Anyone Starting Chemo Jan. 2010?

Options
1454648505162

Comments

  • friscosmom
    friscosmom Member Posts: 146
    edited April 2010

    nkrun - I had my surgery prior to my chemo, my docs recommended lumpectomy due to the results of all my pre-surgery scans and tests. They went in expecting a single 1.8 cm mass and no lymph node involvement as nothing else had showed up on my MRI and such. I was comfortable going on their recommendation, though I originally went into the surgeons office wanting a bi-lateral mastectomy. I am a C cup and was told that based on the size of my tumor and the fact it was deep there would be little or no visible changes to my breast from the lumpectomy; they were so wrong.

     I am now considering a mastectomy for a couple of reasons, one is that my lumpectomy left my right breast caved in on one side and my nipple no longer pays attention to what's in front of her and is constantly gazing off to my right, I feel deformed and I don't want to go through the rest of my life like that. I'm either going to have reconstruction to fix that or mastectomy and my though is that if I'm doing surgery I should just go all the way. The second reason is because I did have lymph and vascular involvement and I am afraid I'll live in constant fear of a reoccurance in that breast and since I have dense breast that it will be hard to detect if/when that happens.

     I don't know how valuable that information is to you situation since you had chemo first and if you did have lymph involvement it likely was knocked out by the chemo. As to the change in your breast after lumpectomy, your tumor was way larger than mine to start with, do they know how big it is now?

  • Issymom
    Issymom Member Posts: 264
    edited April 2010

    Nkrun - When I was initially diagnosed, I was going to have a lumpectomy.  I had NO thought about a mastectomy.  I then found out that I was BRCA1+ and it changed my numbers substantially.  For me, I was more concerned about a new cancer which is a different worry than you have.  There are many of us that had a bi-lat but most don't.  The one thing you really have to know is that there will be no feeling in your breasts.  I met a women who had a DIEP and she has no feeling from her collarbone to her belly button.  I will be having implants so the numbness will be localized for me.  Also, I had a skin and nimple sparring mastectomy.  I thought this was commonplace but have learned that this is relatively new.  Once I get my "stuffing/implants" in, my breast will look like they did many years ago (before breastfeeding and weight gain). 

    I am not sure I gave you much help but theres my two cents.  Good luck on the decision.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    issymom and friscomom,

    Thanks so much I greatly appreciate your feedback.

    My tumor spread was originally thought to be close to 10 cm with the largest being 6 cm. After the first round of chemo and more tests it looks more like the spread is now 6 cm and with the largest tumor around 2.3 cm.  There was a spot in the upper quadrant of my breast that was originally thought to be cancerous but further tests proved not to be. The theory is that the taxol will further reduce the size of the spread and the individual tumors to the point where  surgeon is confident that with my c cup a lumpectomy would be a breeze.  I also have lymph node involvement so those would go too. Fortunately I'm not BRCA. I struggle with the 15% increased risk of a new cancer developing in the breast.  I have 2 friends,  faced with a similar decision with only stage 1 who did not want to assume the increase risk and opted for a bi as well as hysterectomy.  My docs did a pretty good job convincing me that I need to keep my parts regardless how I feel at this moment. I'm just not 100% convinced. Of course I'm thinking that if a new tumor develops in my breasts sometime down the road, I would have a really hard time living with my decision to not have a bi.

  • Tamatar
    Tamatar Member Posts: 38
    edited April 2010

    NKRUN- I'm sure that you know that everyone needs to make their own decision about lumpectomy vs. mastectomy...but since you asked, I will tell you what my experience was...I am 44 years old and had cancer in my left breast.  I work for a large group (300) of physicians and am very fortunate to have the care that I have.  When I went to the Breast Surgeon, she gave me all of my options...lumpectomy, mast, or bi.  She wanted to make sure that I knew I did not have to have a mastectomy.

