To excise or to not excise: the ? for newly diagnosed LCIS
Comments
-
Hi all, for the first time in my life at 50 y.o. I am given diagnosis of LCIS (never heard of it before of course). Previously in life, not worrying about getting cancer, no heavy family history of it (my mother just had IBC at 87 y.o. but i'm told b/c of her age, that really doesn't count as first degree relative risk factor, which makes sense to me). This is a shocker. Just found out less than a week ago--6 days ago now! I've been reeling. I took the whole week off from work, very anxious, staying up all night, getting lots of support though, already met with surgeon, oncologist, speaking with breast coordinator, setting up appt. w/ preventive medicine md outside kaiser. I have now taken a heavy crash course on LCI, burning the midnight oil, learning all I can, learning a LOT. BIG problem right now: I have to decide whether or not to go for an excisional biopsy as kaiser is recommending, stating it is now the standard-of-care. At first I just said, "okay" but It became a big deal to me when I met withe surgeon and because I'm small breasted, he said I could end up with misshapened breasts and he's seen it happen! He thinks it MIGHT go okay though. Needless to say, I'm getting 2nd opionion with a more experienced surgeon. I hope she says otherwise.i don'thave other markers for cancer. mammo had mildly suspicious calcifications prompting core biopsy and it all turned out negative, for both breasts. There's fibrocystic change in both breasts. I also took it upon myself prior to mammo to have a thermogram done. They showed more activity than desired (gave me a TH3 reading for those you familiar with thermos) which means per my interpreter, Dr. Amalu (google ABC news youtube to check him out), a 5% chance I have cancer. Now, hindsight, it looks like the thermo picked up the fibrocystic change and the lobular neoplasis in R. breast. So! I figure it I get a mammo that's negative, a thermogram negative for cancer and 2 biopsies negative for cancer, I probably don't have current co-existing cancer, and to find out if I do is the ONLY reason they're recommending excisonal biopsy, aka lumpectomy, aka partial mastectomy? That seems a bit like overkill to do partial mastectomy/lumpectomy for diagnostic purposes when i probably don't have cancer. I'm thinking if I plead to have MRI and US (ultrasound) and they come out negative as well, that would give me total of 5 screening tools failing to show cancer, then maybe I'd be comfortable confident enuf (95% or more?) that I probably don't have cancer right now, can skip lumpectomy, such an invasive procedure (I already have scarrings from total of 3 biopsies now, one from 9 yrs ago, the ONLY other time I ever had a mammo; hence my reaction all this overtreatment is OVER kill for some anyway, for a lot of folks. I know it's a personal decision but sometimes interventions really are too aggressive (sometimes not aggressive enuf)) and just wait, watch, observe. I'm counting on thermogram to help me a lot. I am a little less than a A cup breast size. I'm really concerned about unnecessary lumpectomy (excisonal biopsy) and scarring. Insurance wouldn't cover reconstructive surgery for that. Other small breasted women out there that can comment on excisional biopsy for LCIS? A doctor from UCSF who wrote article on overtreatment cancer right now did NOT seem to think excisional biopsy should be warranted in my case. Insights/feedback/ideas welcome.
Paula
-
First, welcome to our group! Wish you wouldn't have to be here - I wouldn't wish LCIS/PLCIS on anyone, but this is the ONLY place I've found other LCIS/PLCIS women.
Hey- I hadn't heard about LCIS before my 'suspicious calcifications' routine mammo. Before this routine mammo, I thought that breast cancer only happened to women who ignored their lumps. And I'm a pharmacist. See what I knew.
Hmmmm....I am a B cup, and after my excision, there was a dimple in my breast that may have been as big as 1-2 tablespoonfulls at most, over an area of maybe 3 inches. It completely filled in over the next 9-12 months, so now, except for the 1 inch scar (which is quite faded), it looks quite normal. A year after my excision, I had another biopsy, and I found out the surgeon had gone ALL over my breast - I had extensive scar tissue inches away from the 'lesion of concern'. (My LCIS was picked up as an incidental finding to 'suspicious calcifications'.) A 2nd opinion later said I had 'too much scar tissue to do an MRI'.
Your experience may differ, of course. I think there are others here who have had larger excisions than I had.
There is controversy. There is this thread from about 1.5 years ago. http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/95/topic/702563?page=2#idx_41
The American Cancer Society paper opined "Excision of LN is unnecessary provided that: 1) careful radiographic-pathologic correlation is performed; and 2) strict histologic criteria are adhered to when making the diagnosis. Close radiologic and clinical follow-up is adequate."http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18348299
Other studies can give other opinions. The figures differ. I think the range I've seen in various papers for finding 'something worse' after an initial core biopsy of LCIS and nothing worse ranged from about ?5-30%? (off the top of my head.)
