I am Stage 1 but the Grade 3 continues to make me nervous

Options
24567

Comments

  • Nicole112
    Nicole112 Member Posts: 327
    edited January 2010

    mmm5- Sorry for the 100 questions... just reflecting on what my dr told me... he said I had vascular involvement contained to the tumor area... I recall him saying that this was taken out with the tumor. Is this the same as LVI? WOW, I cannot believe how many things are involved in this puzzle... CAN THEY FIND A CURE ALREADY??? I think we are getting close, I am so grateful for Herceptin for your prognosis! WHAT A MIRACLE DRUG! This gives us all hope there is the miracle potion out there for all BC's and woman diagnosed after us will not have to endure some of the treatments we have had to go through... with this said, I am grateful for all the treatments available!

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    Nicole-

    No worries ask away!

    Look on you path report it will say LVI or lymphvascular involvement and a yes or a no.

    One other thing many premenopausal women are doing is Zometa, or a the bisphos. trial. Have you looked into that as well for an extra benefit against recurrance?

    I am not sure about the stats on time to recurrance for grade 3 but do know there are studies for HER2 that illustrate the first 3 years are  the most important for looking at recurrance.

  • Nicole112
    Nicole112 Member Posts: 327
    edited January 2010

    I am doing the Zometa treatments every 6 months, in fact, I am due in a week for my next infusion.

    I am going to ak for a copy of my path report that way I can have it on hand :) Have a wonderful Saturday, I am itching to go snow skiing, perhaps leaving today with my family and going tomorrow... it is raining in California and takes a few hours to get to the mountain, my hubby may say we will be silly to go on a holiday weekend.

    I hope you have something exciting planned today!

  • shadow2356
    shadow2356 Member Posts: 393
    edited January 2010

    I was glad to read this thread. I especially liked the part that said grade 3 would respond to chemo the best. The aggressiveness of the cancer has been scaring me the most.

    Thanks

  • pumpkinweed
    pumpkinweed Member Posts: 32
    edited January 2010

    Hi Nicole,

    My dx is very similar to yours.  I was Grade 2/3.  I do have LVI which means the tumor started to grow into the blood vessels.  This means that the cancer could have gone directly into my blood stream (the key word there is "could have"...but probably didn't! Smile).  My onc told me that it is similar to having one positive node.  The LVI is the reason that my stage is "1b" rather than "1a".  The LVI has caused me alot of anxiety, but I stay positive by reminding myself that I had chemo, so even if some cancer cells got into my blood stream, the chemo likely zapped them.   And there are lots of women with positive nodes who are doing great...   With bc, it seems like there is always something that we fixate on - whether it's the grade, the LVI, the nodes, tumor size, we all have something that haunts us.  I think we have to work hard to take those thoughts captive and not let them have power over us.  That is what I work hard at every day!  I am 3 years out and doing great, so be encouraged.   Regarding the Oncotype DX, I think you are better off without it.   A doctor who I consulted with (but did not hire) ordered it without my consent, and it has caused nothing but anxiety for me.  My score was rather high, a 29, which is the high end of the intermediate risk group.  I knew that I was having chemo without the test, which is the only beneficial reason to have the test done, so I would have been much better off not knowing this number.  So, I'm glad it has brought some of you peace of mind, but for those of us with higher risk, it just causes more anxiety.  I am really thankful for this board...  I can't really talk to my family or friends about this anymore, so it is really comforting to have all of you.....! 

  • LINDAGARSIDE
    LINDAGARSIDE Member Posts: 345
    edited January 2010

    Hi Meg,

    I am so confused about things right now...my head is spinning a bit.  I was dx late December and will have a lumpectomy and removal of sentinal node (and perhaps a few of his or her friends) this Friday.  I have no idea yet as to the stage or grade of my IDC.  The MRI looked very good so I'm hopeful for low numbers.  I am surprised that your 'sentinal node' was clear but the other nodes had extensive involvement?  This seems strange to me.  I'm certainly not well versed in this sort of thing but I thought if the sentinal node was 'clear' then the others should be as well?  Now I am worried that the surgeon will take out the sentinal node on Friday and not find anything...but alas!  The other nodes will have 'extensive' involvement and we won't know about it and I won't get chemo and only have radiation.  I am 58 years old and post menopausal and as you can tell by this post...I am nothing but a big worry wart.  I hope to gain a lot of courage by interacting with all the brave and wonderful ladies on this site.  

  • sheila888
    sheila888 Member Posts: 25,634
    edited January 2010

    LINDAGARSIDE... I also had a lumpectomy with sentinel node biopsy. Extensive involvement with the other nodes can not be correct. Someone was posted about this, I will go back and try to find it for you.....Look at the top of the page it explains it the difference between lymph involvement.