    I went to radiology to have an MRI and I spoke to our radiologist that specializes in breasts.  She did not want to sway me, but I mentioned to her that I was thinking about a bilateral.  She told me that if it was her, that is what she would do.  I also went to my plastic surgeon and he did not push mast. or bilat, but when I brought it up, he said it is what he would want his wife to do and since his wife is a breast surgeon also, it is what she would do.

    I took all of this information in and decided that although the physicians did not come out and say that a bilateral was best in my case, they agreed when I brought it up and agreed that it was the best option.  i decided to have a bilateral with reconstruction on 12/8/09.  They expected the surgery to take 4 hours, but it took 6 because of my "large breasts"...Who knew???Laughing

     I was in the hospital for 2 days, and never once took any pain medication after surgery except Tylenol (plain old Tylenol).  I must say that there was really no "pain" it felt more like I had worked out too hard and had a muscle ache all over my chest.  I was not in any discomfort, it's just that the surgical bra was quite binding.  The worst part for me was to remember not to do things that I usually do...like dust and vacuum and pick up anything that weighs more than a gallon of milk.

    Anyway, that is my story.  I really did not feel a particular "attachment" to my breasts and what 44 year old woman wouldn't want a "fresh" perky new set!!!! I am glad that I did it because it puts my mind at ease (as much as it can be) and I know that in a few years down the line, i won't have to do this again.

    As I said, this is your decision and there are no right and wrong.  You need to decide what impact it will have on your life and your emotional well being and be sure that you are making the decision fully informed and based on what is best for you.

    Take care of yourself!

    Tammy

  • gramoflexus
    gramoflexus Member Posts: 52
    edited April 2010

    NKRUN,

    These decisions we have to make are so stressful . You need to follow you instinct and talk with your loved ones . Their was NEVER a question in my mind I wanted the breast and all the shit gone with it , and thank god I did . Before surgery I had ultrasound under the arm and also a biospy and nodes came back negative , I remeber asking my breast doctor what is the chances of finding node involvement when she does the sential node test before  surgery. she said if we do it will be molecule(sp). Well 20 nodes gone 9 infected . This cancer thing  is such a crap shoot you never know and that is the most frustrating , everyone is different , docs are different . Its not like their is only one way to treat jsut like there is not just one kind of bread we have a hundred choices Life can be so comlicated 

  • Tamatar
    Tamatar Member Posts: 38
    edited April 2010

    Hi Ladies,

    I wanted to mention something that I just noticed after reviewing some old posts...There really is such a thing a Chemo Brain!

    If you look back at all of our posts, we started posting with proper grammar and spelling and our sentences were punctuated.  As we have progressed through treatment, our letters become transposed and our spelling is terrible!  It just is another example of how different we all are, but how similar our experiences. 

    We are all in this together!

  • bubbalu
    bubbalu Member Posts: 177
    edited April 2010

    1marmalade1:  I like the sound of your surgeon.  One oncologist I talked it over with said that if you have lobular as opposed to dcis (which I have) your chances of it occuring in the healthy breast are greater.  The nurse that I talked to about it today said that the surgery may feel that my recovery from bilateral may be harder on me and not worth the low risk.  Everyone says talk it over with your surgeon, they are really the only ones who can advise you.  You did that and you can feel that you have the best advice you can get.

    Never heard of the Claritin thing, no one at my center ever mentioned it but it can't hurt so I will try it for my last 2 treatments.  Also going to get the Neulasta shot show, that make a difference for me.  Pinch burn and get out fast!  Arimidex?  I get that in my treatment, a shot for my red cells.  I did have a bad low back ache this time, must have been that.  Are you taking it daily?  Do you still have radiation to go?  The nurse said you can have radiation with a port!!!

    Well, sleep on all the advice and pray about it, you will get an answer.  Take Care

  • KAJDerby
    KAJDerby Member Posts: 310
    edited April 2010

    nkrun - I had a 7 cm tumor and am glad I had the uni mastectomy.  I have a friend that did just the lumpectomy with that large of a tumor and it makes it difficult to get your shape looking right.  She wishes now that she had had the mastectomy.  I have the prosthesis and it looks great!  Haven't decided about recon yet.  Just trying to get through the chemo.  It really is such a personal decision. 

