ILC and LCIS effect on Oncotypedx

kmf
kmf Member Posts: 79
ILC and LCIS effect on Oncotypedx
«1

Comments

  • kmf
    kmf Member Posts: 79
    edited December 2009

    I just had my lumpectomy this past Tues.  I had ILC in a 1.5 cm  mass and Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia where calcifications were.  The path from the surgery was sentinel node negative ( hooray!!) but the calc area was actually LCIS.  The surgeon thinks this will throw me into a higher risk and I'll need chemo.  The node is being sent off to have the Oncotypedx done.  Unfortunately, one of my margins was clear but only by 1mm, so I am going back in Mon, to have a bit more cut out.  Should be much easier than the original lumpectomy -- no dye under the nipple which stung like H--- to me and no wires to show the way. (They weren't bad at all but rather not do again.)  Just curious if the LCIS was going to result in an automatic high score on the Oncotypedx. I'm ER/PR+ and Her-2Neu negative.  I was really hoping to go straight to radiation and skip chemo!  Thanks. Karenanne

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited December 2009

    I am sorry you are joining us.

    There is no way to know/predict what it will be.

    My oncologist swore I'd have a low score; mine was intermediate.  I did not have a multifocal and I had no node involvement.  I know some women have a grade 3 tumor and end up with lower onco scores.  Again no way to know.

    Best to you. 

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited December 2009

    Hi, Karenanne and wallycat:  Would you share your ER %, PR% and HER2 status?  - HER2 negative includes both HER2 0 and HER2 1+.    Would it help to predict the Oncotype score?

  • kmf
    kmf Member Posts: 79
    edited December 2009

    I was ER + 75%, PR +20%, Her-2 0 Ki-67 8%.

    On a separate note, I noticed that Wallycat and a lot of women w/smaller tumors opt for a bilateral mast.  My surgeon thought anything more than a lumpectomy was overkill.  I had a contrast and non-contrast MRI of both breast and they found nothing in either breast to indicate suspicious spots other than what we already knew about.  So, I wanted the lumpectomy.  But I see so many that did much more. Just wondering.  Thanks. Karenanne

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited December 2009

    My breast surgeon, 2 oncologists also thought it was overkill.  The radiologist (woman) that was doing the dye for my SNB said she agreed with my decision.  I also know my personality---I could not, emotionally and psychologically, tolerate the 6 month mammograms followed by 6 month MRIs.  That is just me....I was large breasted and the bigger breast was the healthier one; I'd have felt lopsided.

    My tumor was not a % grade on er/pr.  They used a new grading and I was an 8/9 for both ER and PR and Her2 0 .  I was high hormone receptive.  My mitosis was 0-1, so I was shocked with the onco score I got....as were my docs.

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2009

    My surgeon explained that the OncoType test looks at the genetics of the tissue to determine probability of re-occurance. Since it a genetic test, it is very difficult to predict. I have ILC with few mets but my OncoType score as 26 (intermediate). I don't think the doctors will be able to predict genetic results anytime in the near future without performing the actual test. I tend to get frustrated with all the doctors and their intuition unless they opt to go ahead and perform the tests that will confirm (or not) their hunch.

    On a side note, my MRI failed to show the original dx cancer nor did it show the unknown cancer that was found in the other breast after my mast. I'm not a big fan of it now. Ultrasound was what confirmed my original dx.

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited December 2009

    wallycat: Wow, so interesting!  I am shocked about your score as well.

    I understand that Oncotype test is not simply a computer software to combine ER/PR HER2 % and re-calculate them,  my concern is for those early stage women who didn't take this test,  or their countries do not have this test available,  how are they going to decide their treatment plan?  

    Which test should we trust? Innocent   

    ImpatientPatient: Did you take chemo? 

  • rreynolds1
    rreynolds1 Member Posts: 450
    edited December 2009

    My score was 18 which is intermediate but on the low end.  My oncologist also ran 2 computer programs which gave similar results.  I'm sure she used the info from the onco test to do the other programs.  What was different in one of them was that it also included my general health which is "healthy".  Sounds odd that a woman with bc could be healthy but I am.  Still, the results were the same as the onco results.  I decided against chemo because the tests showed a 3% advantage and for me that was not enough of an improvement to warrent the potential damage that chemo can cause.  If I had been younger, I may have decided differently but at 59 I was really concerned about damaging my body with the chemo for 3% results.  Chemo has come a long way and I would not hesitate to have it if my results had been different.

