New and very hesitant to start hormone therapy

Options

Hi there, I joined here about 6 months ago, right after my surgery, and have only posted a couple times so far (time goes by SO fast when you're going though treatment!), but I wanted to properly 'introduce' myself.  I am 36, had a mx on my right, taxotere and cyclophosphamide chemo x4, and am just finishing up rads (22 full plus 5 boosts).  ER and PR +, Her2neu negative.  Before I started chemo I consulted with an ND (have been with her ever since) and I feel that it really helped me get through it all so well.  Soon (in a couple weeks) it will be time to fill my Tamoxifen rx if I so choose.  This is a huge issue for me as I am not a fan of taking pills to regulate my hormones in an unnatural way (that's why I stopped the BC pill years ago) and for some reason it scares me more than chemo or rads did (which I will be doing detoxes for when I'm finished).  My Onc, who knows how I feel about all of this, drives me nuts as every time I ask for stats on Tam, I'm just given the number 50% that it helps with recurrence which can be taken in a few 'different' ways, I know, and I'm just told to stay away from flaxseed and that ALL estrogen is bad for me.  Lupron and Zometa were also recommended, but I said no to them.  My ND has recommended DIM to me, alone, or with the Tamoxifen (which I'm willing to try out, but I just want to hear something that actually makes me want to take it).  I realize to some I may sound crazy and ungrateful to not want a drug that can maybe help, and I don't blame them, we all have to do what we feel is necessary, but I can't shake that it's a known carcinogen and I'm working very hard to eliminate enough of them from my life (and it's going really well).  

It's been very insightful, inspiring, and interesting doing 'research' here and realizing there are so many of us out there who are dealing with this in many different ways (it's also troubling that there really are no clear-cut answers for us, but that's a whole other 'rant' ;)  ).

I apologize for venting, thanks for listening, I look forward to learning from all of you! :) 

«1

Comments

  • Lovelyface
    Lovelyface Member Posts: 674
    edited January 2011

    Sherbear

    I am facing a similar situation - that is whether I want to take hormone to cut my recurrence.  My case is different than yours, as you are 90% positive for ER, and 40% for PR.  I have triple negative cancer, my PR is only 5% positive.  And my onc. wants to put me on hormone therapy.

     I may be wrong, but maybe you need to ask your Onc. for a CD or something to watch how Tamoxifen works.  It is not the same as Hormone Replacement Therapy, which causes cancer in some women.  Tamoxifen is supposed to help you avoid a recurrence.  It binds to the extra estrogens in your body, so that those extra estrogens which your body is making can no longer attack your breast.  The extra floating estrogens have caused your cancer, and Tamoxifen is supposed to stop that process.

    Imagine, I being only 5% positive, am considering Aridimex, which has a lot of side effects, same as Tamoxifen.  One of the side effects is bone loss, so they want to give me Zometa to counter that.  Some studies have shown that when a woman is given aridimex/zometa,  the chance of recurrence goes down by 35%.  The latest study has shown that it is not true.  My Onc. thinks I am a guinea pig and wants me to try this.  I am so scared of Zometa as it can potentially cause severe kidney damage and an ONJ, which is a condition of the jaw and they don't have any answers how to treat that.

    I am struggling like you are, trying to figure out what the heck to do, take it or not.  I am venting too.  Good Luck.

  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Hi Lovelyface,

    Thanks for your response, I'm sorry to hear that you are facing the same thing, it's not easy it is. Is it standard to still give you hormone therapy for your type?  Must be a very tough decision, especially now with the Zometa and it's latest findings.  It's all very unnerving.

      I've researched the Tamox like crazy and know how it works and I'm sure it does, I just don't like the idea of drugs (for years of my life) and every time I talk lifestyle changes with my Onc's they just look at me with this sad look and move onto the drugs, lol.  I get it, they're Onc's for a reason, so I can't really blame them can I?  I'm scared to take it and I'm kind of scared not to.  Just hate SE's even though I know for some they're not so bad.  I guess I can just try it out, but it's a carcinogen, which freaks me out.  Oh well, I'm sure I'll do what's best for me when the time comes.  

