My Tamoxifen Confession
Comments
-
Count me as proud to write that I have nothing to feel guilty about, nothing to hide, and no regrets as one who has for now opted out of tamoxifen. My onc. gave me the option to take or not after explaining all of the pros and cons, and I appreciate being treated like a rational adult.
We all must make the best personal decisions for ourselves with the information we have at the time. Just don't have regrets once you make your decision. That's my motto. And, of course, if things change, we are entitled to revise our decisions.
By the way, Hello Raili, nice to done with rads.

-
My 2 cents for what its worth. My chemo guy let me go off tamoxifen for 2 months to give my body a break. At first I was delighted, but then I started thinking what if the SE start up like the first time, but I went back on it a couple weeks ago, and nothing. No hot flashes, no leg cramps, nothing. I hate that I have to put some weird drug in my body for another 2.5 years, but I suppose thinking about the alternative is worse. I just keep looking at the statistics and can't get past the overwhelming evidence that taking tamoxifen for the full 5 years will cut my risk by a lot. At first I was like, mine was small, I had genetic testing done, negative on it, so am I really at risk of getting it again? Maybe not, but I guess for me it is still scary enough to keep me on the ol' bottle of tamoxifen. I do feel however, that it is still a very personal decision and a person needs to balance their quality of life to the possible benefits of any treatment.
-
My Dad had a saying, "Live every day like it'syour last, but God help you if you wake up tomorrow!
So true, so true....
-
I have been on Tamox since Nov 09. The side effects for me have been the hotflashes. Try Gabepentin. My gyno prescribed it. It helps alot with this side effect. My biggest things is the weight gain. I am heavy and am having a hard time trying to get this stuff. Any suggestions? Sex is still great for me, no dryness etc. I take it twice a day at 10 mg. That is the way is was prescribed. The aches have gotten better since the weather warmed up.
-
mymountain, what a wise man, your dad.
I have read the TC threads about permanent hair loss. Now my hair has grown back some. But I'm sporting the "monk" look with the bald crown and hair along the sides and back of my head. Not thick, but there. Very fine and straight. After bring off Tamox for 2 months I do have some new stubble. But I've had the stubble before and it's just fallen out again. So, I will wait another couple weeks to see if this stubble will stay. If it starts falling out, I might as well start the Tamox. again. If it doesn't fall out, I'll probably start taking the Tamox again anyway. So, what is my point anyway? I really don't know. Maybe I just need to know why my hair hasn't come back like it should.
-
Looks like there are more non compliant women out there!
JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print Jun 28 2010
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9655Breast Cancer
Early Discontinuation and Nonadherence to Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in a Cohort of 8,769 Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients
Dawn L. Hershman, Lawrence H. Kushi, Theresa Shao, Donna Buono, Aaron Kershenbaum, Wei-Yann Tsai, Louis Fehrenbacher, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Sunita Miles, Alfred I. NeugutFrom the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, CA; and Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, Northern California Cancer Center, Fremont, CA.
Corresponding author: Dawn L. Hershman, MD, MS, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, 10-1068, New York, NY 10032; e-mail: dlh23@columbia.edu .
ABSTRACT
Purpose While studies have found that adjuvant hormonal therapy forhormone-sensitive breast cancer (BC) dramatically reduces recurrenceand mortality, adherence to medications is suboptimal. We investigatedthe rates and predictors of early discontinuation and nonadherenceto hormonal therapy in patients enrolled in Kaiser Permanenteof Northern California health system.
Patients and Methods We identified women diagnosed with hormone-sensitive stage I-IIIBC from 1996 to 2007 and used automated pharmacy records toidentify hormonal therapy prescriptions and dates of refill.We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to analyzefactors associated with early discontinuation and nonadherence(medication possession ratio < 80%) of hormonal therapy.