More recently, 8% of this group found 'something worse'. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18517282
This paper was 8-19% http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17460455
(There are lots of papers in Pubmed, at least tens, maybe hundreds on this subject. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=PubMed)
LCIS women are more prone than average to get invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Another nickname of ILC is 'the sneaky one' because it can be difficult to diagnose or detect. It is usually slower growing though....
As far as 2nd opinions from prominent places - well I do encourage them, but get as many as you need. I was not happy with mine, but I'm glad I did it - the misinformation and uncertainty did inspire me to look more at journals and learn. (For example, my 2nd opinion at an NCI certified major university started out (nurse practitioner) with 'Here we use the Gail model for breast cancer risk.' and I finished her sentence with 'which specifically excludes patients with LCIS.' http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/)
But prediction of breast cancer is a VERY complex thing - there is a LOT of uncertainty. http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/23/1673
Do your research. Get as many 2nd opinions as you need. Then make your decision, and don't look back.
-
Paula -
Sorry you had to join us, but you'll find lots of support here.
My doctors (including the second opinion at an NCI-ceritifed hospital) have now said the following in my case:
LCIS - need surgical excision (NOT lumpectomy, which is also known as a "wide" excision or partial mastectomy in some literature) to ensure that there is no other cancer there. Most likely suspect is DCIS.
PLCIS - need lumpectomy with clear margins.
Of course, as leaf as said, there are many opinions out there. However, I have found that the standard-of-care is to get the surgical excision for LCIS.
Anyone who thinks all this breast cancer stuff is based totally on science is fooling themselves. The best we can do is research the literature and find a doctor that we trust. As one doctor told me, if we want to minimize the risk as much as possible, we would all get mastectomies, and that obviously is not smart. It appears that you have gone logically through the thought process in your case. The bottom line is: now that you're smarter about your own situation, what do you need to do to feel comfortable with your risk? It's different for each of us. Good luck, and let us know what you decided.
-
Thank you leaf and cornellalum for your thoughtful and helpful responses. I will follow up on thoughts/references and think more on it. I found both your responses reassuring. Right now am too nervous a wreck to think more about it. I stayed up all night reading Susan Loves crash course. It is so scary. I haven't slept. I keep reading more and more and have all this nervous overdrive activity going on--adrenalin pumping. I need to focus on letting go for a bit and shifting focus to trying to relax, or at least be not this scared. I have time, I have to keep reminding myself of that. BTW, as stats go, rate of co-existing current cancer if diagnosed with LCIS via core biopsy is 14%; however is unclear to me, but I think a lot of this is based on retrospective data where selection criteria for excisionals in which LCIS and cancer was discovered is unclear, ie might be sampling/selection bias error there. And as my radiologist said, its just stats. She thinks I'm playing mind games in my head a little too much and going over stats too much. Maybe all this worrying is for nothing! Based on what you both said, maybe that first surgeon really unnecessarily scared me when he said he'd do a WIDE excisional, and perform lumpectomy/excise as if I had cancer (ie partial mastectomy)!! I balked, Kaiser coordinator who is a gem said she'd refer me for 2nd opinion by their best breast surgeon and anything she says would trump what the first surgeon said. Maybe she'll say they'll just do excisional biopsy but not WIDE and I won't be deformed. That would calm me down. That is very interesting that they excise to mainly just find out if have DCIS, if that's the case. Anyway, I need to calm down. You've both been of tremendous help. It is reassuring, leaf, that your excisional biopsy indentions filled up. A 1" scar I can live with but I know everyone's different. I am really into the idea of tracking my progress or lack thereof with LCIS with thermograms. I was so encouraged when oncologist told me it is possible for LCIS to reverse! I am shooting for that goal. I will let you know if I find something that helps to do that! Thank you both. I feel encouraged.
Paula
-
Hi Paula. I was diagnosed with LCIS this year at 54. I would want the excisional surgery just to be sure. I had the MRI, which looked fine, but my breast surgeon said excisional was part of the process to rule out invasive cells around the orginal biopsy site. I have never heard or read anything about LCIS reversing itself. I would ask the oncologist for more info on that one. That would be a wonderful thing if so. Good luck with your decisions. Did the oncologist recommend Tamox or Evista? (sorry if you previously answered that and I overlooked it) I am on Evista with no side effects so far. Take care!
-
Oh and as far as the scar, I have 2 areas that were excised and the surgeon did a great job on my fairly small breast. I would say about an inch in 1 area and a little less around the nipple area. It has been since April and the areas seem to be looking much better to me. Hope you feel better about the excisional now.
-
Paula----I was diagnosed with LCIS 6 years ago. I had a wide excisional lumpectomy and it's barely a dimple, the scar faded nicely over time and was less than 2 inches. I took tamoxifen for 5 years, still go for high risk surveillance of alternating mammos with MRIs every 6 months, breast exams on the opposite 6 months, and now take evista for further preventative care. My choice isn't for everyone, but it is what works for me. I've never ever heard that LCIS could be reversible (from any of my docs or anything I've read or researched)--I wonder where he's getting that info?
