DIEP Surgery in Seattle
Comments
-
Okay, I am sorry, I can't sit by and watch this last post from Miserable without saying anything. I am SORRY, but a TRAM is NOT equivelant to a DIEP. A TRAM flap utilizes the rectus abdominis for the blood supply - if not all of it, then at least a piece of it. Many plastic surgeons prefer not to do DIEP because it IS so time consuming and because the payout from insurance is generally not as high - so more work for not so great money. There is NO WAY that I would let anyone touch my abdominals. I had to argue with my insurance company about this. Will it affect your ADL's (activities of daily living) to have the rectus abdominis cut? Maybe not, if your ADL's do not consist of a lot of lifting or high activity. BUT, I like to hike, ski, bike, snowboard... etc. All of these activities require good core strength. Core strength = abdominals, back muscles... basically your "stabilizers". There have been studies regarding the risk of abdominal hernia w/TRAM flap, and yes, it is much greater with TRAM than w/DIEP. Why do you think they have to utilize a mesh cover when doing TRAM? Please go to Dr. Said. I know that the University of Washington is very much proactive regarding the DIEP - if you look on the Cancer Care Alliance website, it will tell you how much they prefer it over the TRAM. It is unfortunate that Dr. Isik has chosen this direction. It only helps the insurance companies to deny a much better procedure in hopes of paying less - how are we ever going to advance with this kind of thinking? And who loses out? The patient.
-
www.seattlecca.org/diseases/breast-cancer-reconstruction.cfm
I would also talk to Dr. Said about doing immediate reconstruction... There are doctors that do it - despite radiation... and you would spend less time under anesthesia overall, less OR time, less hospital stay time... etc.
-
Miserable: Nordy is right on. You don't want a big ole floppy belly which you would be left with after a TRAM. Ck out this plastic surgery site; abstract regarding DIEP/TRAM:
There is a lot of information out there; just need to keep digging. Plastic surgery site has a lot of information/abstracts.
J.Seda
-
Wow ..... I appreciate the enthusiasm of all the posts .... but will admit I'm happy to have this particular topic readdressed.
I have currently been turned down by the review board at Group Health for an appointment with Dr. Neligan or Dr. Said at UWMC. I immediately chatted with my PCP who is "hopefully" touching bases with the powers to be before I send off an appeals letter.
In regards to the topic of a TRAM vs. DIEP .... Dr. Paige (Virginia Mason) told me that he could not guarantee that NO muscle would be taken from my abdomen until he was actually doing the surgery. Hmmmmm ?????
-
Dear Golfer: Do you have Grp Health or Grp Health Options with choice to go out of network. I just went through appeal with GH who initially denied Dr. Neligan doing my DIEP procedure. With letters from Dr. Neligan and myself stating this was unacceptable and reasons why (I don't know your history so can't offer info), the decision was overturned and my surgery with Dr. Neligan is going forward. In the state of Wash., medical insurance can not deny you reconstruction after breast cancer. If you can't get this done in a timely manner, citing more options for complications with delay and tissue expanders etc. Besides, a delay also adds another surgery beyond the immediate reconstruction. The costs will be much greater for GH for you to wait. Stay on them as its your body and you're paying the premiums.
Good luck
J.Seda
-
Ck out the above abstract. Failure for immediate DIEP is not 50% higher than TRAM. There are many factors that go into failure; weight, age, radiation, diabetes, smoking. The key to success rate is for the docs to properly select their patients for the different procedures.
J.Seda
-
I didn't ask him, but his office person told me that his first opening is December 21. FYI, I would never opt for surgery anywhere near Xmas. It would muck up the holiday, but more importantly, you often end up with the second string (both docs and nurses) caring for you since the first and most senior string generally gets the holiday(s) off. I worked at VM for many years and that was almost always true.
