radiation after immed. reconstruction for DCIS margins < 1mm

Options
jamiehop
jamiehop Member Posts: 17

Hoping for feedback or direction to threads out there on mast for DCIS with immediate reconstruction, close margins, and the issue of radiation and surgery after radiation. I read through Beesie's misconceptions thread, highlighting the topic of no rads with mastectomy for DCIS, among others.  Thanks! Helpful!

Just met with the Mayo yesterday for a second opinion about rads.  My original rad onc said no.  The Mayo rad. oncologist gave the the paper Beesie linked to along with one other that is quite a bit older, but she doesn't think most studies include women on tamoxifin.  All have recommended tamoxifin for me.  My left breast was pretty much all DCIS (small breasted) and I have close (dirty/positive depending on who you are) margins of <1mm both at chest wall and skin. My 2nd opinion at Mayo-rad onc was on fence.  She asked 4 Mayo colleagues (radiation oncologists) and got 2 yeses and 2 nos.  She has a very slight lean towards radiation but really unsure. 

So, I guess I'm hoping for feedback from:

a) those of you who were DCIS-mast wtih immediate reconstruction and close margins: were you recommended rads or not and how did you decide?

b) those of you who did proceed with radiation with tissue expanders: How did your surgeries go?  I heard that about 50% of the time everything works out fine.  But even if it works out ok initially, there might still be trouble down the road. 

I saw a couple posts out there but don't think I saw a topic on this.  If there is, it would be great if someone could point me towards it, or towards any helpful posts.  I think if my original recommendation was radiation, right after my surgery almost 2 months ago now, I would have been fine.  The process of getting into the Mayo for a second opinion has been a very long one, and I feel like while I'm not at the end of my treatment rope yet, I can start to see it.  And, they want me to start radiation right away if I am going to do it. 

3band1g, will you let me know if there was any talk of tamoxifin?  You said you just did rads.  How did your surgeries go? I read through some threads, but was wondering if you don't mind pointing me to any that might be somewhat detailed. 

Thanks all!

«1

Comments

  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited November 2010

    Hi!  Yes, there seem to be only a few of us who need rads after a mast.  My bs basically told me that if I didn't do the radiation she was confident it would come back.  When I talked to the rads onc he gave me "at least 35% chance for recurrence without rads".   I just felt like it was something I needed to do.  I didn't want to go through all that I did with the surgery to have it come back.  My TE's were fully expanded and I am awaiting my exchange surgery.

    I made it through with zero complications.  I was amazed at how well my skin did and my TE's are fine.  I was very tired at the end and it has taken me a long time to get my energy back.  If finished rads the beginning of July and am just now feeling like myself.  Ridiculous!

    My med onc said Tamoxifen wasn't needed for me since I did both breasts.  If I had kept one she would have wanted me to take it.  I am very glad I don't need it....the side effects sound awful!  I don't know it there are a lot of threads about this...it seems there just arent' that many of us.  I'm still amazed at the fact that my whole breast was full of DCIS and no IDC was found.  I do feel fortunate.

    My exchange surgery is scheduled or Nov 30....I'll let you know how it goes!  I am very nervous about another surgery.  I just don't want to have to recover all over again.  I am counting on it being 1,000 X's easier than the mast!

    Hope this helps and let me know if I can help in anyway.

    k

  • jamiehop
    jamiehop Member Posts: 17
    edited November 2010

    mom3band1g: Thanks for the post! Good luck with your surgery!  Congrats on being done with radiation and I am glad your skin has tolerated it well. That must be such a big relief. I think if I go through with radiation and my skin doesn't tolerate it, I will say "uncle" with the reconstruction and use a prosthetic.  I just don't envision being up for multiple surgeries, skin grafts, etc.