    I am so jealous of everyone that is done!  My last chemo isn't until June 24.  Then I still have to have herceptin until April.  Port has to stay in for a long time!  I am having terrible issues with diarhea and severe abdominal cramping for the last 4 days!  I think it is the taxotere tearing me up!

    Read all of your posts.  Praying for everyone.  This forum has been such a blessing to me.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    January soul sisters your input and experience so much appreciated........I'm so confused!   Good thing I have 9 more weeks before I have to decide.

  • dgirl24
    dgirl24 Member Posts: 33
    edited April 2010

    nkrun- Just popped on and I will just tell you what I would do- the most aggressive action.  If you are questioning it now you probably worry about it later.  Go with your heart- these decisions suck!  I could have had lump. but I would have been left with half a boob- and when they kept telling me how aggressive my tumor was I thought I better be aggressive as well.  I did decide to keep my other breast as much as I thought I did want to.  Now I must say I'm happy I kept the good one and glad I got rid of the other one (I do miss her though).

       

  • friscosmom
    friscosmom Member Posts: 146
    edited April 2010

    GraceOkinawa - I'm with you till June, my last Taxotere is June 17th. I won't be getting Herceptin though, I'm HER negative.

     Recon question, did anyone here get the DIEP or similar or did everyone do implants? Sorry if this has been discussed before. I am seriously considering at least a single mastectomy, possibly double. I know this sounds wierd but I ride horses and I worry about implants and them staying put, I'm thinking the DIEP would be better but worry about the recovery time and pain after such a proceedure.

  • paxton
    paxton Member Posts: 577
    edited April 2010

    I'm 2 weeks out from my bilat surgery.  Things are slowly improving.  I meet with the onc in a week to go over what chemo I'll start next.  I'll be so glad to be done with this crap.  I can't even remember what it feels like to feel good.  But I did enjoy eating supper outside tonight and the baby was a happy boy. 

  • michelle_nj
    michelle_nj Member Posts: 50
    edited April 2010

    Nkrun - Trust your feeling and try to choose something you won't regret down the road.My breast surgeon did a pretty good job convincing me to go for single mastectomy when I felt strongly I should have bmx. Maybe they think it is easier to cut more later than to be sorry you did cut too much. I have ILC, that is harder to diagnose and in my case was not detected by repeated mammogram or ultrasound. I had a hard time forgiving myself for not going to a breast surgeon in 2008.Then my repeated mammogram was good but I had a feeling that something was not right, but I didn't follow through.
    Last December, after my right mastectomy with false negative sentinel lymph node, I had to go back to operation for node dissection. Then I did prophylactic mastectomy too and I'm not sorry for my decision. I think the tests and measurements are far from precise, at least for ILC.

  • KAJDerby
    KAJDerby Member Posts: 310
    edited April 2010

    friscosmom- Not glad you have to go till June, but so glad to have someone to go through it with! 

    Michelle- that was a good point.  With my tumor they thought it was a certain size, but when they got in it was much bigger and more aggressive than they thought.  I feel better that I had the mastectomy.

  • 1marmalade1
    1marmalade1 Member Posts: 308
    edited April 2010

    I have been going thru exactly what you are now...5cm+ tumour, chemo first, and now the decision on a uni or a bi.  Lumpectomy not even an option.  I was leaning strongly towards a bi, but my surgeon phoned me the other day, and without trying to sway me one way or the other, seemed to be suggesting I go for a uni, see how I feel about it, and if I choose, he will do a prophy on the other side if and when I want it.  I think he feels that if I was not adamant right from the beginning to get a bi, then I shouldn't.  As he said "once it's gone, there's no going back - at least with a uni you will have more tiime to make the choice".  He's absolutely right.  And because a prophy  would be a simple mastectomy, no lymph nodes would have to be removed, so the surgery would go easier. 