I've interviewed several plastic surgeons. As for the surgeries, both use lower abdominal fat and tissue to form the reconstructed breast resulting in a tummy tuck and a scar that goes from hip bone to hip bone. The primary difference is that the Tram is done with a pedicled flap which sacrifices the rectus abdominus muscle on the affected side (of both if bilat). The vasculature of the muscle supplies blood flow to the transplanted tissue. The muscle is cut and it and the belly tissue are moved into the proper position through a tunnel created under the skin between the abdominal donor site and the breast area which has undergone a skin sparing mastectomy. You are generally in the hospital for 2 days. I am told that pain in the reconstructed breast area is not a big deal, but the belly pain can be significant for a few days. Opiates are a good thing during this period.
The DIEP is a free flap which also uses belly fat and tissue, but requires teasing blood vessels out of the rectus muscle, moving the free flap and blood vessels to the breast area, removing a portion of a rib to access the appropriate blood vessels in the chest and then sewing the very tiny artery and vein portions together with microsurgery to establish blood flow to the transplanted tissue. It is a much more complex procedure from a surgical perspective and takes several hours longer than a TRAM, requires a 3-4 day hospital stay with the first 24 hours in Intensive Care where the flap can be frequently checked for signs of failure, and is much more expensive. It also has a higher chance of partial or total flap failure due to the potential clotting off of the newly anastomosed (connected) blood vessels. He also mentioned that many women are not candidates for a DIEP because of other problems such as smoking, vascular disease, tiny blood vessels, too much abdominal tissue (aka belly fat), diabetes, etc., etc. The TRAM has a reputation for a more painful recovery because of the muscle issue, but he claims that studies show that pain catheters (which are attached to pumps that allow patients to self medicate with pain meds with the push of a button) have leveled the playing field.
After years of doing both procedures and the new study I mentioned previously (which validates his observations with his patients over the last decade or so), Dr. Isik explained that he thinks it is best to "keep it simple." He will do bilat DIEP's on some women, but not a unilateral DIEP. Like his partner, he is also adamant that immediate TRAM or DEIP is a bad idea, resulting in a 50% complication rate. For that reason, he normally requires his patients to wait about a month. Fortunately, his partner who does only TRAM's and implants, but who is the go-to guy in Seattle (according to many docs I know) both for TRAM flap and implant reconstruction and to correct other docs screw ups, is willing to do a TRAM in about a week, This allows time for the path to come back before the reconstruction.
-
I am totally pissed off at having cancer and I suspect that most of you are as well, but please don't attack the messenger. I understand that everyone has their own views/experiences, but I didn't make any of this up. I am simply repeating what I have been told by several respected plastics guys.
According to Isik, abdominal bulging/hernia post TRAM is primarily a result of poor surgical technique in which the surgeon fails to properly close (suture) the multiple layers at the donor site. (Yes, Virginia, not all surgeons are created equal.) He claims to have never had a hernia issue with any of his patients because he is meticulous in the way he closes the abdominal defect and he specifically told me that mesh should ONLY be used in cases where a bulge/hernia has developed.
Neither he nor his partner differentiated between complication rates for immediate TRAM or DIEP. They both told me that complication rates, which run the gamut from extremely minimal to catastrophic (total flap failure), are 50% higher in both procedures when done immediately. Again, not all of those complications are serious - they have just made a choice to not do immediate reconstructions. However, I had not seen the article you referenced. I'll have to ask him how it is that he is a coauthor of a 2008 article stating the opposite.
As for loss of the rectus muscle, I too am very concerned since I lead a very active lifestyle and own my own business which can require that I lift as much as 40-50 lbs. Restraining two large dogs wanting to chase a cat or squirrel in front of an oncoming car (they're sighthounds and don't see anything but their prey) is also a concern. In addition, this is on the same side as my dominant arm. However, I have had the opportunity to talk to women who underwent a TRAM several years ago and they claim to have no limitations now. It took a while to regain their strength, but it eventually came back and they now have no limitations. The bump caused by the rectus stub left after the procedure has atrophied and is now invisible. Their bellies also look great, not "floppy", but these are active women who work out and keep their remaining 5 1/2 abdominal muscle groups in great shape. (I've certainly seen a lot of floppy bellies with 2 good rectus muscles.) I have also read all the horror stories. I guess it comes down to surgical skill, preop conditioning and luck of the draw.