    Roseann

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited December 2009

    Impatient-patient, are you saying you have mets? (spine, liver ???) or just invasive cancer...which is what ILC is (invasive lobular cancer)?  I am shocked that you are a grade 1 and had a 26 onco score.  Yes, doctors should not speculate about unknowns.

    rreynolds, a score of 18 is considered low I thought.  I was under the impression it is grouped as follows:  1-18 low, 19-29 intermiediate, 30-+ high

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2009

    hlya: I am going ahead with chemo simply due to my age. That 3% over the rest of my hopefully long life means a little more to me than it might to others. I am 28. With that said, it was still a difficult decision to decide to put myself through that. The thing that finally helped solidify my decision was an area of concern where the cancer had infiltrated a lymph vessel. Nodes were clean but the Onc said that the cancer was trying to spread.

    wallycat: I just went in for my bone scan and CT so I don't have the results yet but there was a met count per magnification field of the tumor in the pathology report. There weren't many in the tumor (3 per field). That count was used in the grade. I guess it doesn't impact the OncoType significantly but just means that the cancer is slower growing.

  • momand2kids
    momand2kids Member Posts: 1,508
    edited December 2009

    sign me on as another one with a surprising onco score--- mine was 27--- and I decided in a flash to have chemo---- I was 48 last year at dx and had had a lumpectomy-- great margins, no invasion, no nodes... everything looked great--- my onc didn't think chemo-- nor did I..but at a 27 I was in the intermediate range---- and I was "young" in the bc world, pre-meno.  I did 4 rounds of chemo--- started in Jan, ended in feb.  I was extremely healthy and I think that made a difference in my toleration of it.  I am glad I did it.... I knew I wouldn't sleep any other way--and most nights since then, I have slept soundly..... 

    Impatient, for what it is worth, I think you are making the right decision.... your age plus the fact that there was an area of concern...... good indicators---

    chemo dropped my potential risk of recurrence from 15% to 8%---it was totally worth it and not nearly as horrible as I imagined it to be---- if you need any specific info, feel free to pm me or ask here..... ILC does tend to grow slower.... thank heavens!!! 

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited December 2009

    ImpatientPatient: I agree, everybody's situation is different, and that 3% is just statistically an average score,  which means some people have more & some have less .  But you should make the decision considering your specific situation as you know yourself best.

    and I also agree that grading won't affect Onco test.  Oncotype test focus on distant recurrence, not how fast the tumor grows. 

    Based on Impatientpatient's situation,  I feel that Oncotype test focus more on each tumor's specific gene biological features.  Even there are 2 x women with exactly the same ER/PR & HER2 status, their scores might come back differently. 

  • kmf
    kmf Member Posts: 79
    edited December 2009

    Thanks for all of the insight.  I am hoping that after I get a little more tissue taken out tomorrow it is clear too so I'll have great margins. I am trying to decide where my comfort level is.  I am otherwise very healthy and most of my life have exercised. Unfortunately I slacked off that the last couple of yrs. So, I think I could tolerate chemo reasonably well, but I also know it is toxic -- I had a dog w/lymphoma that went through chemo so I studied up on it a couple of yrs. ago.  There are long term side effects to it.  At a 3% benefit, I'd probably say no thanks and concentrate on getting back into my exercise and doing some nutritional things.  At a 10% benefit, I'm probably inclined to do it.  I'm hoping for a very low score that makes it a no-brainer.  I should know in about a week.  Karenanne

  • mymountain
    mymountain Member Posts: 184
    edited December 2009

    Hi Karenanne,

    I had a 1 cm ILC with DCIS in the margins, had an excisional bx, segmental mast, followed my a full mast w reconstruction.  My final path report from the full mast showed lcis(multifocal, with pagetoid spread to the ducts).  My oncotype score was 11, so I'm not sure that the lcis affects the score or not.,

    Hoping for a low score for you!

    MM

  • Kleenex
    Kleenex Member Posts: 764
    edited December 2009

    I had what initially appeared to be between one and two cm of ILC, and the surgeons I talked to would've been fine with me choosing anything from a lumpectomy to a bilateral. I felt pretty good about the MRI - the known tumor lit up and everything else looked okay. It was done over two days, so it seemed quite detailed (small sections viewed). I ended up having lumpectomy - I figure I can always have more surgery if I need it. I'm pretty ADD - I don't fret too much about things between my 6 mo follow-ups, and I was happy to not be trying to recover from a larger surgery. My Oncotype DX score was 11, so I was not offered chemo as it was thought that the side effect issues would greatly outweigh any possible benefit.

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2009

    Karenanne: I'm hoping for your's to come back as a 1.

    My bone scan and CT came back clean which was a relief but I am on the chemo schedule for Dec. 22nd. I'm comfortable with my decision. I did cry a little after leaving the oncology office yesterday because it suddenly became real. I was ok by the time I got to the surgeon's office though. Nothing to do now but wait and make the most of the weekend coming up.

  • kmf
    kmf Member Posts: 79
    edited December 2009

    Just to follow up --My Oncotype score came back as a 12 (Yeah!!)-- the surgeon who was convinced I'd need to do chemo said it looked to him that chemo gave me somewhere to no benefit to a negative benefit.  My onco that same day said he didn't see any reason to do chemo and started me on Tamoxifen that day.  So, I get to pass Go (chemo) and go straight to radiation.