    I think I will do the uni.  It will give me time to decide whether I really want to save the good breast or not.  I can get the prophy surgery on my terms, at the time of my choosing.  No chemo.  No rads.  Less pressure.   We have enough to deal with just looking after our "bad" breasts.  Trying to figure out what to do with the "good" one seems to cause us the most stress.  Good luck with your decision.

  • georgiabirdgirl
    georgiabirdgirl Member Posts: 143
    edited April 2010

    nkrun-thanks for asking this question about lumpectomy or bmx.  It makes me re-think my process and makes me feel better about my decision.  I'm 37 and don't feel too strongly about keeping my breasts or getting new perky ones.  So, for me it was all about recurrence and avoiding unnecessary surgery.  Originally, everyone said this was straightforward and I was a candidate for a lumpectomy.  Since my main concern was finding out about my lymphnodes, and it was a quickly scheduled surgery, that's what I did.  They got clear margins, and the breast looks better than I imagined, but not terrific.  I had a false negative SNB and knew that after chemo I had another surgery planned to complete the axillary node dissection.  SO, now I go through chemo and start to spend some quality time on these boards.  I send my records to an oncologist in Virginia for a second opinion. The doc in VA said he concurred with my docs all the way, except he would have recommended the mastectomy over a lumpectomy. I started talking frankly to a lot of people about breast cancer.  What I kept hearing was a mastectomy was the way to go. My breast surgeon was adamant that a lumpectomy would do the trick, and she did a good job.  Plus, the percentages of recurrence don't necessarily support a MX.  However, I have been "outside the norm" on all of this stuff.  So, percentages don't give me any peace of mind.

    I just kept reading about people who were back here after having had a lumpectomy the first go round, or who after a mastectomy found cancer that wasn't seen on any scan yet.  So, after some struggling, I decided to go for the BMX.  I know that it's a big deal surgery and that I'll experience numbness and potential complications, but I decided that I could live with that more than coming back to chemo when I could have stopped it.  Now, when I finish my 2010 Year of Cancer, I will know that I did absolutely everything I could to conquer this. 

    Good luck with your decision, and take the time to discuss it with more people.  Ask your doctors what they would choose for themselves or their wives. Oftentimes, when I ask that question I get a better answer.  All of my doctors, except the breast surgeon, said they would probably do the mastectomy.  But, they didn't offer that information until I asked it that way. My breast surgeon didn't give me an answer.  She simply said she supported my decision whatever it was and would do her best surgery.  This is a tough decision, I know.  It would be so much easier if there was just a straightforward plan that was black or white. 

    Happy Friday!

  • stlcardsfan
    stlcardsfan Member Posts: 466
    edited May 2010

    Nkrun - adding my two cents worth.

    My original plan was lump all the way, based on size of cancer, had chemo first to see if TCH combo would shrink it. Well, after 4 rounds cancer was un-detectable. Based on my age (42 when this started) and no know history of BC on either side of the family, it was recommended that I get genetic tests. Turns out I am positive for BRCA 2 mutation - which was a shock needless to say. So, lumpectomy out the window. Based on HER2 status and mutation, decided on bmx with immediate reconstruction with tissue expanders. Meeting with both primary and plastic surgeons - neither tried to sway me either way. But when they asked me what I was thinking - I told them bmx, and they both agreed that was a very good choice. Will also be having a ooph as the risk of ovarian cancer with the BRCA mutation has increased as well. 

    This is a very personal decision and my husband was there for all of these meetings and agreed with every decision that I had made. They asked me if I needed to talk to a conseler or anyone as this was a big decision. I asked why - my boobs could kill me - take them off! I also have very dense cyst prone breasts on both sides, in fact the good side has over 5 cysts now, confirmed several times with mammo's, ultra sounds - you name in. The left side, where the cancer is/was, was actually right next to a cyst - so when I first felt it, I though - oh great, another cyst. Both surgeon's and oncologist commented on how the cysts could mimic cancer in the very early stage, small lumps that grow quick, just like HER2 cancer usually does.

