Chemo or No Chemo ......

marie111
marie111 Member Posts: 119

Hello to all you wonderful ladies,

I am again at another crossroad in this journey and need your wonderful insights. I was diagnosed on May 7th with ILC and LCIS in the left brest. I have since had a lumpectomy and SNB.  All the results came back good. I have clear margins on the ILC, no node involvement and no lymphatic or vascular evidence. My case was presented last week at the tumor board at St-Mary;s hospital  for recommendations. They have recommended I have a mastectomy because of the excessive presence of LCIS and that I will be put on Tamoxifen for 5 years. Where they are not clear is about the chemo. Because of my BC being early stage (Stage 1, Grade 1 or 2 depending on the pathologist) and my tumor being ER+/PR+/HER2- chemo may not be necessary. On the other hand because of my age (42) chemo would usually be recommended. They have asked my to enter the TailorX trials to determine my OncoType (I am in canada and here Oncotype is not approved by medicare or readily availalble) and be in a better postion to make my decision.  This means another 2 to 3 weeks wait. So what do I do ? Do I have chemo and forget the Oncotype as I do not want to wake up 5 years from not and say I should have had chemo. Also I feel like it's getting long to do nothing (dx on May 7th and operated May 25th - nothing since). Or do I wait for the Oncotype results and make a more educated decision? There is a small emotional part of me that says if I don't have to go thru chemo why would I ...... Is there alot of you ladies out there with similar type BC as me who did not have chemo?  How reliable is the Oncotype test ? I am using this to lame out of chemo or is having BC with no chemo treatment really a reality and is it really safe ? So many questions so little answers, would love any feedback you can give.

Thanks and my thoughts are with you all going thru your own journeys.

Marie

Comments

  • idaho
    idaho Member Posts: 1,187
    edited July 2009

    Are you going to have the mastectomy?  If you are I would think they would do that first and then chemo if necessary.  That would give you plenty of time to get oncotype testing back.    I personally don't think waiting another month would do any harm- especially since you have already had a lumpectomy and because then you will know for sure if you need chemo or not with the oncotype.  Peace and health to you,   Tami

  • Rabbit_fan
    Rabbit_fan Member Posts: 166
    edited July 2009

    Hi Marie - this is confusing stuff, isn't it?  Tami makes a good point about sorting out the mastectomy first and I second what she said.  There's another thread in this forum called Any early stage women not take chemo, or something like that where a lot of people have weighed in. 

    I wouldn't call it laming out if you don't do chemo.  The fact is that with node negative at least, more women don't benefit from chemo than do benefit from it.  Chemo seems like a pretty rough thing to me, and if you don't have to go through it why would you?  Just to give you some comparison info, here is what the oncologist told me before she even mentioned the Oncotype test:  out of 100 women with my age, grade and ER status, in 10 years:

    With no chemo and no tamoxifen: 82 would NOT have a distant recurrance, and 18 would. 

    If all 100 just took tamoxifen, 89 would not have a distant recurrance and 11 would anyway.

    If all 100 just did chemo, 88 would not have a distant recurrance and 12 would anyway.

    If all 100 did chemo and tamoxifien, 92 would not have a distant recurrence, and 8 would anyway.

    So by her stats, the difference between tamox only and tamox+chemo was that only 3 women would benefit from adding the chemo.  I asked her if she really thought a 3% chance of benefit was worth it, and she said "If you're one of those three women, it is."  So that seems to be their perspective - no matter how few people will be helped, everyone should take the chemo.   I think it is safe to not take chemo for the majority of people, because in my scenario 82% didn't even need it, and 8% have a distant recurrance anyway - but the problem has been that they said they didn't have a way to find out who those few were who would benefit.  That's where the Oncotype comes in and I decided to make my decision based on that, rather than the much more generic risk typing that the doctor wanted to go with initially.   I guess for now I decided I would rather regret not doing chemo than regret doing it.

    There's also another gene test that is supposed to be available this summer called Breast Bioclassifier - I'm keeping an eye out for that because I want to have that done when it comes out too, just to get some backup of my Oncotype results.  I suppose that's going overboard but I think the more detail you can get on your particular case the better.

    Everyone has a different viewpoint, so two people with the same stats could take two different routes - you just have to go with your instinct on what is right for you.  I think if you feel like you were talked into your decision and it doesn't turn out the way you thought it would, that's where the real regrets come from.  Good luck!  Eileen

  • Rabbit_fan
    Rabbit_fan Member Posts: 166
    edited July 2009

    I'll also add about the TailorX trial - I didn't sign up for it because I was really leaning away from chemo anyway, and I didn't want to be randomized to chemo if my score came back on the low end of the randomization range (which it did).  If I had been leaning toward having the chemo anyway before I looked into the TailorX I probably would have gone ahead and signed up for it and gone with wherever it put me.