Anne
-
That's interesting that one of you says they had wide excisional but others have not with core-needle biopsy found LCIS? I wonder what the standard of care is on that. perhaps it depends on how big the LCIS? Or if it was associated w/ mass vs. calcifications on mammo? Or perhaps it just depends on the surgeon! Did you all use a general surgeon? re cosmetic results, for whatever reason, I'm less concerned with scarring than dimpling, indentations. Sounds like it can take a bit for them to fill up. Yes, I am scared I have co-existing cancer, but I don't want deformity or needing reconstructive after lumpectomy (same as wide excisional) and in reconstrutive surgery world they do talk about that. I'm hoping I can get surgical biopsy or else I will just monitor. That used to be the standard of care for LCIS up to one year ago from what i've gathered. Yes, I was sooo surprised when i asked oncologist if it's possible for LCIS to reverse/regress. I guess most cancers can and do sometimes, so I guess that's what he's basing it on, but he's young. Maybe he doesn't know what he's talking about. He just meant theorectically and added it'd be hard to ever know because it's not like they're going to be excising that spot again--it'll be gone! and if they dno't go in there now, what are odds, they'll go in there and sample that spot again? Still, I"m hoping! I see better breast surgeon on 12/22 and then will have more info to decide with. I"m not comfortable with tamoxifen or evista either. My mother had complete hysterectomy at my age from endometrial hyperplasia caused by synthetic hormones (she lost a fair amount of energy after that) and has has extremely severe osteoporosis--6 vertebral breaks so far and is at high risk for total spinal column collapse. I am going to look into healthier breast prevention strategies (green tea, broccoli sprouts which are scientifically proven to stop breast cancer from growing per John Hopkins and they're very conservative about such things), etc. I'm going to a preventative medicine doctor with a nationally recognized rep (he's on advisory panel of life extension organization among other things) AND main thing, I'm going to try this strategy of trying these things and monitor progress or lack thereof by thermograms, which I'm very excited about (again, see Dr. Amalu being interviewed on ABC evening news via youtube or go to his website and see research articles suporting this noninvasive screening measure. It called what I have now pretty well).
Paula
-
The reason why they want to excise after a core biopsy that shows classic LCIS is NOT to excise the LCIS, but to see if there is something worse in the area (DCIS or invasive). Often times LCIS is not found AT the lesion that prompted the biopsy, but adjacent to it. (The rest of this message is only talking about classic LCIS, not pleomorphic LCIS (i.e. not PLCIS.)
My 'suspicious microcalcifications' were in 2 areas. When I glanced at my mammos during my first biosy, it looked like one area was maybe as big as half of my (nipple + areola.) NONE of my biopsies have been triggered by a mass. My excision was called 'LCIS found on core biopsy, verifying the diagnosis.'
It took many months, but my breast is now as soft as it used to be before I had any breast issues. (I have never had lumpy breasts.)
I have no idea whan your doc meant when he said LCIS could reverse itself. From what I've read, LCIS is often multifocal (occurs in several different spots in one breast). Its not unusual for it to be bilateral (in both breasts). They know this because they used to do routine bilateral mastectomies for LCIS.
But, the LCIS precursor issue aside, from what I've read, it doesn't really matter if you have multifocal bilateral LCIS. That's because even if you are in the minority and only have 1 small spot of LCIS in one breast, LCIS puts BOTH breasts at increased risk. (The risk may not be completely equal between the two breasts, but its close.) That's why I have not seen anyone in the last 10 years or so recommend anything but bilateral treatment - if treatment is desired. (I've never seen anyone commit to a number (%) of times LCIS is a precursor to something worse, but I've always seen the adjective 'small', e.g. LCIS may be a nonobligate precursor in a small number of cases.)
From what I've read, its not uncommon for the LCIS woman who does go on to get DCIS or invasive, that the DCIS or invasive occurs in an area that used to look normal (for example when the LCIS was diagnosed.) From what I have read, I don't think they know what makes LCIS put one at higher risk for something worse. But this is why people who choose to do so get prophylactic mastectomies for LCIS, and not just go for multiple attempts at clear margins or a single mastectomy.
Its like 'action at a distance'. LCIS is a weird disease.