    I am doing everything I can to lower my risk of re-occurance given the type and genetic results.

    Just wanted to add my two cents worth. 

  • lindee629
    lindee629 Member Posts: 61
    edited April 2010

    Friscomom--your story sounds exactly like mine...smaller tumor (mine was 1.6 cm) with little possibility of LN involvement, etc....so my BS suggested go for the lumpectomy. Which I did.  Unfortunately, there WAS LN involvement, I had to have axillary node dissection, and a further revision of my surgical margins, and now my breast looks exactly how you have described yours (except I am --ooops WAS--a B cup). My right breast is also caved in on one side and my nipple is also facing to the right (not front and center). They tell me that it will "fill in" but I think thats bullcrap. I also had the similar experience of finding a new (but benign) lump while being on chemo.

    I wish now that I had gone with a mastectomy instead of the lumpectomy. So now I have my little deformed breast, I really don't like the way it looks, and when I questioned my BS about maybe some kind of recon or plastic surgery in future, he kind of waved off that idea and said to wait to see how I do after rads--something they told me I would not have needed had I opted for the mast instead of the lumpectomy in the first place.

  • pagowens
    pagowens Member Posts: 194
    edited April 2010

    Hi All,

    Thank you to all who responded re the Claritin.   I've been taking the Claritin (regular, non-drowsy) every day through the Neupogen shots this week.  I had heard about the Claritin and the Neulasta before but the Neulasta didn't cause me bone pain when I was getting it the day after my AC chemo.  The daily Neupogen shots are giving me hip and knee and leg aches badly - like a toothache inside my bones.  I think it may be a little less this week since I've started the Claritin  - but I still have the aches and pains in the same places.  Last night I had to take an Oxycodone around 11 PM because I just couldn't fall asleep as a result of the pain.  The nurse practitioner who brought it up to me early this week also said she didn't know why it worked but that it seemed to for some people.  I don't think I'm in that group, as per the results this week.  But, if I have to have more Neupogen shots next week, I'll keep taking the Claritin to see if maybe it builds up over time.

     I have to take the Neupogen rather than the Neulasta now because my Taxol is weekly and the Neulasta requires a two week interim between chemos.  I don't think they work exactly the same.

    I had the lumpectomy.  My tumor was thought to be around 2.5 cm but turned out to be over 3 cm - had clear margins and yes, my right is now smaller than my left.  But fortunately the nipples both point in the same direction and they both look okay - no big dents or weird looking - just one full size one on the left and a 3/4 similar boob on the right. I also have nodes involved.  But my MRIs show that both breasts are clear of cysts or other tumor like or calcified stuff.  So, I thought I'd do the more conservative lumpectomy - even my second opinion doctor at University of PA Rena Rowan Center recommended lumpectomy.  They also told me that with radiation, the rates of recurrence are very similar between mastectomy and lumpectomy. 

    My BS was very forthcoming as well - talked about "why" people decided uni, bi or lumpectomy.  She felt that the lumpectomy would be a workable option for me - but she didn't pressure me any one way.  At the time I felt that I would follow the most conservative practices (lumpectomy) and hope for the best.  I don't have the BRCA gene, no other breast cancers in my family, a very localized tumor that was on the outside upper quadrant of my right breast (pretty good spot for the lumpectomy and no organs involved - like the heart - re the radiation).... so I went for the lumpectomy.

    At this point I am glad that was my choice.  I guess if I have a recurrence I'll do the next level surgery - uni or bi -- whatever is required then.  I'm going to think positive and believe that the lumpectomy removed what was needed for the tumor and the chemo is battling the spread in my llymph nodes.  When I met the radiologist early on, I asked about the internal radiation (the weeklong procedure rather than the 6 week external regimen).  He recommended against the internal stuff and for the 6 week daily external radiation and told me that he would radiate my involved  breast area, under arm and shoulder area - to be most aggressive re the lymph nodes.  I haven't been back yet - that's sometime in June (no date yet). 

