Are soy products bad for breast cancer?

Options
135678

Comments

  • RachelKa
    RachelKa Member Posts: 174
    edited January 2011

    Hi,

    Guess the jury is still out on soy and breast cancer (at least for estrogen-positive BC). But here's the latest ...

    Info on soy and breast cancer ...

    The soy and breast cancer debate If you've had breast cancer, you may have heard two entirely different debates on whether soy is good for you. Soy products like tofu and soy milk are rich in chemicals called phytoestrogens, which can function like estrogen and increase growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Or so we have heard.But in Asia, where diets are highly concentrated in soy, breast cancer rates are dramatically lower than in much of the world. In fact the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study found that of 5,042 Asian women diagnosed with breast cancer, those whose diets were highest in soy had the lowest relapse rate - a  23% to 32% lower risk of recurrence compared to women who ate the least soyBenefits of soy appeared to increase with intake up to 11 g of soy protein or 40 mg of soy isoflavone per day, but the benefits stopped after that level.This has some researchers looking closer - does soy increase - or might it actually lower risk for breast cancer or recurrence?What we do know, is Asians typically eat much higher concentrations of soy and from minimally processed whole foods.  While the Shanghai study indicates that eating natural soy is probably healthy, the American Institute for Cancer Research stresses that data on soy and breast cancer are not conclusive.What we know at this point is the phytoestrogens in this food source are "anti-estrogens". In other words, they may block estrogen from the receptors - and possibly protect women from breast cancer. Studies found that pre-menopausal women may benefit most as their natural estrogen levels are high. But, studies found high levels of soy in menopausal women may add estrogen to the body and actually  increase their risk for breast cancer.Bottom line:Have a diet that includes soy, plenty of  whole grains, fruits and vegetables. Post menopausal women should stay away from isolated isoflavone supplements in pills or powder and it is actually questionable whether anyone should use them.Look for your soy from natural, non-genetically modified sources. You can find these products  most often in organic and natural food stores.  Or check with your local health/food inspection agencies.More information:http://ww5.komen.org/ContentSimpleLeft.aspx?id=6442451776http://www.healthcastle.com/soy-breastcancer.shtmlPlease check out my site for more stories and resources for us c warriors!Best, Rachelwww.1UpOnCancer.com

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011

    We are in commercial break.  I will have to check out tofu.  He is suggesting that we eat tofu.  Does it have active bacteria in it that would change the omega 6 in soy?  

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2011

    I emailed my onc yesterday about this to see if his thinking has changed and it hasn't.  He said there has been lots of talk about soy, for years, but that nothing has really materialized to indicate that it is dangerous, so I should feel free to eat it (in moderation).

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited January 2011

    "While the Shanghai study indicates that eating natural soy is probably healthy, the American Institute for Cancer Research stresses that data on soy and breast cancer are not conclusive.

    What we know at this point is the phytoestrogens in this food source are "anti-estrogens". In other words, they may block estrogen from the receptors - and possibly protect women from breast cancer. Studies found that pre-menopausal women may benefit most as their natural estrogen levels are high. But, studies found high levels of soy in menopausal women may add estrogen to the body and actually increase their risk for breast cancer.

    Bottom line:
    Have a diet that includes soy, plenty of whole grains, fruits and vegetables
    ."

    Okay, what did I miss?  The data on soy and breast cancer is inconclusive.  Soy may be beneficial to pre-menopausal women (which also means that it may not be) and soy may increase the risk of BC in menopausal women (or it may not).  From that we get a "Bottom line" that says to have a diet that includes soy????

    What's the source of this information?  Whose advertising or promotion is this? 

    Rachel, have you read the previous posts in this thread that have discussed the research and the fact that there are questions as to whether a study done in China is applicable to women who grew up on have a Western diet?

    Also, no offense meant here, this is an honest question that I have after reading a few of your posts, but are you here as a legitimate new member of the board or are you here to promote your own website and draw women there?  (That is against the rules of bc.org, by the way.)

    I'm not posting this to suggest that soy is bad and shouldn't be consumed.  As I wrote in an earlier post, it seems that the information on soy is inconclusive and we each need to draw our own conclusions.  I'm just questioning what appears to be a promotional posting.   

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011

    Beesie,

    To be honest I interpreted Rachel's post as a promotional one and didn't really take in the info.  But, I would be interested to hear what you research has told you about the omega 6 in soy.  I have stayed away from it because of the question surrounding phytoestrogens but the omega thing is new for me.  And why is tofu okay?  (according to Dr Servan-Schreiber.  

    Perhaps I will start a new thread about his studies.  I do so with great hesitation though.  I do not want to start another battle!  I just want info. 

  • Fearless_One
    Fearless_One Member Posts: 3,300
    edited January 2011

    The bottom line is they don't know for sure.   Until they do, I am avoiding it.  

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    OK well lets just agree that eating soy during months with the letter "r" in it is ok but not OK in months without the letter "r". Wink

    It would be nice if there was a clear cut answer. I have read quite a bit on the subject… still not coming up with any definitive answer. Sometimes there isn't one. It could be as strange as soy is beneficial only in women with low fat diets. Who knows? There are so many things that can factor into this.

    For now as an ER+ I'm not going to add any extra soy but not go nuts avoiding it… and I will not give up my occasional hot & sour soup at Sun Wah or sushi

    ------------------------

    edited to add the word "not"

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2011

    Even I wouldn't say we should actively seek out soy.  I think its fine in moderation but we shouldn't consume too much of it.