-
I just wanted to introduce myself on this site to get involved in the dialog. This is the first time, I have participated in any online forum for anything--although I am on the computer all day. I am usually too busy for that. I had an excisional biopsy for a large # of non-suspicious calcifications in August, which found LCIS. The reason I had an excision straight off was because I am so small breasted that they could not do a needle procedure. About 10 years before that I had a biopsy which found atypical hyperplasia. The AH risks were not really explained to me in great detail, and I didn't worry too much but have alwasy gotten regular mammos etc and even self referred for a screening MRI. This time, in part, because the dr seemed to be encouraging me to go on Tamox, I took this much more seriously, researched much on the Internet, learned a lot and totally freaked out. My life stopped for several weeks. I could not eat. I learned everything about every protective drug, about the newest mastectomy techniques--everything. I am a planner and wanted to understand all my options going forward. I have a marketing/writing business that works for medical equipment cos and do a lot of work in cancer and breast cancer arenas--so I did know a lot but also had a lot to learn. Apparently, the LCIS must have been small because it was discovered when removed during the biopsy with clean margins.I am now in a high risk program at a large university hospital (columbia) and know my breast surgeon from business dealings. He is considered very good and is truly a compassionate, wonderful person on the human level. i plan to go on linical trials for vitamin D (being tested for decreasing breast density) for the next year while I visit varous drs--oncs, obgyn (for their take on Tamox), surgeon to find out about skin-sparing PMB (for way in the future) and do develop an overall plan. Being in touch with the people on this board is part of that plan. I am now much less afraid of the diagnosis (I actually went on antidepressants, which is not something I really do or in line with my self image, but I needed help. They worked) I have a fairly good understanding of the "sicence" and clinical aspects of LCIS, but some of the boards confused and scared me. It seemed a lot of people were having PBM for this condition--which didn't make a lot of sense, unless i did not understand the context of their decisions. Maybe they had had multiple biopsies, large areas of LVIS, problems getting clean margins or even cancer along with the LCIS. FINALLY QUESTIONS: Would a normal person in my situation even consider a PBM? Do most LCIS sufferers take Tamox (scares me more than the surgery, i think)? Do most people watch and wait and go on with their lives? A major issue for me is that i have small, dense breasts with extensive calcifications that make me very hard to image thru a mammo.
-
Well, treatment is such a personal choice that I don't know that giving statistics about what other women do is probably not very relevant.
Its almost impossible to find data about LCIS women in particular. In this 2004 study, A comparison of the 38 women with LCIS or AH who accepted tamoxifen and the 30 with these diagnoses who refused the drug demonstrated no significant differences with regard to mean age, family history of breast carcinoma, menopausal status, or history of hysterectomy. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15112259 So it looks likein this small study, about half of the women who were offered tamoxifen took it.
In this study that looked at women 1988-2001, In addition, all LCIS cases treated with a total mastectomy were excluded from all analyses (n 648, 12.6% of the total).17 ...Data from 1998-2002 indicated that 65% of LCIS patients treated with a total mastectomy received a bilateral mastectomy. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/112579964/PDFSTART So it looks like about 13% of this group had mastectomies, either unilateral or bilateral.
The date may be very important, because it wasn't until the early 1990s that lumpectomy+radiation was shown to usually be an option for women with early breast cancer.
about LCIS: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is sometimes considered an alternative approach for women at high risk for breast cancer. Many breast surgeons, however, now consider this to be an overly aggressive approach. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/HealthProfessional/page6 But many more women here seem to opt for PBMs than this sentence implies.
It has been shown that women that join support groups (online or in person) are, understandably, more likely to have issues with their condition. The women that opt for watchful waiting are much less likely to join support groups, as they are getting on with their lives. So you are much more likely to see women posting here who are opting for bilateral mastectomies or tamoxifen. The women who opt out of prophylactic mastectomies or antihormonals are more likely to just be getting on with their lives.
Whatever choice you make is very valid for you. No one can make this choice for you. This is NOT a 'majority rules' type of decision. No one should pressure you into one option or another.
-
Leaf, Thank you for your response. And, yes, I would agree that other people's decisions should not drive my own. However, every every dr and medical site has their biases, and I am trying to get a sense of whether going on Tamox is protocol for a LCIS diagnosis. that is the impression I had from my dr although he certainly was not pushing it against my will.
When I had a biopsy with atypia 10 years ago, I was told basically that this put me at a very slightly elevated risk and if I wanted to, I could see a breast specialist once a year in addition to having an annual mammo. No one mentioned any drugs like Tamox. This time, the Dr. told me that the LCIS was really no more risk that I had before with atypia (not sure that that is true) and said my lifetime risk of cancer was about 30 percent. I left feeling grateful I didn't have cancer. He advised me that I might consider Tamox, and I said I doubted I would. Then, when I looked up information on the Internet and found these forums where this diagnosis had really changed people's lives and they had mastectomies etc., I realized that I probably didn't understand the seriousness of the condition and got overly upset. So I'm still trying to get a perspective on the situation and the implications for my life. Time will tell for some of this--if I have a lot more biopsies, it might affect my decision. Any way, I will be on the site and looking for and sharing information. BTW, I also posted my inital introduction on its own string after I posted here. Thank you again.
-
I found some more studies that provided some information on what women chose. Notice the low number of subjects.
