Tumor Markers
My onc told me she will not do tumor markers because they are not accurate in breast cancer and only cause high anxiety. Also, because I am stage I, OK-really stage II since one of my nodes had atypical cells, she says I won't need them because TCH will be curative. I wish she read this message board. Is it the norm for stage I not to have tumor markers done? Are they helpful? What are the marker tests called? Is it possible she doesn't do them because my cheap axx insurance won't cover them?
Comments
-
I am stage one and my med onc does a CA15-3 test every 3 months. My insurance approved fee is less than $50.00 for the test. She says the number itself is not as important as the trend. But lots of docs do not order them. I like it.
pam
-
ASCO guidelines are NOT to do tumor markers, except in stage IV disease (American Society of Clinical Oncologists)
What to Know: ASCO's Guideline on Tumor Markers for Breast CancerRecommendations
Different tumor markers are used at different points in the diagnosis and treatment process. The ASCO recommendations for tumor markers for breast cancer include the following:
For patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS):
DCIS means that cancer has not spread outside of the ducts in the breast. It is also called noninvasive breast cancer. No tumor marker tests for DCIS are recommended at this time.
For patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer:ER and PR tests, to help predict response to hormone therapy after surgery
HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments and some types of chemotherapy
Once these tests are done, the cancer is classified as ER-positive (if the tumor has estrogen receptors) or ER-negative (if the tumor does NOT have estrogen receptors); PR-positive (if the tumor has progesterone receptors) or PR-negative (if the tumor does NOT have progesterone receptors); and HER2-positive (if the tumor does have HER2) or HER2-negative (if the tumor does NOT have HER2). Learn more ASCO's recommendations for HER2 testing.For patients with node-negative breast cancer:
uPA and PAI-1 tests, if available, to estimate the prognosis. Patients with tumors that do not have uPA and PAI-1 have a very good prognosis and may not need chemotherapy.
For patients with node-negative breast cancer that is ER-positive and/or PR-positive:Oncotype DX test, to identify patients who may be successfully treated with tamoxifen alone and may not need chemotherapy
For patients with metastatic breast cancer:ER and PR tests, to help predict response to hormone therapy
HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments
CA 15-3 and CA 27.29, for monitoring treatment; these should be used along with the patient's health history, a physical examination, and diagnostic imaging tests, such as an x-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
CEA, for monitoring treatment; this test should be used along with the patient's health history, a physical examination, and diagnostic imaging tests.
For patients with recurrent breast cancer:HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments and guide the use of specific chemotherapy
Kira
-
I think it's a good idea to track a number of tumor markers regularly. They give you a lot of valuable information. But you need to understand them. Cost is also a factor.
There's a good article about tumor markers here (scroll down):
http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-027.shtml
At the moment I'm are mainly tracking CEA, CA 15-3, Ferritin, ALP, BCA 225, TPA, NTx, alpha-1 globulin, and Hyaluronic Acid. Each marker tells a different story. Combinations of markers are far superior to just one or two.
Recently I changed therapy and I do some markers weekly before the next therapy, and I can get a good idea about the response I'm getting. It's amazing how much of a response you can get in some markers in such a short time and they do appear accurate. If one waits too long to check, we can get much bigger jumps in the marker, which I feel are more scary. If something isn't working, it takes longer to find out. Which is what happened to me before. When changing anything with our therapy, marker checks beforehand are a good idea, so that we can isolate the effect it has. I think it makes it less of a guessing game.
-
I had no idea this was used for early stage! Are you guys in the us?
-
Is the onco score test results on the path report if one was ordered? I don't seem to see anywhere that the test was performed my onc does not do the CA blood test on early stage BC. I will have to ask her in Feb at my appt.
-
Well, my onc does do tumor markers for early stage and guess what? Mine are up during chemo! I started at 27 and 29 before surgery & chemo and now they are up to 47.5! I am freaking out, needless to say. I hope they are NOT reliable in my case.
-
I read elsewhere on the board that they spike during chemo, and also they can spike from non-tumor causes.
-
My onc does the CA.29 test every three months. There is no harm in asking if you want them to do it. That's what I did when I wanted the test to see how well I metabolize the Tamoxifen. I didn't think my insurance company would cover it based on what the plan said, but was willing to pay out of pocket because I wanted to know. My onc explained why she doesn't usually do it, but didn't seem to have a problem ordering it when I asked her to. Insurance did wind up paying. Good luck.
Sue
-
My onc says that they are not always accurate, but she uses them for the "trend" they establish. I had one at the first visit and she said it was "good". I have them every three months. I have finished my last rads tonight, had my last chemo on 9/10/09 and am Stage 1, Grade 3 triple neg. She did blood work last week and they called today saying all was fine and my tumor marker is 11. I was happy, but if I have no cancer in me (which I hope is the case), why wouldn't my tumor marker come back "0"?????
-
Carcharm - if your onc will not do the tumor marker testing ask your primary doctor. A gal I work with had cancer years ago and no longer sees an onc. She asks her primary and gets tested annually. My onc does the tumor marker - CA27-29 along with a CBC. There is a book called Life after Breast Cancer that discusses various testing alternatives.
Weet911 - the book I mentioned above states there are MANY reasons for elevated and fluctuating values, many of the reasons have nothing to do with cancer. Guess what I took from the book is the results can give false negatives and false positives...and in many cases the false positives - mean more tests necessary to determine reason for elevated results.
-
LRM216 - The first time my onc did the tumor marker test I thought the same thing. Why would it show anything if you no longer have a tumor? I'm going to ask her later this month about that.
Sue
-
Thanks, Sue. I see mine Dec. 23rd, so I'll ask too (if my chemo brain remembers!).
Linda
-
kira, Thanks for posting the guidelines. I was curious about the follow-up for Early Stage women.
-
LRM, Even healthy women who have never had breast cancer have a postive response to the CA 27.29 test. That is why numbers up to 38 are considered normal. Your number of 11 is completely normal! It can still mean there is no cancer in your body. Doctors use these tests more to look at the trend of results, rather than for an absolute number. A consistent increase in the numbers is likely to mean something is going on, but even this doesn't happen in all women with recurrences. This is part of the reason why the use of tumor markers is controversial. Many doctors don't use them at all because they can be somewhat unreliable.
-
Weety -
Thanks so much for putting my mine to ease! I am not a dumb woman, but after I got off the phone with the PA who told me all my blood work came back good and my tumor marker was 11, I felt good. Got off the phone and began wondering, geez, maybe it should have been "0". Tried googling, but could not find anything telling me anything concrete. You just did! Thanks, again - and to you - all good wishes.
Linda
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team