Stage III versus lower

Barbe1958: How does that work? Well, I can't be the only one here who had inconclusive scan results and botched biopsies. It took 3 months of mucking around before I knew whether I was Arthur or Martha - not that it really matters because cancer is cancer whether we're O or IV.

And of course I know that Stage O's lose their breasts - and that node surgery has risks of LE - I was merely giving a bit of support for Agentmo who, like me, probably had her whole armpit removed and as such is probably more at risk - but that's my opinion, not fact -  and giving her support does not mean I'm in favor of making this forum exclusive.

And now I'm wondering why I ever left the comfort and distraction of Games and Humor !!!!

I have never posted in this forum but this thread came up on the active topics list and got my attention. BTW, that is probably where a lot of "off-forum" comments come from.  I have found myself in the "wrong" forum several times by following the active topic links when a title catches my attention.

I have to say that I disagree with your post.  Not being ugly about it, but I do disagree.  Everyone who goes through this has something to offer those who come along behind you, whether their diagnosis is better or worse.  I would never begrudge someone wanting information or advice about this horrible disease just because they had the so-called fortune of a better diagnosis than me.  I see no room for jealousy over staging.  As others have pointed out, staging means very little.  Those stage 1 and 2 women whose posts bother you may go in for a regular exam/scan next week and come out of it stage 4.  I am currently stage 1, but I am 40 years old, triple negative, grade 3, 98 % proliferation rate, and metaplastic.  I had no positive nodes, but metaplastic cancer rarely does, as it tends to spread by blood. For all I know, I am really stage 4 but it just has not manifested itself. I cannot imagine anyone thinking I am lucky with this diagnosis.  I cannot imagine anyone thinking ANY woman with cancer is lucky.  We are all unlucky and can all learn from each other and support each other.  Just my opinion.  

That said, I will stay off the stage 3 board as it obviously is an issue to some.

allalone, nope, still don't get it. I don't see how you can be staged as IV and now you aren't. Somebody jumped the gun on your diagnosis before all testing was done or something, cause it just doesn't work that way.

Karen, you know that other stages get chemo too, don't you? Getting caught at an earlier stage has absolutely no bearing on recurrence. It just means you get a lighter treatment. As mentioned above, the lighter treated women seem to have a higher chance of recurrence!

Staging is strictly done to decide treatment. It has nothing to do with who is worse off or who is going to die first. GRADE is the more important indicator!

I do hear what people are saying here in this thread. All of great arguments to support their POV's.

But I tend to agree with Barb. Staging its not nearly as important as grade. And I hate to think that ladies are being "judged" based on their stage. I tend to look at the grade more so than the stage. It seems far more significant to me when understand exactly what kind of fight each individual woman is facing.

This is about the beast known as cancer, IMO. It's not about where we are on the battle field. JMO 

Karen - None of my comments were directed at you.  I apologize if you took it that way.  I was responding to the original post.

I can relate to your wishing your cancer had been caught earlier.  I do too.  I would love to be a DCIS or under 1 cm, rather than the almost 2 cm that I am.  Hell, I may even prefer a stage 2 of a less aggressive cancer to the nasty one that I had.  But it would never occur to me to be upset with someone posting because they did catch theirs earlier.  Just like I am not upset by the many posters on this site who have less aggressive cancers than me.  

I agree with you that we should all be friends here.  This site is for support.  Which is exactly why I so strongly disagree with the original post.

In truth, I have no reason to be on the stage 3 forum.  I ended up here only because of the thread topic in the active list.  I have never posted here before and will not again - in part to respect the requests of those who are bothered by it (I mean that nicely, not snide) and in part because I do not have as much in common with the women here as I do in other forums.  I mainly posted in the chemo forum until finishing earlier this month and now mostly the triple negative forum.  But should a topic be of interest to me, I would like to think that I would be welcome to post.    

Sheila you said it so well!!

Irr4993, too bad another human being got scared off from posting where she has every right to post. Please reconsider and stick around. Some of the ladies are great! Others......think they're the only ones going through this.

My diagnosis info is now set to private.  Should resolve the issue. I never realized breast cancer was so exclusive of one another instead of inclusive to help one another out.  Stage IV's don't want anyone but Stage IV's posting there.  Now Stage III's don't want anyone but Stage III's posting there.  Something seems to be wrong here.  We should all be helping one another deal with this beast.