    I'm surprised you got a 35% estimate of recurrence but as you had grade 3, I suppose that sounds right.  I would love to know what data that was based on though, if you happen to know.  No one has been able to give me any ballpark of recurrence, not even at the Mayo clinic.  My second-opinion surgeon took a guess that i was below 10%.  The radiation oncologist quoted the studies from 2-20% (she found only 2 studies that seemed relevant).  My left breast was full from edge to edge like yours, but just grade 2.  None in the right. There was micro-metastasis (.2 mm) in the SLN that was ultimately discounted as either a false positive or an irrelevant positive.  The pathologist searched for 3 days straight for any invasive breast tissue in my specimen and found none.  

    I also wonder why all are universally promoting tamoxifen for me (also a bilateral) when none suggested it for you  Maybe it is because of this potential micro-met.  

    Anyway, I'm sure you are very busy preparing for your surgery so don't feel the need to respond to all my wonderings.  I'm getting lots of feedback and there is yet another tumor conference on Tuesday where my case will be presented so I hope to get more answers. 

    I am so happy for you that you are rounding third!!!  All the best!!!!


  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited November 2010

    It does seem that they all have their views when it comes to DCIS....seems they really need more research.  I think my bs was basing her opinion on her personal experience as a surgeon.  Where my rads Dr got his numbers I don't know.  Even with rads he said he could only bring it down to 'around 4%'.  I know that is a GREAT number but frankly, I was expecting 1-2%.  Mine was found due to a palpable lump, grade 3 with necrosis....maybe that's the difference.  Have you thought about consulting with Dr Lagios?  (sp?).  There is a woman on here, SWALTERS, who  highly reccommends him and he is a leader in DCIS.  I did ask for a 2nd opinion on  my path before my mast (I started with a lumpectomy) and again before rads.  Nothing but pure DCIS was found. 

    There is another woman here , Nana60, who has the exact same scenario as us and it was rec she do rads. 

    I would be more   nervous about taking Tamoxifen than doing rads!  Maybe they feel Tamoxifen would be needed if you didn't do rads?  Beesie has some great posts on Tamoxifen.  In the end I  feel good about doing rads and avoiding drugs.....but that is me!   Such tough decisions and made harder by conflicting info.

    Good luck!

    k

  • gep
    gep Member Posts: 5
    edited August 2013

    I also had extensive grade 3 DCIS and a mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. (no nodes x4) My margins all came back good except at the skin-initially the surgeon and radiation oncologist wanted radiation but I pushed for more surgery and had more skin taken off at the area around the incision where the margin was. The surgeon then said the data was not clear to him and he felt it was reasonable for me to forego the rads. I didn't get a second opinion on this as the medical onc. also felt not doing rads was ok but again I only had the margin at the skin and did have (rather extensive) reexision at the area and was so set on not doing the rads I went with that. I do think if I had a margin at the chest wall or an area that could not be re-exicised that they would have felt radiation was necessary and I probably would have done it. It looks like my surgeon was right, the data is just not conclusive and different docs have different recommendations. Good luck

  • Nana60
    Nana60 Member Posts: 60
    edited November 2010

    Hi Jamiehop,

    I had a similar path report from my left mx this past Aug 23. No microinvasion and no nodes involved, but positive margins in multifocal areas. (I posted similar question on this board in Sept., you can search it.) I also have TE and so far it appears as though my skin has held up well. My PS does not want to see me again until I am a month out of radiation. Radiation is delaying my exchange surgery by 6 months and there is a possibility that it will not hold-up, but I am trying to be positive.

     My BS said that no onco would recommend radiation for DCIS - I met with 2 med oncos and 2 rads oncos and they ALL recommended radiation. It was a shock, but I did the rads and will finish 33 treatments this coming Tuesday. 

    I am scheduled to start tamoxifen in December, which I am not looking forward to. 

    Feel free to send me a PM if I can be of any help to you. 

    Please continue to let us know what your doctors advise as I am interested to know their recommendation.