In this study in Italy, 35 of 40 women with LCIS are included in a follow-up programme, 5 of them had a bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16910353
In selected situations, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with or without reconstruction may be considered when atypical hyperplasia or LCIS is diagnosed. Although this reduces risk for developing subsequent breast carcinoma by 90%, patients selected for prophylactic mastectomy represent a small subgroup of lobular neoplasia patients and generally have other risk factors, such as strong family history or evidence of genetic predisposition. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16687097
In this 2004 study Fourteen patients (35%) were placed on a selective estrogen-receptor modulator. Eleven patients (28%) had bilateral mastectomy. Three patients had unilateral mastectomy http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862506
-
jjp-
yes, I am in the same situation as you. LCIS in Sept. BS and onc. downplayed it, but did suggest tamox. I said I would think about it. Meanwhile, I am waiting for a second opinion appt. at Sloan. (April). I PM ed some others with similar dx-really freaked me out what measures some take. Am I not taking this seriously enough either? I am a worrier and tend to be overly anxious because I've already over obsessed about it with friends, family, colleagues, etc. They all say- "but you don't have BC and probably never will" So then I feel foolish and now I don't talk about it. Just worry to myself, read these disscusion boards etc. I like reading what leaf has to say- very calming and informative.
-
Hi there Lori - I know this diagnosis (and diagnostic procedure) can cause a lot of anxiety. I actually went into mental therapy shortly after my LCIS diagnosis. (And was promptly diagnosed with a PTSD-like syndrome.) If things get too complicated, you may want to consider seeing a counselor to try to clarify your options for yourself.
Your feelings are valid! Don't let others define your feelings! The mind is not always linear. It doesn't have to 'make sense'. I have had PTSD-like symptoms and sometimes I have NO CLUE as to what triggered them. It is better now. Things can be very, very complex. Take as much time as you need to decide what to do.
-
Hi Lori51
We are both going through very much the same thing. Did you notice that I said I had myself put on anti-depressants I was so upset, which really, really helped me. Your experience when you tell others is exactly what mine has been. Occasionally, it is the opposite, they don't understand and think I need to be treated for breast cancer and are very upset. At this point, I think I have made my peace with the diagnosis to some extent. But, I do plan to talk to many doctors etc and get opinions about what are my best options. Likely I will go on Tamox or Relox during the next few years. I also want to learn about what a mastectomy would involve and try to get comfortable with what would hopefully be my worst case scenerio only if things get a lot worse.
What are you getting a second opinion on at Sloan--what to do about LCIS or on your actual biopsy results? I am also in the New York area I went to Columbia/ NY Presbyterian because I know the breast surgeon there. They also seem to have a good high risk program.
This board seems to have a lot of good information, especially Leaf.
-
First, leaf- what is PTSD syndrome? Do you receive counseling or medication? What type?
jjp- I have an appt. at Sloan's Breast Surveillance Center for high risk women. The earliest appt. they could give me is in April. I sent them a long application, recent pathology reports, MRI reports, etc. I guess this is going to be my second opinion. I don't know what quite to expect there. I have read on their web site that they offer counseling, nutrition classes, etc. I just wish I didn't have to wait. Meanwhile, I have my 6th month follow up with local radiologist and BS in March. I am assuming they will tell me to go on tamox. At first I wouldn't consider it, but now maybe I would. Did either of you read Dr. Susan Love's book? She seems to suggest it is not necessary to take tamox. with LCIS. Just monitor. I don't know. Do either of you have any suggestions on what type of anti anxiety med. I could ask for? Who should I ask? My GYN?
Thanks!
-
Lori--I was diagnosed with LCIS 6 years ago. I was given the standard 3 options of close monitoring, tamoxifen, or BPMs. All my docs (onc/pcp/gyn/rad/bs) felt BPMs too drastic a choice, even with my family history of bc (mom had ILC); I chose high risk surveillance which I am still doing. I have digital mammos alternating with MRIs every 6 months, breast exams on the opposite 6 months, I took tamoxifen for 5 years with minimal SEs (mostly hot flashes), and now I take Evista for further preventative measures. Recently I asked my oncologist if I was on the right track with all this---his response was "unless the worry is keeping you awake at night or it's affecting your quality of life, you could get BPMs". But it's not and it doesn't, so for now I will continue with what I'm doing. If I were to have another issue requiring biopsy, I might reconsider. But I'm not at that point yet. It's a very personal decision, one we each have to ultimately make for ourselves.Please feel free to PM me if you'd lilke to talk.
Anne
-
First, leaf- what is PTSD syndrome? Do you receive counseling or medication? What type?
PTSD, or post-traumatic stress disorder, is an anxiety problem that develops in some people after extremely traumatic events, such as combat, crime, an accident or natural disaster.
People with PTSD may re-live the event via intrusive memories, flashbacks and nightmares; avoid anything that reminds them of the trauma; and have anxious feelings they didn’t have before that are so intense their lives are disrupted.
