No Scans but what about..............

Options
tamlyn110
tamlyn110 Member Posts: 195

At my last visit with the Onc. I asked him what scans I would have after I am finished with all my treatments and he said none unless I have symptoms. In the same visit he told me I have a high chance of recurrance because of the TN status. I had a bi-lat so I obviously am not going to get mammograms but should'nt I at least have an MRI? It does'nt make any sense to me. If I would have had a lumpectomy I would be getting mammos but since I had a bi-lat I get nothing?

Comments

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited February 2010

    Hi Tamlyn,

    It's the dilemma so many of us have. TN does have a higher risk of recurrence, but only in the first 2-3 years, and after 5 years it actually drops below the risk of the general population!  Woohoo!

    It's pretty standard to not do any scans unless there are symptoms.  The main reason is that studies have shown that early detection of a recurrence is not critical like early detection of a primary BC.  The prognosis and treatment aren't shown to change whether recurrence is detected by screening or upon development of symptoms.  

    That being said, and having read a ton of research on it, I just can't seem to grasp that.  Some people operate on the "don't borrow trouble" philosophy and are more comfortable assuming they are cured, while others feel more comfortable with the reassurance of periodic screenings.  Depending on which category you fall into, you may be able to get the scans if you want and insist on them.   My oncologist was fairly neutral about it, but I have decided that personally I'd rather know, so at this point my plan (and my doc's ) is to have periodic scanning, and she has a fairly low threshold for ordering CAT scans, PET scans, MRIs, if I have any symptoms at all.  Of course it's a fine line between vigilance and paranoia, but hopefully it will become easier as we approach that magic 2-3 year mark!

    Best of luck and congrats on finishing up with treatment!!!  Definitely a mixed bag of emotions, I know, but a huge milestone nevertheless!  

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited February 2010

    I realize why the scans aren't imperative..unless you notice something different..but thenewme.how aften are you going to do your scans?  I'm 26 weeks from chemo..when should I ask for one...at one year of diagnosis?  which would be very soon for me...or at 2 years..what should I ask for?  I honestly feel very, very good right now..almost afraid to have the scans..I can only admit that here....

  • tamlyn110
    tamlyn110 Member Posts: 195
    edited February 2010

    No, I am not comfortable not having scans. Why do women still have to get a mammogram after lumpectomy if it does'nt matter if a recurrance is detected early or later?

    Do local recurrances not have a chance of mets like primary BC can?

    edited to add- "Local" recurrances

  • angelsabove
    angelsabove Member Posts: 363
    edited February 2010

    Tamlyn.....I have been wondering this same stuff. You can see my signature below. I did double mastectomy in May. Prior to Chemo. I did 6 months of Chemo and then 32 radiation treatments. I completed those 10 days ago. I was told by my breast surgeon, that breast cancer in the breast DOES NOT SCARE HER...she said we can go in there and get it out. She said it is the breast cancer that goes somewhere else...the stuff that gets away is what we worry about. She said even if it comes back in the breast IF it is caught early enough then just remove it again. I was like ok....but I still want DOUBLE MASTECTOMY....she did smile and say GOOD GIRL...

    When Chemo ended I asked my Oncologist ....OK NOW WHAT????? She said well I am gonna keep my thumb on you pretty tight. I want to see u for an exam and I want blood work done every three months. It seems like she said for the first two years. Then we can go to every 6 months. She said the standard call is NOT to do any scans unless symptoms, but she said I do like to do them. So will see her every three months and scans every six months until we reach the point...I believe she said she would breathe easier after two years. She said then the recurrence goes down.......

    Lots Of Love and May God Bless Us All 

  • sftfemme65
    sftfemme65 Member Posts: 790
    edited February 2010

    I hate that "only scan if you have symptoms"  and let me tell you why.....If you scan someone and find a small lesion on their liver, you have options, you can surgically remove a lesion or start chemo and hit it hard and possibly go into remission....now if you wait til there are symptoms you will probably find several lesions or a very large one.  My thought is, isn't it easier to treat one small lesion than several?  I realize at that point you aren't looking for a cure but NED is a real possibility and I dont care what they say, it has to give you more time.

    Maybe Im off base here. I dont know

    Teresa

  • HairSprayMom
    HairSprayMom Member Posts: 251
    edited February 2010

    My onc wanted to do a scan at 12 months post chemo. He got insurance to pay for it by saying I was having bone pain and I needed a scan. I was NED in April of 09. I will say this I will not do another scan unless I have symptoms. It was sooo very stressful and to be honest I just don't want to be reminded of it every year and be scared waiting on test results. I am ready to move on and quit living my life by the next surgery or scan. I am pushing on forward and for the 1st time in a long time, I am not looking over my shoulder to see if the beast is on my heels!

