what is "microscopic focus"?

Options
Deidre-Round2
Deidre-Round2 Member Posts: 3

Hello, everyone. I'm new to the forum, and wonder if anyone has experience with this term? 

In August, I was diagnosed with a second breast cancer - invasive lobular carcinoma - 8 years after being diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma.  I opted for a lumpectomy which I had this Monday and just received the pathology results, by phone.  They said the lymph was clear but that there was "microscopic focus of residual invasive cancer". I asked for clarification several times, but apparently having the nurse repeat the words to me did not help me understand exactly what that meant!  The surgeon will not re-excise.

Does this make sense to anyone?  My research is only further confusing me and I don't see my surgeon again until next week.

Thanks for any insight.

Comments

  • carcharm
    carcharm Member Posts: 486
    edited October 2010

    I think there are several other discussions on this topic elsewhere in BC.org. Did you have a biopsy prior to lumpectomy? Even if you didn't what can happen when they excise or do the lumpecomy some or one of the cancer cells can travel down to the lymph node during the procedure. When they say residual.. to me .. it indicates that it is not part of the lymph node per se but traveled down from the tumor site during or after biopsy or lumpectomy. It is of the same cell type as the original tumor and not metastatic cancer. They would use other wording to identify metastatic disease.

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited October 2010

    I can't answer your question but like you I had IDC followed several years later by ILC. Best wishes to you

  • Deidre-Round2
    Deidre-Round2 Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2010

    Thanks, carcharm. I assumed they were talking about the margins, not the lymph, so this is something new to ponder.  I will look for the other discussions you mentioned.  @hrf - thanks so much for your good wishes.

  • Drim
    Drim Member Posts: 302
    edited October 2010

    This sounds like lymph node micro-metastisis. I would definitely speak with your surgeon tomorrow to make sure he/she clarifies and then discuss what the implications of this is on your treatement plan. Good luck!!!

  • akram
    akram Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2010

    Panasonic is eyeing expansion of the appliance business as its next growth driver, as the audio-visual equipment market starts to saturate," said Daiwa's Miura. The company doubled TV sales in the past 10 years with the switch to more expensive flat-panel screens, he said. "That situation can be recreated with eco-friendly home appliances."
    Panasonic's EcoCute, a water heater that extracts heat from the air, costs around 800,000 yen, four times more than a conventional gas boiler. Panasonic's induction cooking range costs about 400,000 yen, double that of a typical gas system.
    MB2-423 | MB2-498 | MB2-631 | MB2-632
  • Deidre-Round2
    Deidre-Round2 Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2010

    The mystery is solved!  Apparently, the microscopic focus was the remaining cancer cells around the biopsy site that were *removed*. The way the nurse said it over the phone had made it sound like it was tissue that was left behind.  I was glad to have this clarification.  According to my surgeon, the pathology report was good - no lymph involvement; good margins.  Thanks to all of you for your input!

Categories