Neratinib Clinical Trials

Options
2456735

Comments

  • k4katz
    k4katz Member Posts: 240
    edited October 2009

    Kristy, glad to hear all is well so far!  I will keep my fingers crossed for you!

    I received information from the clinical trial location near me.  I will have to switch oncs if I participate in this trial, since they will need to see me at this cancer center instead of the one I have been going to for the last 3 years.  I am OK with that, so I am going to call today and get the ball rolling!

    *Hugs*

    Kristin

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    Has anyone else started the study yet? They are not kidding about diarrhea as a side effect- I had to hunt out the boxes of immodium Saturday morning ( i kept it on hand during chemo since TCH also caused it for me)- other than that, Im doing great!

    Kristy

  • k4katz
    k4katz Member Posts: 240
    edited October 2009

    Hi Kristy, sorry to hear about the diarrhea!  I guess that means you got the neratinib, not the placebo!  Is the immodium working?  Are you experiencing any other SEs?

    I have a meeting with the clinical trial office in my area today.  If that goes well, we will set up an appointment with the study onc and get all the tests scheduled.  So, more to come!

    Kristy, keep us posted!

    *Hugs*

    Kristin

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    Hi Everyone,

    Immodium is taking care of things- I am taking it about every 24-36 hours so it is not an unmanageable thing. My research nurse says that most people adjust within 2-4 weeks and it is not so much a problem anymore. Noone knows for sure but the side effects look like I am on the real deal and not the placebo- other than diarrhea I have some tummy queasiness- not really nausea just that icky feeling when you eat too much dessert at Thanksgiving kind of feeling (I hope that makes sense).

    Kristy

  • k4katz
    k4katz Member Posts: 240
    edited October 2009

    I met with the clinical trial lady yesterday afternoon. I signed all kinds of papers, so now it is just a matter of them acquiring and reviewing my medical records (to make sure I really do qualify) and then I have to get a few easy tests done (ECG, chest x-ray, bloodwork). If all that comes back OK, I will be in the study! Plus, I still get to see my regular onc as well as the study onc! I feel better with all these doctors checking me out periodically!

    So, right now, I just have to wait until they review my records.  I have a tentative appointment set up for 10/29.  If they review my records and all is still OK, I will have the physical exam and bloodwork done on the 29th, and they will also give me the scrips to have the ECG and chest x-ray done.  If all does well, I should be starting around the middle of November!

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    k4katz,

    Sounds like you are making progress. My onc is so excited about this trial, she had her nurses call us (her HER2+ patients) and get us in for exam and bloodwork within 4-5 days, then within another week, they did our MUGA, EKG, and all the other stuff AND started the meds. She told me last visit that she was one of the top docs in terms of the number of patients in the trial so far - LOL- I can see how she does that one!

    So far so good- a week on the medicine and diarrhea is my constant companion. Hopefully it will settle down soon- nurse says within 2-4 weeks usually!

    Kristy

  • Corinne6
    Corinne6 Member Posts: 311
    edited October 2009

    I am planning on going on this too.  Would like to join in on this discussion. I am finished with herceptin as of Aug 09.  I am scared stiff that things will come back.  I had a PET scan that showed a small something on my right side a week and a half ago.  I then had a follow up ct scan and bone scan. Both of these came out normal.  I cannot repeat the PET scan until Jan. However, she said I could start the Neratinib when the trial opens here. She does not think my spot is anything to be concerned with but...I am.  Has anyone had  a simular experience??

    Corinne

  • fightinhrd123
    fightinhrd123 Member Posts: 633
    edited October 2009

    2 more herceptins and i will enter the trial.  Cannot wait!  I already prequalified, so just have to do the blood and muga after im done with herceptin :)

    Laura

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    Welcome Laura and Corinne- I need company on this trial. I am almost 2 weeks in and other than constant diarrhea, I feel fine. I don have a little bit of queasy stomach and am experimenting to find out what to eat when I take the pills- they tell you to take them in the morning and take them with food. I take Immodium as needed since diarrhea is a daily thing - hopefully my body will adjust soon- the research nurse said it usually does within 2-4 weeks of starting- AND it looks like I am getting the real drug since I have the strong side effects.

    Kristy

  • jap
    jap Member Posts: 172
    edited October 2009

    Hi,

    I am hoping to enter this trial as soon as my hospital approves it.  What are the potential problems with taking the drug?  Some have cited liver damage.  How frequently does it occur and is it reversable like heart problems?