    Good luck with your decision and vent away!   

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2011

    I don't think any of us wants to take drugs.  But we didn't want cancer either, and I am grateful the drugs are an option.  Keep in mind that DIM and other supplements are also drugs, though perhaps with less study and oversight.  I believe that lifestyle changes are important but only help prevent recurrences or cancer in the first place around the margins.  You can't beat cancer on diet and exercise alone.  I say this as someone who has been a vegetarian for 27 years and is an avid runner.  I have no family history so with my lifestyle I should never have gotten cancer.  Thats why I would never trust such things alone.

     I suggest you try the tamoxifen and if its really awful you can decide to go off of it.  Most women do just fine on it.  I took the full five years without a problem and am now on zoladex and arimidex (and i feel great).  You can overstate the extent to which tamoxifen is a carcinogen.  It very rarely leads to cancer.  It does have some positive benefits as well -- lowering cholesterol, strengthening bones.  Not that you should take it for those reason, just saying. 

  • mathteacher
    mathteacher Member Posts: 243
    edited January 2011

    Hi Sherbear,

    I sent you a private message. The alleged 50% benefit number is actually 3.5% if you are node negative.

    I can see how you would see Tamoxifen as more objectionable than chemo or radiation. At least those treatments don't go on for five years!

  • bevin
    bevin Member Posts: 1,902
    edited January 2011

    funny- I don't like the idea of tamox/or arimdex either. I guess its the 5 year haul. However, I know I am fortunate to have an option to fight re-occurrence.  I will say, my understanding is that 50% benefit as I understand it is on your reoccurrence rate. So if your reoccurrence rate is 20%, it lowers it to 10%. if you reoccurrence rate after surgery, chemo and rads is 12%, your rate on tamox is 6%.  I friend of mine, only had a 3% benefit from tamox and had terrible side effects. Her onco blessed her coming off it. 

    Mathteacher - your facts are probably more accurate given your penchant for math!! I am only recalling a verbal discussion I had. I could be recalling full details incorrectly.

    Sherbear - I'd confirm your reoccurrence rate after surgery, chemo and rads.  your 50% bene % from tamox  is 50% off that final number..

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    I chose not to take AI's and I take DIM, along with grape seed extract and other AI-like supplements. So far so good with me. I have other medical issues which made this my choice.

  • rgiuff
    rgiuff Member Posts: 1,094
    edited January 2011

    Sherbear, I too was very ambivalent about taking tamoxifen and the rebel in me said "No way", but I decided to try it.  Initially I told myself, I'll do it for half a year, that has to have some benefit and then I'll quit if I don't like the effects.  7 months into it, I took myself off of it for about 6 weeks due to horrendous hot flashes and issues with my libido.  The libido improved slightly, the hot flashes improved, and I started to think about what if I get a recurrence?  Then I might regret not taking it, so I started it back up again.  I told myself I'll do another 6 months and then reevaluate.  Well, I've been on it 2yrs and 2mos now, and am currently telling myself that at 2.5 years I will quit taking it for good.  At that point, I will probably tell myself, why not make it an even 3 yrs and then be done with it.  The 5 years to me is very overwhelming, so this is my way of getting through it, little by little.  Don't know if I will do a full 5 years,  I would feel just fine stopping at 3 and/or taking another break from it soon because of my Stage 1 status.   I barely notice any side effects now, hot flashes aren't too bad, in summer they get worse or when I'm out shopping carrying too many things and wearing too many clothes.  I still get problems with my libido on and off, but am using testosterone gel, which helps with that problem.

    I get my uterus and ovaries monitored twice a year with transvaginal sono and so far have had no problems.  If any problems seemed to be developing in those areas, I would not hesitate to immediately stop the tamoxifen, as I do not want to end up with a hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy.

    All my lab tests since I've been on tamoxifen have showed fantastic numbers on the cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides panel.  Everything extremely into the good range.  Don't know for sure if this is from the tamoxifen, because I've also made exercise a consistent part of my life now and have increased my fruits, veggies, and good carbs and fats.

