Canadian Health Care

Options
145791045

Comments

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    From what I've read, the "mob rule" anger and rudeness so evident at the townhalls (at least as portrayed in the media) is the result of "viral" emails, certain preachers exhorting their flock, and the media who don't have either the "balls" or even the intent to seek out the truth.

    My concern is that, with a possible federal election in the offing here in Canada, are we to be bombarded with the same tactics?  And what can we do to stop them?  We've already had the example of negative ads (outside of a campaign) and I absolutely hate them. The party says it uses them because they "work".  Where on earth has the desire for truthfulness gone?  And how can we bring it back?

    (Sorry, this is sort of off-topic, but it's really been bugging me....Frown)

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    The Conservatives are definitely moving in that direction. How do we make them realize that, Canadians don't like the negative ads and what we are looking for is truthful information.

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited September 2009

    I wonder about the people who are convinced by the negative ads? What is wrong with their thinking process?!

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    Unfortunately, not everyone has had the opportunity to an education that has taught them how to think properly.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    I watched a re-run of Boston Legal last night and the issue of political campaign ads and the lies that are told in them was part of the script.  Hmmmm, too bad it's legal.  And no point in launching a slander suit because by the time it comes to court, the election will be over, and we all know that we humans tend to always believe the worst in people -- otherwise there would be no market for tabloids and scandal sheetsTongue out.   (By the way, I never did watch Boston Legal when it first came out -- so I'm really enjoying it now!!! -- the writing is amazing).

    So, coupled with the average IQ of 100, plus Helen's note that many don't have the education or training to look at things objectively and sift through the chaff to find the grains of truth, negative ads will continue to work until our lawmakers declare them unlawful.  The sorry thing is that any political party that refuses to stoop so low will not, in the end, be rewarded for good behaviour by being elected.

    And now, back to Canadian healthcare>>>>>

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    Interesting article on HuffingtonPost.com written by a psychotherapist - Ruth Bettelheim - which may help explain the hysteria we see on the U.S. nightly news regarding healthcare at the townhalls.  It's titled "Anxiety in America:  Behind the Healthcare Debate".

    Also, in the October issue of Chatelaine there's an interesting article about women doctors (esp. GPs) and how/why they are changing the face of family healthcare.  The article also discusses the doctor shortage and how the system is trying to overcome the problem.

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    Layne, you are welcome to come north anytime you want. We won't even ask for a passport.

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2009

    Atta girl, Layne!

  • CapeBretongirl
    CapeBretongirl Member Posts: 364
    edited September 2009

    Thanks for the links, Layne.   Interesting.  Angel

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    I love that word "sheeple"  -- so descriptive.  Anyone know who originated it?

    I've been getting the impression (still faint, but growing) that the mainstream media have been getting lots of negative feedback about featuring the rowdy townhalls etc. on their newscasts, and are actually starting to do some factchecking and pulling back. Perhaps they're finally realizing that they have been guilty of contributing to the general mayhem by allowing themselves to be used by the rightwing crazies.  Well, one can hope!

    Dole and Gingrich showing some support for the President?   Priceless!!!

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    Why do I keep on thinking that the "we don't trust him" is just a euphemism for something much more revolting?

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited September 2009

    These are the same people that trusted NIXON???

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    Linda, I'm thinking the same thing you are. These are the people who elected Geoge W. TWO times ..... like once wasn't enough????!!!!

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited September 2009

    and these are the same people passing on stories about failures of goverment run health care. I couldn't stop myself from posting. There is only so much nonsense this chemo had can tolerate.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited September 2009

    That person only has 2 posts under his/her belt.  Speaks volumes.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    Thinking the same thing Blue....funny it should happen prior to Pres. Obama's healthcare reform address to Congress this evening........

    What gets me is that the very people shouting the loudest and rudest are the ones who will suffer the most if the "system" continues as is.  But then, as someone said, let's make sure the richest 1% keep the remaining 99% right where they belong -- far beneath us.......

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited September 2009

    For so long the US has been looking for problems outside their country -- those nasty WMD and terrorists.  They haven't had to focus on their own country and it's internal problems.  They've been too busy running around like cowboys.  It's a slap in the face to see that their own country isn't the best in the world, as they thought.  They're in shock and being defensive -- how dare someone point out their weakness(es).  So they're trying to shoot down Obama for drawing attention to their inadequacies, and bury them under the carpet.  Out of sight out of mind.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited September 2009

    It's interesting that they question Obama's patriotism when he brings light to the problems in the US.  I would consider it more patriotic that he wants better for his country.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited September 2009

    Hey guys, what's up with all the brand new posters on the other thread?  Do you think it is just coincidental?