The DIEP is clearly the newer and more sophisticated procedure, and it is clearly the most expensive of all the reconstruction options. Clearly, some docs will be unwilling to do more work for less $$, but not all. Frankly, I don't give a rat's pitutti about the financial thing; I am much more concerned about the complexity of the procedure, its risks and the possibility of a really poor outcome. The blood vessels used to support the transplanted tissue flap are tiny in even the best candidates, and the risk of occlusion at the anastomosis during the first 24-48 hours is not insignificant. You get one chance. Lose the flap and you can't "go back to the well" for more tissue. And let's not ignore all the DIEP horror stories out there. A good outcome is by no means guaranteed with any procedure. The other thing that keeps me wondering is the fact that a surgeon will never guarantee that you will not wake up with a TRAM even though you went to sleep expecting a DIEP. There is simply no way to reliably determine if the diameter of a patient's blood vessels is sufficient to support the flap until the surgeon gets into the belly and actually looks at them.
Bottom line: this all scares the crap out of me. So far, I've been in the (bad) minority on everything related to BC. I've had 15 years of "normal" mammograms, but was in the 10% that are not detected by mammo; my DCIS is large and multicentric meaning that I am in the minority of DCIS patients who require a mastectomy; my DCIS is high grade with a Van Nuys score of 11, etc., etc. Given what has happened so far, I feel like I have a bull's-eye on my back and if it can go wrong, it will. All I can do is continue to search the literature, talk to lots of docs and postop patients, use my gut and my best judgment and make the choice that seems best for me. It may not be the best choice for anyone but me, but then again, I'm the one that has to live with the results. That is true for everyone of us.
-
Hi miserable (I hope this names changes at some point
) - I can only talk about my DIEP experience. My PS told me he had done 200 DIEP's, mostly in the last two years, with no flap failures (he did admit it could happen at some point to him though). I asked the nurses in the hopsital what they observed in all the ladies who came in for DIEP and they said from time to time there is venous congestion which is treated with leeches (yuck, but they work) or if there is poor circulation (which becomes apparent that first 24 hours with the hourly checks), the patient goes back to surgery that day to fix the problem. I was told there is little risk of flap loss after the first few days. I was never told I could possibly have a TRAM if for some reason the DIEP didn't work. Maybe my PS was pretty confident, I don't know. I guess the message is that you need to find a PS who does this all the time and has lots of microsurgery experience. My PS also re-attaches fingers, etc so I think microsurgery is his thing. Cost is not a factor because I am in Canada. I should add I had a unilateral DIEP and I asked what would happen if I developed BC in my other breast. I was told there would be the possibility of using the inner thigh, the SGAP and other sites could be used for a reconstruction.
-
I had the same discussion (re cancer in the contralateral breast) with each of the plastics guys I've met so far. Interestingly, they all said the same thing. In their experience, most women who have had either a TRAM or DIEP on the first breast opt for an implant if they have a recurrence on the other side. They don't want anymore big scars and they want to get it done and over with rather than having to go through a protracted recovery again. Don't know what I would do in that event.
-
I think no matter what surgeon you talk to you will get a little bit of a different story, doesn't really need to be a battle of who's right. That gets discouraging for people just beginning their journey I think
-
Having had both implants and SGAP, I cannot imagine having an autologus transplant on one side then an implant on the other. I really doubt many women would choose that sequence at all!
As for determining the size of blood vessels, most of the microvascular surgeons get MRAs or CTs of the abdomen and pelvis prior to surgery. This shows not only the number of perforator arteries, but also their size and location. If my gluteal perforators had not been adequate, we would have changed course--pre-op--to IGAP or stacked DIEP. Never would they have just gone ahead and done a TRAM. Unthinkable. Perhaps all surgeons do ont work that way, but I'd be pissed if they switched on me like that. Good pre-op planning prevents the bulk of the complications.
Can anyone enlighten me on why there is a stated 50% complication rate with immediate flap surgeries? Especially if there will be no chemo or rads? What does delaying surgery do besides putting you at risk for another anesthesia?
