"Evidence-based medicine" can be blind
The first time I heard the words "evidenced-based medicine" was when I had a consultation with an ob/gyn with the question on whether or not I should get a hysterectomy. The doctor kept me sitting in a paper gown in a cold examining room for over 30 minutes. When he came into the room, he dismissively waved in the air a letter I wrote to him which explained my concerns (cysts on my ovaries, growing fibroid, enlarged endometrium lining and breast cancer). Before even introducing himself he said, "You don't need a hysterectomy - I practice evidence-based medicine - and you're in the same risk category as every other woman in the world." I was shocked at his attitude - very indifferent with an obvious superiority complex..............thus started an intellectual arm-wrestling which lasted about two weeks - which I eventually WON........he finally agreed to do the hysterectomy, but without conceeding any of my points (that my PERSONAL evidence for an increased risk in gynecologic cancer outweighed his statistical evidence.) Ultimately - because of my increasing fear of getting MRSA again - and because I didn't want to force the hand of ANY surgeon (how safe are you, under anesthesia, with a surgeon who doesn't want to be there?) I decided to forgo the surgery - but not after he performed a endometrial biopsy on a "suspicious thickness"..........which came out B9, thank God.
I tell my story because it shows my emotional response to the words "Evidence-based medicine" which is in the news these days due to the new mammography guidelines. I have a scientific bent of mind - always have - I worked for a medical publisher (correcting studies submitted for publication for a major medical journal).........prior to that I worked for a major pharmaceutical company working as a secretary for an MD/PhD in analgesics and cancer/research. I am not intimidated by the superior attitude many doctors take with their patients........ I do respect their education IF they show me they haven't lost an open mind.
That said..........I have a major problem with accepting the "mantra" of "evidence-based medicine" because oftentimes there IS no evidence to support ANY treatments. So does this mean we stop everything that has been of apparent usefulness for patients? What did the doctors in the distant past due? They listened to "old-wives tales".........they searched for the science behind these tales..........they visited "witch-doctors" to understand why some of their treatments work..............they studied with herbal doctors in the Far East............how do we think we found ANY medicine to help us? All this happened prior to statistical analysis. Of course we've come so far in the 20th century and the future looks bright IF we can get enough researchers interested in performing large studies.............but that doesn't mean we cancel out ALL other information.
It's simplistic black and white thinking that leads us astray in many areas of life..........I like to remember - there is always the "gray"...........thus I try not to attack people on the Alternative Therapy threads............much of what they say has a component of sound common sense.........oftentimes I feel like it's NOT our scientists with their LACK of evidence that is propelling us forward.............but the Good Earth, and the grace of God and our natural abilities to heal............we need to remember our past. In a similar way, sciemologists were shocked a couple of years ago at the huge tsunamis that destroyed entire islands and killed thousands of people. There had been no "evidence" that it would occur.............because no one was watching..............except for the native island people on a particular island. They remembered the "old stories" from their grandparents, that "when the sea and the earth are angry, the sea is like an scorned woman and she will run far away, exposing the sand below, and when this happens, the people must go inland to the high hills because the sea will return with great anger and will try to destroy the earth." All the people on this island survived the tsunamis. I was very very impressed. Read the stories at this link about indigenous people and how they survived the tsunamis
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/LEEPERFY/
The following quote should be required reading of arrogant, closed-minded scientists, even in the medical field:
Although our understanding of science has increased and information technologies have become intense, we have lost our human's primary instinct of survival. We have much to learn from the keen environmental awareness that many indigenous people possess.
We in the 21st century could learn much by not forgetting the old stories............and by not relying solely on "evidence-based medicine" to make our decisions..........as one former doctor who wrote the following in 2004:
So you see the problem I have with evidence based medicine. The evidence is not understood. Perhaps my problem is not so much with evidence based medicine as with its users, who find in it a useful but sometimes dangerous rock of certainty in an uncertain world. I'm sorry, colleagues, but you've still got to observe, and you've still got to think.