    Good Luck

    Sheila

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited January 2010

    From what I understand about a sentinel lymph node is that it is the "probable" lymph node that the breast would drain to first.  The test for determining the SLN is not 100% accurate, as nothing in this whole freakin cancer world is, but it is accurate enough that usually if the SLN is negative, the other nodes are negative as well.  That said, it is possible that cancer cells can be found in the other lymph nodes but it is very uncommon if the SLN is negative.  I think they then call it a "false negative."   I think that means the SLN they found was not the SLN afterall. Again, though, it is very uncommon to have a false negative SLN.  That is why they do this procedure first, because it is highly accurate in finding where the cancer cells might go first.  Most surgeons do not remove anymore nodes if the SLN is negative.  My surgeon told me that sometimes more than one node "lights up" from the radioactive dye, and that is why they might take 2 or 3 nodes if there is not a clear sentinel node found.  In my case, the report read something along the lines of "after removal of SLN, very little radioactivity was found" meaning the node they took was clearly the main drainage point.

  • SandyAust
    SandyAust Member Posts: 393
    edited January 2010

    Hi Jill,

    Sorry I have only just seen your post.  I had a mastectomy hence the "lopsided" comment.  How big was your tumour?  Mine was nearly two centimetres plus I had 4.5 cm of high grade DCIS, this is why I had a mastectomy.

    Take care,

    Sandy 

  • meg8000
    meg8000 Member Posts: 108
    edited December 2010

    Hi Lindagarside -

    The extensive lymphatic involvement was in the breast tissue.  It meant the tumor accessed the lymphatic vessels in the breast tissue, but since the sentinel lymph node was clear, the presumption is that all lymph nodes are clear.  The concern would be that some cancer cells accessed the lymphatic system and may have traveled elsewhere, but could not be found in the lymph nodes.  At least, that is my novice understanding of it.  That fact, combined with the aggressive grade of the tumor, is why I have chosen to do chemo.  I'm hoping it would kill any cells that may have traveled, so that I don't have any surprises later. But I must admit, it worries me.

  • LINDAGARSIDE
    LINDAGARSIDE Member Posts: 345
    edited January 2010

    Hi Meg,

    Thank you for your explanation.  And Sheila...thank you for looking into this as well.  I am having my surgery tomorrow morning at 8:00 a.m. and going for a gamma probe today, to prepare for the node testing.

    I feel somewhat guilty about everything as I took HRT for about 6 years (stopped about 6 years ago) and now I think I'm the one who caused this to happen.  I also have a sweet tooth and blame my bad eating habits.  If I could do it all over again...

    I am going to remain positive (regardless of self guilt) and have already started to change my eating habits.  I'm also taking vitamins now, including extra Vit D.  While I know I can't change the past...I know I can affect the future and that is exactly what I am planning to do.

    Thank you so much to all my 'sisters' out there....we truly are a family and we care very much about each other.  I could weep for joy.  Thanks again.

  • LINDAGARSIDE
    LINDAGARSIDE Member Posts: 345
    edited January 2010

    thank you.  I needed to hear that. 

  • sheila888
    sheila888 Member Posts: 25,634
    edited January 2010

    LINDAGARSIDE....I will be thinking of you tomorrow. Please post as soon as you can.

    HUGS

    Sheila

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    Hi ladies

    I am also nervous about the grade 3, I had a run in with a mean Oncologist this week that has really go me down. I was getting another opinion on my hormone treatment and he just kept calling me high risk due to grade 3. I was also 9/9 on the Bloom Richardson Scale so that scares me too. HOw many of you ladies that were grade 3 were alos 9/9?

    I like to cling to the good things about my dx, like no LVI or Lymph nodes and being able to have Herceptin, but he kept scaring the crap out of me. High risk, High grade, blah blah blah.....I was doing a lot better before meeting with him. Wont' be going back!

    My other 2 Onc's give a much better prognosis.

  • dalycity
    dalycity Member Posts: 248
    edited January 2010

    Hi, ladies:

    Okay, here's my 1 cent worth. My doc said the single most important prognosis factor is the STAGE. It seems the GRADE is something in addition to all the other factors; but STAGE is the 'most important' factor.

    Recurrence happens most often 2-3 years after surgery; but of course, recurrence can happen any time after that. Many say after 5 years if no cancer recurrence, it means the cancer is gone; but for BC, it's after 8 years. So, I guess we are never safe.  But that's how life is for everyone else too--we don't know the future. So enjoy every donut and chocolate!

  • sheila888
    sheila888 Member Posts: 25,634
    edited January 2010

    mmm5....Correct me if Im wrong but between 8-9= Grade 3. Yours was 9 out of 9 brings you high end of Grade 3   9/9 

    If its between 5-7= Grade 2. Mine was 7 which brings me higher end of grade 2    7/9.

