NO Chemo

Options
poolealicia4
poolealicia4 Member Posts: 4
Hello All,
I'm sord of new to the site but visit quite often. I was wondering was there anyone out there who has refused to take chemo. I'm not sure if this is the right thread but any feedback would be helpful. I don't have my path report in fron of me but know that i'm a grage3 had lumpectomy along with sentinel node removel. Results were cklear marings with 0 node involvement. I'm all for the radition but just don't want to do the chemo.I'M CONSIDERING DOING ALTERNATIVE MEDCINE INSTEAD.
«13

Comments

  • MomoB
    MomoB Member Posts: 68
    edited September 2005
    Hello singer, I have a similar dx and I have decided against rads and chemo and I am also looking into doing
    alternative medicine and exercise. Would like to learn what you have decided.
  • poolealicia4
    poolealicia4 Member Posts: 4
    edited September 2005
    Momob,

    i sent you a pm
  • pinecitycarol
    pinecitycarol Member Posts: 1
    edited September 2005
    Hello everybody. I am a "newbie" to the discussion board.
    Had lumpectomy 8/15/05 with removal of 9 lymph nodes. One positive for metastatic CA. The oncologist today recommended the strongest Chemo available....he calls it the DDS (a course of Adriamycin and Cytoxin every 2 weeks for a total of 4 doses, followed by Taxol every 2 weeks x 4 for a total of 4 doses. IE this would equate to a total of 8 doses over 16 weeks.

    He has also recommended radiation. He want's my decision by October 12th!

    I would really like to avoid both, and go with a more naturopathic approach, but I'd sure like to know a few more things about the naturopathic approach such as:

    1. Is there an ND (Naturopathic Dr. anywhere that is a participating provider with most health insurances?

    2. What are the "odds" of survival, if I opt to avoid the conventional modalities (treatments)?

    3. I KNOW the quality of my life would be better for a while at least!

    4. have any of you ever heard of the AMAS test (provided by the Oncolab in Boston, Mass).??

    5. Has anyone in this vast group with Metastic CA refused conventional treatments and survived?

    Pine City Carol
  • rosieS
    rosieS Member Posts: 83
    edited September 2005
    Hello Pine City Carol. Chemo is not fun, but it has been proven to reduce chance of recurrence. Dose dense chemo is over after 4 months, and you will get through it! It's not what I would choose to do if I didn't need to, but I am relatively young (48 at dx), now almost 49. I did the DD chemo, then radiation. The rads are to protect the rest of your breast from recurrence! After the treatments, then I chose to start with supplements, exercise and the naturopathic approach. But since I was er/pr+, I am taking arimidex and have been put into menopause with lupron shots.

    I do not want this to come back!! I have a husband and three teens who still need me and I want to be here for at least another 40 years! The best chance of that is to do the treatments! The first shot is the best shot. Hit it hard and then try to move on.

    That's just my opinion, but it's an educated opinion!
  • 2verna2
    2verna2 Member Posts: 122
    edited October 2005
  • prayer
    prayer Member Posts: 77
    edited October 2005
    Ladies, I hope that I am not scaring you and do not intend to so forgive me if I do.
    I absolutley believe that chemo is your best shot regardless of node involvement. My mother had micro invasive, neg node bc when she was diagnosed and they gave her a mast and told her she was 98% cured. They could not find it anywhere else in her body at the time. Less than two years later it was throughout her body and she was terminal. By the time they decided to do chemo it was to late. For these reasons I have decided to do chemo even though I only have 1 very small tumor and neg nodes. My thought is will I forgive myself later if it comes back and I didn't take chemo? A lot to think about.
  • Bluejean91
    Bluejean91 Member Posts: 1
    edited October 2005

    I refused chemo also. According to what I have read, as long as my margins were clear and the lymph nodes were clear, the percentages were not enough to convice me that chemo would be worth it. The side effects of Chemo can be devastating and I didnt see that it would prolong my life since I was going to have radiation and was taking Arimidex. I think the choice is yours however, research what the percentages are for your cancer diagnosis (Grade, size, margins, Hrt FACTORS and etc. plus your own health)Then you can make a reasonable decision.