    Thanks,

    Jo Anne

  • anitach
    anitach Member Posts: 191
    edited October 2009

    Hi Everybody,

    I am getting really excited about this trial and hoping to join it soon as well. Little history as you may be confused by the Stage IV dx in my signature. I was dx in May '07 with Stage IV due to a mediastinal node that lit up on PET. I had 3 rounds of Abraxane, Cytoxin, and Herceptin and then showed up NED on follow up PET. All signs of cancer.... GONE! I finished out 5 more rounds of Abraxane and 2 years of Herceptin and have remained NED this whole time. I made the very difficult decision this summer to have a double mx with immediate TRAM reconstruction. I did this at Vanderbilt University hospital in Nashville. The surgery was very successfull and I am so grateful to God that he led me in that direction. Despite the clean PET and a clean breast MRI right before my surgery.... they found a 1 cm "spot" of DCIS in the right breast.

    Anyhoo, short story longer, I met with a new onc. at Vanderbilt and she mentioned this trial. She said that given my response to chemo and Herceptin they would like to restage me to 3. Also because they never biopsied that node to get a definite dx. Obviously I am beyond thrilled by that! I am 2 hours away from Vanderbilt so I tried to arrange to get into the trial through my local onc. He told me he could work with Vandy on the trial but so far he has done nothing to get me in.

    So I took it upon myself to call the trial Onc. yesterday and we are now playing phone tag. Please keep your fingers crossed that I will get in this trial. Being that my staging is so sketchy I am scared to death of doing nothing.  

    Anita

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited October 2009

    Is Neratinib orally administered?

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    Neratinib is orally administered- right now you have to take 6 little pills to get the 240 mg dose but they are apparently working on a single tablet that should come out during the study. The current pills are very small so taking 6 really isnt a problem.

    IMHO, they are NOT KIDDING about the abdominal cramps and diarrhea as side effects- they are both intense. I changed my med time this morning to a later morning with more on my stomach (instead of first thing in the morning with a very small food volume) to see if I have less of the cramps and diarrhea- otherwise Immodium and Pepto tablets are going on my walmart list because I will run out taking so much of them!!!!!

     Kristy

  • orange1
    orange1 Member Posts: 930
    edited October 2009

    Hi KristyAnn,

    Thanks for keeping us all up-to-date on your experiences.  I still haven't decided if I should pursue this.  I need to make an appointment to talk to my onc about it.

    You mentioned that your onc is very excited about neratinib in stage IV.  Did she share any specific articles or data with you?  I'd love to read about it but haven't been able to find much on the internet.

    Best ..

    Jackie

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    She didnt share specific articles and what I have found has been on reviews on the trial websites!

    Kristy

  • my2boys
    my2boys Member Posts: 339
    edited October 2009

    I too am thinking of joining this trial.  I must confess that the side effects are making me think twice about it.  I'm told that they are universal and pretty much everyone who gets the drug has the symptoms.  I hope you have some relief soon, Kristy.  Thank you for sharing your experience with us!

    Taking a few months off to think this through.

  • swimangel72
    swimangel72 Member Posts: 1,989
    edited October 2009

    Hi Mountains1day - your pathology is very similar to mine - I was also diagnosed in February of 2008 . My tumor was about the same size as yours but it was only a grade 1 (well differentiated). My Her2 status was 4.5............I had a year of Herceptin which ended in April of '09...........so I guess I could consider enrolling in this study except, like you, I wonder if it's worth the side-effects since my risk for recurrence is already so low (my onc said I only have a 7% risk now.) My onc didn't follow normal chemo protocols for me........I never had any of the Taxol's, but instead he  put me on a "light" chemo, Navelbine, every two weeks for 4 months, with the Herceptin which continued for a year. What chemo did you get with Herceptin? I am always nervous that the Navelbine wasn't strong enough........although my newest onc is the third one to tell me it was fine - there was some Finland study showing that Herceptin given with ANY chemo is effective. 

    Anyway I wanted to thank you for posting this info about the study - and wish the women good luck who are going to be enrolled!

  • Mountains1day
    Mountains1day Member Posts: 102
    edited October 2009

    Hi Swimangel----My onc decided to put me through 4 rounds of Taxotere/Cytoxin/Herceptin and then just 4 more rounds of Herceptin alone, totally 6 months of Herceptin versus standard 1 year.  She said Herceptin is all "over the place" in terms of treatment duration studies (all showing benefit) and my recurrence risk being low, but the biggest punch would be Femera.  Post treatment, she said I have lowered my recurrence risk factor to 5 percent, as long as I stay on Femera for the 5 year sentence. I'm nervous that because my Her/2 ratio was 6.5 and if I had enough Herceptin. There always seems to be something to be nervous about regardless of what we do.  Also, she feels it's not worth the side effects, etc. involved going on the Neratinib Clinical Trial because of my low risk factors and she is one of the chosen study doctors.  I am following it very closely and like you, cheering on all the brave women who are choosing this study.  All the best to you as well!