You can read his opinion at the following link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC390232/
Thank you everyone for letting me share my thoughts and opinions on this topic. Feel free to dissent, discuss, or disseminate this information any way you'd like.
Comments
-
Swimangel, you know I agree with you 100% on this!
Two things immediately come to mind regarding the limits of "evidence-based medicine":
1) Individuals are not groups -- just because findings apply to "94%" (or 78%, or whatever) of a group, does not mean they apply to everyone. And if you are one of the "6%" or "22%" or even 1 out of a hundred or 1 out of a million -- the fact that you are in the minority does not render your situation "nonexistent." Looked at another way, if there's "only" a 1% possibility of, say, a life-threatening reaction to a drug -- if you get that reaction, YOUR probability is 100% for you.
2) The other thing is what you said about "no evidence." I have to thank Otter for sending me an article that repeated this axiom for medical/scientific researchers: A lack of proof of effectiveness is not the same thing as PROOF OF LACK OF EFFECTIVNESS.
-
Hi Ann - thanks for writing - and I found another article that explains EBM - the writer also emphasizes what Otter sent you:
No evidence of effectiveness does NOT mean evidence of no effectiveness
It's a long article - I'm still reading it - here's the link if anyone else is interested:
The use and abuse of Evidence-based Medicine
Edited to add: here's one quote from the above link that I really like:
The first rule of statistics is - or should be - that you don't always need statistics. Statistics is an aid to common sense, not a substitute.
P.S. Edited to add yet another great quote regarding EBM - note the word "tyranny":
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avoiding abuses of EBM - the potential for tyranny in evidence based guidelines and protocol:
It is up to individual doctors, in consultation with individual patients, to decide which evidence applies. Sackett (1996) identified the risk that, without clinical expertise, practice could become tyrannized by evidence. Even the best external evidence will not apply to all cases. Worldwide, healthcare commissioners, whether government or insurance based, look to evidence based clinical protocols and pathways to ensure value for money. Deviance from such guidelines can result in financial and even legal penalties for doctors. But strict adherence means a dumbed down, monodimensional, mechanistic and unthinking approach, which has been dubbed "cookbook medicine". In 1996, Sackett stated that EBM could not result in a slavish, cookbook approach. But in 2007, the EBM cookbook has become very popular with health commissioners. Its recipes are chosen by committee. Health economists decide what is best for the population. The chosen dishes are then served up franchised, quality controlled to ISO 9000, Mcdonalds fashion. Newly created regiments of specialist practitioners, unburdened by the skepticism that follows a broad medical education, are taught to follow the rules, follow the guidelines, and all will be well. The public like it because they are getting their treatment quicker. But is this fast medicine good for your health in the long run? The best defence against this misapplication of EBM is to be skilled and confident enough to know when the guidelines apply, and when they do not.
Guidelines are for guidance of the wise, and the blind obedience of foolsHampton (2003) wrote that
"Guidelines for medical management are now part of medical life. A fool - loosely defined as someone who does not know much about a particular area of medicine - will do well to follow guidelines when treating patients, but a wise man (again, loosely defined as someone who does know about the disease in question) might do better not to follow them slavishly. The problem is that the evidence on which guidelines are based is seldom very good. Clinical trials have a variety of problems which often make their relevance to 'real world' medicine dubious. The interpretation of trial results depends heavily on opinion, and a guideline that purports to be evidence based is actually often opinion based. A guideline will depend on the opinions of those who wrote it, and the wise man will use his judgement and give due weight to his own opinions and expertise."
-
Sounds like you need a new gyno. It also sounds like it's easier (less hassle) for him to rely on EBM instead of treating the individual patient.
I had a vaginal hysterectomy before I had cancer. No abdominal surgery was necessary for the procedure. I'm glad my uterus is gone. One less thing to worry about. Down the road, I had my ovaries removed due to an 8 cm tortion cyst, which turned out to be a huge invasive abdominal procedure.