    Sometimes its too much trying to figure out every number.

    I am also Triple+

    Chocolate is a very good idea.

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    You are correct!

    Being triple positive what kind of treatment did you have? I am assumming Herceptin but what about hormone therapy?

  • sheila888
    sheila888 Member Posts: 25,634
    edited January 2010

    I had 4 cycles of A/C. 4 cycles of Taxol started Herceptin and continued for 52 weeks.

    Radiation. And I am on Femara since march of 2006 which will continue until March 2011.

    I had a lumpectomy.

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited January 2010

    mmm5, my original biopsy put me at 8/9, but after the mastectomy, they upgraded (or do I say downgraded?) me to 8-9/9.  I think the mitosis category is the one that got changed.  I know what you are saying and how you're feeling about being called "high risk" for recurrence.  The onc I saw at UCLA kept saying those same words to me.  I finally asked (very cautiously because I didn't want to hear anything else bad!) why she would consider me any more of a high-risk than any other HER2+ gal, and she said mostly because of my age and the fact that it was growing and behaving aggressively.  Not what I wanted to hear, but it is what it is.

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    Yeah after having a 9/9 I thought it weird that I was only 16% on the Ki67, so was it really moving so fast?? and no LVI too Confusing!

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited January 2010

    Tell me more about a Ki67.  I didn't have this done.  SHould I ask for it now?  What does it measure.  WHat does it tell?  Tell me a bit about the scoring, too.  I know you have researched the heck out of it!

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    The ki67 should be right on your path report from mast. It is a percentage and illustrates for lack of better terminology "how on the move the cancer is" perhaps a better term is proliferation.

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited January 2010

    I don't think my provider does it routinely.  It's not on my path report.  Can it be done after-the-fact, or is it more a tool to determine whether or not to do chemo (like the oncotype test)?

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited January 2010

    You need to request the specifics of your path report? It should be there, just like the er, per, Her2 etc.

    Correct me if I am wrong ladies, but i think it is fairly standard

  • KarenVW
    KarenVW Member Posts: 92
    edited January 2010

    I have been told more than once by my surgeon and oncologist at Sloan Kettering that the BIGGEST factors related to overall prognosis are tumor size, lymph node involvement, stage, hormone receptivity, and HER2 status.  Hope this helps!

  • Nicole112
    Nicole112 Member Posts: 327
    edited January 2010

    Whew, I haven't posted for a few days, was in my own self absorbed over thinking world... I ad my mammo today and a bone scan done due to some persistent back pain which they keep telling me is lymphedema but it has come to the time to do a scan just to be "safe"/... so the mammo went well, got the "all clear", I have to wait until next week for the results of the bone scan.

    My logical side tells me everything is fine but my illogical side always doubts... with this said, I went on a date with my hubby tonight and he was with me for the mammo and the bone scan, even when I was radiating and not to be "too close" to people.

    Thanks goodness for this website and all my love and support in my life. Now, I just need MY ALL CLEAR ON THE BONE SCAN and I will be one happy woman! I go for Zometa infusion on Tuesday!

    Have a good weekend ladies!!

    Nicole

  • RunningV
    RunningV Member Posts: 3
    edited January 2010

    LINDAGARSIDE:  I hope your surgery went well yesterday.  Never feel that you caused your breast cancer.  I had no family history of breast cancer, fitness is my personal pastime, I eat really healthy, I have only one or two alcoholic beverages per week, and I still got breast cancer.  It is simply chance.  You can certainly do everything possible to live a healthy lifestyle, but there are no guarantees for any of us. 

    I have been feeling like I fought the good fight and won, but then I felt a small lump in my armpit yesterday, and that Grade 3 diagnosis popped right back to the forefront in my head.  When BC strikes, it makes you realize how vulnerable we all really are.  Gotta live life to the fullest!

  • RunningV
    RunningV Member Posts: 3
    edited January 2010

    OOPS!  Previous message was intended for LINDAGARSIDE. 

  • LisaM1957
    LisaM1957 Member Posts: 1
    edited January 2010

    Hello Nicole,

    This is my first time writing to anyone and when I saw the note I knew exactly how you felt. After reading what everyone posted I feel much better and really appreciate all of the info everyone submits for others to read. I have completed chemo, rad and started tamox 1 month ago. I feel like I am going crazy as I thought once I ended my tx I would be happy and feel so much better. I am in a fog and cannot seem to snap out of this depression. I was prescirbed Effexor but became very sick on it and stopped after 2 days. Did anyone else feel like this and does it get better? I could really use some positive insight into recovery. Thank you for any insight into how to make it through all this.

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited January 2010

    mmm5,

    Instead of continuing to hijack this thread (sorry ladies!) I will pm you for more about the ki67.

Categories