  • poolealicia4
    poolealicia4 Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2005
    Yeah,
    That was my understanding as well that when you have clean margins and node neg (no chemo). I truly beleive that it's up to the individual and what your beliefs are. As for me i'm sticking with my decision.... I believe that we can do all things threw christ who strengthens us. Please forgive me if i've offened anyone in my belief
  • MomoB
    MomoB Member Posts: 68
    edited October 2005
    hi singer and Bluejean91, I also feel that with clear margins and node neg, I have a good chance. I might get
    a recurrance and I might not. I have read so many things
    about recurrance whether or not chemo has been done. I am
    ready to make plans and live another chapter of my life
    while I wait to see if the cancer shows up again.
  • gretchv
    gretchv Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2005
    Here are my thoughts on chemo decision- I had stage 1 IDC in 1998, mastectomy, 0+/21 nodes taken out, and no sign of cancer in bone scan or liver. Decided against chemo because of its harsh treatment. Felt great and lived life normal for 8 yrs. Now I have had 2 recurrences(one w ILC in the other breast, had lumpectomy/rads, and then came a lump in the mastectomy scar) in the past year, and the latest resulted in bone mets diagnosis. If I had to do it again, I would do the chemo the first time around, as now I have stage 4 incurable (so they say) cancer. But I still feel great, and live life normal for the time being. I am 50 and in good shape, and still have hope for getting the cancer stabilized and a long life. I don't beat myself up over the original decision, it felt right for me at the time.
    But you never know whats around the next bend. Even those who have had chemo get recurrences.
    Best wishes to you and strength in making your decision.
  • MomoB
    MomoB Member Posts: 68
    edited October 2005
    Gretchen, thanks for your post. I know the risks are great
    either way. I am glad you are feeling good, and sorry to
    learn of your recurrences. Did you have chemo the second
    time you had a recurrence? I keep reading about the risks
    and have had several consultations, getting different points of veiw from each. One reason I did not choose to
    do chemo is that I have reactions to several meds already
    and do not have to take any meds now, only a few supple-
    ments. You are so right, you never know what is around
    the next bend.
  • Jacq
    Jacq Member Posts: 7
    edited October 2005
    Singer,

    I don't feel like we have enough information about your case to help you make a decision. You have a grade 3 cancer - that means it is the most aggressive type. It would help to know if you have ER or PR positive or negative, and what is the Her2- positive or negative? Even if you are Stage 1, and grade 3 - these other factors would help you to make a choice, because hormonally positive cancers are very treatable with anti-hormone drugs instead of chemo in lots of cases. This could be an option for you in addition to radiation.

    Pine City Carol - your situation scares me even more because of a positve node. If your Onc is suggesting the strongest chemo possible, your other pathology information must support that recommendation.

    Momob - I would also ask you the same questions I asked Singer.

    Singer and Mobob and Bluejean91 (you are all node negative)- please consider Oncotype DX testing on your tumors. It may be the only way for you each individually to know your exact chance of recurrance, and the chances that chemo will or will not be effective for each of you. There is no guessing, or relying only on general statistics (stage, grade her2,etc) with this test. Your own DNA (tumor gene expression profile)will tell you whether your cancer is the type that will be hard to beat even with the most aggressive treatment, or will respond to anti-hormonal therapy and will not need chemo. For information about this testing - your surgeon needs to send in a sample of your tumor that is already at the lab-please see the website genomichealth.com

    You can't have enough information when making this decision. You only have one chance to do it right the first time! Or be kicking yourself all the way to the grave! (As someone on this site has said)

    Good luck!