While I realize you're discussing EBM on this thread, it really sounds like your doctor has to go. My docs evaluate the whole .. EBM, the patient, and what is best for the patient specifically. My PCP once told me she practices medicine .. that it is part science, part art and part medicine.
hugs,
Bren
-
Bren - your doctors sound fantastic.......fortunately I don't go to this obstetrical gynecologist routinely, it was only for a consultation. All my regular doctors are wonderful. My story about the insenstive "foolish" gynecologic oncologist was only to illustrate my emotional response to the words "Evidence-based medicine" which is what the new mammo guidelines are based on - and what so many doctors are spouting these days. It's a slippery slope.........and I can see many doctors who are overworked with little time to do their own research, sliding down very quickly - along with our insurance companies, sigh.
-
Evidence-based medicine is indeed more of the science than the art. Stats are fine--for others.
But there have been GOOD things that have come from more emphasis on EBM--like less unneeded treatment with antibiotics, for that "just in case" infection that is either viral or will clear on its own. For treating asthma more with steroid inhalers initially, then just albuterol. For waiting a few weeks on getting an MRI for a sprained knee (in most people).
But I agree, swimangel, any doc who comes in spouting EBM as a reason not to have a dialog with me about what I know about my body, needs no longer to be my doctor. Anyone who is so rigid as to go ONLY by the book should probably go into research, not work with individuals.
Anne
-
Just want to clarify that I work in medical research, and I know good things have come from evidence-based medicine! It's just that a pendulum has swung too far in the direction of randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs), and meta-analyses of large trials, being considered the ONLY source of "evidence"... often without regard to the quality of those trials.
I've posted this link before, but I will again, because it illustrates the point so well:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7570/701And here's a more serious article about the problem of dismissing evidence that doesn't come from RCTs:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7570/701 -
Great articles Anne - thanks for posting them!
-
A bc friend of mine said the following:
"I would rather be anecdotally alive than statistically dead."
Thanks Brenda for that!
-
I was a Victum of EBM, and the quote:". Newly created regiments of specialist practitioners, unburdened by the skepticism that follows a broad medical education, are taught to follow the rules, follow the guidelines, and all will be well. " says it all for me.
I had urinary retention post op--not uncommon. The first year resident in neurosurgery, (read intern, graduated 4 months previous) was up in arms that I'd had a straight in and out cath the night before (requested my ME and showiing a residual of 600cc) and wrote orders that I was to never have one again. Her reason: possible introduction of bacteria to infect the hardware in my back.--Again, first part of a good reason. BUT, just what was I supposed to do with all the urine accumulating in my bladder? She just would Not get past the "hospital acquired infection:" part of straight in and out catherizations. She put the fear of God into the nurses who would not call a more senior resident or my doctor. Argue, I did, but to no avail. My bladder became the size of a large grapefruit, documented on x-ray! that she ordered to eval. my hip pain, that no one ever examined--just x-rayed.
She refused to listen to any reasoning about ruptured bladder, retrograde urine into th kidineys, etc, etc. Even my surgeon's nurse was at a loss of what to do??? She ordered a urology consult. LOL I finally peed a little at a time into a towel---took me over 6 hours to get relief---and then the urology consult arrived!!!! Agreed with my dx and said that the first yr. "will have to learn". Meantime, I learned what a level 9 on the pain scale means.
Cookbook medicine (EBM) has been discussed and demeaned by clinical practioners for decades (to all the researchers out there!). stats are great, and can be made to say anything. GUIDELINES are a much better way to practice medicine. And if all else fails, examine/and listen to the damn patient. Mayo's and some bunch in the northwest ??? are going on EBM, and all are very happy to be on a salary and work 9-5. Oh, and to be writing papers and collecting stats.
Personally, I want my doc to understand that the body is inter-related---knee bone connected to the thigh bone kinda thing and to know more about the body than just his/her specialty. That's why a neurosurgeon got a picture of my hip but didn't examine me ---wouldn't have known how to examine a hip number one, and number two wouldn't know to diagnose bursitis, let alone how treat it.