Anne
-
Loving the discussion regarding DIEP vs TRAM. Here's a site/study that states * in this study* no big difference in DIEP flaps vs TRAMS. http://www.eclips.consult.com/eclips/article/Breast%20Diseases/S1043-321X(08)79098-2
Again, you have to trust your surgeons and their assessment of the big picture for you, taking your health into consideration as no one else knows your situation. Anne W is correct. The preop studies give the surgeon the information he needs to make his pre-surgery plans and what is best for you. He's not going in half cocked. Trust me, they are being very careful and giving your case their ultimate scrutiny prior to. In all the medical abstracts I've read, I've not encountered anything anywhere that states there's a 50 % complication rate on immediate DIEPS. That doesn't make sense. Also, I've not ever heard, other than on this site, of a surgeon switching during the procedure from a DIEP to a TRAM. If they tell you this on your consent form, I would really question this before signing, even if I had to get another opinion. I have my PS pre surg visit next week at the U of Wash and I'm going to approach this question so will pass on what I hear as well.
We all need to do our jobs by getting in the best shape we can be in, as well as eat healthy and exercise prior to having any procedures done. Praying is good too!!
JSeda
-
Read several plastic surgery abstracts and have found no statistics that demonstrate 50% complication rate with immediate DIEPS. Here's another abstract that states no difference between success rate of immediate DIEP vs delayed DIEP.
I'd personally rather work on being in good shape and going for the immediate DIEP and not the TRAM as I don't want the floppy belly the rest of my life. Again, all depends on the surgeon's skill and our condition.
J.Seda
-
Okay, I have only skimmed thru most of this whole thread because I saw so many things that really caused me visceral upset, and it is a holiday weekend and I want to relax! I logged out and tried to put it out of my mind, but then decided I couldn't, so I'm going to, at least, try limit how much I would usually write. I'm sorry if I rile anyone else up.
I had stacked DIEP in '06 in New Orleans. These are the most experienced doctors in DIEP in the country - probably the world - thousands of DIEPS and GAPS and all manner of stacked combinations. Their website is filled with a wealth of info. If I have to have the contralateral breast done, I would NOT get an implant, I would have another flap surgery in New Orleans - maybe a stacked GAP this time. Scars fade, but I don't want to be worrying about having to have an implant replaced at some future date. And after having the best, I only want the best again.
http://www.breastcenter.com for lots of info on reconstructive techniques and studies about outcomes.
Their failure rate is less than 1%. Anyone who quotes 50% is either ignorant or trying to instill fear about the procedure. Also, with experienced surgeons, there should never be a need to be deciding, during surgery, to do a TRAM vs. a DIEP. Never. But again, this is in the hands of experienced surgeons. If they can't offer you this guarantee, they have not had enough experience. I traveled from Minnesota to have my surgery. My insurance paid. This clinic works with many different insurance companies. Don't ever feel that you don't have a choice and that travel is not doable. Doing this was outside my comfort zone, but I'm so glad I took the leap of faith and headed south. Just consider it as an option, if it's possible for you.
We talk about the great medical care in this country. And it is great, if you have good insurance (and insurance companies are rationing care, don't kid yourself). Or if you have a job that provides insurance (and less and less can afford to do so). Or if you have a lot of money. We need to think beyond our own personal situations to all the folks who are not fortunate to have money and coverage. Preventative care sucks in this country. Our costs are higher and health outcomes are poorer. Again, I'm looking at our whole society, not just a select slice of the pie. And we all go down with this sinking ship. Fear tactics to preserve a status quo that only works for the privledged really ticks me off. No one in this country should go broke because they get sick, or not get good preventative care or be tied to a job lest they lose their coverage. And no one's job is safe in these economic times, so don't think it can't happen to you, no matter how hard you work or how deserving you think you might be. Wait 'til you have a kid graduate from college or grad school and either hasn't been able to land a job yet or gets job that doesn't provide coverage. You wouldn't believe the premiums the insurance companies are charging for healthy twenty-something kids who have to pay for their own insurance. I don't think health care should be considered a capitalistic commodity, but a right for all Americans. Now I step down from my soap box!
-
Minnesota, you made my day!
