraging someone to take international legal action because she doesn't like what was written in a post that has been removed. Double standard anyone?
-
Pat -- there's a big difference between not liking something and being slandered.
-
Pat
Apples and oranges. Reporting posts is not illegal. Hacking is. Accusations of hacking are more serious.
-
Apples and oranges tossed together and turned into tin foil anyone?
Removing an internet posting and accusing somebody of illegal activity are so totally not the same thing.
I don't know about removed ... but once something has been seen by numerous people the damage is done and the gossip and slander is started. You can't 'remove' that just by trying to remove the evidence of what was said.
-
That post was read by many. No apology has been issued. Just because its gone from the screen doesn't mean its gone from the people's minds who read it. So my reputation has been sullied. The damageis done. So all I'm asking for is an apology.
-
Wow
How many times does the difference between accusing someone of deleting posts and accusing them of hacking need to be explained?
-
Oh shokk..."I suggest that you contact the Department of Justice here in the U.S...........Eric Holder is on top of everything like closing Gitmo and bringing the Masterminds of 9-11 to justice"
Scary...but actually, Fife would be more knowledgeable than Eric! lol
I just can't help but think this whole thread is looney. I know, I know, if I don't like it, leave it. lol
btw...ONLY 17 states consider web libel a FELONY. And do you realize how much money you'd have to dole out to an atty to fight something like this? There's no guarantee you'd win. And you cannot use a public defender for a civil case.
-
blue - Exactly WHO are you asking for an apology from?
-
PatMom wrote:
I find it very interesting that the very same people who are so up in arms that anyone would ever dare report any post for any reason are the same ones who are now encouraging someone to take international legal action because she doesn't like what was written in a post that has been removed. Double standard anyone?
I think if you'd take the time to look back that you will see that no one ever advocated against reporting posts. Most of us agreed that the problem is the failure of the reporter to admit who they are and state their reason for reporting.
If you don't understand the difference between accusations of reporting and deleting posts and accusations of committing a crime, then I would suggest you consult an attorney or professor of law, so they can explain it to you.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team