I feel for you young folks, you (and my kids) have to live with the new medical treatment and medical educations, and cost containment-- fortunately, I'm old enough that I won't be around so much longer to have to know the difference between a doc who treats people and one who practices cook book medicine.
-
Iodine--I remember that the nurses cringed every July when the new residents came on board. I'm sorry to hear that you were caught in that cycle. Without doubt, medicine is both science and art. Isn't it possible that legal medicine is out of control and helped to erode that aspect? New residents though are a different story. I remember that they came in fresh and eager with the latest knowledge and techniques. Then they were reined in by the professional staff and nursing staff. Within two years they were better seasoned with the wisdom of the ages, ready to impart their own on the world.
Without doubt (IMHO) cook book medicine followed the pressures of best practice models of efficiency and cost containment hand in hand with malpractice gone Vegas.
Maybe there's a lesson to be learned?
-
One lesson I learned - it helps to have a doctor in the family - thanks to my BIL (a cardiologist at UPenn) who spoke at length to the gastroenterologist on staff (who was ready to do an endoscopy at the insistance of my original PS who was convinced my fevers were due to a gall-stone)........the gastroenterologist listened to my BIL (they went to med school together) - and he refused to do the endoscopy - and felt confident enough to stand toe-to-toe with the PS and insist he aspirate a pocket of fluid near my abdominal incision which proved I had MRSA. (The PS was not very happy when he came in to aspirate the fluid........he was rough on me.........I had to stifle my screams and cries due to the pain.) If not for my BIL and his connection with the gastro-guy, they would have gone in to remove that gallstone, the MRSA would have spread and no doubt I would not be here now writing to you about the blindness of EBM.
So - be friends with any family members who are doctors..........they can help save your life. EBM carries less weight when it comes to family..............one of the best questions that I still ask my doctors is "what would you do if I were your mother or sister?"
-
swimangel172 - just posted a rant in the HER2 forum - on this very topic - the toxic effect of medical egos. Your experience bears out my own and your insight about not wanting to be at the mercy of someone wielding a scapel when they think THEY know better is very very apt. I am so sorry they were rough with the aspiration - I had a similar - hideous experience when I had a D and C years ago - I was so sore EVERYWHERE when I came around - I thought they must have used my poor old body as some sort of punching bad because I dared to insist on being treated according to the schedule they had told me instead of being treated last - when it was taking all my nerve just to turn up - that was a massive low point and despite needing more surgery - I have not since gone back - just too darned scared!!!
You did exceptionally well to withstand all of this so you don't have to deal with the horrible aftermath of someone else's mistake...yes 'evidence' is only useful in the hands of those wise enough to use it properly....and I also agree - for much of our journey - there is NO evidence of what will and will not work - just the old try it and see approach
Fidelia
-
As ER charge in a university hospital, staffed with Interns (not first year residents) who spent a year rotating thru all specialties, I was one of those nurses who didn't look forward to July 1. Did you know that the death rate rose over July 4 and Labor Day weekends? Every year! Hmmmm.
Most fun was when we'd have a code and the 'tern would demand I call the "harvey team" (cardiac team) and I would calmly whisper in his ear---Doctor, we ARE the harvey team! At least I didn't ask if he wanted fries with that. LOL
At least those guys/gals recognized a human body---not just the bones, or nerves or stomach, or whatever.
As mentioned before, even if you don't have a medical family member---have family with you at all times. Yes, they'll get tired, but it will save you a great deal of misery. Unfortunately, I'm married to a surgeon and docs don't know that help is needed in the patient's room----they are just accustomed to writing orders and leaving, to return to have "it" done. My dh, bless him, only "got it" when he waited 10 hours to talk with the middle resident to request my dressing be changed first day post op. When said resident finally arrived at 11 pm, he declined to change the dressing because my surgeon didn't want any of his dressings changed in the hospital (sound familiar: hospital acquired infection). Of course, he didn't observe the dressing which was saturated and hanging off my back. but he did agree to call my dh at the motel and then again refused to change it. He Did agree to look at it and if he didn't agree it needed changing, my dh would talk with my surgeon in the morning. Of course, he changed the damn dressing.
