Debate over mammograms splits along party lines
Comments
-
Repubs are already mandating a rationing of a women's reproductive rights. But I guess this is different??
Hah. I swore I wouldn't be baited back into the fracass here, yet here I am. So weak, so weak.
-
Federal funding for abortion (now it's "reproductive rights"...) is not the same thing. A woman choosing to terminate an unwanted pregnancy should fund it herself. (There are exceptions, but they are few--life/death situation, etc.) Medical screenings for cancer, heart, etc. cover the entire population and save lives. These new 'guidelines' are nothing more than a way to save a buck. They have nothing to do with what's best for the patient.
-
I said I'd stay away, too, But: If ins. cannot help fund abortion, how about it Stop funding Viagra and Begin funding birth control?
-
-
Madalyn .. it's interesting that Maryland passed the amendment (along with New York, which changed its prior status) to change the screening age from 40 to 50 under their state's Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening programs. BCCS screening is funded by the CDC. If breast or cervical cancer is detected, Medicaid then kicks in and covers everything. The CDC uses the data for their own research base.
I wonder how many states will follow suit and change their policy for screening of the poor and uninsured/underinsured.
I also wonder why the CDC hasn't jumped into the fray with their agency's opinon on the changes.
Bren
-
Bren -- do you have a link to New York changing the screening age from 40 to 50 under the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection program? I have been looking for this and can't find it.
I did see that request from a reporter posted by the Mods, asking if anyone had been turned away from the program because of their age -- but I think they meant women 65 and older...
I wonder if what New York State did change (or may change) is their expanded coverage of the program beyond the federal mandates? The federal program mandates screening mammography of women ages 40 through 64 (on the assumption that Medicare covers women 65 and older). New York State offered additional coverage through the state program to women 65 and older, and also prostate cancer screening to men. So maybe this has been rescinded (or will be) because of NY State budget crisis? But since the CDC hasn't changed their guidelines (40 and older), I don't see how a state can choose not to meet the minimum federal guidelines. I have been googling for this and can't find it, so I would appreciate a link!
Thanks, Ann
P.S. I just called the New York State program and was told that routine screening begins at age 40. Diagnostic screening is available for women under 40 who are symptomatic or have a family history. The woman I spoke to did think that for women 65 and older, Medicare was the presumed coverage, but she wasn't sure. She gave me the number of the program unit closest to my address -- but I didn't want to pursue this any further with a program that is busy trying to respond to people who need appointments.
P.P.S. Regarding the topic header "debate over mammograms splits along party lines" -- Barbara Mikulski, who sponsored the amendment that would require health insurers to cover mammograms for women ages 40 to 49, is a Democrat.
-
Ann .. I'll have to check.
I did do some research at the CDC site. And particularly in VA, where I live. What I did notice was that (according to the data collected by the CDC between 2002-2007), fully 25% of the women in VA screened under this program were ages 40-49, and of that 25%, in less than 1% cancer was detected.
Anyway .. back to the topic above ... Apparently, although there may be some split between parties, I don't think that is at issue here (regarding the CDC screening program). I think this goes back to the panel's recommendations. The CDC data (from their screening program between 2002-2007) seems to coincide with those recommendations.
Bren
PS .. Ann, I've got to run, but I'll get back to looking for the link.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team