    Lori

  • bluedasher
    bluedasher Member Posts: 1,203
    edited October 2009

    Lori, there are studies in Europe showning that 18 weeks of Herceptin is enough. There is even the FinHer study that tested using just 9 weeks of Herceptin. My onc told me not to worry if I had to quit Herceptin early (though I ended up doing fine on it and she had me take the whole year). Unfortunately, there isn't any head to head study of 1 year vs 18 weeks (or there may be a small one underway but I haven't found any results from it. So we don't know if there is some advantage to getting Herceptin longer but it probably isn't much of a difference and you've had 6 months.

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    Good Morning Ladies,

    On the neratinib side effects- I did manage to put an end to the abdominal cramping but moving to a later med time- mid morning with food on my stomach rather than first thing in the morning. That has pretty much eliminated the cramping problem, Diarrhea continues however- research nurse said "most" people adjust within 2-4 weeks and that it is not so problematic after that- Im not at 4 weeks yet so I am still optimistic!

    My diagnosis was a higher risk which is one reason I proceeded with this study- I was very high HER2+ and also Grade 3- fortunately my tumor size was <1 cm so hopefully that means caught early- but with the high grade and high Her2+ and also a high Ki67 number- my onc considers me high risk. I also had a positive intramammary node and a negative sentinel node- not common- and that also gave me a higher risk profile since they dont really know the implications of the positive intramammary node with a negative sentinel (my onc had never had that combo before- usually a positive intramammary node also shows positive in the underarm lymph nodes).

    Well,,,,, way too much medical junk for now- so mnay decisions they leave to us and you need a biochemistry degree to figure out breast cancer treatment anymore.

    Hanging in there,

    Kristy

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited October 2009

    Kristy Ann,

    If you don't mind me asking, how did they know your intramammary node was positive?  Did they remove it?  With my tumor, also less than a cm, also high HER2+, they only removed the sentinel node which was negative.  The oncologist just told me that it was possible it could be in an intramammary node because it was in the inner portion (right in the cleavage area) of my breast.  I guess inner tumors can tend to drain centrally rather than axiallary?  They also didn't do a Ki67 on me.  I think they didn't do anything else because the onc basically said that with what I had, it really didn't matter whether it was stage I, II, or III, it would still be the same treatment.  She didn't even really give me an official "stage" on my reports, although, looking through all the criteria, it should be stage I (unless the intramammary node was infected.)  I guess I'll never know.  Please share any more of you experience.  It might help with my peace of mind!

  • Brenda_R
    Brenda_R Member Posts: 509
    edited October 2009

    KristyAnne, Tell your Onc you are not alone! I am Her2 strongly positive, ER-, PR-. My BC was 3.7cm with satelite nodules coming off of it. It was Grade 3 with a KI67 70%. I also had a positive IM node (not accessable for biopsy, or for removal per my surgeon), dx'ed by pet and ct scans, and no positive axillary nodes (17 removed, including 2 sentinal). My lump was medialy located in the inner, center of my breast, and it did go to the IM node chain. 

    I am stage 3 and my old onc said he thought I was a "cure", which doesn't jive with  everything I read that says I am high risk for recurrance. My new Onc just wrote "at risk for recurrance". 

    I thought about getting in the Neratinab trial, but have Medicare and don't think it would pay for it. 

    I am almost 3 years out from dx and 1 and 1/2 years out from active treatment, and NED so far.

  • KristyAnn
    KristyAnn Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2009

    weety911 and Brenda,

    I had a mastectomy - I had one area of IDC that was < 1cm and another area of DCIS- on opposite sides of the breast. The IDC was located on the outer quadrant and the DCIS was near the nipple. The positive IM node was found by the pathologist after the mastectomy- so completely unknown at the time of surgery and the sentinel node biopsy. They only took 1 sentinel node- was negative during surgery so the rest left alone. Because of the Positive IM node I had chemo and radiation. My Ki67 was also 70%. I am only 6 months out from my last Herceptin so I was eligible for the trial and my onc highly recommended it- she is so excited about neratinib!

