Sentinel node is positive

Options
joyce1419
joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
edited June 2014 in Stage I Breast Cancer

I had a lumpectomy and sentinel node only removal  last week.

the surgeon said the margins are clear enough.  smallest is 5 mm. he sees no need for further sugery of the breast.   however, the sentinel node is positive but does not feel any need for further surgery.  i do not get to see my oncologist for two weeks to discuss what next. 

 is it becoming standard practice to not remove other nodes?

Comments

  • rachel5738
    rachel5738 Member Posts: 920
    edited January 2011

    Hi there--I also had a sentinel node positive. Normally before the surgery they provide you with that injection that will light up your nodes--that way, they can decide to take out more nodes if required. This is what happened with me--my sentinel node was positive so they took out that layer of nodes -- this way they check to see if any additional spread to axillary nodes. Follow up with your surgeon and ask them also--he/she will be able to tell you for sure what they did during surgery and why they didn't go for any further nodes. Take care!

  • aussieched
    aussieched Member Posts: 244
    edited January 2011

    Hi Joyce,

    My surgery was 3 years ago, and had lumpectomy and Sentinal node biopsy. After the surgery I was initially told the sentinal node was good, however a week later more pathology came back to say the node was positive.  As they did not get clear margins plus positive sentinal node, I went back for more surgery and had a total of 30 nodes taken out plus to get clear margins.

    That was 3 years ago, and from a lot of information I have read recently, some doctors are now opting not to do auxillary clearance of nodes as stats are  apparently saying that it does not appear to give us any better outcomes with the auxillary clearance, plus it can also start the lymphadema problems which I do have.  I believe they are saying that the chemo will sort out any problems without taking further nodes.  I believe the auxillary clearance was just another tool for them to work out your staging.

    Try not to worry too much, I know the waiting is the worst, however I am sure your onc will sort it all out for you.

    ched

  • joyce1419
    joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
    edited January 2011

    Thank you for the reply.  Yes, the waiting is the worst but it does give me a chance to sort out my questions and concerns.

    I am sorry that you have lympadema problems.  On the one hand I want all cancer cut out, but I am hoping the chemo will take care of it and that is what the oncolist will reassure me.  I just read that is not the gold standard to not check all available nodes and I freaked.  I am right handed, and already have right shoulder problems so I might go along with the new thinking as a gamble for less post treatment issues.

     Hope all is well in Australia.  I loved my visit to Sydney, Melbourne and the GBR a few years ago.  A childhood dream that took decades to fulfill.

  • CrazyKitties
    CrazyKitties Member Posts: 180
    edited January 2011

    i had double mx, sentinal node biopsy, came back negative, 1 week later, sentinal node was positive---micro-mestasis----6 weeks later, 19 axillary nodes out, all negative.Long before my double mx, i imagined my cute yet sadistic good cells smiling while holding machine guns in my armpit and fighting off the bad cells. I invisioned my sentinal node as a glorious, brave, female warrior. It worked for me. She kicked ass. She saved me.

  • Fortis
    Fortis Member Posts: 12
    edited January 2011

    MX surgery and reconstruct coming for me on the 15th of February. I hope you don't mind, but I'm now adopting your female warrior sentinel node vision. I LOVE it. Thank you for sharing!

  • CrazyKitties
    CrazyKitties Member Posts: 180
    edited January 2011

    Please use the warrior, please! It helps! Best wishes to you!

  • kumanakaya
    kumanakaya Member Posts: 10
    edited January 2011

    I had sentinel node biopsy, positive last July, 2010.  Surgeon got good margins, took out three nodes, one of the three was positive, all three lit up.  I love the warrior image! 

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited January 2011

    JOYCE...I was diagnosed in December... had my lumpectomy and sentinel node removed.... at surgery time, the node was considered negative, but a week later I found out I had a .38mm micromet... I did have clear margins on the tumor. I think the clear margins or lack thereof would be of more concern... I have heard that they can go back in and try and get better margins. Based on what you said, it isn't a clear cut case. I would ask about that. I have a friend who had two lumpectomies and then mastectomy in search of the clear margins...."clear enough" would bother me.

    As for the nodes, I asked about having more out and my surgeon said that with a MICROMET, there was no need... that she was 99.9% sure that my other nodes were clean... plus my sentinel node had a second node attached to it and it was clean. How much was your sentinel node involved? If the involvement is less than .2mm, that is considered as basically negative... .2mm - 2mm is considered micromet... above 2mm is considered positive.

    I am doing chemo to MAKE SURE no little cells escaped, so maybe that is enough for you too.  I know lots of people who have had complications from the node dissection 

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited January 2011

    btw... micromet is also considered positive, just not as bad

  • JeanH
    JeanH Member Posts: 281
    edited January 2011

    Joyce, my bs said the newest studies have shown with a lumpectomy/radiation and less than 3 positive nodes the results were the same for just taking the affected nodes and doing a complete dissection. Since I have 2 positive nodes she said no more surgery,



    I would want positive enough defined, again my experience was there was one margin with a tiny amout of cancer but since it was over 2mm from the edge it was considered clear.