    Jackie
  • christineK
    christineK Member Posts: 1,265
    edited October 2005
    Like others I wanted to know I had done everything possible to reduce the risk of reccurrence. My onc gave me the choice, saying she would rather ovrtreat than undertreat. I agreed and went for it. The worst side effects were tiredness and constipation. Now, if I do get a reccurence I won't be saying "What if..."
    Although we are all different and must live with our own choices.
  • poolealicia4
    poolealicia4 Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2005

    Hello, i finally found oout that i am er-pr neg with a grade 2. My onc told me that the onc test would't help very much. They're just constantly pushing chem because of age and saying that the tumir was an aggressive one

  • gretchv
    gretchv Member Posts: 4
    edited October 2005
    Hi again, and to answer your question Momob, no I didn't have chemo after the recurrence/lumpectomy because I had the Oncotype DX test and it came back w. a low rating for recurrence. SO I just did the rads. Obviously the Oncotype DX was not too helpful in my case, as when I did get another recurrence/bone mets it was from the original ductal cancer, not from the second lobular cancer (the one that the ONcotype test was done on). It gets a little confusing when the cancer returns in different disguises!
    What's a woman to do?
    Don't fool yourself into thinking that you can beat it with just alternate treatments, thats what I told myself way back then when I had my first diagnosis. My mindset has really changed after mets diagnosis.
    Think hard about that-
  • skipper
    skipper Member Posts: 1
    edited October 2005

    my DX was ILC with LCIS,stage 1 er+PR+ no nodes. tumor size was .90CM my onco said no chemo, i am on arimidex for the next 5 years. i was not feeling good about not being offered the chemo, so DR M. took it to the tumor board at my request, i think i offended her by asking her to do that. But she came back and said no chemo. SO at this point i am still working thru the idea, that i hope they are right and no chemo was truley a good thing....I will feel better as more time passes, it has only been 2 months since my surgery.

  • b445
    b445 Member Posts: 1,325
    edited November 2005
    I was diagnoised Oct. 20 2005, with IDC all three negative, grade 3, stage 1. The surgery was sucessful in removing all known cancer and no node involement. Now the Oncologist want to do CMF weekly for 6 months followed by 6 weeks of Radiation. My mothers paternal grandmother and her sisters all died from BC. No one has had it since. HOwever my paternal grandmother and Aunt have had Stomace and pancreatic cancer. I too am in the delima of weather or not to go through with the chemo. My husband doesn't want me to, but I sorta feel that I should. My health have never been terrific but I try to keep myself going. My husband is worried that chemo will be too much for me. Especially since the suregon said tht he felt I had a 90% chance that it would NOT come back. That there would be little to no Chemo.
    I'm confused and unsure what to do. Treatment is suppose to start 12-12-05 and my granddaughter is due to be born 12-17. Great timing!
  • Teresa44
    Teresa44 Member Posts: 56
    edited November 2005
    Hi cthomason,

    I was dx on Sept. 15, 2004 at the age of 43. I had invasive IDC. One of my tumors was 6.5cm and the other was a lot smaller. I had chemo before my mastectomy to shrink the tumors. Which worked with Gods help. By the time I had the surgery , the tumors had shrank to nothing. They were gone!!! I have no history of bc in my family. My pet scan had shown some node involvement but after surgery, my surgeon said he stripped all tissue from under my arm and all he got was 2 nodes and they were both negative. Another blessing!!! I had 4 treatments of Taxol after surgery just in case any microscopic cells got loose in my body. Then I had 25 treatments of radiation. I finished all treatment on about the end of June. Its been 7 months since nochemo and this last week I was finally able to put away the wigs. My hair is pretty short but some women actually pay to have their hair done like mine.
    Are you hormone positive or negative? I am triple negative meaning that my cancer was not driven by hormones.
    I am now making my 3month check-up with my onc. I had one today and everything looks great. I am glad that I had the chemo. If not I would still be wondering if one tiny little microscopic cell got away. This kinda of puts my mind at ease. Post later and let us know what you decided.