Results We identified 8,769 patients with BC who met our eligibilitycriteria and who filled at least one prescription for tamoxifen(43%), aromatase inhibitors (26%), or both (30%) within 1 yearof diagnosis. Younger or older age, lumpectomy (v mastectomy),and comorbidities were associated with earlier discontinuation,while Asian race, being married, earlier year at diagnosis,receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and longer prescriptionrefill interval were associated with completion of 4.5 yearsof therapy. Of those who continued therapy, similar factorswere associated with full adherence. Women age younger than40 years had the highest risk of discontinuation (hazard ratio,1.51; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.85). By 4.5 years, 32% discontinuedtherapy, and of those who continued, 72% were fully adherent.
Conclusion Only 49% of patients with BC took adjuvant hormonal therapyfor the full duration at the optimal schedule. Younger womenare at high risk of nonadherence. Interventions to improve adherenceand continuation of hormonal therapy are needed, especiallyfor younger women.

-
Very interesting study. I can't say that I'm surprised. While I'm sure using pharmacy records made the study very accurate, it is a bit unsettling.
-
That study makes a lot of sense, especially the part about women younger than 40 being most likely to discontinue using the Tamoxifen. Most of the more bothersome side effects are things that women deal with anyway while going through menopause, so they are less likely to cause someone in the age range of menopause to stop taking Tamoxifen.
One other issue with the study is that it doesn't attempt in any way to ascertain the reason these women became "non-compliant". Women who develop serious side effects, who are stage IV at diagnosis and who experience progression, and some of those who become post menopausal during the course of those 4.5 years would all be switched to a different treatment by their doctors. That isn't "non-compliance", that is a change in treatment plan.
-
One other question about that study. Did they account for women switching their prescription to another pharmacy not within the system whose automated records were being evaluated? How many of us have switched pharmacies for at least one of our prescriptions in the last 5 years?
-
PatMom -- I don't know how they accounted for women who left the Kaiser system, but Kaiser is a self-contained HMO -- they pay nothing toward any out-of-Kaiser care (except for a few areas where they don't provide specialized care) and they have their own hospitals and pharmacies, etc. So using the population of Kaiser patients pretty much guarantees they would be getting their meds through the Kaiser system.
-
I'm sure that some women changed insurance providers in that 5 year period. The study also mentioned that
longer prescriptionrefill interval were associated with completion of 4.5 yearsof therapy.
That sounds like some of the women might have begun paying for the prescriptions out of pocket at local pharmacies rather than having to go a a Kaiser facility frequently to pick up the prescription. That probably wouldn't happen with an AI that is still under patent, but for Tamoxifen which is now generic, they might be able to pick it up for the same price as or less than their co-pay, so convenience would be a factor.
-
I think the longer prescription refill interval means that if you have a 30 days supply of tamoxifen, and you fill it in 45 days, you aren't taking your meds, not that you have switched pharmacies. Maybe I misunderstand your point though.
Kaiser's meds are free to Kaiser members, and it's all electronic. I don't think Kaiser patients use other pharmacies - I could be wrong, but I've never met one who does. My boss and BIL are Kaiser members and they have to get their meds from Kaiser pharmacies.
I also don't understand the thinking that the side effects are normal menopausal symptoms. The ones I'm experiencing aren't. I was perimenopausal when I was dx'd with cancer. I had some hot flashes but regular periods. Within two weeks of being on tamoxifen, I began having some extreme bone pain that has not let up. I know hundreds of menopausal women, and none of them complain about the kind of pain I'm experiencing. I have constant hot flashes, which is probably normal menopausal and my skin is getting crepey - also normal. But the bone and joint pain, the constant all-night cramps - nobody I know in "normal" menopause has it.
I think there is a disconnect between what the medical community believes the side effects of tamoxifen are, and what some of us patients are experiencing.
-
There are some less common side effects of the Tamoxifen that aren't normal menopausal symptoms, and apparently you are dealing with one of them. You deserve help from your doctor in finding relief that pain.
Aquiring new aches and pains is not uncommon as we hit middle age, especially if we try to do a sport or activity that we haven't tried in a decade or two, but extreme pain is not normal.
-
I went and read the whole study at pubmed. It is fascinating.
The "longer prescription interval" refers to how often you have to refill -- every 30 days or 60 or 90. The study randomized women into these 3 groups.