  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Hi everyone, thanks so much for your responses, I really do appreciate all feedback, pros and cons :-)

    I guess I just hate the thought of medication every day and potential SE's when I already feel healthy.  That was the worst part of chemo and I got off pretty easy SE-wise, still bugged me though lol.  Before this, like a lot or most of us I'm sure, I didn't have any major health issues, so surgery and chemicals and xrays and radiation and now hormone therapy has all been quite the shock in the last 6 months.  We also did fertility stuff before chemo and have to consult with our dr. as to what our next steps will be regarding that.  At least my oncs are willing to give me 3yrs of Tam so my hub and I can try it sooner.  We'll see.  :)

  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Anyone on Tam also doing DIM or something like it?  I think my ND said I could do both and DIM would help the T.   I'll be meeting with her in a few weeks after my rads are done, just thought I'd ask though.  Also, does anyone get hormone testing done?  It weirds me out that this is so hormonal, but none of my oncs want to test anything, never have through all of this (I guess you can't through chemo etc.).  

  • rgiuff
    rgiuff Member Posts: 1,094
    edited January 2011

    Sherbear, the Natural Girls Forum has a lot of women who are going to Naturopaths and getting hormone testing done.  Many of them use natural hormone balancing methods in addition to or instead of taking the pharmaceuticals.  There is also a whole thread just about DIM and I think it's called just that, DIM.

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    I'm not too excited about being on a drug for 5 years either. I did not have any infected nodes or LVI but there are many other factors that can put you at risk for mets. In my case my tumor is larger, grade 3, very high proliferation rate and HER2+. My ER is only 30% and PR 5%.

    At the very least I want to try it. I can always stop. Just remember there are many natural things you can do to keep your estrogen down as well.

    BTW my onc had initially discussed Zometa for me when I was diagnosed with slight osteopenia. After the study came out at the St Antonio conference she now says no and I should let my regular internist watch my bone issue. She did have me start taking calcium supplements. I was already on D because of D deficiency.  My internest says no need at this time to worry about the osteopenia. I will be retested in a year.

  • Annabella58
    Annabella58 Member Posts: 2,466
    edited January 2011

    Hi, you wanted a positive feedback for tamoxifen...I had highly er+, and 5 years of it.  Rads, no chemo and lumpectomy.

    My bones got better, I lost weight, I never had a hot flash, I did not go into menopause, I did not notice anything at all.  I felt terrific.

    I continued being a slightly overweight, (tho not on tamoxifen) :):), slightly osteopenic, slightly warm ups pre menopausal lady.

    It was a perfectly easy drug to take.  I HATE drugs, and I sort of find it ironic that of course what do I end up with?  Cancer.  I don't even like to take a tylenol!

    but this one is a good one. BTW, I got cancer again one year off of it, due to them "missing" a little spot of it, as my original surgery was from a mammo, and the MRI would have found it.

    When I got an MRI, it found it, I had chemo, mtxmy, recon and am now on arimidex.  that's fine, too!

    As with anything, eat healthfully, exercise, stay as stress free as you can (now that's funny, after bc, right?) You will do just fine.  It is a proven drug that works.  BTW, I chose to have my ovaries removed to lower my supremely high ER+ status.  Perfectly fine uterus taken out.  However, I no longer worry all night about sneaky ovarian cancer.

    PM me if I can help you further.  I understand, and delayed taking the first pill forever.  But it is a quite safe drug with few SEs except for some people.  If it does not agree with you, there are other options.

    Good luck

  • Annabella58
    Annabella58 Member Posts: 2,466
    edited January 2011

    p.s. I also had an oncologist who was zometa happy.  I was very reluctant and now, due to new findings, very glad I did not go there.  Now, there is a scarey drug for you!

    Tamoxifen has 30+ years of good research and findings behind it.  Talk to your GP, your onc, your BS, others on here.  All knowlege is power.