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited January 2011

    membe_of_the_club, I so agree I try to avoid extra soy, it's in way too many products as it is.

  • althea
    althea Member Posts: 1,595
    edited January 2011

    Beesie, I have the same gripe with the word "may" in that phrase you quoted.  Rachel, are you sure your information is recent?  It sounds just like information that I read about soy years ago.  One side:  soy is bad because of phytoestrogens.  Other side:  soy is good because of phytoestrogens.  The experts all seem to agree that soy's phytoestrogens have the capacity of attaching to receptors.  And they all say MAY, as Beesie highlighted above. 

    Beesie, do YOU know why they can't figure this out?  I've had this question for years now.  Why can't someone figure out WHICH estrogens are actually making the attachments to the receptors?   The pro-soy people say the phytoestrogens are protective of health because they are weaker than our own bodies estrogens, thus they lack the capacity to feed a tumor and they prevent a stronger estrogen from attaching to the receptor.  How does anyone know which estrogens make the connection to the receptors?  Has anyone looked?  I'm totally not a science geek, but I don't think anyone has to be to see that there's a gaping hole here.  

    editing to add a ps:  for anyone wanting to read a pro-soy author, Jane Plant is a five-time survivor of bc and she advocates using soy in the diet.  She has a PhD and wrote a book "Your Life in Your Hands", which I have a copy of but haven't read yet because I finally got my hands on it just when I swung back to the 'not doing soy' camp. 

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    "Jane Plant is a five-time survivor of bc"

    She also cut out fats/dairy and started eating more fruits and vegetables. This might be the reason she and all those Japanese and Chinese women have less incidence of BC. It might not be the soy.

    I don't know the answer but there is more than one way to look at things.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    Well, if diet is so important, then why is she a FIVE time survivor! Doesn't look like she did anything right from 1-5...hey, I'm just saying. Would you take relationship and marriage advice from someone who'd had FIVE divorces?

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    Barb that was my reaction too but I ready she didn't do anything about her diet till #5

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    And the Atkins guy died of obesity! Go figure.....

    Maybe HER diet was SO bad before!!

  • Fearless_One
    Fearless_One Member Posts: 3,300
    edited January 2011

    The Atkins guy fell and hit his skull, I am pretty sure that is how he died.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    Oh. Maybe he fell because he was fat? He died with obesity at least. That I know.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    I had a girlfriend that was 400-500 pounds and her biggest fear was falling because she couldn't get up! Just before she died at 42, she did fall at home and they had to call the fire department to get her up. So sad....

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011
    Bangers & mash, fish & chips, Yorkshire pudding. What's wrong with that Wink
  • IHOP
    IHOP Member Posts: 79
    edited January 2011

    The Atkins guy died from a fall on the ice and a traumatic head injury.

    http://www.snopes.com/medical/doctor/atkins.asp

  • IHOP
    IHOP Member Posts: 79
    edited January 2011

    Dr. Atkins was not obese when he died.  He weight 195 when admitted to the hospital for his brain injury.  Not thin but certainly not what I would consider obese for a man his age and height.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    Finally had to Google. This is what I saw:

    Founder of Atkins diet 'was obese when he died'

    BY AGENCIES Dr Robert Atkins, creator of the famous low-carbohydrate diet, was clinically obese at the time of his death, according to medical reports made public today.

  • IHOP
    IHOP Member Posts: 79
    edited January 2011

    He was not obese, this article is inaccurate.  Please check out the Snopes website.

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011
    "Before his death, he had suffered a heart attack, congestive heart failure and hypertension, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing a report by the city medical examiner.

    At 258 pounds, the 6-foot-tall Atkins would have qualified as obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's body-mass index calculator."

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/26/health/main595707.shtml 

    Yes he was a big guy but I don't think big enough to qualify for "biggest loser"

    Edit: Darlene just saw your post. Still not sure about the heart issues but the weight issue is true.

  • IHOP
    IHOP Member Posts: 79
    edited January 2011

    The Snopes says he was 195 when admitted to the hospital and the fluid build up from his organ shut down caused the weight gain.  I don't think the guy can be held responsible for what happened while he was in a coma.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2011

    What I remember reading at the time was that he had fluid buildup as well, that he was not obese.  This is very common in such situations.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    please seek medical advice from your onocologist and a BC dietitian.  PLEASE do not reply on what certain people say here.  Every case is different.

    Beesie stick her opinions everywhere and she is not a medical expert

  • althea
    althea Member Posts: 1,595
    edited January 2011

    What's with all the snarky comments?  People who succeed with alternative therapies typically are people who focus on the upside, the positive, those who seek the silver lining in a black cloud.  Why focus on 5-time instead of SURVIVOR?  As I stated before, I haven't yet read Jane Plant's book, so I don't know when the change in lifestyle entered the picture.  I simply mentioned her name as a possible author of interest. 

    As for taking relationship advice from someone who's been divorced five times, well, I think again that is focusing on a negative.  I would want advice based on where a person is at this time.  From what I understand, this is the model used by Alcoholics Anonymous.  It's my understanding that EVERYONE in that group is an alcoholic and that their program is very successful in helping people.  

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2011

    Erica, thats out of line.  Beesie is merely reporting the research which is essentially not controversial.  I think we can all agree that there are no definitive answers about soy, which is why we have to make our way through this with whatever we decide is best.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    I don't think any of the comments were snarky......why read more into them than they deserve?

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011
    althea just a little humor. Nothing directed at you. Sometimes I just have to laugh/smile even if it does increase my crow flocks. (I have gone beyond 2 pair crow feet with chemo).

Categories