I, too, do not know anyone who has Kaiser insurance who fills prescriptions elsewhere, although it would be possible. I think it is a safe assumption, however, that the number of prescriptions filled elsewhere would be very small. How much the medication costs can vary with your type of coverage. During the study the women all had similar copays in an effort to control for insurance status and cost of treatment.
The researchers also do point to treatment toxicity as a possible reason for noncompliance with treatment (duh) but didn't address that issue in this study.
-
My doctor is helping, I get percocet that I take twice a day.
But, I have spoken to other women in the infusion room, and seen the posts here and elsewhere, that lead me to believe that the SEs of this drug are much worse than mere "menopausal" symptoms that everybody continually tries to sell.
Yes, for many women, it is hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms, but a 50% discontinue rate when we are talking about preventing cancer is extraordinarily high, and points to something more than menopausal symptoms, IMO.
Even with the percocet, I may not be on it five years. I'm hoping that I settle into it but if it remains this bad in five years, I could very well end up being one of those who discontinues treatment.
-
I've been taking it since late april 2009 and talk about advanced aging - joints, bones, weight. But it is worth a discussion with the onclogist because maybe you could do another one. There are no guarantees. That is the most difficult pill to swallow. Not the tamoxifen. The hardest part of this cancer thing for me is to not use it it to beat myself up with - I'm having post traumatic stress after getting through treatment, trying to resume life, not being connected the way I was before, seeing everything differently and not really the old me or a new me - more like a big fat zero.
-
Anyone here taking Evista. I spoke to my onc about se. He said less se with Evista. Yet I am still worried. I had mx in Jan 2009. My original BS did not think I needed to even consider tamox. Since I am still having pain after 18 months I decided to seek 2nd opinion. She insisted I see onc. Tested for BRCA. Came back neg. Now he wants to start Evista. He seemed to say if I had mx on other side I would not need any additional treatment. Anyone in the same sit.
Thanks for these links
-
jkfran------I took tamoxifen for 5 years and now I have been taking evista for about a year and a half (I am high risk due to LCIS and family history of ILC); fortunately I tolerate both meds pretty well overall. Tamox is the more effective drug but it does have more SEs, but the serious SEs (blood clots and endometrial cancer) are less than 1% and generally found in people who are sedentary or who smoke.
anne
-
My onc took me off Tamoxifen because of fatty liver disease and sent me to a GI doctor for a liver workup. Well, she (the GI doc) told me she was sure my liver problem was not caused by Tamoxifen and that she was going to give my onc the green light for me to start taking it again.
I did not find that to be good news. In fact, I was horrified. After being off Tamox for more than 2 months, I became fully aware of how much it had affected me in subtle ways I didn't notice all that much while I was taking it. I had gained about 20 lbs and had a horrendous appetite, especially for spicy, fatty food. I was lethargic, fatigued, unmotivated, and mentally foggy. I had high blood pressure that was not controlled with meds. Generally, I was a mess. After 2 months off Tamox, I have lost 15 lbs, my BP is normal with reduced meds, I feel more energetic, and I have regained my mental edge.
I am quite certain I will not start Tamoxifen again, but I'm not sure I will tell my doctors.
Tricia
-
Hey there...I thought I'd stop by here and I'm sorry because I'm going to play the Devil's Advocate. For all of those who have considered stopping or have stopped their tamoxifen...please, please reconsider. I too suffered from the side effects all of you have mentioned. After almost 5 yrs I finally figured I had gotten all the benefits from the drug and had the mistaken impression that after 5yrs that was it...I was done. So, I opted to stop all together. Well, 6 mos later I was diagnosed with extensive bone mets...pretty much everywhere in my body. Since that time I have suffered from bone pain that you cannot imagine, flu like symptoms from my treatments, depression, regret, nausea, lack of appetite, complications from anemia and extreme fatigue....all of these on top of those nasty menopausal symptoms (hot flashes, lack of libido, insominia, nasty hot flashes, etc, etc). I would do anything to go back and deal with the minor side effects I initially had on just the tamoxifen. I'm not trying to scare anybody....just to share my story....whether stopping the tamoxifen had anything to do with it or not...we will never know.