  • MissTW
    MissTW Member Posts: 98
    edited January 2011

    I originally made the decision I wasn't taking tamoxifen after surgery/ final path report due to the side affects.

    Then when I was told that I may need chemotherapy prior to my Oncotype score I started to change my mind. My oncotype score was 22, low intermediate. No chemo for me!

    My Oncologist said the best thing for me is Tamoxifen for 5 years and I am more than happy to do so! I will be taking 10mg in the morning and 10mg in the evening. Some say it is tolerated better this way.

    God bless to all and for those of you on chemo please be strong and patient.

    I had stage 3 colon cancer 3 years ago at the age of 44, I know how difficult chemo can be.

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    My onc is putting me on 1mg of anastrozole once a day. Anastrozole is the generic form of Amrimidex so assume the amounts would be the same. Granted I'm only 30% ER & 5% PR. I wonder how they decide the dosage?

  • Lowrider54
    Lowrider54 Member Posts: 2,721
    edited January 2011

    I am not a statistic anymore - I stopped being a statistic when I was counted as a 5 year survivor after surgery (masectomy left breast), node positive 5 of 25, chemo (CMF 8 months) and 2 1/2 years of Tamoxifin (prior cervical lesion at 22 made me not a good candidate when the study on the possible link between ovarian/cervical cancer and Tamoxifin came out).  I made it 5 years - in fact, I made it 10 years - but at 10 1/2 years - mets. 

    Pop over to the natural girls and see what they have to offer - or you can try the Tamoxifin and see how the se's are - there were really nothing for me and I would have continued had it not been for my issue, which you don't have - it made me in a high risk category.

    I was NED for 10 1/2 years - not bad - could it have been more if I was able to complete the full 5?  I don't see the point for 'what ifs' now - I could 'what if' myself crazy! 

    You will make the choice that is right for you and it sure sounds like it will be an informed one. 

    Wish you the best....LowRider

  • DesignerMom
    DesignerMom Member Posts: 1,464
    edited January 2011
    sherbear-  Like you, the hormone therapy is the hardest part of my decision.  Did you have the Oncotype DX test?  That can give some good information on your chances of recurrence.  I have decided to decline ARimidex.  Having said that, in discussion with my Onc, I can start it at anytime if I change my mind.  As I understand, the lower your recurrence risk, the smaller your benefit from any hormone therapy.  If your recurrence risk is 10% and taking hormone therapy reduces your risk by 50%, then not taking hormone therapy would mean you would increase your risk to 20%.  So you see that it is all very, very personal depending on your ver unique situation.  What I insisted was that my Onc speak to me in overall survival rates, not recurrence rates.  From what I can gather, there is no survival benefit.  This is a very hot topic on these boards and you will get lots of hot opinions.  There are two threads I would suggest reading the old post in as there is lots of good information.  The "natural girls" thread in the alternative forum and also  one called "declining hormone therapy" in the hormone forum.  Best of luck with your difficult decision.  I know it is torture.
  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Rgiuff~ thanks for sharing, makes me feel better as that's probably how I would have to make myself think about it too!  My onc did mention that I would have to have US's to make sure my uterine lining isn't thickening.  Nice that it's had some benefits for you, but I agree about all of the changes you've made as well :)  Oh, I started this thread in the Alternative forum as I am most interested in dealing with treatment, but also the cause of all of this (I know I will never know the exact cause or anything like that) and I know not everyone on the other areas are interested in alternative stuff (thought this would give me both sides).  I will definitely post in the Nature Girls thread! Thanks!