    Kim

     

  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited November 2010

    Kim, I  know we have 'talked' but I cannot remember why they want you to take Tamoxifen.  It was not rec for me (and I am fine with this!) but am curious as to why you are to take it.

    thanks,

    k

  • bher
    bher Member Posts: 86
    edited November 2010

    Jamiehop,

    My DCIS diagnosis sounds very similar to yours except I had a single mastectomy with TE instead of a bilateral mastectomy with TEs. My DCIS covered basically the entire lower breast and I had several close margins.  I originally had a nipple and skin sparing mx but had to have a second surgery due to positive margins.  Radiation was recommended to me because of the close margins.  I was told by the RO that it would decrease my chances of recurrence by 50%.  I just completed 10 out of 36 rad treatments today.  So far the TE seems ok but my skin is starting to react.  My PS made a comment that the radiation could shrink the TE but then said I could do additional fills if necessary after radiation was completed.  The PS also said I would need to wait at least two months after radiation was completed before surgery or additional fills could be done.

    I am curious about your micromets to the SLN.  Is that the same as ITCs (isolated tumor cells)?  I was wondering because I had ITCs found in my SLN.  The doctors believe the ITCs got into the SLN from the core needle bx.  I was told not to be concern about it since no invasive cancer was found. I still wonder though if they missed something.

    Tamoxifen is also recommended for me but it was my understanding it is for the protection of my non-cancer breast.  I seem to remember being told that if a bilateral mx was done then no tamoxifen needed but that was before I had the mx and the close margins.

    Good luck with your decision.  I know it isn't easy.  Every decision I made during this treatment process was hard to make.  I still have not completely decided to take tamoxifen but probably will since my oncologist is strongly recommending it.

  • jamiehop
    jamiehop Member Posts: 17
    edited November 2010

    Thanks Nano60 and Bher for the information!  I also heard the reducing by 1/2 and 2/3rd number but haven't gotten a sense of what the risk of recurrence is for a gal like me.  I know it is all VERY FUZZY...but I'm curious if either of you got any ballpark risk of recurrence numbers? 

    Bher, looks like we are both grade 2.  Nano60, can't remember what grade you have, if I know.  And what age?  I'm 39.  The Mayo radiation oncologist said they don't typically recommend radiation uncless your risk of recurrence is over 15%.  And she just quoted the broast studies that say between 2 and 20%.  The Mayo surgeon took at stab and said he thinks I'm under 10% but then quickly added that I should ask the radiation oncologist. 

    Bher, I remember the doc explaining that I was on the cusp between ITC and micrometastesis, just barely a micromet.  My surgeon explained to me how they sometimes do get transplanted but for some reason felt strongly that that wasn't my case and asked the pathologist to go back.  He did another 3 days of going through my breast specimen to see if he could find any invasive cancer but couldn't.  Because of that, my med onco recommended I do chemotherapy (said it wasn't a must do, but that he recommended it).  I was all set to do it but then decided to get a second opinion.  The Mayo said that the micromets were basically either a false positive (transplanted) or an "irrelevant" positive. They didn't view them as a negative prognosticator, so recommended against chemo.  Turns out that my med onco was the only oncologist at the tumor conference that discussed my case who thought I should do chemo, all others said no.  I appreciate him being aggressive, and certainly understand as he is the one who needs to sleep at night knowing he's treated his patients well.  Short story LONG, Mayo wasn't concerned with the micromets/ITC.  

  • bher
    bher Member Posts: 86
    edited August 2013

    Jamiehop,

    Thank you for the explanation regarding the micromets/ITCs.  None of my docs felt chemo was indicated in my case.  I would have gotten a second opinion too if chem had been recommended.   

    My medical oncologist told me that my lifetime risk of a DCIS/IDC recurrance is 10-15% with doing radiation and tamoxifen. 

     I can understand your hesitancy regarding the radiation.  I was really depressed when told I would need rads. I would almost be finish now with the reconstruction if the rads had not gotten in the way.  I decided to do it since all my docs agreed that I could benefit from the radiation.  I do however worry about the TE and the final outcome of my reconstruction.