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited July 2009

    Marie,  In your heart do you already know what you want? Which way are you leaning right now, what decision could you live with, that's what it comes down to, I think.  With a grade 2 tumor that is 2 cm you are in a position to benefit from chemo according to the traditional clinical criteria, even with negative nodes.  I guess you have to decide how much trust you put in the OncotypeDX number and the criteria used in the trial.

  • LoriL
    LoriL Member Posts: 185
    edited July 2009

    Hi Marie,

    I don't think waiting another 2-3 weeks for the results of the Oncotype Dx test would put you in harms way. I was diagnosed 4/22/09, had bilateral mastectomy 5/28/09, and just got the results of my Oncotype score back a week ago. I'm 43, and my Oncologist was leaning toward not recommending chemo for me as my tumor was only 0.8cm. Initially I was thinking of enrolling in the TailoRX study, but decided against it for 2 reasons. The first one is that I need radiation because even though I had clear margins, my tumor was growing very close to one of the edges. Normally that wouldn't have been a problem to do the radiation and the TailoRX study, but my Radiation Oncologist is adament about not starting Tamoxifen until radiation is completed. With the TailoRX trial, you have to either start chemo or Tamoxifen (depending on your score) within 2 weeks of enrolling in the study. The second reason I decided against the study, is like Eileen said- I was leaning toward no chemo anyway, and didn't want the trial deciding it for me. When my Oncotype test came back low at 16, that confirmed it in my mind and that of my Oncologist, that chemo wouldn't benefit me a whole lot. My Oncologist said that it would decrease my recurrence rate by only 1%.

    However, in your case, I have to agree with Gitane. A 2cm tumor is a whole lot different than a 0.8cm tumor, even if you didn't have any lymph node involvement. A friend of mine had a 1.8cm tumor and they didn't even suggest the Oncotype test for her as she was automatically a candidate for chemo because of the tumor size.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2009

    As Eileen's post pointed out, doing chemo is not a guarantee that the cancer won't come back, and really only changes that likelihood by a couple of percentage points.  Her stats also point out that if you are only going to do one systemic treatment, hormone treatment is the more effective route.

    Which scenario would you be able to better deal with:  not doing chemo now, enjoying good health for a period of time, having the cancer return eventually and fighting it then from a position of strength with everything you've got at that point or doing the chemo now, dealing with months of issues from the chemo including lowered immunity, potentially doing permanent cardiac and nerve damage to your body, losing your hair and possibly your nails, and then have the cancer still come back?

    For me, I chose good health up front.  I lost a significant amount of weight (which according to my breast surgeon lowered my risk at least as much as doing chemo), exercise much more regularly, lowered my stress levels, and increased the amount of sleep I get each night.  In other words, I made me a priority, and am taking good care of myself for the first time in years.  It's been over a year.  I take my tamoxifen faithfully, and I've had a couple of lumps that have shown up as my breasts have healed, but the biopsies were clear.  So far, so good.  I know absolutely that I made the right choice for me.

    You have to make the choice that's right for you.  If you think that the Oncotype score will help you be more comfortable with your decision, then it is worth waiting for, but if you already know which way will make you able to face the future head on, then go for it and don't look back. 

  • Kleenex
    Kleenex Member Posts: 764
    edited July 2009

    I beg to differ on the tumor size issue. I've got similar stats to Marie here: 2.1 cm ILC tumor, no node involvement, ER+ & PR+, 45 years of age at diagnosis. Oncologist #1 was prepared to push for chemo based on just tumor size alone. Oncologist #2 sent off for Oncotype DX, and I came back an 11. So Oncologist #2 took chemo completely off the table: she said that the negatives of the side effects would outweigh the small possible benefit for me. I'm taking Tamoxifen, which allegedly reduces my risk of recurrence/spread by half.

    The young age thing is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you're expecting a longer life within which the cancer might decide to do more bad stuff. But on the other hand, in that same longer life, issues from the chemo could also become problematic. Your age of 42 may play into this for the oncologist - at 45, I'm "young," but actually just at the bottom end of the general age span within which ILC tends to show up...

    Please try to have the Oncotype DX test if you can, with your tumor size, no node involvement, and "undecided" grade 1 or 2 status. It amazes me when insurance won't cover it: chemo is really expensive... Some women would do chemo if it meant even a 1% improvement. I'm not in that category - but I would have done it if my tumor profile showed that I really would benefit from it...

    In my case, I think I would have been sorrier if I had done chemo and not done the Oncotype DX test... You really do need to think about what's the best choice for you here - I hope that you come to a decision you are comfortable with.

