The VALUE of the Self Breast Exam (SBE)
Comments
-
I found a 'thickened" area while doing a self exam in Dec. 2004. My regular OBGYN appointment was in Jan 2005. She said she could not feel anything but to have them mark the area when I had my mammogram. I had the mammogram in Feb 2005 and they marked the area of my concern. In March 2005 I received an all clear on the mammogram.
I wanted to file away the results and go on with my life but I just knew my breast was different. I called my OBGYN and told her I wanted more tests given a very strong family history of breast cancer. She sent me for a biopsy which occurred late March 2005. The results indicated an ILC breast cancer. The tumor was the size of an egg.
I know that I may well not be here had I not done routine SBE and also had I not stood up and said, "I want more".
I had radiation as part of my treatment and I told the radiologist about my egg sized tumor not showing up on a mammogram. He told me that looking for a tumor with a mammogram on women with dense and or large breasts is like looking for a snowman in a blizzard.
I lost my mother and her sister and two first cousins to breast cancer. I have two well endowed daughters and I want them to have an MRI rather than a mammogram.
Sharon
-
I found my lump during a self-exam after experiencing pain in my breast. One week later it did not appear on mammogram. A MRI confirmed it. I'm 51. I don't think mammography was especially useful in my case, but I would never ever discourage women from an annual mammogram starting at age 40 (35?), and never discourage self-exams. I do agree with Dr. Love however who says that we need to find a test that is more reliable.
-
Found it myself too. Not only is it important to detect cancer early, but by doing SBE on a regular basis helps a woman to become accustomed to what her normal breast tissue feels like making it easier to detect changes.
-
While there is definitely value in the SBE, there is more value in the mammogram. My mother was diagnosed with IBC in her mid-50s and died in year 7 of breast mets. From age 35, I was advised to have yearly mammograms, because of a strong female hormone cancer history in my mother's extended family (her own mother, aunts). They didn't have BRCA tests back then. I started my yearly mammograms and just last October, as a result of a mammogram, learned that I had Grade 1 DCIS. It doesn't get better than that if you have to have breast cancer. I am approximately the same age my mom was when she was diagnosed, but she found a lump with SBE.
By the time, I would have felt a lump where the DCIS was, it would have been invasive. I believe that the mammogram saved my life. If the mammograms were better when Mom was diagnosed, she might have been saved too.
These guidelines are truly appalling.
-
Jo_Ann_K: Right, but this thread is not about Mammo vs. SBE, which one has the most value? It's not one over the other.
The guidelines recommend against doing SBE claiming they have "no value." I just think that statement needs to be held up for ridicule.
-
And maybe if women don't get breast cancer screening until 50........then maybe they will not FEEL the need to have reconstruction surgery like our younger SISTERS do. And then maybe the HEALTH PLAN will not pay for your reconstruction when your past 50. They know that young women diagnosed with breast cancer usually opt for reconstruction and many dollars would be saved with a later diagnosis. SAY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!
-
Good point, Rumoret! I had not given thought to the issue of reconstruction. Although I have not seen any stats on age groups most likely to opt for reconstruction, I would also tend to think it would be dominated by the <50 rather than the >50. Oh what a tangled web...
-
I believe the guidelines suggest that lessons on how to do the regimented BSE, one day per month, that I was taught 25 years ago, doesn't need to be taught by physicians on an office visit. Those minutes could better be spent on other things. Studies have shown that the majority of women do not follow through on this type of BSE over the years anyway.
IMO, the advice by Susan Love to be comfortable about your breasts, and to know them and to be aware of any changes, is not the same thing as the BSE mentioned in the guidelines.
Most women who find a lump themselves do so accidently during normal activity such as showering and not during a special time set aside one day a month to do BSE.
-
You can split that hair if you want to. The few minutes it takes to teach/recommend the BSE to a women is time well spent. Even if a women is not faithful to do it like clockwork every month, does it hurt for her to know the proper way to do it when she does attempt it?" Even a women who accidently finds a change, may not rush right to a doctor, but instead may check it at intervals through the course of a menstrual cycle or two. The guidlines definitely say "no value," and I can't agree with that, regardless of what extrapolation you put on it.
-
I posted this elsewhere and it's not only about the BSE, but it applies:
Since it has been all over the news, my hubby has renewed his interest in B/C. He made an excellent point this morning...If mammograms result in a lot of uneccessary biopsies, and the BSE isn't reducing the mortality rate, then we need better detection methods AND better procedures following detection. Those two methods DO find the lumps, they just can't tell cancer from non-cancer. Maybe someday something will.