    I was Stage 1 until they found the IM node and they changed it to Stage 2- there is some controversey about those IM nodes when they are positive- and my oncologist went the more aggressive route since I am also still in my 40's with young kids. Having the radiation after a mastectomy was also a somewhat controversial choice and the radiologist told me that some doctors would disagree with his recommendation.

    I talked to the research nurse today and we are going to try to treat the diarrhea a little more aggressively and see if we can get this thing to settle down- the good news is that it appears I am on the real drug and not the placebo! I bought the 48 gel cap pack at the drigstore this weekend and my 17 year daughter thought that was a hysterical thing to carry around in my purse!

    Feel free to ask any more questions weety- you can send me a private message or ask them on here- I try to check in most days (weekdays anyway) since I run around a lot with kids on the weekend.

    Kristy 

    Kristy

  • orange1
    orange1 Member Posts: 930
    edited October 2009

    Brenda -

    Don't assume you cannot participate in the neratinib trial.  Wyeth will provide the drug free of charge.  And when I called a nurse about the study, she told me the Wyeth (the pharmaceutical company that is developing the drug) has provided a budget for the necessary scans if insurance won't pay.

  • Brenda_R
    Brenda_R Member Posts: 509
    edited October 2009

    Thanks orange1. I'll call them tomorrow and see what they say.

  • Mountains1day
    Mountains1day Member Posts: 102
    edited October 2009

    Bluedasher - Yes, onc and I were aware of the FINHER studies at the time I started Herceptin.  Although the study was very small, it supported her "gut" instincts and my decision to only have Vit H for 6 months.  Currently, there's a study that's comparing Herceptin 1 year verses 2 years.  It will be interesting to know how that turns out.

    Brenda - I second what Orange1 said about Wyeth.  I was told if you didn't have Insurance, they would make arrangements and didn't want that fact to discourage anyone from getting in. 

    Kristy Ann -  I hope your side effects get better as your body gets acclimated to the Neratinib!  You rock! 

    Y'all -  Interesting information being discussed here about IM nodes.  I had an IM node show up on ultrasound follow up but not on PET or MRI's.  On MRI's it was showing as a solid mass located near scar line on the outer quadrant.  I thought IM nodes were associated w/the inner medial chain but I now know IMnodes are normally located throughout the breast and may or may not be associated w/inner medial chain.  Onc said it could have always been there and insisted to biopsy it anyway and it was B9!  Another hurdle, yea!  However, scary stuff, cuz, is it possible to have neg sentinal node without knowing about a possible positive IM node?  Does this make sense? 

    Also, just wondering about how high a HER-2 copying ratio can be.  Mine is 6.5 and my onc said it was high but she has seen higher.  Also, does it make sense that the higher it is, the more aggressive the tumor? 

  • mmm5
    mmm5 Member Posts: 1,470
    edited October 2009

    I am confused about the IM nodes, I had a ct scan right after dx that showed up negative would that have shown whether or not I had a positive IM node.

    My ki-67 was 16%, I am thinking about the trial in January, but my Onc states Herceptin should have taken care of my situation, no nodes, no LVI, however very aggressive tumor and I am not sure about IM nodes???

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited October 2009

    Let's keep this IM node discussion going.  It sounds like a lot of interesting, if not confusing information.  Also, how do you know what your Her2+ copying ratio is?  Mine was just noted as  "Score 3+  Strong staining of entire membrane in over 30% of tumor cells."

  • orange1
    orange1 Member Posts: 930
    edited October 2009

    Weety 911, they may not have sent your tumor out for FISH testing (to determine copy ratio).  Since you were 3+ you are considered positive and eligible for Herceptin.  It wouldn't make sense to test your further for 2 reasons: 1. cost 2. avoid conflicting results.  the ICH test (that showed 3+) and the FISH test (that shows gene copy number) agree in about 95% of the time for tumors that are ICH 3+.  If for some reason the two tests did not agree, and you had a low gene copy number, your insurance company could have tried to deny you Herceptin.  This would be terrible because in at least 1 study, H has been shown to help improve odds for ICH 3+, even in the absence of a positive FISH test.

    Typically ICH 2+ tumors are sent for FISH testing because for these tumors, ICH and FISH results are consistent only about 25% of the time.  Some instituitons may do FISH testing only(and not do ICH testing), because it is considered more accurate (but is more expensive).

    Brenda - good luck - let us know how it goes.

  • magentagirl
    magentagirl Member Posts: 101
    edited October 2009

    I am interested. Can someone post the phone number to call or pm me? Thanks

Categories