  • Nana60
    Nana60 Member Posts: 60
    edited November 2010

    Jamiehop,

    I was a grade 2 and just turned 50 years old when I was diagnosed. My rads onco put me at a 50% risk of recurrence without radiation.  However, my breast surgeon felt I didn't need radiation because I had pure DCIS and it isn't supposed to spread. You can research that.

    Having positive margins has been a difficult road for sure, but I am very thankful for those on this site who have taken the time to help me though this. You are not alone and you will make it too!

    Kim

  • jamiehop
    jamiehop Member Posts: 17
    edited November 2010

    50% sure seems high, poor thing!  While my margins are technically close, I know some doctors have called them margins "positive", they say it is really mincing words.  I've only heard the 2-20% risck of recurrence quoted.  I suppose I ought to make my decision based on the 20% risk rate.  I saw one of the 2 studies posted with a 15% recurrence rate for "close" margins but that was less than <2mm.

    Not a fun decision.  Of the two potential negative outcomes (no radiation/yes cancer; yes radiation/yes cancer), I feel like I would just be grumpy as all get-out if I chose to do radiation, had complications, failed implant, and then STILL got cancer.  Grr.  But the odds aren't favoring that of course.  And I am certainly inclined to do what I can at this early stage.

  • Nana60
    Nana60 Member Posts: 60
    edited November 2010

    I can't even begin to tell how how difficult the decision to have radiation was for me. But, in the end, I came to the conclusion that I had to do everything I could. I had 2 med onco and 2 rad onco opinions and they ALL suggested radiation. 

    I am also hopeful that my TE will hold-up. 

  • sunshinegal
    sunshinegal Member Posts: 209
    edited December 2010

    I'm joining your club, ladies! Nothing personal, but boo! I'm sad to be doing so. :(

    I had a single mastectomy and TE placed on 11/15. Surgeon and PS were both hopeful of avoiding radiation, but anterior margin was less than 1mm (posterior less than 2mm) and while the tumor board that discussed my case last week was split in their opinions, 2 radiation oncs who were there recommended rads because of my age (36), including the one I will be seeing for the first time Thurs.

    I had really hoped to avoid radiation. :( I haven't had any fills yet and am worried about how it's all going to go now. 

    I suppose I'll find all this out Thursday, but will I get all my fills before starting rads? Is there a window within which they want/need to start rads? I think I am going to have whole breast radiation because they don't know exactly where the close margin was (the tumor was 9.5cm - basically the whole breast). How is this different from other types of radiation treatment and will SE be worse because it's covering a wide area?

    Gee, I guess I could still say no to radiation, but I'm someone who would be pretty pissed at myself if I skip it and have a recurrence later.

  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited December 2010

    I had rads with TE's.  I had all my fills prior to starting radiation but I never wanted to be very big....it didn't take but about 2 fills.  I had to get clearance from my ps to start and that took a few extra weeks (wanted my incision to be healed a bit more).  I also had whole breast radiation due to several areas of less than 1mm margins.  I did very well with it and had very little skin issues.  I had a lot of trouble with fatigue.  I did have to wait 5m after radiation was done to finish my reconstruction process.  I just had my TE's exchanged last week!  It is a pain going every day but it's doable.  Heck, after a mastectomy anything else is easy!  There aren't many of us in this situation  but there are a few.  I wasn't quite as young as you (39) but I did exercise the whole way through rads and I think it helped my healing a lot.  Good luck.

  • jamiehop
    jamiehop Member Posts: 17
    edited December 2010

    Sunshinegal! Sorry you're in this club! I was told they like to start rads within 4 weeks but will start within up to 12 weeks.

    Mom3band1g! Glad your surgery went well. I've been thinking about you. They think your implant will hold then, that is so great!

  • sunshinegal
    sunshinegal Member Posts: 209
    edited December 2010

    Thank you both! I'm glad to hear you tolerated rads so well, mom3band1g. I'll cross my fingers that it goes as well for me too (assuming I do it). I'm not aiming to be very big myself - I'm a DD/E and am kind of excited to be a B/C when this is all over. Too bad that rads extends the reconstruction timeline so much! Gosh. Well, maybe I'll be done in time for swimsuit season. :)

    Jamiehop, have you decided to do rads, then? Or are you still weighing the pros and cons?