    Good luck and remember God Answers Prayers

    Teresa44
  • b445
    b445 Member Posts: 1,325
    edited December 2005
    Negative to the hormones. & apartently I'm post menopasal too so no the hormones don't affect this bit of cancer. I guess the Doc's prefer it to be positive cause then they can treat it better.
    I'm leaning towards doing the chemo. Just to be sure!
    have a great day
    Cheryl
  • Jessy8933
    Jessy8933 Member Posts: 9
    edited December 2005
    Cheryl,
    My cancer was also triple negative. Our type of cancer responds well to chemotherapy. I gave it a lot of thought because I really didn't want to go thru chemo, but I am now 8 months out of treatment (I had 4 rounds of A/C, every 3 weeks), and as I look back on it, it gives me great piece of mind that I've done everything I could to prevent a reoccurance. This type of cancer is very aggressive - mine seemed to pop up overnight, out of nowhere. I wish they had something better than chemo to treat us, but they don't. As I am further and further out of my treatment, I can look back and say I have no regrets on the decision to go thru chemo. Soul search when making your decision, it is a very personal one. I don't know your age, but I was 43 when diagonsed. My dad was 78 when diagnosed with prostrate cancer - he could not handle chemo.
    Good luck,
    Jess
  • stacey2930
    stacey2930 Member Posts: 210
    edited December 2005

    Gretchen did you have the oncotype 8 years ago? I thought it just came out last year? Stacey

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2005
    Hello Singer,
    You know each of us during our journeys have to make BIG decisions and choices. What is good for one, may not be good for another. Whether it's fear, or you don't believe, or you just don't want to make a decision, it is your decision to not make a decision. And I know I might get zapped from this board, but everyone has a right for what THEY want. I know I had to make some myself, and yes I went thru chemo for 6 months...if I had to do it again my decision would be no, but that is MY decision and my feelings. After the chemo, I did refuse the Taxol, as I knew it was not good for me, and I am happy with the choices I had made on that "for me". I did not do radiation, as I do not believe in it, but again that was MY decision,and I know and feel I did the right thing for me.

    Everyone is different, and each of us leads our own trails behind us...I feel walking a path of the unknown or should I say (I can't go there) for what ever my feelings are about it, like you and your choices of not doing chemo, that was good for you, IF you feel good about it. I had 6 months to research what drs wanted me to do, and I am so glad I had that time, as I was rushed thru everything so fast and furious, I had no idea what I was up against in the beginning. I have written I believe a "bio" in the discussion group of bios or something like that and you may want to read what I had gone thru.

    You hear good and bad stories of all this stuff, and each of us are so different, yet so much the same. Different cultures, backgrounds, histories etc, then we are all women fighting all we can or you may not want to fight at all. That is your progitive of what You want. Sometimes things work for some and sometimes they don't and I don't want to rain on anyones parade. But I do believe we all know our own blueprints and our own health history, and we are all smart women here, and we hear one thing and then another, that is why this board is here...what may be good for Jane Doe, may not be good for Mary Sue Jones, even though she may have the same type of BC with maybe other things that may be the same. We all beat at a different drum, and when you hear the beat, that sounds good and right for you, then you kind of research a bit more maybe then maybe go with that. Plus talking with your dr. may help.

    We are here to encourage you to your own choices and we should respect each others feelings in their choices.

    Believe me IF you read my so called " bio" you will understand a bit more about why I chose no more after chemo., And I am delighted, yet a bit scarred just like everyone else here.

    May your path not be filled with stickers and the sun to shine on your backside while traveling your journey.

    Ter
  • flea
    flea Member Posts: 9
    edited January 2006
    I agree with Ter. Ultimately it really is your own decision, but, if you have children, a husband, family members, its hard not to listen to what they want you to do too. They want you to live as long as you can and be as healthy as you can because they don't want to lose you.