    To: ImpaitentPatient  -- If I were in your shoes I'd do the chemo w/a 3% benefit. You know what is best for you!  Don't second guess yourself.  Karenanne

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited December 2009

    kmf: So glad to hear you were able to skip chemo. That is a nice relief.

    I started chemo on Dec. 22nd. TCx4 and it isn't so bad so far. I had one bad day but consider myself lucky. I'm happy with the decision to go ahead with it. I'm not a worrier by nature but I think I would have always wondered. Thanks for the support of everyone here. I can't imagine making these decisions without a place like this forum.

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited December 2009

    Impatient...  I hope your treatments go well.  Great that you are not a worrier, I am!  Will be thinking of you in the coming days.  Hugs.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2009

    ImpatientPatient hope you treatments go well. 

    Not very nice to have to start just before Christmas.

    Will be thinking of you,

    Take Care

    Cathy

  • balsie
    balsie Member Posts: 391
    edited December 2009

    Impatient~

    I finished up TC on October 22.  It wasn't real bad..on the third day after the chemo I would always feel like I had a really bad hangover.  Since the chemo is finished I have had problems with my fingernails and my big toenail fell off.  My hair is coming back now......so happy about that.  You will do really well...drink lots of water.  If you have any ? feel free to ask.

    Best of luck to you!

    Balsie

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited January 2010

    Thanks Ladies! So far so good. I had a few more days with nausea and stomach pain but we got it figured out. My hair started falling out today which was more shocking than I thought it would be but now its ok too. Just rolling with it. Its all we can do.

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited January 2010

    ImpatientPatient, in your previous post you said "mets" and 3 per field.....did you mean Mitosis rate?

    Cancer sure is crazy....I was a grade 2 with onco score of 20...and mitosis rate of 0 - 1.

    Go figure ....sure wish it was more predictable Tongue out

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited January 2010

    ImpatientPatient,  It was good to hear back from you, and especially to know that you got the SEs figured out.  I remember when my hair started coming out.  I had it cut very, very short.  It was a windy day, I scratched my head and saw hair flying out across the yard.  Ya, seeing myself bald was a shock. Having hair keeps our heads warm, too.  I slept in a cap because my head got cold at night.  Keep rolling, won't be long before treatment's over.  

  • ImpatientPatient
    ImpatientPatient Member Posts: 41
    edited January 2010

    Wallycat: Yes. I probably abbreviated and said mets when meaning mitosis. I need to go back over those results and refresh but I wonder if the magnification is standardized across labs??

    All: When you lost your hair, did you have a lot of fine lighter hairs left behind? Did those last long or what did you do about them? My hair is completely gone already except this fine hair that is poking me all the time.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited January 2010

    ImpatientPatient: I only lost half of my hair after the first TCH treatment, then it started to grow. I got it buzzed when it started to fall out and had to get a touch up the other day. I think everyone is different. I've got several finger nails that look like I'll lose them, but I haven't lost eyebrows/arm hairs/ facial hairs or leg hairs. Just most of the pubes and half of my head hair.

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited January 2010

    ImpatientPatient,  About the hair,  after my second AC treatment mine all fell out within two days.  I used an electric clippers and just kept any fuzz that remained clipped until even that fell out.  My scalp was sensitive but not itchy or painful.  About mitosis, I think the mitosis counting is pretty standardized across labs.  If your tumor is grade one the mitotic count was probably low, most ILCs have low mitotic counts (that is they grow slowly, few cells dividing at a time).

  • helena1018
    helena1018 Member Posts: 23
    edited February 2010

    Dear kmf:

    I was diagnosed mid- January 2010 with ILC with associated LCIS, node negative, clear margins, ER+, PR+, HER2-.  Just received my Oncotype DX breast cancer assay 3 days ago.  It was a 9 (scale of 0-100) so my medical oncologist said NO chemo as this low risk number for distant recurrence in 10 years indicates chemo would be more harmful than beneficial.  I hope your score is very low, too so that you don't need chemo.  Talk to your medical oncologist about your concerns.

  • JannaC
    JannaC Member Posts: 30
    edited February 2010

    rreynolds1....My diag is very similar to yours.  I was 57 when diagnosed (1 year anniversary this Feb 18th, with two lumpectomys in last March)  Did not have clear margins the first time.  The first big decision before surgery was to have a lumpectomy (with a reduction, I was big) or mastectomy.  My oncotype was 19 and it was a hard decision to decide on chemo or not.  My doctor gave me her opinion and decided the 3% wasn't worth it.  I too, am in good health and went straight to radiation and femara the same day.  I guess only time will tell.  I am a worrier but it's gotten easier as time passes.  I go in next week for my yearly mamo.  Never had an MRI.

     Good luck KMF!

  • helena1018
    helena1018 Member Posts: 23
    edited March 2010

    Hi Ladies!  Does anyone know whether having a low Oncotype DX score has any bearing on whether or not to undergo hormone suppression therapy (Arimidex or Femara)?  I really don't want to take either one for five years as I feel great right now and fear the side effects of HT.

Categories