Adapted from the Encyclopedia of Psychology http://www.apa.org/topics/ptsd/index.aspx00
In my case, I probably started having trauma very early in life (before I could talk.) I have talk-therapy, I did some cognitive therapy, and I take an antidepressant (sertraline), even though it probably interacts some with my tamoxifen.
-
Hi Leaf et all (and the LCIS gang), just to clarify. Yes, absolutely the ONLY reason they want to do surgical biopsy with me is NOT to remove the LCIS lesion (that would be silly since, like you said, it's likely to be multi-focal and bi-lateral (I think that's true for something like 30-40% of LCIS patients) but to makes sure they didn't incidentally catch the outer edges of a cancer when they went in there with the core biopsy. So, yeah, it's just to see if I have cancer now. The only way to know for sure is a surgical biopsy. But retrospective studies have shown that it is MORE likely there's co-existing cancer when core needle that finds the LCIS was originally prompted by a mammo showing a mass as opposed to when core needle biopsy was prompted by mammo with microcalcifcations, That's the point I'm making. If these different diagnostic screening measures are discordant for LCIS alone finding (ie a mass showing up in other diagnostic screening tools) they about have to do an excisional If multi-modal diagnostic tools are concordant for no mass,cancer, then it's a little less pressing to do excisional, although that could be debated and I think it's controversial (at times a contentious) debate going on in the field over that. But I do think a lumpectomy for small breasted woman diagnostic purposes is aggressive alright. I read 31% of women after lumpectomy continue to experience pain, that may depend of level of skill of the surgeon. 5% are unhappy w/ cosmetic results of women who have lumpectomy (I would assume its greater among small breasted women). I know, I know, that it may seem to some absolutely necessary to find out for sure and not play games with this, but it could also be argued that a lumpectomy (partial mastectomy) might be an extreme measure to take for diagnositc purposes when odds are (statistically) 86% chance it won't have been necessary (hindsight being 20-20). Anyway, as I keep saying, it's a cost-benefit-risk ratio analysis that one has to make on a very personal level. for me, I am waiting to see what I get in 2nd opionion from better surgeon. See if she's a little more confident than the first one that she can get in there and excise the necessary amount for diagnostic perhaps without misshaping my breasts.
I've read it can take 3 yrs. for breast to normalize after a lumpectomy. I take it almost all of you have had the wide excisional biopsy/lumpectomy for diagnostic purposes to make sure you did not ahve the co-existing cancer. Is it taking that long for the breast to "normalize"? It's funny, even with the little core needle biopsy I had, my breast is a little indented. I assume that'll fill in not-too-long a time. I appreciate everybody's input thus far. It's encouraging to read all of you who do NOT seem upset about results of lumpectomy cosmetically, even among the small breasted.
Paula
-
JJP, boy can I relate to your post. Yes, I have not gone to work since being diagnosed 10 days ago, I have loss of appetite, I am researching everything under the sun. I'm a psychologist, so it is somewhat in my nature to be research oriented (although I'm a clinical psychologist, not researching), . I'm curious, I hope this is not too personal, but if you are so small breasted, cannot do mammo, when they did excisional on you, didn't that result in taking out huge portion of your breast tissue? for me, PBM is way too drastic prevention. That's for me. If I had loved ones and family that died from breast cancer and it ran in my family, I"m sure I'd feel differently. Anyway, just to share there are TONS of other diagnostic screening tools out there that are looking better than mammos. I've been researching this stuff like crazy--ductal lavage, Susan loves intraductal treatment approach, optical imaging techniques (with MRIs and ultrasound, I think) where breast size probably wouldn't matter and they don't use radiation I don't think. Wow, you are soooo lucky to be working with researcher from Columbia. Would it be Dr. Feldman? I came across his name as Columbia breast surgeon who has primary interest in minimally invasive biopsies. I was thinking of flying out there just to see him. I'm really interested in future research on cryosurgery for destroying breast cancer that would not involve any kind of invasive surgery. They can just freeze and destroy that one little areas if the tumor is less than 1.5 or no greater than 1 cm (something like that. I'm not sure exactly). Anway, I just see such promising research out there, we're on the brink of major breakthroughs, so I personally would not want to opt for something drastic prophylactically, even if it is hard to live with this fear and uncertainty. That's just how I feel for me. Iike I said, I understand PBM and I have entertained it. I am extremely reluctant to take Tamox, I won't do it at this point. SO, my plan is to try other things that decrease risk and then try to discover markers/means to measure my progress (ductal lavage, blood markers, thermogram, etc.)--Paula
-
I can't find the stats now (darn it! I think it was in the Susan Love book? not sure), but I THINK a substantial portion of women starting on Tamox can't stand it for the full 5 yrs. and don't end up completing the 5 yr. course. maybe even the majority (hence some women opt for PBM just to avoid all the downsides to these SERMs. But most of you out there would know more than me what it's like to take them. I won't consider it or evista at this point bc of family history of synthetic estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia resulting in full hysterectomy as well as fam. history of severe osteoporosis.--Paula