    Lago~ I understand your 'un-excitement' :).  I guess I forgot in my signature that I'm stage 2, grade 2a, 0/8 nodes, with an Oncotype score of 17.  My onc was going to give me AC+T if I scored 18 or over and told me that even though I was in the 'high end of LOW", they were being aggressive with me due to my age, I ended up with just TC.  That's why they wanted the Lupron and Zometa and as well because of my age.  To me, it just seemed so much so I opted out of that and it was right after the San Antonio release anyway so they were okay to stop it (although a fellowship doctor told me it's still good for my bones........uhhhhh I'm 36, not 106! lol).  Like you, I'll just monitor my calcium with food and supplements :)

    Anniealso~ Thanks for the positive feedback on it!  Sorry they missed some of it and you had to deal with all of this again, such a crazy experience!  My stress level seems to be pretty good, all things considered haha, and I'm exercising and my diet has never been better (and I feel great too), this decision is the thing in my life that is causing me the greatest amount of stress ;)

    MissTW~ Sorry you had to go though yet another cancer, jeez!  Been reading some of the other threads about Tam and if I start it, I may talk to my onc about doing 10mg in the AM and 10mg in the evening to break it up as you are doing.  

    Lowrider~ Thanks for the info and for sharing your situation, I'm so sorry to hear that you are dealing with mets now.  I agree, you cannot beat yourself up and play the 'what if' game.  I will check out the other threads for more guidance.  Best of luck to you!

    Designermom~ Yup, I was 17 for my Oncotype (sorry to be repeating myself here).  I have tried to talk more about the stats with my onc, but she is a true drug pusher and almost did back flips in the office when I actually took the Rx paper from her lol.  She finds it "interesting" that I don't want to take a med that will save my life and I don't enjoy that kind of 'talk' because there are no guarantee's and everyone is different so how can she absolutely say that, in fact, it will save my life?  Everything about treatment these days just seems like it gets spit out of a computer and I find that really strange, but I don't know what I should expect since I had never been down this road before, I guess it makes sense in this day and age.  Thanks for all of the advice and sharing your experience.  

      

  • nancyh
    nancyh Member Posts: 2,644
    edited January 2011

    I am stage 4 (massive recurrence to my liver, lungs and spine a little over a year ago) and am deeply regretting my decision not to take tamoxifen.  I hope I can influence others not to make the same mistake.  There are no guarantees of course, but taking tamoxifen can reduce your risk of recurrence.  Believe me, the side effects and inconvenience of taking tamoxifen are nothing compared to living with stage 4. Browse the stage 4 forum and see how many of our sisters we've lost in recent weeks and the hardships that are part of living with advanced breast cancer.

  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Thank-you Nancyh, for sharing your story, I'm so sorry to hear that you are going through this.  Stay strong, I wish you nothing but the best.  

  • amym159
    amym159 Member Posts: 212
    edited January 2011

    My thoughts/experience to add:

    I was very afraid of Tamox but have found it not bad at all (have been on it for one year). But I know some have horrible side effects and to me that would be a huge part of the equation.

    Your onc would drive me CRAZY! Everyone is different but for me to feel comfortable I have to know a lot about the proposed treatment and go to someone who is willing to let me be part of the decision making. For example, I had a hysterectomy 5 years ago so most onc would go with a  AI, but I didn't want to do that becuase I also have osteopenia. 

    There are various sites in the internet that allow you to plug in your info and look at your owns stats with and without various treaments. I used adjuvant online and found it very VERY helpful.

    My onc has never said ONE WORD about diet and exercise, and I think this reflects a narrow minded view of preventing recurrence. I think they should put it all there for us side by side. There is a lot of evidence on the benefit of exercise for example, so why do they not all  include that when discussing stats on recurrence?

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    My onc never said anything to me about diet and exercise but I think it's because even though I gained about 12 lbs on chemo I am thinner than most of her patients, actually thinner than her but I'm younger.  Tongue out Also when she first met me she new I was exercising regularly.

    My onc was interviewed in this months Chicago Magazine Jan. issue (page 81) Top Doctors For Women issue "Breakthroughs for Women's Health". Here's part of what she said:

    "Patients want to know what they can do. It used to be you could say, 'There really isn't anything.' Now you can say, 'If you control weight after diagnosis of breast cancer, you'll be less likely to die.'"