Until then, we have the biopsy. If your lump is non-cancerous, the biopsy removes some tissue. If your lump is cancerous, the biopsy (or follow-up surgery) removes cancerous tissue, in a way that can leave displaced cells behind. I'm not saying ALWAYS, I'm just saying it can, and we have no way of knowing if it did. That is pretty much why we are radiated. So there is room for improvement in the biopsy and surgery areas, as well as in detection methods.
It's our group of women, now, that have to speak out so that there will be improvement for the next generations to come.
-
No mammograms. No self-exams.
I think we're supposed to sit back and hope our tumors email or text us about their presence.
-
There were very valid reasons for developing the BSE, most especially the fact that if it is done the very same way, at the same time each month, then it will show changes due to the monthly cycle, and not due to some uncontrolled growth. As well, if one does it regularly, it becomes routine and much less scary. In fact, it can serve to eliminate unnecessary biopsies and other diagnostic techniques.
The fact that it scares women needlessly, and doesn't uncover all tumours such as ILC shouldn't be a reason to recommend not doing it, IMO.
-
My daughter felt a lump when she was 30. Mammo showed 3 cancerous tumor, had a mast and chemo. At 34, she felt a another one in the same breast, ultra sound showed it and it was removed, chemo and rads that time. Now, at 37, she has mets to her liver and bones.
Now she may be that 1 in a 1000 but she's my daughter, a mom and wife. Yes, it's emotionally draining for those who's lumps are tested and not cancer BUT for those whose are cancerous...it's a relief knowing you found it early. If these guidelines are followed, women like Kendra will NOT be here to get a mammo at 50!
-
My cancer was diagnosed because I found a lump. I am beside myself over these new recommendations.
-
Your dog looks skeptical too! ;-)
-
I found a thickening too. mammo showed nothing. 16 months later, the breast changed again. I called the doctor. Mammo just said calcifications, questionable. US confirmed. STAGE IIIC bc.
I don't know what the right answer is. I always did SBE and had 2 mammos 34 and 38 before I was dx. I will always wonder when I had the first thickening and had a MRI...would I not be a Stage IV today?
-
I found mine too via a self exam! They should just castrate us, then healthcare would be less costly. Now the pap smears at age 21. No offense to any moms out there who's children are in High School, but most girls lose their virginity before age 21. I really feel strongly that self examinations should be taught to high school kids.
-
What is especially frightening is the number of women here who were premenopausal before diagnosis and found their cancer within months of a "clean" mammogram. We know that dense breast tissue, early onset of menstruation and late menopause are all risk factors for BC. If they want to play this game, then they need to re-evaluate and CHANGE the risk factors so that women who fall into these categories remain candidates for mammography (even though it didn't work in my case) and continue to practice BSE. This, of course, they will NOT do, because too many premenopausal women have dense breast tissue and it wouldn't save government funded health care enough money. I found my three lumps TWO MONTHS after a clean mammogram and four months after my GYN did a yearly breast exam. Plus that, after my MS, they found other lesions that never showed up on two MRIs. We can't trust tests; we have to trust ourselves and our relationship with our own bodies....Tammy
-
That Pap smear recommendation is INSANE. The Pap smear is one of the great, great, public health accomplishments of all time. It's what all the doctors always say they WISH they had for every other kind of cancer...
I had an abnormal Pap requiring cryosurgery when I was very young. Can't remember exactly my age, but around 20. But if THAT had been postponed... well, let's just say that on the whole I've LIKED the past 37 years of my life...
Required another cryosurgery at about age 35... and the changes between previous normal Pap and the abnormal one were very rapid within one year... aren't they saying Pap every two years now?
I'm sorry, calling this a "Preventive Services" Task Force is really Orwellian. Doubleplusungood. If they really were classic public health doctors trying to persuade people to take care of themselves, they would know that, if they recommend "yearly" a lot of people will feel concerned enough to try to make sure they get their checkup every 2 or 3 years, and recommending "monthly BSE" will mean that at least women will know that it's normal and healthy to examine their breasts every once in a while!!! I seriously believe that -- most people need prodding!
But instead, I'm starting to think this task force aims to prevent people from getting services ("wasting resources")...
-
I started to believe that finding water on the Moon ( or was it Mars ) is getting more important than our Health.