-
Lori (and LCIS gang) I think "but you don't have cancer and probably never will" is a point to take into valid consideration. Genetic testing and meeting with a breast cancer prevention specialist and a breast cancer center to assess your individual risks may be of great benefit. That's what i plan on doing. And trying to research and discover a way I can monitor progress/efficacy of my interventions (they do that in clinical trials to assess efficacy of interventions so it's certainly plausible) so that I can reduce my risks, and I plan to try plenty of them, just not Tamox or Evisa if I can help it.--Paula
-
I wish I could go to Columbia. You guys are lucky and I think will be in GREAT hands. I'm thinking of going to UCSF; doctor there supported my thinking to not seek wide-excisional biopsy given my circumstances (it would depend on the LCIS person and related risks and other factors). You know, as far as PTSD, this IS a trauma you guys, This is a bona-fide trauma to undergo to even learn of this diagnosis. It is so hard and scary to even know what to do and what not to do because they're all to some extent shots in the dark and they--the various options-- all can have serious, traumatic consequences, hence it's so intense, and so frightening when so much seems to be riding it. It could be relatively easy to overreact or underreact and there's really no definitive answer as to which would be what. I think it's just taking the time and exploring options till each individual can reach a decision that THEY can live with because they're the ones who're going to have to.--Paula
-
Hello everyone,
I was dxd with LCIS/ADH with a stereotactic biopsy, and the excisional showed LCIS/ADH/ALH. The reason for the excisional was to see if there was an invasive component.
The surgery went really well. I had pain for about 3-4 days. I iced constantly and took some pain medication. Now, 5 months later, my breast looks pretty good. I have a 3" scar about 1" above my nipple, but I am pretty happy with the results.
After much research and talking to different doctors, I have decided on Tamox and close monitoring. I have been on Tamox for six weeks. The main SEs for me is dizziness and nausea (my bs insists that these are not SEs of Tamox, but my pharmacist and family doctor disagree with him). The SEs are getting better now.
Everyone must decide what is best for them. Some will decide on PBMs, others close monitoring, and others Tamox. You need to do what is best for you. For me, Tamox and close monitoring work for me RIGHT NOW. I may change my mind in the future.
-
Paula---the risk of endometrial cancer from tamox is very low, less than 1%, and both tamox and evista are very good for your bones.
Mary--sometimes it takes a few months for your body to adjust to the medication. I never had any nausea or dizziness from tamox, sorry to hear that. I tolerated it very well for 5 years. Now I take evista and am doing fine on that as well. I continue with high risk surveillance of mammos and MRIs. Just got approved for genetic testing today from my insurance company.
anne
-
Anne -congrats on your insurance OK of your genetic testing!! Woohoo! The possibility of more answers is good!
I sent you a PM, Paula.
-
Hi Paula7
I think we can trade a lot of useful information.
To clarify, I can have and do have mammos. However, I am too small chested to have a needle biopsy on the new "tables" they use. So any biopsy for me has to be surgical, which will be difficult and cause scarring that makes imaging less effective going forward. I didn't really have any fear of the biopsy because I had never heard of any of these issues of denting etc. I had a previous biopsy, but it was almost under my arm and you really could not see it. It had little side effects. This one is still sore about a month 1/2 later. I see a little indent but nothing awful. It doesn't bother me. But I am concerned that the pain will stop. I think it is still healing. The Dr, cut around my nipple and tunneled in so there was no scar.
The LCIS was an incidental finding and apparently had clean margens by chance. I am guessing that they may take more tissue from you if (if) you had a needel biopsy with LCIS because they want to be sure there is no invasive cancer around it. The only way to do that is a surgical biopsy, and most would feel you would be smart to do it. The nipple cut is a neat trick--scaring is the rim of the nipple.
My concern with mammos is that because I am small chested, dense tissue with many calcifications, I do not image well and mammo is not a good screening tool going forward.
Through business I am involved with medical equipment and medical associations, including one involving breast surgeons. As a result, I know a lot about breast imaging and cancer, and I would be happy to share with you. What you should know is that each modality is sensitive for different things. Calcifications, for eg., that in a certain pattern suggest DCIS will show on a mammo but not on an MRI. Invasive lobular cancer,(not LCIS--invasive) will often show on a Nuc Med SPECT scan (often called Dilon for the camera brand they use). Ultrasound provides other info. I am tall and thin--and honestly my breasts are not a big part of my identity. Honestly, I'd be more upset to gain 30 lbs than to have dented breasts, but some people of course feel just the opposite.
Now for Dr. F He is, in fact, my surgeon and I know him from business. I would imagine that in his position he is very talented. What I can tell you is that he is an amazingly caring, kind and knowledgable person. I have also run into people (phycists and scientists), who unsolicited told me that he was one of the most talented and caring surgeons they knew.