  • hellome
    hellome Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2010

    Just a note on radiation and reconstruction. I had radiation the first time I had DCIS in 2001. It came back earlier this year, and I opted for a mastectomy because radiation wasn't an option for me the second time around. I considered doing another lumpectomy, but it was pretty widespread including the grade 3 and lots of lower grade stuff. My grade 3 stuff was also pretty close to the chest wall but since there was no signs of invasion either in that tissue or via the lymph node dissection, I think I am pretty good.

    Anyway, my point on radiation and reconstruction is that I had an implant after the mx and did have a problem with it in terms of skin shrinkage. The skin and tissue on the previously radiated breast actually began noticeably shrinking a few years ago. So when I had the surgery and the implant, the skin really reacted and shrank right around the implant almost like a vacuum seal, even under the implant on the underside. So it's fairly unattractive and there is some discomfort since it is all pretty tight there and the implant is sort of pushed toward my chest. 

     I had a great experience with radiation at the time - no burns etc. and the skin continued to look great, so that wasn't an issue. I don't know how common it is for the skin to shrink but it's something you can ask about. Or maybe if you have another type of reconstruction than I had it could make a difference?

    In the end I'm still glad that I had it rather than no reconstruction since I'd been dealing with a big difference in breast size for the last ten years and having to compensate for that with inserts and such. So this is more convenient at least. And I don't have to worry as much about recurrence, obviously, as I would have if I had another lumpectomy and just done tamoxifen.  

  • hellome
    hellome Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2010
    @sunshine, I was a D+ on my healthy breast before surgery and had a reduction on that at the same time I had the mx and reconstruction on the other. And you're right, it feels wonderful not to be so "weighed down" lol. I walk straight, look thinner, and I think even a little bit younger - or at least a little less mother earthy lol. Thing is my plastic surgeon told me I would be a B to a small C as well, but I think what she didn't take into consideration was my band size. I am a 40, and while I might be a small C if I were 38 or 36, I am more of an A in a 40. Which is very difficult to find. As yet the only one I could find the cup wasn't wide and flat as my breasts are but more narrow and pointy, so I didn't fit in that either. So there have definitely been some fit issues, even with stretchy bras since they make the cup area bigger the bigger the band size gets.
  • 3monstmama
    3monstmama Member Posts: 1,447
    edited December 2010

    Hmmm, I had DCIS and was told rads no question.  Perhaps it depends on grade? 

    I met with two plastic surgeons.  At the time, I was with a surgeon who thought I would need a mastectomy.   Both PSs specialized in breasts. One was supposed to only do reconstruction post treatment, the other was supposed to do it concurrent.  When we met, both said they would not do reconstruction until after any other treatment including radiation--in their professional experience, it created the potential for too many problems.  I think part of the problem is no one can really predict how any one individual will respond to something like rads.  I anticipated having a miserable time--I am fair skinned and always get miserable sunburns.  Instead I pretty much sailed through skinwise [though I did get tired].

    As for tamoxifen, I've been on it since August with not a single side effect or issue.  It really depends on the individual.  I know when I was trying to make my decisions there were a lot of things I was really scared about like rads and tamoxifen but because my doctors recommended it, I pushed through.  I'm glad I did.  In the end, neither was nearly as bad in reality as they were in my imagination.

  • bher
    bher Member Posts: 86
    edited December 2010

    Radiation was also recommended to me after unilateral mx and TE with DCIS due to close and positive margins.  I am a little more than half way done with my rads (20 out of 36) and my skin is very red. I may be reacting more because they do a bolus tx on me every other time.  Also my TE is getting very tight.  Did anyone else have bolus treatments with their radiation?  I was fully expanded before rads started.   I do not have any pain but I am very uncomfortable and worry that my skin and TE will be a problem with the final reconstruction result.  I really would liked to have said no to rads but I wanted to do anything possible to reduce my recurrence rate. Can't wait until it is over with.