Anne
-
The particular surgeon Miserable is talking about also quoted me $50K for my bilateral delayed DIEP when I called 2 years ago, stating that they don't deal with insurance and that I would have to submit for reimbursement.
-
I'd definitely go to someone else if that's what he told you as it is not the status quo!
J.Seda
-
Ladies: I agree with you that health care is too expensive. My family is in the healthcare field and we see it first hand. Its a very hard and demanding field to be in. You can make a good living but its not so easy any more with having to pay high salaries, high costs of supplies, high malpractice ins. premiums, as well as less and less reimbursement for services. That's why we're seeing more and more good docs get out as they can't afford to keep the doors open as well as way too much paperwork/regulations. I also see how much free care, we the healthcare providers, give away. We get no assistance from the gov. for this. Its out of pocket and our costs still go on. Might want to look at the facility side of healthcare as to where the monies are going. No one has had the common sense yet to put a price freeze on costs/healthcare/insurance premiums, which keep going up faster than you can blink an eye. Until this happens as well as torte reform, no system changes will work. There has to be some common sense. Also, who's going to pay for the free healthcare for everyone; our broke government. People in this country have got to learn to pay for things, not just wait around for handouts on one hand as well as demanding the best care in the world on the other. These services cost money.
I grew up in a large family and we as kids, learned to work out buts off and if we wanted something, we earned it, and because of those basic principles, we were taught at an early age, that you don't buy what you can't afford. With that in mind, we also learned to educate ourselves about what we are after, such as med insurance, then make the best choice as well as live with the decision. We didn't learn to go out and complain everytime things didn't go our way, or, if we made a bad choice and had to buck up, learn from it, then go on. I do agree that insurance companies (own washington dc) need to pay their CEO's less and cut prices. But, we still need free choice to keep coverage and prices competitive. I would like to see some solutions offered instead of complaints about healthcare. Its easy to complain and takes an effort to fix it. We all need to start and if you do have great ideas, write/call your congressmen/senators. Remember that old saying, ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can do for you. Its amazing how fast we forgot. Like in the past, America was known throughout the world as a leader and today, we've become followers.
We're all dealing with the field of Plastic Surgery, which is a very specialized area of healthcare. I do feel that costs do need to come down into a more realistic range. But, you also have to realize how high their malpractice insurance is as well as how many yrs of education it takes to get there. Never hurts to talk to your docs and negotiate a price prior to having procedures done. Worse case scenario, they say no, but then again, you might be surprised.
Now, I will also get off my soapbox.
JSeda
-
I am astounded how many have misinterpreted or mistated what I posted. I NEVER said 50% failure rate. DIEP flaps have a 1-3% failure rate in most of the literature, but you can find double digit failure rates reported in some series if you look. The term "complications" includes but is not limited to flap failures.
The real issue here is that nobody who plans to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy wants to wait if they don't have to. I totally agree with that. Studies show that women who undergo immediate reconstruction gain an immediate psychosocial benefit over those who have delayed reconstruction, but long term follow-up studies have also shown no real differences in psychosocial adjustment when all is said and done.
I talked to one of the docs I'm talking to again last night. I told him that I had stirred up a hornet's nest with the 50% COMPLICATION rate thing. He emphasized that every woman has different risk factors and will heal differently. He then directed me to http://www.medicaledu.com/phases.htm for a basic explanation of his rational for delaying reconstructions. He again told me that the increased complication rate in immediate reconstruction (whether implants, TRAM or DIEP) is tied to the phases of wound healing. Immediate reconstructions are performed during the inflammatory stage which begins immediately during the mastectomy. Doing an immediate reconstruction procedure piles one inflammatory response on top of another. For that reason, women who are earlier in the healing phase are more likely (not guaranteed - just more likely) to have problems, which again can range from very minor things to catastrophic things. In their experience, women who are in the Remodeling Phase post mastectomy sail through reconstruction with few if any problems, but he is willing to consider doing a reconstruction during the second or Proliferate Phase. It is clearly a more conservative approach than that used by docs who do immediate reconstructions, but it does make sense from a purely physiological perspective. I'm not advocating one way or another. I simply offered it as information to be considered by other women facing the same thing I am facing. Choose to believe it or not, but for those of you who have not yet decided what to do, I certainly would ask any doc I see about it.