    Sometimes my siblings get on my nerves because they think they know whats best for me and they think they know more than my doctors, but I know they love me. They're just concerned.
  • Milica
    Milica Member Posts: 43
    edited January 2006
    I was triple negative. Small tumor, less then half inch. No nodes. My onc said that if I were er/pr positive there would be no chemo -- just give me tamoxifen.

    But since my tumor was er/pr negative he said the treatment is to give chemo because er neg tumors are more aggressive -- even when tumor is small.

    An small er neg tumor is more apt (then a small er positive) to send out cancer scouts to prepare a new camp in the body. And the chemo would be to hopefully kill off those scouts and destroy their new camp.

    No one has been cured with alternative treatments.

    The women who refuse treatment and survive were just lucky. Many more women have died then survived after refusing chemo.

    Cancer cells are not just 'things' they are an aggressive life form -- their will to survive is as powerful as ours. Perhaps more powerful then ours since they kill 4 women each hour of the day.
  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2006
    I am coming into this thread late and the original posters have probably made their final decisions and moved on, but I have to speak up because this idea that alternative medicine can cure cancer really, really troubles me. There is absolutely no science behind such an approach while there is tremendous support for the idea that chemo saves lives. And I really hate some of the myths that are out there about chemo, especially those promoted by the proponents of alternative medicine. Chemo does not kill every living cell in your body. Chemo does not bring you to the brink of death. Chemo does not kill more people than cancer and finally, chemo is not worse than the disease itself. I hear these myths over and over again and I think they are dangerous and cuase women to forego lifesaving treatment. Chemo is simply very, very strong medicine. As such, it has side effects and the side effects are nasty. However, most women find that life goes on, even through chemo. I went running most days throughout my treatment. Yeah, sometimes I felt lousy but I carried on and more importantly increased my chances of survival.

    Sorry for ranting, but I obviously feel strongly and I fear for some of these women ho have chosen alternative approaches.
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2006
    Yes I chose only chemo for 6 months. I had made a promise to my family that I would. This hard decision/choice I had to make was not easy. I have several other life threatening diseases attacking me for the past 5-10 years, and when BC struck, then again in bones. I had to make BIG decisions. I am very pleased with my decisions, as I know they were/are the right ones for me. Not everyone feels that way, and yes I am on a real journey. Seeking quality over quanity, and I know its right for me.

    Do I know when "it" will strike? No, no one does,

    Do I feel the pain, Yes, 24/7

    Do I like it, no, just barely tolerating it.

    Is there anything at this time that can calm the pain? NO I am allergic to ALL pain meds.

    Do I sometimes feel sorry for myself? Of course I am human.

    Am I scarred? Somewhat, but not really, as I know I have many murals that God is waiting for me to paint, as I have not been able to be creative for years.

    Am I going to miss everyone? You betcha, and I thank all of you here who keeps me in touch with real people, who let me speak up, and do not degrade me for my decisons I have chosen.

    Life and death are so close to one another...
    What is important? The DASH...you ask what is the DASH? It is the dash that is inbetween the date of birth and date of death....That DASH represents that persons life, of the good and the bad, happy and sad, those they loved and cared for, it was their life...Make your dash a good one!
  • Teresa44
    Teresa44 Member Posts: 56
    edited January 2006
    I agree with Member of the Club. And Ter I really liked what you said about The DASH. Makes a lot of sense.

    God Answers Prayers

    Teresa44
  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited January 2006

    I LOVE what you said about the dash. My feeling is that life will always have the bad with the good and that if you love life you have to accept whatever combination your life gives you because it's the only life you have.

  • katz03
    katz03 Member Posts: 94
    edited January 2006
    I am so sorry the painkillers don`t work for you. I don`t know how you cope. Prayer is the only answer. I will pray for you.

    Kathy
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2006
    Hi again, actually I found the poem on "THE DASH" and I am going to post it in the Inspiration Part, thought that would be approperiate...it is by a Linda Ellis Copyright 1996.
    Please check there for "THE DASH".

Categories