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited September 2009

    On the American people's behalf I would like to state that we did NOT elect G.W. Bush twice. All research since the 2000 election has clearly shown that had the Supreme Court not stopped the recount in Florida, but had instead directed that all legally cast ballots be counted, Gore would have won Florida and the 2000 election (and he did have more of the popular vote even without the recount in Fla, so the people didn't want Bush, the system allowed him to weasel his way in.) And in 2004 the voting irregularities in Ohio were so rampant that it is not a conspiracy theory to wonder if lines 6-8 hours long in areas that tend to vote Democratic while there were no lines in traditionally Republican areas might not have had a hand in the outcome of that election. In both cases the Secretary of State for that State (the official in charge of elections) was a Republican with a major role in the Bush re-election committee for that state. Just to say.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    And that's why it was so gratifying to see such a wide majority of electoral college votes in the 2008 election.  Too bad many Repubs still refuse to accept the people's will.....

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    From what you say, Revkat, it sounds like the American version of democracy is not as sophisticated as Americans want the rest of the world to believe. Regardless, Americans demonstrated more respect for George W than they do for Obama. Canadians love Obama - polls indicate he'd be Prime Minister in our country easily.

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited September 2009

    hrf -- on the respect thing you are so right. The left may have hated George W. but they respected the office. Not like the idiot from South Carolina who yelled "you lie" at the President this evening during his speech. The lack of respect for Obama was also shown in the kerfuffle about him speaking to school children.  Bush was in a classroom on 9/11 for heaven's sake. Presidents have a tradition of speaking to children. But not when that president is Obama. Then it is seen as some kind of scary political manuever.

    I'm in a bad mood tonight, so I better get off the boards. Sorry for talking you off topic.

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    Anytime, revkat .... you can vent here any time you want. It's too bad that Obama is going to have to be 10 times as good as anyone else in order to get even 1/10 the credit he deserves. Unfortunately, from my perspective, I believe there is an underlying issue .... I  hope time will prove me wrong.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    I think most of us outside the U.S. recognize the "underlying" issue that makes so many southern repubs angry about the current occupant of the White House.  They have no idea the damage they are doing to the world's opinion of the U.S.  Fortunately those of us closest to you know that the  majority of Americans are caring individuals who respect their democratically elected President and want only the best for their fellow citizens.

    Hugs to all my American sisters,

    Linda

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2009

    Excuse me, Linda.  But did I see something about racism in your post... "underlying issue that makes so many southern repubs angry about the current occupant in the White House"?  I hope that I misunderstood your comment.  I would have loved to have had Condi Rice as president.  Or Michael Steele.  I can tell you that many, many conservatives do not like Obama's ideology.  Can we disagree with him without being called, "racist?"  I am a southerner and I can assure you that having an African American occupying the WH is the last thing on my mind.

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    Shirley, I can totally accept what you are saying about your own value system and that disagreement doesn't equal racism. However, the poisonous comments and outright lies coming from some American pundits are being noticed around the world and the international media are commenting on what is happening in your country. You probably wouldn't get to see these articles but I have seen them in our national papers - some written here and some reprinted from other countries. The beauty of living in a democracy is that, while we are free to speak openly about our governments, we generally respect the office of the President or the Prime Minister or whoever happens to hold the top job in our respective countries, and we overall support our country because we know that we can vote differently in the next election. We like to think that we live in civil societies where we respect the role of the majority......sometimes our candidate wins and sometimes not but we know that within the next 4 years we have a chance to get a new leader. I do wish good things for my American friends - and certainly all of us on these boards want good things for each other because we all face a common challenge - breast cancer.

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited September 2009

    I agree, Helen. The total lack of respect for a man who was elected by a much greater majority than the last guy is quite surprising. The underlying root of the backlash is his race - and the mistruths about his "ideology" provide a polite excuse in the minds of some people to rage against a duly elected President.  The nonsense preceding his speech to students this week is a prime example.

    But let's get back to Canadian Health Care. First I am off to play some bridge. Because I don't have to spend a second of time or mental energy fighting an insurance company or mortgaging my house to look after this dratted breast cancer.

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited September 2009

    If we are getting back to Canadian health care, then I have a problem and maybe someone here has advice for me. I started the Arimidex about a month ago. My baseline bone mineral density confirms osteopenia (not news).....and I think many of us have heard about the research indicating that Zometa reduces risk of bc recurrence by 35% as well as protecting our bones. The hospital where I get my treatment won't administer Zometa and my insurance company says that it is a drug covered under the Canada Health Act and so they won't pay for it. The people from the drug company will actually arrange for someone to come to my home for the infusion ... but I would have to pay about $1,000 for each infusion. Has anyone else encountered this? Any suggestions?

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    Helen, check the CancerCareOntario website.  It lists all the drugs covered under the Canada Health Act in Ontario for cancer patients.  If Zometa is not listed, then you can take that proof back to your insurance company.

    My doc recently put me on Actonel for slight osteopenia (and darn, I just remembered that I forgot to take it this a.m.Frown).  With your second primary, it may well be that Zometa is the drug for you, esp. with your BRCA2+ status.  If it's approved by Health Canada you should be eligible.  And let's hope your insurance company is not trying to pull a fast one.....

Categories