I had hoped that I would find support here and that we could have an open exchange of information and share what we have been told, learned through our own research and through talking to women who have faced the beast before us. I don't agree with things in a lot of the posts I've read and know that some of the things posted are simply not accurate, but I respect the poster's right to exercise their right to free speech without being attacked. It saddens me that the responses from some of you has been downright hostile. I simply don't have the energy to deal with that on top of all the other crap I'm dealing with right now.
-
I don't have a lot of time to read these big long posts, but I don't think any of them are really helping the original question or her issue.
-
I DID ask how the "complication" rate was figured. I know there's not a 50% failure rate. And I am not sure I believe this quoted complication rate. That's half of all flap surgeries, done as a part of the mastectomy procedure, have complications. Really???
Is that true complications? Or are they factoring in stage 2 revisions?
I can see a higher rate of complications if the surgeries are done before rads, and possibly before chemo. But getting such an extensive surgery usually means you've gone over the risks/benefits with your surgeon. Most surgeons of course delay recon in lieu of treatment that can compromise the outcome. So I'm thinking that is another example of stats used to distract from the real story.
I don't think you were attacked personally, dragonfly, after going back to re-read the posts. Sorry if you feel like you were. There are many excellent points made here by all people--you included--and I think it IS a good exchange of ideas.
There are reasons to delay surgery. Some surgeries will suit one person over another. And we are nothing if not passionate about our own surgery successes and our surgeons here.
Anne
-
Me? I don't feel attacked at all, I know better than to take this personally. I was simply stating that this banter wasn't even addressing what golfer posted for her question, IMO!!
-
I think maybe Anne meant that to Miserable per her posting... ?
-
Wow ... guess I opened a can of worms ! I was just looking for any experiences with local (Seattle docs) which I did receive and I thank those of you who responded to my initial question with their thoughts.
As you all can see I have numerous posts over the last 2 years, and there is room for all sorts of forums. What I have found works best, is to keep to the topic at hand.
I will continue on with my journey and still look forward to any/all thoughts on the topic. Thanks, Gals !!!
-
I live in Seattle so I was going to say there is Dr. Isik and Dr. Beshilan, and the guy at UW. They are all supposed to be very good and experienced.
Miserable, I'm also looking at eventually doing a unilateral reconstruction and I'm now beyond frustrated.It is so confusing.
The whole TRAM vs DIEP thing is driving me crazy. I've been going back and forth between them for over a year now. One surgeon team is adament that there is no difference and the other says it does. So what am I supposed to do toss a coin? My gut (so to speak) say to go with the DIEP and keep the stomach muscle intact. I do a lot of core strengthing to keep my back from acting up. I've also got a 2 and 4 year old so having to wait a few years to get my stomach muscles back is not a option.
I do want to clarify that I'm not trashing the TRAM. I know Dr. Isik and Welk are excellent, excellent surgeons, I know many woman who have gone to them and had wonderful results and they have fixed some bothced surgeries. If I did decide to do a TRAM I would go with them. I just worried about losing a stomach muscle. I won't get that back!
I had hoped to go to Dr. Isik for a DIEP, but I guess that won't happen now and you are saying that Beshlian is booked up for over a year????!!!!!! UW is out of network for me and my insurance pays nothing for out of network.
Anyway I'm not sure I helped much, but best of luck on your surgery.
Jilda
-
Correct me if I'm wrong but Dr. Isik's website promotes the DIEP as well as the TRAM procedure.
J.Seda
-
http://www.diepbreastreconstruction.org/
Check the aforementioned out re: diep vs tram procedures. Another opinion.
J.Seda
-
Yes Isik's website does talk about DIEP over TRAM which is a bit confusing if he has changed his policy.
Thanks for the link!
Jilda
-
Hello Seattle Gals ..... looking for anyone that had a DIEP surgery performed by Dr. Paige at Virginia Mason. Would like to hear of your experience !!!!!!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team