What all this says is one Must become one's own advocate, and if at all possible, have friends or family in the hospital with you all the time. As I said, I was the victum of the worst nursing and medical care I've ever seen. I truly never dreamed it could get that bad. And I'm one who stands up for herself and actually knows why something should or shouldn't be done. God help all the folks who are at the mercy of those hospital staff who know so little.
-
Iodine - your story is very scary! I'm so sorry for your awful medical care. It speaks volumes to me about the differences in protocols in different hospitals in different geographic areas.........like they say in Real Estate, sometimes it's a matter of "location, location, location"..........and ALWAYS we must remember, "buyer beware". When they were scheduling my big abdominal surgery to repair the hernia and take out the gall bladder, originally I was scheduled to be in the hospital over the July 4th holiday. I called my surgeon's office and said I was NOT comfortable being in a hospital after major surgery during a big holiday when no one would be around but inexperienced residents, but the secretary said it was "impossible" to switch surgery dates because all the operating rooms were booked. Then just two weeks prior to my surgery, she called back and said, "the doctor had to reschedule my surgery due to family obligations". How miraculous..........suddenly an operating room schedule could be changed without difficulty when the SURGEON requests the change! It worked out as a benefit for me because I was no longer stuck in the hospital over the July 4th holiday............but it was an epiphany moment for me, when I realized "No - it's impossible" is used for patient requests, but NOT for surgeon requests. I do understand that it would be insanity to give in to every patient's request, however,my surgeon is a friend of my family and he knew I waited over a year for this surgery and I was extremely nervous about the care I'd receive since my abdominal problems all stemmed from poor care which resulted in MRSA.................but it still made no difference at all. So the lesson I've learned is this................the best we can do for ourselves is STAY HEALTHY and STAY OUT OF HOSPITALS as much as possible.
-
And do you remember why people didn't want to GO to hospitals 75 years ago? Because they were dirty, you could catch a worse disease, and poor people just went there to die. People were cared for at home until the 40's (penicillin) and it became the norm to be hospitalized for anything in the 50's and in the 60's you had to be in the hospital to get your insurance to cover anything. We're comming full circle.!!
-
So true Iodine! I bought Mad Men on iTunes at the suggestion of my friend. A very good TV series. Anyway, they went to the hospital for her to deliver the baby. It was so well done...the nurses were totally "in charge", the patients had no say about anything, pain meds were the main course....this was the 50's and 60's. I was born in '48 and my mother's anesthesia cost $15. Women of that time didn't complain...as my mother often reminded me.
And yes we are full circle....we/they dosed everything to the max until it is no longer effective! Viruses no longer respond to antibiotics. And I remember hearing "them" talk about this over 20 years ago that this would happen. Why are we poor schmucks so easily sold the bag of goods?
-
This is such an interesting discussion. It is such great advice to have someone with a loved one in the hospital, even if they are top notch. My SIL is a med tech and when her father had a blackout they took him to the ER where they told him all was fine. She insisted on a specific test to see if he had actually had a heart attack and they refused. Since she was also a patient advocate for the hospital, she knew who to go to. She got the test run, and sure enough it proved he had had a heart attack. Someone who did not know any of this would have been left in the dark. If my SIL had not done this, her father might have died from another one. Instead he got the care he needed.
There really does seem to be a lot of movement now in going back to some of the old ways of preventing disease, from the use of iodine and cod liver oil, like my grandmother use to promote to even bleeding to get the build up of iron out of our pipes. Modern medicine has accomplished a lot of miracles, but some of the old ways were just as successful and a heck of a lot cheaper.
Swimangel-have you looked into chlorine toxicity from swimming pools? Just wondering because I have been reading on my yahoo group about iodine deficiency and the toxicity of chlorines and bromines in pools and hot tubs.
