Debate over mammograms splits along party lines

Comments

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited December 2009

    Repubs are already mandating a rationing of a women's reproductive rights. But I guess this is different??

    Hah. I swore I wouldn't be baited back into the fracass here, yet here I am. So weak, so weak.

  • HelloFromCT
    HelloFromCT Member Posts: 280
    edited December 2009

    Federal funding for abortion (now it's "reproductive rights"...) is not the same thing.  A woman choosing to terminate an unwanted pregnancy should fund it herself.  (There are exceptions, but they are few--life/death situation, etc.)  Medical screenings for cancer, heart, etc. cover the entire population and save lives.  These new 'guidelines' are nothing more than a way to save a buck.  They have nothing to do with what's best for the patient.

  • iodine
    iodine Member Posts: 4,289
    edited December 2009

    I said I'd stay away, too, But: If ins. cannot help fund abortion, how about it Stop funding Viagra and Begin funding birth control?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2009
  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited December 2009

    Madalyn .. it's interesting that Maryland passed the amendment (along with New York, which changed its prior status) to change the screening age from 40 to 50 under their state's Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening programs.  BCCS screening is funded by the CDC.  If breast or cervical cancer is detected, Medicaid then kicks in and covers everything.  The CDC uses the data for their own research base.

    I wonder how many states will follow suit and change their policy for screening of the poor and uninsured/underinsured.

    I also wonder why the CDC hasn't jumped into the fray with their agency's opinon on the changes. 

    Bren

  • AnnNYC
    AnnNYC Member Posts: 4,484
    edited December 2009

    Bren -- do you have a link to New York changing the screening age from 40 to 50 under the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection program?  I have been looking for this and can't find it.

    I did see that request from a reporter posted by the Mods, asking if anyone had been turned away from the program because of their age -- but I think they meant women 65 and older...

    I wonder if what New York State did change (or may change) is their expanded coverage of the program beyond the federal mandates?  The federal program mandates screening mammography of women ages 40 through 64 (on the assumption that Medicare covers women 65 and older).  New York State offered additional coverage through the state program to women 65 and older, and also prostate cancer screening to men.  So maybe this has been rescinded (or will be) because of NY State budget crisis?  But since the CDC hasn't changed their guidelines (40 and older), I don't see how a state can choose not to meet the minimum federal guidelines.  I have been googling for this and can't find it, so I would appreciate a link! 

    Thanks,  Ann

    P.S. I just called the New York State program and was told that routine screening begins at age 40.  Diagnostic screening is available for women under 40 who are symptomatic or have a family history.  The woman I spoke to did think that for women 65 and older, Medicare was the presumed coverage, but she wasn't sure.  She gave me the number of the program unit closest to my address -- but I didn't want to pursue this any further with a program that is busy trying to respond to people who need appointments.

    P.P.S. Regarding the topic header "debate over mammograms splits along party lines" -- Barbara Mikulski, who sponsored the amendment that would require health insurers to cover mammograms for women ages 40 to 49, is a Democrat.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited December 2009

    Ann .. I'll have to check.

    I did do some research at the CDC site.  And particularly in VA, where I live.  What I did notice was that (according to the data collected by the CDC between 2002-2007), fully 25% of the women in VA screened under this program were ages 40-49, and of that 25%, in less than 1% cancer was detected. 

    Anyway .. back to the topic above ... Apparently, although there may be some split between parties, I don't think that is at issue here (regarding the CDC screening program).  I think this goes back to the panel's recommendations.  The CDC data (from their screening program between 2002-2007) seems to coincide with those recommendations. 

    Bren

    PS .. Ann, I've got to run, but I'll get back to looking for the link.

Categories