  • hellome
    hellome Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2010
    @3monstmama, I think where the question is for many is radiation in addition to mastectomy. I'm pretty sure that I've read that the recurrence rate with mastectomy is really low, like 2% since most all of the breast tissue is removed. Radiation reduces risk of recurrence about 50% so it would only reduce the risk of recurrence in most cases only about 1% and the benefit to risk ratio doesn't bear out. In my case I had raditation with breast conserving surgery my first time but had a mastectomy the second time since it isn't recommended a person have it twice in the same place (a) because it can do more harm than good and (b) the fact that it came back could suggest the cancer was resistant to radiation. So mastectomy was my only treatment choice other than another lumpectomy and tamoxifen, which doesn't provide the same benefit that radiation would have. It was actually recommended that I take tamoxifen now but for me I don't think the risk to benefit ratio works out, since the risk of recurrence is quite small (that 2% again) and tamoxifen doesn't totally eliminate it.
  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited December 2010

    bher, I did not have a bolus but with you experiencing tightness now I would rec you get in to a PT.  They can help by massaging the area and helping to release some scar tissue.  I did not feel the peak affects of rads until about 3 months after I had finished!  My PT person said that was typical.  I actually was a tad worried that my ps was comfortable doing my exchange 5 months after rads as I had read 6months minimum was best.  In the end I went ahead because we could not afford for our deductable to start over and I do have a bit of trust in my ps.  I did have a lot of scar tissue which he took care of during the exchange but it tightened things up even more.  Time will tell.  I'm just hoping things will calm down and I will be learn to live with the tightness.  Actually, I'm hoping the tightness eases up with time!

  • bher
    bher Member Posts: 86
    edited December 2010

    mom3band1g - Did you have PT during the time you were undergoing rads or did you wait until rads was over?  I am still in the middle of rads and my skin is so tight plus very red. Getting through rads has been very hard for me.  My PS also told me he would get rid of the scar tissue during the exchange and said I needed to wait a  minimum 2-3 months after the rads before doing the exchange.  Sounds like it is better to wait longer.  The RO and PS both seem unconcern about my skin and tightness and say this is all normal but I am so worried.

    I can see from your dx that your entire 2010 year has been consumed with bc treatments and surgeries.  I am happy for you that your exchange is finally completed and hope your tightness gets better.

    Thanks for the PT tip! 

  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited December 2010

    bher - I didn't start pt until after rads but I wish I had gone sooner.  If you are this tight now I would really try to do something proactive to help.  The tightness is normal but that doesn't make it any easier to deal with!  I found through my ps a center near me that is run by women who have had bc and all their services are for bc patients.  They have pt, massage therapist, counselor, etc.  It really was a nice place to go.

    Yes, 2010 was not the best year for us!  This December marks the 1 year from when I found my lump.  I am so happy to have all this behind me.  This New Year's will be a celebration for sure!  Thanks for your well wishes.  I hope you are able to get through the rest of your treatments with little SE's.  Are you using any special creams?  I used XClaire and found it to be very helpful.

    good luck!

    k

  • kcshreve
    kcshreve Member Posts: 1,148
    edited December 2010

    hellome- depending upon the type/style of bra, sometimes you can find a 38 which would match your breasts and add a hook expander to get up to a 40. Both my dd and I have this difficulty.  We fit better into the sizes created for 38's, but they are too small for our ribcage.  Target sells these expanders.  3 Sets, different colors, for about $8.