-
Vivre -- the iron build-up thing is VERY interesting! I just came from a research grant planning meeting at my job -- research division of a med school-affiliated hospital -- and one of the new investigators is looking at excess iron after menopause as a contributing factor to osteoporosis! He thinks excess iron (since we're no longer "blood-letting" by having periods!) may contribute MORE to osteoporosis than lack of estrogen!
No suggestions yet what to do about it, but it seems to be a big contributor!
-
Ann I am just reading a book on the topic. It is called Survival of the Fittest, byt Dr. Sharon Moalem. It is about the historic study of disease and one of the things he notes is that babies who were fed extra iron during the great plagues did not survive as well as those who did not. We think of all the bloodletting they use to do as so barbaric, but he explains why in some cases, people did recover because it bled out toxic amounts of iron. We know that excessive iron is linked to cancer too. So I am going to see if it is okay to give blood and see how it makes me feel. I heard you can do so after 2 years. We shall see. Like everything else, I feel like my own guinea pig but I figure there is so much evidence that a lot of the standard protocols are useless anyway, so I am happy to be looking outside the box, because I feel fantastic. It still burns me that some drug study can only prove to work say 50% of the time and it is considered okay to use because they have the money to do the study, whereas any alternative with the same stats is considered quackery because it is unproven, even though there are lots of testimonials from people who have tried them and lived. But because they were not part of some "study" no one believes them. It is all a big racket.
-
Vivre earlier in the year I posted a thread discussing the danger of chlorine........I did get reassurances from some women about it.........but it is worrisome. Still my extra weight and stiff joints affect my QOL so I will continue swimming - but quickly showering as soon as I get out! Since I had lymphodema in my arm, I no longer go in any hot tubs. My 23 year-old daughter won't swim in chlorinated pools any more - this after years on a swim team.........I don't blame her at all. My mother also gave all of her 8 kids a tablespoon of cod liver oil every morning before school (washed down with orange juice.......to this day I can still taste that combination in my memory, yuck!) The iron connection is real - there's a simple test you can have done to see if you have hemocromatosis, a hereditary condition of excess iron.........my sister told me she was a carrier, so my onc tested me and I was a carrier too. For some reason people of northern european descent are susceptible to this liver condition..........if it goes unchecked, many illness crop up later in life and often get dx'd as other things - in particular cirrhosis of the liver. The cure is giving blood. However, since we are all cancer patients, it's unlikely they'd want to KEEP our blood. Also - more women (even post-menopausal) suffer from iron-deficient blood.........so before trying to have blood taken from your body be sure to get your iron levels checked.
-
Wow swimangel, the book I noted talks about the link to northern european ancestry and the disease related to too much iron. You really should get this book. Also, have you looked into the connection to iodine deficiency? Iodine is one of the family of halides that include chlorine, bromine, and flouride, all which are in all kinds of foods besides pools and are toxic. Iodine naturally draws those toxins out of the body. Iodine also is stored in breast tissue,where it does the most good. When we are iodine deficient, we are suseptable to cancer. Since I have learned so much about iodine deficiencies, I can look back and see all kinds of signs that were affecting my health. If only I had know then . . . But the good news in, taking iodine has made a huge effect on my body. I felt energized immediately and it totally softened my breast tissue, got rid of lumps, and the hard knotty scars from my surgery and rads. I expect that my therm next month will really show a vast improvement, because my last one was still red. I think this stuff is the secret to prevention. If you have not checked out the info at breastcancerchoices.org and our iodine thread, please do. Also there is a discussion yahoo group that is an offshoot of naturalthyroidchoices.org that I learn a lot from. They were just discussing the swimming pool issues.
-
Swimangel, I noted your questiion to your doc "what would you suggest to your mom or sister?" Most folks say "wife". I never did those , figuring how many docs didn't like their wives OR family, so I asked about their Daughters. I rarely find someone who doesn't like their daughter!
-
Vivre--the link didn't work...so I googled and found www.naturalthyroidchoices.com. Is that what you meant?
I'm hypothyroid (I take meds) and I'm interested to read more about this. When I was young, I was also a competitive swimmer at the local swim club. Never gave chlorine a thought.