    Coleen

  • makingway
    makingway Member Posts: 799
    edited July 2009

    I'm willing to risk not doing chemo at this point. I'm already screwed up from the ALND and my poor body doesn't know what hit it.

    What does an onconotype test look like? Numbers? Letters? Scores?

  • don23
    don23 Member Posts: 512
    edited July 2009

    I had a 1.8cm tumor that was ER/PR+, Her-2neu negative, grade 2 with no node involvement. I went to first oncologist and she told me I would probably need chemo (TCx4 or TACx6).  this was before we had the oncotype results. She ordered the oncotype test and it came back with a score of 11. After those results she told me I do not have to chemo if I don't want to or I can do it. I deciced to get another opinion because I couldn't decide what to do. The second oncologist told me with a score of 11 with a recurrance rate of 7% that chemo would not benefit me in the least. I do need to take tamoxifen though. I asked her good the oncotype test results are and she said she has complete faith in them. I decided not to do chemo but will take tamoxifen for 5 years or so. (By the way, I had my bilateral mastectomy on May 22nd and if I decided to do chemo it would have started next week which would make it almost 7 weeks from my surgery).

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited July 2009

    Marie ~  I can add one bit of info' that might be helpful.  There is a study that showed no difference in outcome when starting chemo 1, 2 or 3 months after your last surgery.  There has been no research beyond 3 months.  So, if you don't have a mast, that would give you another month or so to get back Oncotype test results.  If you have a mast, then you technically would have even more time to decide on chemo or not.  If I was in your  position, I would probably wait for the Oncotype test results, although I'm not familiar with exactly what commiting to the Tailor-X study in order to have the test means, so my opinion isn't based on what that commitment would mean re. your tx. 

    makingway ~  The Oncotype-Dx test gives a woman a single numerical score (e.g. 22) that predicts her chances of a recurrence based on a number of factors about her individual disease.  From what I've observed here, the results are not always as obvious as they might seem.  Sometimes women with apparently low risk factors have a higher risk than you might assume, and vice-versa.  If you go to the very top bar on this page (the informational section), within that section there's a search box and you can search for a full description.       Deanna

  • Seabee
    Seabee Member Posts: 557
    edited July 2009

    makingway--The Oncotype DX test is a detailed analysis of a sample of your tumor. You can get a full description of the process on their website, including a video.

    Yes, the AND is a bummer, and in rare cases chemo can kill you. It's better to avoid both if your situation permits. Like Coleen, I was resigned to chemo if I had to do it, but I also did everything possible to find out if I needed it. The oncotype test helped me conclude that I didn't, but if the results had been otherwise, I would also have felt more confident that it was necessary.

  • Iam
    Iam Member Posts: 82
    edited July 2009

    I am 52.  I will know the results for the Oncotype DX in two weeks too.  I have also had no lymph node involvement, margins clear, ER/PR +, HER -, Grade 1, Stage 1 (<1cm).  My oncologist said that studies have shown that Tamoxifen works better without Chemo and will leave me with the option.  If my results from the Oncotype DX do come back high, we will do the chemo.  But, the chemo my onc told me is so 'low' that I will not lose my hair.  That for me is a plus.  Please ask your oncologist more info on your chemo treatment and the affects - if you are unsure.  We need to know everything we need to know.  I had a bil. mastectomy because of my past history in LCIS 11 years ago and every year I was a nervous-wreck - 'was'.  

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited July 2009

    Hi, Marie,

    I did surgery on May 8 but haven't been on any treatment yet, my ONC said it's OK within 12 weeks.  So no worries.  I also PM you about the trial, if you need more info. you could PM  me back.

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited July 2009

    Marie,

    Basically, joining the trial is good.  They will keep much closer eyes on you, do more check-up with you for 5 - 7 years and see how the treatment works for you, which means the pathologists would care more about trial patients.   I don't want to take chemo but my hubby strongly advise me to join the trial even it would bring me to chemo

  • karenz01
    karenz01 Member Posts: 11
    edited July 2009

    I'm so glad that I'm not the only one going through the "what do I do" stage.  I too have Stage 1 without node involvement.  My surgeon told me that I would absolutely need chemo because of my age (46).  My tumor was 1.2cm ER+/PR+ Her-.  I met with the "top" oncologist in CA at Scripps Mercy and he told me that the Oncotype would better predict if Chemo would benefit me.  I then got a second opinion and asked the doctor (female) what she would do if it were her.  She said "no way would she have chemo if the test came back low risk".  So, I'm just waiting on pins and needles for that Oncotype test result.  I will decide then.  I can't see putting my body through chemo if it means only a small percentage that the cancer won't reoccur.  With all the side effects, I just can't justify it.  If later the cancer does come back, then I'll have to face the prospect of having it.  It's so hard to decide but you know if your gut what is right for you.  As my therapist told me, "any decision is the right decision except for no action at all".  Let me know how it goes for you and good luck. 