  • sunshinegal
    sunshinegal Member Posts: 209
    edited August 2013

    Dear all,

    I saw a rad onc and med onc today. The rad onc was strongly in favor of me doing radiation (no surprise there). She was not able to give me a very precise percentage likelihood of recurrence in my case, but when I mentioned the 1-2% recurrence stat for mastectomy in general, she quickly said "but that's not your situation." I then asked whether she thought my risk of recurrence was something like 10-20% and she said she thought even higher than that (!) though she didn't offer hard numbers or data. Her reasoning was that since (1) my lesion was large (over 9cm), (2) my margins were small (<1mm anterior), and (3) my age is young, I am in a higher risk category. When I got home tonight, I was reading another related thread on this forum and came across this study that Beesie linked to, suggesting recurrence risk of 16% for cases like mine/ours:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18954711

    Back to my meetings today: after the rad onc, we saw the med onc, who had attended the tumor board meeting last week about my case. She acknowledged (and she said the board agreed on this) that my case is a gray area in which either decision about rads could be defended. However, when pressed, she said if it were her, she would probably do the radiation.

    Here's what surprised me: she did not strongly recommend Tamoxifen right now for me. Since my hubby and I want to start a family (I turn 37 next week), she seemed quite comfortable with the idea of me not doing Tamox at all, or of deciding in 3-5 years (after kids) that I want to start it then. She was not overly worried about the increased risk of a new primary in my remaining breast, and did not feel a prophylactic mastectomy was indicated for me since my BRCA tests came back negative.

     So. I was not anticipating having an option of skipping Tamox (for now at least), or of getting a green light for trying for a family so soon. I did ask her about this guideline I had heard of waiting 2 yrs after a BC diagnosis before getting pregnant, but she said that was more relevant for women with invasive disease, and intended to be sure they were doing well before introducing a pregnancy into the equation. I guess with DCIS she's not worried about that 2 yr period.

    Man, DCIS is a weird beast. Lose the boob, and radiate what's left, but then go for it in terms of getting preggers. 

  • sunshinegal
    sunshinegal Member Posts: 209
    edited December 2010

    Also, hellome, on the question of radiating the breast twice, I asked the rad onc today about that - can a breast be irradiated twice? I fully expected her to say "that's correct, it can't." What she said instead was, it's not recommended but she has done it. She irradiated one woman twice on the same breast and she did fine second time around, which was 7 years ago. That woman is doing well, and is turning 97 soon!

  • mom3band1g
    mom3band1g Member Posts: 817
    edited December 2010

    sunshine - that is great news!  I think I posted my RO gave me a rate of at least 35% recurrence without rads but felt with rads it could be brought down to around 4%.  I think it's because I was 39, found by a palpable lump, and had many chest wall margins less than 1mm and 1 anterior margin of 1mm.  I really felt like if I didn't do all that was rec the first time around and it came back I would really be mad at myself.  It was a lot to put my kids through and I don't want to do it again.  It was rec I not take Tamoxifen either.  That is great news about being able to go ahead and get pregnant!  Very exciting and you should be able to nurse from one breast just fine!  Good luck.

  • Nana60
    Nana60 Member Posts: 60
    edited December 2010

    I too had rads after MX with TE and will be moving to the next phase starting Tamox next week. It's nice to have a place to to share with others in similar situations.

  • laurakay
    laurakay Member Posts: 109
    edited December 2010

    I just wanted to chime in--been staying off the boards because they make me paranoid (sorry!)--but saw this.  I had a less than one mm margin after mx, but it was considered 'clean.'  I pushed to talk to RO.  Two of them said they didn't know what they'd do if it were them (not helpful), and an onc who said no to radiation, and my bs was adamant no.  I consulted with Dr. Lagios (he's out in CA) by having my stuff sent to him.  He was the first person who was able to make me feel comfortable making the decision not to have radiation--because he was able to explain things to me, and also because he's an expert.  Day after I spoke with him on the phone, front page NYTimes was quoting him on DCIS.  Sooo...maybe that would help?  It's about 600 dollars, and he got to me within days.  You can find him on the web.  I still wouldn't be sleeping if he hadn't helped me.  SUCH a hard decision, and NO ONE had anything very solid to say, except people who then couldn't explain to me why they were saying it!!  Be well--you will be!!!!! 

Categories