-
AnnNYC, you gave us a reality check, I think, and you know, SO WHAT if a woman misses a month of BSE? Does that mean the next month, when she does do a self-exam, that it is worthless? No! It STILL serves as early detection, especially if it was in between mammo times anyway. Without mammos for the under-50s, BSE might be all they have; and in the 50-75 group where they want the women to go twice as long (2 yrs.) between mammos, the BSE can become even more important.
Re-read LJ31-2 (above) -- so funny and true!
I found my 7mm lump approx ONE MONTH after a clear mammo and clinical exam. I didn't rush right to the doctor because the mammo had given me a false sense of security. My bad. I did, however, keep an eye (and I mean HAND) on it and went in for a diagnostic some months before I was due for the next screening.
-
I found my 6.5 cm mass by myself, also, and it saved my life. I'm so disgusted with these new guidelines/advice. It all boils down to money. They do not want women to find any lumps so they won't seek medical treatment. Period! It's like they WANT a certain percentage to die so it cuts down on the economy.
-
Of course!!!!!
I was watching movie about a lady who had breast cancer and I just started feeling around and found one lump. For a few days I kept feeling around and then felt a second one. Both turned out be cancer!!! My breasts were very small --- the lump felt like a marble ( size) and kind of like when you feel your eyeball in that it was not totally hard.... and was moveable. When I told my health care providers.... they said ( wrongly) that because there were 2 lumps, kind of soft, and moveable that it probably was benign.....
Big believer in self exam, mammo, Ultrasound, and gut feelings..... and being your own advocate.
Wendy
-
I posted this elsewhere but was ask to copy it here ...From Susan Love's blog ...Additionally the guidelines do not say “never do breast self exam or touch your breasts again.” The data shows that formal four-position 20-minutes breast self exam is no better than the usual poking around we all do. The guidelines continue to suggest that women be aware of their breasts; they just do not recommend that physicians spend time training women in formal BSE. Most cancers in women under 50 are still found by the woman herself and not screening mammograms.The alternative to finding your cancer on a mammogram if you are under age 50 is not death.The alternative is finding the cancer by feeling a lump while in the shower, or poking around, or rolling over in bed.The new recommendations also note that:
• The USPSTF recommends against teaching patients breast self-examination. *************************What I have issue with is that they are dismissing the importance of BSE and mammograms under 50. They say do not teach BSE at all. I would have respected it more if they said teach a less aggressive method and / or instead of monthly self exam we can relax and do them every other month or so. The way they state this is to not educate the upcoming generations on any form of BSE and to just let women "poke around" randomly on their own with no guidelines at all. Susan Love's idea of BSE seems to be very casual, do as you please, when you please, if you please and you will find your lump. Ask many and this was NOT the case. Some of the lumps are down deep and hard to figure out. I learned BSE in high school. I don't necessarily believe doctors have to teach it but someone does, even if it is a less aggressive BSE.Mammograms and BSE have saved many under 50 from far more aggressive treatment, long term side effects, and yes, death (not statistically significant though!). Sometimes one worked better than the other depending on the location and type of cancer. Maybe the guidelines could use modification but they took it too far by not giving under 50s anything and that is where I lost my respect. We COULD lose our "right to radiate" (as per Love, how obnoxious) ever under 50 if we are not high risk thanks to this. We are getting up to world standards they say. Since when are world standards definitely better than the US? The European health care system is NOT for us to aspire to.Dr. Weiss please step up for us or find someone who will take over the research movement. We need a new leader. -
Thanks, siezetheday, some excellent points.
Hey, I just realized that I have the BSE acronym as SBE in my title. Duh! Same difference, right? Anyway, I can't make a change in the title. Sorry about that.
-
I have a plastic sign hanging in my shower that reminds me to do my BSE each month. I've been doing it on the first day or so of my period for years and years. Since my mom and grandmother had BC, I've had mammos since I was 35 (I'm now 46). It might not be a 20-minute-4-position BSE that I do, but I do my 1 minute version because of the little reminder in the shower. I wouldn't do it if it wasn't there. I wouldn't have found it just by washing.
I found the lump myself, on day 1 of my period, on August 1st. My last mammo was 4 weeks prior and was fine, as usual. So perhaps for me, a mammo isn't useful, due to dense breasts, but when would it have been found if I didn't do my version of the BSE each month? And there are soooo many women with more severe BC found under 50...........
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team