    You can read this issue online here by clicking on the cover. You will get a pop up that allows you to turn pages or change to grid view. Free flash plug-in required:
    http://www.zinio.com/browse/issues/index.jsp;jsessionid=4A58E3FFA1B004218644CA2FE44F77A1.ns103-e04?skuId=416148752&pss=1

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    I just want to chime in on the diet and exercise too.  My ND said the best thing I could do to combat side effects from Tamoxifen (and help prevent reoccurence) was to eat healthy (read the "Anti-Cancer" book!), consistent regular exercise, plenty of rest, and threw in a few supplement recommendations in (Vit D, Melatonin, Iodoral, etc).  Although diet and exercise is not a "guarantee", neither is Tamoxifen, chemotherapy, etc.  I (with the blessing of my Medical Oncologist) decided to bet my money on, BMX, Tamoxifen (due to my high ER status) and diet and exercise.  I have to tell you that I have never felt better!  I am 7 weeks out from the BMX and started back in my Step Class and 4 mile walks weeks ago.  I'm starting the Tamoxifen at the end of this month (wanted to settle in to my "new normal" so I could ascertain what was truly a "side effect" or just an adjustment to recovery/going back to work full time).  So we'll see if I'm still singing this happy tune come Feb! Kiss

    P.S.  My Naturopath Oncologist (from Cancer Centers of America) STRONGLY advocated to NOT use any DIM or IC3 with Tamoxifen...said it will reduce the effects of Tamoxifen?!!! 

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited January 2011

    Susan, it sounds you are off to a great start!

    I have one question. While the benefit of combining tamoxifen and melatonin has been documented, I can't find any published source finding DIM or I3C will reduce the effects of Tamoxifen. Also, DIM and I3C are not listed on the interactions profile from rxlist.com.

    Could you find out the published source of this interaction from your naturopath oncologist? Many women do take both Tamox and DIM so it would be helpful to have an actual published source to verify that information.

    Thanks!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011
    Molly.. I will try and contact him and find out.  I specifically asked him that question because I have been taking DIM since shortly after my diagnosis, and plan on taking it up until I start the Tamoxifen.  He was pretty adamant about me stopping it? Undecided
  • Lovelyface
    Lovelyface Member Posts: 674
    edited January 2011

    I just want to add my two cents worth -  I have never taken any prescription drugs in my life, except occason anti-biotics and tylenol, that too once a year or so.  I felt the most healthiest just before cancer, having gone through menopause, yet running like a 20 year old.  So the cancer was a huge shock, not just for me but for all my friends and family.  I did visit the herbal stores all the time, and took lots of supplements, including using progesterone cream, as recommended in the book by Dr. Lee "what doctors don't tell you about pre-menopause".  What I guess I am saying here is that don't be too fooled by what is stated on bottles at herbal stores.  I used to avoid even listening about prescription drugs, however, when I see my mom making it to the 80th year, I am amazed.  She has taken high blood pressure medications, something for cholesterol, aspirin for heart, etc. etc.  And here I am just depending on curing my body on my own through the herbal store and being confident that I was doing only "natural" things.  Not true.

    I think I am willing to try aridimex/zometa even with 5% positive progesterone.  The new study about zometa - I think it is a little misleading the way it is written.  My Onc. still thinks that I, being a tripple negative, should try the aridimex/zometa, since I have nothing else after chemo and rads.  At least I have one option to fight this beast.

    I totally agree with Member_Of_The_Club's post.  We cannot depend on just exercise, healthy food and herbal stuff to fight this beast.  This is probably the first time in my life, I am going to listen to doctors and take their medications, honestly.  I have never done what they asked me to do, used to throw away prescriptions.

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011
    Loverly face I agree. Granted I do think there are natural things that can help in conjunction with traditional western medicine methods…but it's not an either this or that type of thing. You do need to check with  your doctors reagarding these alternative methods to be sure they are not in conflict with your current treatment.
  • tpcjkk
    tpcjkk Member Posts: 67
    edited January 2011

    I was told that Tamoxifen is as important as chemo and rads in preventing recurrence, and I was actually so grateful that my tumor was ER/PR positive so that I could take advantage of the benefits of Tamoxifen.  I sweated out the results of a CYP2D6 test that my insurance ordered, and luckily I was found to be a good metabolizer.  My bias toward Tamoxifen is probably because my side effects are not significant; just a few hot flashes, which are not disruptive to my life.  I feel so fortunate that I am able to tolerate it so well and will gladly take it for the next 5 years.