Hi Ladies, Easy is never being diagnosed with bc.  I want a cure, no matter what stage we are.  BTW, the difference between 2B and 3A is virtually nothing, we all need support from everyone.

Love to all S0-SIV

Maureen

Honestly Meg I just think they don't know. Grade one cancers may be slow but you can still end up a stage four. Mine is a grade 3+ and my first onc still told me I would probably never deal with the cancer again. I don't know what to believe.

(((TO ALL MY SISTERS))) 

I didn't plan to post in this thread again - it is after all in the Stage III forum and I am one of the few who believes that the purpose of the Stage Forums ("to meet with others who are the same stage as you") should be respected. But given where this discussion has been going, I have to speak up.

There are many prognostic factors related to breast cancer.  Type of breast cancer, stage (which incorporates tumor size, nodal status and presence or lack of presence of metastasis), grade, ER/PR status, HER2 status, age at time of diagnosis, etc...  All are important and all factor into one's risk of recurrence/progression/mets.  However it is stage that is the most significant prognostic factor.  Stage represents the amount of progression of the cancer at time of diagnosis.  The further that a cancer is known to have progressed, the greater likelihood there is that it might in fact have progressed further, which in the future will show up as mets.  Most mets are not the result of a local recurrence that isn't found until it progresses.  Most mets develop because cancer is already in the body prior to the discovery of the cancer/removal of the cancer.  So it makes sense: The more that a cancer is known to have progressed, the greater the risk that might actually have progressed further.

Grade is important too, but not as important as stage. Grade is more important within the Stage. Someone who is Stage II, grade 1 will have a better prognosis than someone who is Stage II, grade 3.  But overall, women who are Stage II will have a more positive as prognosis than those who are Stage III. Certainly there may be some overlaps - for example, someone who is Stage II, grade 1 might have a better prognosis than someone who is Stage I, grade 3 - but overall it's Stage more than grade that determines prognosis (and therefore the likelihood of mets). 

I don't have time now to include any links to support this (but I do have the links) and probably won't continue this in another post later because I'd like to remove myself from this discussion and this thread.  But I felt that this had to be explained. 

Stage is used primarily for PROGNOSIS. 

It doesn't change the treatment between a 2 & 3, they are generally the same if the histology of the tumor is the same.

That's a good list allalone! But I agree with you that daydreaming is important. That's where our creativity comes from.....

I do not post very much on BCO, but since my diagnosis (as a Stage 3A), I have gained a lot of valuable information here. To explain, generally, I am very shy and even though I have the anonymity of the internet, it doesn't matter.  That's just me.  But, I felt compelled to respond in support of AgentMo.

What I find astounding is that many people, who complain about others lack of compassion or lack of respect for their feelings on other threads, are here doing the exact thing they complain about to AgentMo.  In fact, I have seen this thread referenced on another thread that I was reading, and not in a nice way.  This is a stage 3 forum, and while maybe not everyone agrees that stage is important, this particular forum is here for a reason, and should be respected. 

I don't think that means that others who are not stage 3 can't post here, I think it just means that it is important to respect the feelings of those who are stage 3.  While I don't know exactly what posts AgentMo is referring to, she is entitled to her feelings and opinions.  If you don't agree and want to attack her for having these feelings or accuse her of running people off the boards, you shouldn't respond--honestly it only makes it worse and stirs the pot.  If you want to gently debate or discuss, then feel free.

There are plenty of other forums within BCO to address everyone's particular situation, and there are certainly some more generic ones that everyone can fit into.  I realize that not everyone logs in and goes to a particular forum, rather they look at the active topics.  But that doesn't mean that once you go to a particular thread that you can't see what forum it is in.  You definitely can, and then you can determine whether or not it is appropriate to post a reply.   

Everyone with breast cancer has worries and fears, regardless of stage.  But, many crave the company of others in their particular situation.  They may want to discuss their treatment, compare the types of follow up tests ordered by their oncologists, the frequency of follow-up visits, etc. - many of which could vary depending on stage.  They may want to go back to their owne doctor and say "hey, how come I am not receiving the same scans, etc. as other lades with Stage 3?".  Having separate forums for each stage is one way to accomplish this.  Not everyone may agree, and that is their right.

For me, it all comes down to respect and common courtesy.  Please respect AgentMo's opinion and consider re-reading any posts you are about to make, and ask yourself "could my post offend someone, hurt their feelings, or come off as disrespectful?"

Just one Stage 3 girl's opinion...