    But, that's my story with my individual perculiarities and cancer picture.  Each decision is individualized and who the heck knows if it is the best decision in the long run.  We make the best decision we can at the time with the information we know.

    I am awed by the reconstruction discussion - I hadn't even focused on that issue at all and am struck by how much I don't know and how hard these decisions are. 

    Hugs,

    Pat

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2010

    Again thanks for sharing advice and experiences I'm really taking it all in when making a decision. It looks like most women, including those outside this support group, opt for either a uni a bi even when a lumpectomy is an option. I'm really confused by this because it seems like the experts (oncologist, breast surgeon and plastic surgeon) recommend the potentially least profitable(lumpectomy) option.  With my slanted view on the cancer industry, I wonder what what is in it for the docs. Yes I know deep down inside they put the patient first and actually care about our outcome.  This decision is harder than thought. My husband and kids  say they will support my decision either way.  So this is why I'm really appreciate everyones input. I feel like those who are not in the trenches cannot fully understand what is going on in our heads. 

    Today I went for my weekly herceptin and taxol.  I could not get taxol because my liver enzymes are too high.   I guess taxol is extremely hard on the liver too.  When I got home from the infusion center I broke a tooth while chewing on some food.  Bummer. I need to have my dentist and oncologist get together on Monday to determine what level of dental work will be ok while on chemo. I guess it is a good thing I could not get taxol this week in case I have to have major dental work next week. Oh yeah I also have some GI issues requiring a colonscopy. yipee  Oh and my boss thinks I pushing myself too hard at work and said I should think about cutting back. I should be glad, but I enjoy playing the wonderwomen "this cancer thing won't get me down" role. On another note since I'm feeling like crap, I had to cancel my son's 18th bday party that was scheduled for tonite. I think he understands but he is still bummed.   Yes I'm having pity party. So thanks for letting me vent. Too bad I kicked the wine habit when I started chemo because I could sure use a glass. 

  • mslrg
    mslrg Member Posts: 293
    edited May 2010

    Hi Ladies, haven't posted in a few days. I go some disturbing news on Tuesday: I have to return to work by June 3rd, or be put on a 39 month rehire list--lose my job and maybe get a teaching job if one becomes available--with all the current layoffs, that's unlikely to happen. They will not hold my administrativ jobfo me. Then I saw my onc today, I am more anemic and neutropenic than ever! "profoundly anemic" to quote my onc, and on my way to getting an infusion. She said that my blood counts make her want to EXTEND my medical leave rather than shorten it--remember, the chemo caused me a lot of rectal bleeding,and it's taken its toll! She wanted to start me on Tamxifen, or have me decide to get a hysterectomy, but both are out of the question right now because my bloods are too low. Then I got home and received another call from my HR office "Oops, we over paid you $4300.00 and you need to pay it back by June 30th,  and you'll be getting no checks for May or June." I am in a panic because I do not feel well enought o return to work, but I have to have an income. Iam so depressed and hurt that people can be so insenstive and callous. Somehow, I'm going to have to go back to work, just so we can keep our household going. I really don't know how I'll do it--my exhange surgery is coming up, and the shots are so painful-I still hurt from the shots I had a week ago. What to do?????

  • pagowens
    pagowens Member Posts: 194
    edited May 2010

    Hi MSLRG,

    Well, I can see you work for a school district.  I assume you are under some kind of contract?  If so, what are the terms?  Ours are annual (which are renewed in March each year and stipulate separation terms).  Do you belong to a union? If so, they must be negotiating separation terms - do you know your rep? Are you out on official Family Medical Leave or just on sick time? The FMLA is federal law and takes precedence over state terms or your employers terms (except they can cut jobs if there are financial issues - but there are regs around that too). Do you have a disability insurance plan at work?  Is there a person that you trust in the HR department that can help guide your decision making and give you options? 