You must follow your heart but please think through your decision carefully. Good luck and best wishes to all.
Hugs,
Cat
-
Cat,
I'm sorry for your dx. . I'm glad you shared your story with honesty and sound advice, and it is a wake up call for those of us on the fence about continuing tamox or AI's.
It's been my goal to live my life with as few regrets as possible, and that's a pretty tall order some days, but do my best...
Even with skipping some doses here and there, I'm slated for a hysteroscopy and d&c , and bx from the tamoxifen causing uterine thickening.
Cutting the dose in half, taken in the AM and PM seems to help a bit, but the leg cramps are still a be-otch at night
-
Ladies, for all of you who are on the fence about whether or not to stop Tamoxifen, I would like to share something. I am on my 6th year of Arimidex and already being post-menopausal and having osteoarthritis and back and joint pains, I was terrified of what that drug was going to do to my body. However, I could not understand why being on it did not increase my pain problems until I read a couple of posts here referring to Gapapentin (Neurontin). Years ago I was given Gapapentin 3 times a day (just 100 mg. each) for panic attacks I started having after a brain operation. My bp which I could not get under control suddenly got controled and it helped my panic attacks and a lot of the pain in my body. My doctor told me it was a "miracle" drug and like aspirin, they have no idea how or why it works for so many problems. Diabetics I know take it for their severe neuropathy pain etc. etc.
What I am getting to is, if you really want to try to continue with the Tamoxifen or Arimidex but don't want to cope with the pain SEs, why don't you talk to your physician about taking Gabapentin with it and see if it makes the other pill more bearable for you to cope with. I would try it for a few months and if nothing changes and you are still miserable, you can always decide to quit the Tam then. It's just another alternative I am suggesting. There has to be a reason my Arimidex has been bearable for me and I think it can only be the Gabapentin I take daily. The great thing about Gab is that it is a GENERIC!
-
http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/78/topic/755868?page=0#post_1929171
Hi all: Seeing that the debate is really how much people think Tamox really is necessary is so interesting, as there is so much that confuses me about how much it really helps and whether or not the SEs are worth the benefits. Onc told me that "If the SEs were bad, I could go off it." What message is that giving someoone? That it is OK to stop? Didn't want to take over the thread, but posted the above link asking if there are any BMX / DCIS gals who were told to take Tamox. Still not sure what the consensus is. Thanks.
-
Tamoxifen has been shown in studies to cut the chance of recurrence in half. It's no cure-all. Even women who take tamoxifen sometimes have recurrences or worse...I believe it's more to do with your personal "environment" (i.e. what is going on in your cells) and that some cancers are more aggresive than others.Tamoxifen can help...but as others have said, even with tamoxifen, they have had recurrences.
Susan Love says: ... the relationship between cancer cells and the cells and tissue that surround them. In the past, we blamed everything on the cancer cell, as if it were a criminal that functioned autonomously. But we now know that the neighborhood (stroma) that the cancer cells live in also plays a critical role in determining whether a cancer or even a precancer like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will remain dormant or become invasive. Think of it this way: the stroma is like soil; cancer is a seed. In soil that support the seed (cancer cells), the seed (cancer cells) will flourish. In soil that is inhospitable, the seed (cancer cells) will never grow. Estrogen and progesterone are two of the major influences on the stroma. As soon as a woman starts taking HRT, her breasts will appear denser on a mammogram. And as we know from the WHI, breast cancer increases as well. This is because of the impact the hormones have on the stroma, making it more inviting and supportive to cancer cells. In essence, the stroma is providing a nurturing environment for the cells to function criminally. Likewise, as soon as a woman starts to take tamoxifen to reduce her breast cancer risk, her breasts appear less dense on a mammogram. That's because tamoxifen is keeping estrogen away from the stroma. And, in this case, the stroma is providing an environment that is, in essence, rehabilitating those criminal cancer cells.
http://www.dslrf.org/breastcancer/content.asp?CATID=0&L2=1&L3=4&L4=0&PID=&sid=130&cid=1200
-
adenacb,
Actually that Tamoxifen "cuts your risk in half" number is a misleading relative risk statistic.