    I hope this helps.



    Jean

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited January 2011

    Yes...over the summer the first study came out that showed there was not a medical benefit from the additional disection.

    I still wonder though, if you are a candidate to skip chemo in terms of oncotype, whether they would need to know about the other nodes .

    Good luck..I think your onc app will help clear things up.

  • joyce1419
    joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
    edited January 2011

    cookiegal,

     is that study that came out anywhere on line?  i am reading lots and making questions for the oncologist next week.  thanks for your input.  joyce

  • joyce1419
    joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
    edited January 2011

    I find stuff that says if the sentinel node is negative, no need to take more nodes.  anyone read where if the sentinel node is positive, and mine is, no need to take any other nodes?  Of course, that could still happen as do not meet with oncologist till late last week and that may be part of a plan..  But everything says, more surgery always involved if SN is positive.  I am confused. 

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited January 2011

    My sentinel node was positive (micromet) and that was all they took and said no need to go back

  • joyce1419
    joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
    edited January 2011

    thanks for feedback.  my sentinel node itself was 1.8 cm and the positive measurement was 2.5 mm,  so maybe that is considered a micromet? 

  • mks16
    mks16 Member Posts: 415
    edited January 2011

    Joyce, my sentinel also contained a micromet (0.25 mm).

    btw, more than 0.2 mm(which about 200 cancer cells I believe) and less than 2 mm is considered a micrometastasis.

    My surgeon said radiation might be required if they considered my node as positive. She suggested we go for another surgery and remove 10 or more, and if they all come back as negative radiation won't be required. With micromets, there's a 13% chance that cancer might be present in other nodes as well, but with additional removal, there's also an increased risk of lymphedema (about 10% increase). Furthermore, if more than four nodes came back as positive, I will have radiation for sure, which will then double the risk of lymphedema (total increase of 20%).

    I opted for additional surgery, mostly for my peace of mind...

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited January 2011

    And my micromet was .38mm, so really small and here size does matter... if the cells were under .2mm that is considered negative... .2-2mm is micromet and 2mm+ is simply positive. For mine, my surgeon said that it was highly unlikely, like less than 1%, that I had any other positive nodes, but again, mine was really small and it had a negative piggybacked node... When I asked about taking more, she wouldn't... and the onc agreed. I may have already said all this in a previous post. BUT because of the micromet, I am in chemo just to make sure... all fine by me... and when I get radiation, I suppose its possible they will radiate the node area as well.

    MKS16... so how did they come back?

    And JOYCE... yours at 2.5mm is NOT micromet. If it were .5mm smaller it would have been,,, but still small.

  • mks16
    mks16 Member Posts: 415
    edited January 2011

    bdavis, they didn't come back yet, I only found out about it and made a decision yesterday. My surgery will be next week.

    Part of what influenced my decision was that I had some drainage issues after my BMX couple of weeks ago, and the area needs to be re-opened and cleaned out. Might as well do it all at the same time. 

    You're right about general opinion being not to take more... I've been doing some reading on the internet, and that seems to be a general concensus anyway...

    Sloan-Kettering has come calculators for positive non SNL predicability, but its only applicable if sentinel node is simply positive, not for micromets.

  • minxie
    minxie Member Posts: 484
    edited January 2011

    my sentinel nodes were originally declared negative, then they found 2 micromets (smaller than 2mm). They did an axillary node dissection a week later and took out 6 nodes, all negative. But the micromets were considered positive nodes and this pushed my stage from I to IIa.

    This was in December of '08.

  • mks16
    mks16 Member Posts: 415
    edited January 2011

    minxie, I think Ia and Ib classifications must be fairly new... or maybe it depends on the actual size of micromets, but by this definition you would be Ib.

    http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/?CdrID=684439 

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited January 2011

    My bs says I am stage 1b and my onc says i'm stage II... And yes, a micromet does mean positive, but its good to clairfy positive vs positive (micromet)... just because if it had been larger, maybe more would have been taken, maybe... or maybe I would have insisted.

    mks, based on your size 2.5 and the fact they need to go back in, I think its an excellent idea to take more... you just need to access the risk of lymphodema vs gained knowledge from taking more nodes.

  • Shrek4
    Shrek4 Member Posts: 1,822
    edited January 2011
  • joyce1419
    joyce1419 Member Posts: 29
    edited January 2011

    Day,  thank you so much. 

  • minxie
    minxie Member Posts: 484
    edited January 2011

    mks - thanks for that info, it does make me feel a teeny bit better to be officially a 1 rather than 2. Of course since I'm triple negative it really makes no difference - chemo-wise they threw everything and the kitchen sink at it, and then I had a BMX afterwards.

Categories