    Sending Love and Claming Vibes~~~

    Regina

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited February 2010

    Teresa, I completely agree with you - how could it NOT be beneficial to detect a recurrence earlier than later?  It seems so counterintuitive!

    I think the risk of a new primary is what the mammograms would mostly be for.  A new primary is not nearly as concerning (relatively speaking!) as distant metastasis, which is the very real concern especially for us TNs. 

    Regina - you go, girl! The "scanxiety" and the issue of scans often leading to more scans are big reasons for the no-scan-unless-symptomatic plan. 

    Titan, congrats on feeling great!!!!  I know what you mean - afraid to have the scans but afraid not to?  Did you have anything in your pathology or treatment that would warrant more concern than normal? If not, if I were in your situation, I'd probably hold off a while.

    For me, I had a "questionable" IM node on PET scan before chemo, so they wanted a post-treatment scan to check on that.  It turns out that was gone, but it did show some small lung nodules, so they wanted to check on that....and there was an area of something on the ribs so they wanted to check on that,  and I was/am having some breastbone pain and swallowing issues so they wanted to check on that... you get the picture.  The good news with all of that is that so far (knock on  wood!!!) nothing has turned up as anything to be concerned about - whewwww!  I have a cat scan in a couple of weeks to monitor the lung nodules, so of course I have scanxiety about that. I suppose I am the poster child for the scans-lead-to-more-scans-and-scanxiety plan!  D'oh!  For me personally, though, I *need* information and facts and my oncologist agrees. 

    Hopefully as I get farther out from treatment, I'll get closer to Regina's philosophy and state of mind.  I'm counting on it!

  • tamlyn110
    tamlyn110 Member Posts: 195
    edited February 2010

    I don't want scans all the time I just want one a few months after treatment maybe even 6 months after just to show that I am officially NED and everything I did worked so far. Then I will go along with the symptom thing. I still don't understand it but I will go along. I did not have chemo before surgery so I have no proof that it works for me. I am sure it did but I like "proof"

  • tamlyn110
    tamlyn110 Member Posts: 195
    edited February 2010

    I am sorry,  must be chemo brain but in my original post I meant to say that Onc. said I have a higher chance of local recurrance than recurrance somewhere else. That's why all the drama about not getting at least an MRI then.

  • Titan
    Titan Member Posts: 2,956
    edited February 2010

    Regina..no..as far as I know..I'm fine...my Onc told me at my last visit 3 months ago..that "I think that you will be fine"...I don't thnk he would say that if he didn't think it..of course he said I "think"..not that "I know" but I don't expect that from a cancer onc...they see crap every day..wouldn't want his job.

    About scans...I know some people want them..some don't..personal preference...I go Tuesday and I have a list of questions for my poor onc!  I guess after having/had cancer...I think I know my body pretty well.....not sure how far some of us are out from our treatments..but I'm thinking a year..or even 2 will not show alot...then supposedly..us TN's are pretty much in the clear..I'm thinking with TN's it may be a matter of getting it all with surgery/chemo/rads..the first time around...if it is taken care of then..well hopefully we are good to go...at least I hope so..for all of us!

  • jenn3
    jenn3 Member Posts: 3,316
    edited February 2010

    My onc originally said no scans - said it wasn't so much his decision as it was the insurance company's decision.  I pushed a little more........ because I do have pain around the area of my liver which has gone unexplained for two years - this pain put me in the ER twice before my BC dx - both times my liver counts were extremely high, but they couldn't find anything.  Based on this I am having a CT scan of the abdomen once I finish radiation (end of March), but because I don't have other symptoms that will be my only scan for now.  Apparently this is "standard" and unless the dr's can get the approval from the insurance companies, we can't get the scans.

  • livvienigelmom
    livvienigelmom Member Posts: 25
    edited February 2010

    Im with you. Everyone preaches early detection so why wait until you have neurological symptoms to have a brain scan?? Irritating to me. I had some pronounced dizziness for about a day and a half---marked dizziness. I am calling my doc Monday and asking for a brain scan. Funny, I had a minor neck injury from Taekwondo a couple of years ago and the doc couldn't get me a ct scan fast enough. I have a beasty cancer and it likes to spread and I can't buy a scan! Eeeesh. Keepin a sense of humor!! Take care!

Categories