    I totally understand your panic.  But, this might also be an opportunity for you as well to get the time and rest and recovery with some income.  You are entitled to Social Security Disability because you have breast cancer and couldn't continue working - that is some income there and it's a formula entitlement.  Or, if you get laid off, you are entitled to unemployment compensation benefits - which are must longer right now than previously because of the bad economy.  How much you're entitled to depends on how much income you've earned the last year.  I don't know your financial needs, but I am assuiming your health insurance is through your employer as well and that is also a big deal. So, I totally get keeping your job for the income and benefits.

    As for the overpayment - that's THEIR MISTAKE and you should play hardball in  negotiating the payback terms over a longer time. 

    But, all in all, it sounds like you guys (there must be others besides you in this boat) need some legal representation to help you negotiate best terms of separation or coming back.  Among your friends, any civil attorneys who might take you on pro bono right away?  (Another way to ask for help when we're sick).  My experience is that those represented by attorneys are treated differently than the masses.  And, you need someone pretty fast to represent your best interests.

    And, I wouldn't feel bad about retaining an attorney because school districts do not (in my experience) think about the individual - they are political entities who have other agendas.  It won't hurt you (like people getting mad and you and then taking it out later), it will help you instead (like they won't so readily mess with you - they will be sure they are willing to spend legal $$ on whatever the issue is).

    I don't know if this helped but I also send hugs out to you, because feeling physically bad doesn't help us do our best thinking.  When it rains, it seems to pour.  But, it doesn't pour forever - the rain lets up and the sun shines through eventually.

     And, I was severely anemic and my onc had a bag of iron infused each week for 3 weeks to build that hemoglobin back up to a moderately anemic level. Now I get an iv bag of iron every other week to keep it up.  That helped, plus I ate lots of organic egg yolks, spinach, and organic calf liver to help my levels.  I'm also neutropenic which is why I've been getting the Neutopen shots every day.  Taxol did a number on me too.  I've been able to avoid the blood transfusion so far.

    Pat

  • georgiabirdgirl
    georgiabirdgirl Member Posts: 143
    edited May 2010

    Nkrun- yucky complications!  I hope they are able to get your tooth fixed easily.  I'm with your boss regarding the superwoman thing.  It's nice to feel like you can handle things, but it's even nicer to give yourself a break.  It sounds like you might need one.  If you scale back a bit, it might give you enough energy to deal with the GI issues and whatevere else is coming around the corner.  Take care of yourself.

    mslrg- I am so sorry to hear about all the job stress.  That's just what you need while facing all of these BC challenges. I pray that someone in the HR dept there can help out once they know the circumstances.  Good luck with the blood levels.  I hope that between food and iron supplements, you will start to bounce back. 

    Take care

  • KAJDerby
    KAJDerby Member Posts: 310
    edited May 2010

    Nkrun - How frustrating!  I was telling someone the other day that it just wasn't right to have the stupid little things happen like dental, sickness, car breaking down, etc. when we are already having to deal with this bc!  So sorry about your son's bd.  Hugs and keep going!

    mslrg-Wow!  I agree with what pagowens said about making the money  pay back on your terms.  Hugs and hang on!

  • 11tyBillion
    11tyBillion Member Posts: 96
    edited May 2010

    Hi all!

     I have been lurking on here for a while, and have not posted.  Congrats to all of you done with chemo!  I cannot wait to be done!  I just had #8 of 12 Taxol on Friday.  I was also notified that I had real low WBC ...   0.840 ... which is 840.  Apparently my Onc. said that he will usually halt treatment when the number is at 800 .... damn.  I have been feeling so good too!  I was sure that I would feel like crap if my WBC got low.  I lowered the dosage a smidge, and now we are keeping our fingers crossed that next week my counts are not too low .. I really do not want to delay any of my treatments!

    Thing is, I am surprised that he did not bring up Neupogen shots?  Has anyone had low WBC toward the end of Taxol, and gotten Neupogen to raise the levels?  I would much rather take the neupogen shots rather than reduce the Taxol dosage or have to delay treatments!

