Oopherectomy??

There's a lot involved in your question.

1. Statistically (remember group, not individual results) oopherectomy +AI does not confer any additional benefit compared to the lupron shots +AI.  You also have to consider the risk of any surgery. It is still surgery with its inherent risks.  It does hurt and it does have a recovery period.

2. There is a statistical advantage to the AI's  BUT you are sacrificing the bone density.  There is also a newer research study which is raising some questions as to the accuracy of the advantage of the AI's over tamoxofin. 

3. It 's also been considered to be as effective if you do 2 yrs Tamoxofin and then switch to the AI's.  You may be at menopause naturally by then.

4. It is still difficult to find ovarian cancer early enough , accurately and that can be a benefit of doing the oopherectomy.

it is not unreasonable to get a second opinion.  It is a very personal thing and you need to get a good medical opiniion to make the decision.  You may want to also talk with your onc.  They may have already done the benefit/risk analysis for your particular situation. They just might be poor at expressing why they think the Tamoxofin is better for you.

Having said all that, I have to admit that I chose the oopherectomy route but I also had more history and other things that lead to the decision for me.

I hope it all works out for you. 

I was Stage 1c, ER+ with grade 2 tumor in 2001.  Had 4 rounds A/C, rads, tamoxifen, and 7 rounds of zoladex.  In addition I would get uterine fibroids (fed by estrogen).  Finished all treatments in 2006.  I recently recurred with mets to the liver.  Good news is it's one tumor and can be resected.  Biopsy is ER/PR+.  My Onc and her cancer team unanimously agreed that an oopheractomy is reasonable in my case and AI will be added to treatment after recuperation from surgery.

Without question I would seek another opinion.  Remember, it's your body and your life.  Good luck with your decision.