New Imaging machine/Better than MRi

Options
rianne2580
rianne2580 Member Posts: 191

http://www.ted.com/talks/deborah_rhodes.html

 Strongly recommend this video from TED.com. Very interesting and informative about finding breast tumors accurately.  Check it out.

Comments

  • rianne2580
    rianne2580 Member Posts: 191
    edited January 2011

    Why you should listen to her:

    For all of the lives it saves, mammography still cannot detect the early onset of breast cancer in as many as one of every four women ages 40 to 49. And women with dense breast tissue are four to six times more likely to develop cancer than others. Deborah Rhodes and her colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota think they’ve found an effective way to screen these high-risk patients: molecular imaging.

    Rhodes, who specializes in evaluating and managing breast cancer, is collaborating with a nuclear physicist and various radiologists on a dual-head “gamma camera” that can capture the tiny tumors in dense tissue. The new technique, which would complement (not replace) mammography, is sensitive enough to pick up a mass two-fifths of an inch in diameter. Molecular breast imaging requires patients to be injected with a radioactive drug, but it is much more comfortable than the vise-grip mammogram and is expected to cost only slightly more.

    "MBI detects three times as many breast tumors as mammography in high-risk women. Although it would not replace mammograms, it might become an additional tool for screening, especially in higher risk women with a dense tissue that makes tumors hard to spot. "
    CTV News, Sept. 4, 2008
  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited January 2011

    Just thought I would chime in here. There is also a PEM scan which is similar to a PET. My personal experience is very positive. While the MRI showed a second (false) tumor, the PEM cleared things up allowing me to me to make the right surgical choice for me.

    The downside is that PEM's do give a high dose of radiation, but I believe they are working on reducing it. There is also a study that shows the pems can miss some things that an MRI catches. 

    Still it's good to know.

    (Full disclosure I am a stage 2 not a DCIS, but it seemed relevant. I was diagnosed on my baseline at 42. I did have some DCIS as well, wish I had caught it earlier.)

  • sharon68
    sharon68 Member Posts: 115
    edited January 2011

    Thank you so much for posting this!

    It addresses so much of what I have been questioning for years!

    Blessings  Sharon 

Categories