Now we use sea salt with iodine in the water for pasta...wonder if that helps too.
EDIT: I just quickly visited the link that is posted. My question is when the link is .com instead of .org isn't that a company based on profit? I'm always skeptical of the "evidence" they post.
-
Blundin-the link between iodine deficiency and bc is irrefutable. And the thyroid plays right into that. natural thyroid choices was started by a women who is a thyroid cancer survivor. She also runs the forum on yahoo group and I can tell you she puts hours and hours of volunteer time in to answer peoples questions because she is so passionate about spreading the word that a thyroid that does not work right is cause for grave concern. I was very skeptical at first, but the more I kept reading about it, the more I was convinced that it all made a lot of sense. So after much thought, I started taking the iodine and it made a huge difference. I use to swim a lot too. I was a lifeguard in college and took my kids to the pool all the time.These toxins build up in us, and linger and contribute to disease.
I do not always look at a site for .com or .org. Even the .org sites are expensive to run and the people doing so should be paid for their time, as they are on this site. I do not believe that Steph is out to make money on her site, but if she sells something, I feel she deserves it because she has done so many people a real service with her information. There is another site called stoptheythyroidmadness that is also great.
You may have a bit of trouble getting iodine in Europe. It seems that the good ole US FDA has had a hard time outlawing it here, because so many doctors are fighting it, but they somehow managed to do so in Europe. They still promote the idea that iodine is dangerous, which is a total lie. There are many of us who are taking 50-100 mg of the iodine/iodide compound and we feel fantastic. Iodine flushes out the chlorine(which we also absorb in the shower or bath), bromine(common as an additive in our foods) and flouride, in our drinking water. You may have less worry of all that stuff in Italy. Lucky you. My thyroid numbers look normal, but I had all the signs of hypothyroid. Doctors will only look at the numbers, not the symptoms. Iodine helps to regulate the thyroid.
A good place to start is to get Dr. David Brownstein's book "Iodine, Why you need it and Why you don't". His books are easy to read and inexpensive. I get my iodine compound from my local pharmacist, but you can get it online at optimox or at breastcancerchoices. Please check out our thread here too for lots of info from those of us who are using it.
-
Hi Vivre, Probably I wasn't clear in my writing. The link that I said didn't work was the www. link not iodine. That link I agree is well known. I've followed some of the threads here that discussed it and I've paid some attention to my iodine intake since my hypothyroid diagnosis in the early 90s. Recently my husband read that iodine is lost when boiled in water (pasta for example) and it was suggested to add the salt at the same time to add the pasta instead of before to boil the water. Sea salt is a standard here.
I was talking with my sister yesterday and we both agree that toxins are here to stay and so is the frustration to purge them from the body. I use an entire lemon with the skin, with three cloves of garlic and some olive oil with water in a food processor....then drink it. It is a cleanser for the liver and gall bladder. But who knows what the ratio of toxin to cells might be....it can't hurt me though.
About the .org .com....it's been a test of mine to pay attention to these because .org needs to pass accounting and organizational tests that a .com doesn't. That small hurdle (albeit not prefect) helps to sort extraneous information out. It's not that there aren't kernels of truth to be found anywhere...and I seek it out too because the timeline of new research can be long. It's just that I prefer to seek to balance the information I find with info distilled by trusted and knowledgeable science. I often find they converge if there is sound basis to the findings. Many words and hope not to confuse.
Getting back to the thyroid meds....it's still the one size fits all problem...like using a shot gun to hit a smaller target. My endocrinologist advised me that the numbers are used as a guide to the symptoms....and my symptoms were painful. Taking the meds I feel better. I did a lot of reading and found help in suppliments from women walked the path before me...recommended books, ets. It all helped and If I could manage it any other way then the meds and consistent I'd do it. I admit too that I have so little time to do this work. But for those who do bravo! and grazie! I'll keep reading your results. We had some lengthy conversations on these boards several years ago when we linked some of our symptoms.
Best wishes to all as always,
Marilyn
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team