If you are node negative, Tamoxifen takers have a 3.5% all cause survival advantage over nontakers. That is what they call the absolute risk statistic. You can read the manufacturer's information http://www.druginfonet.com/tamoxfen.htm
"Survival at 10 years was 74.5% for tamoxifen vs. 71.0% for control [placebo]"
74.5 -minus 71 % equals 3.5%. So the actual survival difference is 3.5%.
-
That trial included women who used Tamoxifen for significantly less than 5 years.
10-year outcome data were reported for 29,892 women in 40 randomized trials of adjuvant tamoxifen using doses of 20-40 mg/day for 1-5+ years (median 2 years).
The small overall survival advantage was based on a group of women who were not all ER+.
Fifty percent of the tumors were estrogen receptor (ER) positive (>/= to 10 fmol/mg), 18% were ER poor (< 10 fmol/mg), and 32% were ER unknown.
Even within that group, the recurrence free advantage among node positive women was 8.8%, and among node negative women, it was 5%.
As has been stated before, the 40% to 50% is a relative risk advantage, so the higher your personal risk, the greater your potential benefit.
We each have to balance the risk/benefit ratio that applies to us in our unique personal situation, and make the treatment choices that are the best for us.
-
No, no no. If I may...
Relative risk does not mean your personal risk. It means the relationship between the numbers. If 4% of women live longer than the placebo group (2%) then that's where you get the 50% number. Because 2% is 50% of 4%. That's why Susan Love goes around saying 50%.
Totally misleading to the patient.
So actually, Tamoxifen has a 97.5% chance of not working for all-cause survival.
If people are happy on their Tamoxifen, more power to them. But the stats are meager if you're node negative.
-
Relative risk doesn't mean your personal risk, but it applies to your personal risk.
Someone who has DCIS, and has a small personal risk of distant recurrence, would get a much smaller benefit from taking Tamoxifen than someone who has numerous positive nodes and a much higher personal risk to begin with.
50% of 5% is much smaller than 50% of 30%. Women at higher risk stand to gain a higher benefit.
We each have to decide for ourselves (with Tamoxifen, on a daily basis) whether the risks associated with any treatment are offset by the potential benefits based on our own diagnosis, prognosis, and health history.
-
I am so glad I found your posts, PatMom and Janeluvsdog. I was diagnosed with multifocal DCIS last Sept, had a unilateral MX with DIEP reconstruction in Dec and am almost through with the whole reconstruction (just got my nipple last week). I am very blessed that I had zero positive nodes and am BRCA negative and didn't have to go through any radiation or chemo. Earlier this year when I met with my medical oncologist, she rattled off the stats as they believe they are for me and basically gave me the option of whether to take Tamox or not. Her opinion, at the time, was that if it were her "she wouldn't do it". I heard that and freaked!
Of course, this was at my worst time and she addressed that and told me to take time before I made my decision. I thought all along that I needed to take it. I simply needed to do everything I could to prevent a reoccurrence. So, I started them on June 1. By the second week in July, I developed a rash on my arm that was enough to make me nuts. I saw the doc and she adviced I stop the Tamox for about a month and see what happens.
I have now been off of it for 10 days, the rash has almost cleared completely and I am not nearly as itchy as I was. It's crazy that a stupid rash has got me thinking more about this. My chances are low and I know that. I'm scared to death of cancer now but I am also scared to death of all the side effects of Tamox and how it will affect my day to day life, not only physically but mentally and emotionally. I don't know what's worse. I'm thinking now that my chances of a side effect is higher than my chances of a reoccurrence. I struggle with this right now and just want to say thank you for your information and your supporting those who decide it's not right for them.
Crazy question - how do I know if I am ER/PR + or HER2 +? I have my pathology reports but cannot seem to find that on them and keep forgetting to ask my oncologist when I see her. I know this plays a role in the potential benefits of Tamox as well.
-
I just came off of tamoxifen a couple of months ago and am having the opposite problem: more joint pain and stiffness rather than less. Is this possible?
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team