  • mom2Bnegativex3
    mom2Bnegativex3 Member Posts: 221
    edited May 2010

     11ty..I get Taxol DD and mine went down to 1.2.Now I have to get the shot. I wish you the best!

  • swolfram
    swolfram Member Posts: 6
    edited May 2010

    I had four rounds of taxotere and cytoxan.  After each round, I was given the neulasta shot the next day.  On my second round, my WBC went down even after taking the neulasta...I was then given 3 neuprogen shots.  After my final round in March, my WBC plummeted and I was hospitalized for a week and given blood transfusions.  I shudder to think what my WBC would have been without both the neulasta and neuprogren shots. 

    I am about a month and a half out from my last chemo.  My energy level is returning and I have few SE from chemo...just waiting patiently (well, really not patiently) for my hair to begin growing. 

  • pagowens
    pagowens Member Posts: 194
    edited May 2010

    Hi 11tyBillion,

    I'm on the same schedule as you - 12 weekly Taxol.  My WBC tanked around week 4 - I've been getting Neupogen shots (2 to 3 per week) to keep my WBC up since.  I get #8 of the 12 on Tuesday.  I don't know why he hasn't done that.  I don't think there is anything else that can be done, except a blood transfusion, to address it (ie nothing you can eat, excercise, etc.).  You can't do the Neulasta with the weekly chemo.

    Call your oncologist and find out why he's not using the Neupogen.  If there's some chemo reason, please share.

    Thanks,

    Pat

  • 11tyBillion
    11tyBillion Member Posts: 96
    edited May 2010

    Thanks so much for your replies.  I am feeling a little miffed because I cannot figure out why El Doctore would not have brought up the Nupogen himself.  I know the doctors have this thing about not wanting to put the cart before the horse, and not bring up things too early beforehand, you know, to keep from scaring us unnecessarily.  But damnit ... Not only do I want to miss or delay any of my treatments, but I also have two small children to take care of ...  possible transfusions and a week in the hospital (and NO family in town to help us) is a hell of a lot scarier than the prospect of taking several nupogen shots as a preemptive move against neutropenia. 

    I am thinking about calling his office Monday to ask about it -- I am just hoping that he does not take the question personally and think that I am questioning his expertise ... but on the same hand, I am questioning his expertice because damnit is it really up to me to figure this out?

     The ONLY thing that is keeping me from being angry about this is that MAYBE his first move was to try to decrease the Taxol doasge to see if this would keep the WBC from dropping any lower ... and if this works, then maybe we can eek out a few more weeks.  If this does not work, then maybe he was going to bring up adding Neupogen to the protocol?  I dunno.  Seems to me that he would have done the neupogen last week when he saw my numbers.  LEt's jsut cross our fingers that it does not fall much below 0.84 by next friday!

     Would you guys mind sharing what your WBC's were when your Oncos. decided to put you on neupogen?

    sorry.  Just venting!

  • swolfram
    swolfram Member Posts: 6
    edited May 2010

    During the initial conversation with my medical oncologist, she told me about both neulasta and neuprogren shots.  She recommended that I automatically receive the neulasta shot the day after each chemo round.  I did some research and then agreed.  She also told me that if my WBC reached a certain number, there would be no hesitation in admitting me to the hospital and receiving blood transfusions.  I knew all of this before chemo ever started.  My target was to keep treatments on schedule and to not have to decrease any chemo. 

    I really never thought I would need blood tranfusions but after my final round of chemo, I became ill very quickly.  I became faint and then very, very nauseated.  Additionally, my temperature rose.  In research, I learned that very few die from chemo itself but more so from the SEs.  On the way to the hospital, this did scare me. 

    My oncologist went over everything very thoroughly before chemo ever began.  Please do not be frightened to ask questions...it is your body and your health.  I have learned I need to be my own advocate when it comes to managing my health.  Good luck and I would certainly make that call on Monday morning.  

Categories