  • Sherbear
    Sherbear Member Posts: 215
    edited January 2011

    Amym159~ That's great, thanks for the info.  Yeah, my one onc drives me nuts, we just don't gel, and while it's not like I'm totally agains't western medicine (I had surgery, chemo, and rads for the love of god!), she just doesn't look into anything I ask about really.  We kind of got off on the wrong foot when I first met with her as she talked to my hub and I about chemo and then said "okay, so, what do you want to do, we should get this all started" lol.  Uhhh, I told her I wanted a 2nd opinion and needed time to think.  I want to do adjuvent online again, but when I've gone on the site, it says it's only for doctors, not patients.  Frown  Oh, and I definitely think that onc's should at least have to take a nutrition course AND be up on the latest findings for food and exercise.  I know that they are extremely busy, but c'mon, this is our lives that they're playing with.  In the guide book that they give us for eating during chemo, from the Canadian Cancer Society, it lists putting Cool Whip on your food (obviously dessert type food) to make sure you're getting enough calories Surprised.  My ND almost had a heart attack and all I could do was laugh.  

    Lago~ Thanks for the article, will definitely check it out!  Sounds like she's very reasonable and at least 'gets it'.  I just think a lot of them miss 'common sense' sometimes.  

    Susansgarden~ Oh I have that book, it's so great, I recommend it to everyone!  Got lots of books now, lol.  I have been taking AHCC (mushroom complex), melatonin (minimum amount), Vit D, Fish Oil, green tea, probiotics, and flax (even though it's on my list of no's from my onc) and I only use a bit and not every day though.  I think that that is one of the things that's frustrated me the most since most of everything I read on it says it's beneficial.  I just do everything in 'moderation' now.  Really want to check out the whole Iodine thing though, that interests me and will definitely talk to my ND about DIM with Tamox again to try and clarify everything. My onc had someone look it up and they're not agains't me taking it, but just wonder why I would even bother with it (of course, hee hee).

    Lovelyface~ Oh I totally agree, and I try not to be a sucker with supplements (anymore, *ahem*), even my ND doesn't want me taking lots of stuff, she would rather I exercise and get lots of nutrients from my food.  And I also agree that a herbal mixture isn't going to 'cure' me and that lifestyle can only do so much, but I also don't believe that a pill is the 'cure' either.  That's what bothers me, they don't even want to do any testing whatsoever, they don't care if I exercise, eat well, get proper sleep, and try to stay as stress-free as possible, they just want me to take a pill every day and forget about it.  It's very counter-intuitive to me, but I understand it's not their speciality to take those other things into consideration unless there are conclusive studies out there about them.  I believe in balance, and am willing to try the meds and see how I do on them.  Smile

    Tpcjkk~ Thanks for your input, I hope I am like you! 

  • DesignerMom
    DesignerMom Member Posts: 1,464
    edited January 2011

    I am struggling with the same decision on whether to take hormone therapy or not.  I am in the mad research mode about some complementary/alternative treatments to take alone or in conjunction with hormone therap.  To my great surprise, my strictly medical Onc, gladly accepted some research articles yesterday.  I pointed out that some studies say that I3C  actually worked better than Tamoxifen.  I need to research more, but here is what the Life Extension site says about I3C.  You can read more at lifeextensions.com.

    "In studies from the University of California mentioned above, I3C inhibited the growth of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer cells by 90% compared to 60% for tamoxifen. The mode of action attributed to I3C's impressive effect was interfering with the cancer cell growth cycle. Adding tamoxifen to I3C gave a 5% boost (95% total inhibition) (Cover et al. 1999)."  I would like to find some more recent research on I3C and DIM.  I will look on pubmed and report back if I find anything.

Categories