Initally, every muscle in my body was like in lock down mode, and I couldn't eat a thing for 3 weeks.
Personally, I would not do PMB unless I had to have multiple biopsies or I had DCIS. Initially, I said no way to Tamox but I may change my mind. There are other chemopreventive choices. I was told that my risk was 10 % for the next 5 years. so ican live with that, but as I get older and risk gets higher, I may think again. Let's keep in touch through this board.
-
Lori51
I have read Love's books and what she says about Tamox. I am looking at my age and current risk factor to make a decision. I had atypical hyperpalsia 10 years ago, and some might have counseled me to go on tamox then, I think. I said to an onc, well if I did that, it would have outrun its usefulness and I didn't get cancer. Why not wait until you are older and your risk is greater? She just laughed--because she didn't know how to respond, I think.
Today's anti-deperess are serotonin-uptake inhibitors. Depression can be biochemical at some point and this medication restores the serotonin you are missing due to depression. It's not like you're taking a drug that you are "on" while it's in your system and it makes you high or alters you mood. It helps alter your body chemistry so that it is easier to lift yourself out of depression. Any doctor can prescribe them, but you need to be on the right one and take the right dose. That can be tricky. they can make you feel worse. A psychiatrist really knows best. Again, I have not taken these before, but I needed to do something because I was really stuck in a bad, bad place. It truly helped.
-
I'm a psychologist and I'm personally not TOO big on antidepressants. They have their place, certainly for major depression, but they have their drawbacks too. For me, bottom line/question is if one is able to function or not, how badly depression is interfering w/ one's ability to do that, and then I guess how persistent, intractable it may be. Sometimes its just normal to feel sad and in pain and scared. I just esp. am uncomfortable with SSRIs (antidepressants) being used then. I don't think we really know the long term effects of these things yet. I read recently somewhere, can't remember where, it may be serotonin is not really what's at play with SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) anyway, but rather is their effect on different part of brain. I can't remember what now. Therapy could be a big help. jjp, I am again so envious that you get to see Dr. F. I have spent the entire last 2 weeks researching all I could find and in that search I decided if I could have any doctor to help me right now it would be Dr. F. I think he was voted one of top best doctors in nation. (oh, nipple trick to reduce scarring--interestingly Susan Love warns patients to be careful with this bc a surgeon can more apt screw that up and damage nipple nerves and doesn't the tunneling leave scars or do something negative, I can't remember what?_ But Dr. F looks like the best, He looks VERY caring and his photo suggests same. I would feel in good hands with him. About diagnostic screening tools, Ive read of so many new ones now, my head is spinning. But I've also read big caveats of radiation being worse in some of these , like the breast specific gamma imaging. I wonder about the molecular breast imaging that mayo clinic is current doing clinicial trials on and radiation. I read CT scans really radiate. I read there's articles/opinions about all this from top notch sources, not just outlier hooey too-alternative type folks questioning this and warning about it. now reading the posts, I'm finding another reason to avoid an excisional and that's the scarring it'll do to me inside that'll get in the way of future screenings. I'm kind of crazy perhaps, but I don't even want to know more bc if I have cellular level DCIS it may well never turn into anything more, it could even disappear on its on but if the docs were to find out about it, they'd want to cut/hack away and nuke the damn thing and put me on meds that could give me cancer later, etc. So far, I feel all this "help" is causing me more harm than good, but if I can turn this around, I'll feel differently. Okay, I know most would not share that reaction but that is how I feel. Not a lot of trust I guess and not good experiences thus far (although everyones nice on a personal level. It's just the system. I probably should change thread soon to alternative treatments bc I'm deciding I will monitor this with thermogram, mammos perhaps, ultrasounds that are SAFE (Have you heard of SoftVu? that looked like a nice, new ultrasound and safe) and try to give preventative medicine a chance. I think proliferative growth seems like something that could be turned around. Anyway, That's my plan for me. I would love to correspond more with you jjp about these screening measures but not for a bit when my heads cleared and I can organize what I've found/learned thus far bc I am ending up with bunch of questions. Right now my priorities are safety and reducing false positives. I've had enuf o f those! At least kaiser docs are not balking too much with my sentiments, are being supportive and even validating (although --hey leaf--my oncologist also used Gail model on me! Not even an NP but an oncologist!! Why do they do that? So crazy!------Paula--PS: I still don't know how to PM somebody (I seem to be able to reply to PMs though). If I want to PM any of you, how do I do that? And I wish I could copy and paste urls to share with you guys to provide basis for my lack of trust, shall we say. Anyway, I may not post for awhile (then again I might) as I feel I am reaching my decision on how to proceed and coming to terms and need to step back. I've been obsessing too much. You guys have been agreat support. But don't take me at my word. I am too lengthy in my writings and can't seem to tear myself away from this topic, so I could be right back at it every day for awhile, ie I don't know. ---Best-=--Paula
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team