  • Rabbit_fan
    Rabbit_fan Member Posts: 166
    edited July 2009

    karenz01 - thanks for posting what your doctors' opinions were on the Oncotype.   We individually can only go to a limited number of doctors for opinions, and if you search the net for info you will find articles both validating and questioning Oncotype.  I find it really helpful to hear what other doctors said, especially if they're the one of "top" oncs! 

    Wishing good luck to you with your results!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2009

    Just to confuse the issue.......Marie, my dx is nearly identical to yours.  Tumor .08cm, stage 1, grade 2.  I did opt for the bilateral mastectomy, and am still in my expanders.  I, too, was on pins and needles about the chemo question.  My oncologist - extrememly well respected in our area with much experience - said no.  He did say that plenty of other oncs would recommend chemo, though.  I'm 47, so older than you by a bit.  I did not have the oncotype done because he said it wouldn't change his opinion.  I am on tamoxifen and dealing with it, though not without side effects.

    Wishing you peace in your decision!

    Valerie

  • marie111
    marie111 Member Posts: 119
    edited July 2009

    Thank you all for your advice and sharing your stories with me.  I have decided to have the Oncotype test done and am still awaiting results.  Both my ONC and BS feel that my results should be low therefore would not need chemo. My age (42) and tumor size (2cm) I guess are the variables that would make my ONC recommend the chemo but she did want to wait and see the results of the Oncotype test before making the final decision.  I will also be having a bilateral mastectomy, If I need chemo will do mastectomies after chemo if not will do them probably in September. So for now I wait and am ready to do whatever is necessary depending on my score. As time goes by I am feeling more and more anxious and feel more depressed then I did before which I find a little strange.

    IAM & KARENZ01: Let me know how your test comes back and what you decide to do, like you I am on pins and needles waiting for the results and waffle back and forth each day as to what I want to do "To Chemo or not to Chemo.... That is the question !!!

    Hugs to all !

    Marie

  • hlya
    hlya Member Posts: 484
    edited July 2009

    Interesting...seems most of ILC are grade 2

  • JannaC
    JannaC Member Posts: 30
    edited July 2009

    I know what you are going through.  I was diagnosed in Feb, had lumpectomy in March and reincision 10 days later to get a clear margin.  I also have LCIS in both breasts and hyperplasia.  I'm older than you, 57, and even though my oncotype was a whopping 19, my oncologist recommended against chemo, said it would only lower my chances of recurrance by a couple of points.  I had 25 radiation treatments and am now taking Femara with zero side affects.  I would wait for an oncotype number, because if you can avoid chemo, I guess that would be good.  Lots of luck and my thoughts are with you.  Janna

  • marie111
    marie111 Member Posts: 119
    edited July 2009

    Getting my results on Thursday, keeping me fingers crossed for a low enough score not to have to worry about doing or not chemo.

    Marie

  • marie111
    marie111 Member Posts: 119
    edited July 2009

    My score came back at 16 and my ONC recommends chemo. I am still having a hard time making my decision. I don't want to do chemo if I don't have to but also I don't want to look back in a couple years and say I should have done, I do want to do everything I can to make sure I get rid of this cancer forever ,,,,,,, Still pondering !

    Marie

  • YoYo44
    YoYo44 Member Posts: 203
    edited July 2009

    Hello Marie,

     I am sorry to hear about your onc score.  I was rooting for you on the sidelines.  Good luck and hope you findpeace with your decision.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2009

    Marie, your score is considered low.  Have you looked at the Quality of Life and Longevity thread under Moving Beyond Cancer?     

    I had a very high score, and chose not to do chemo.  The more I learn about it, its lack of effectiveness against breast cancer, its devastating side effects, potential to cause other cancers and potential for long term damage, the more certain I am that I made the correct choice, at least for myself.

    Some recent studies have questioned whether the chemo drugs themselves are effective at all against breast cancer, or if it is the chemo induced reduction in hormone levels that is actually at work.

    You don't have to do everything to get rid of the cancer forever, as long as you do the right things.  You have already had surgery, and are planning more extensive surgery to limit your risk.  You will be on Tamoxifen for 5 years. 

    You have a lot of years to live with the risk of cancer coming back, but that also means you have a lot of years to live with the after effects of chemo.  The risk of anyone in the general population developing breast cancer is currently between 1 in 8 and 1 in 7, or about 11% to 12%.  You have to question the validity of someone telling you that a treatment will cause your future risk to be lower than that of a woman who has never been diagnosed with breast cancer. 

    Whichever way you decide to go, I hope that you make a decision you can live peacefully with for a very long time. 

  • LoriL
    LoriL Member Posts: 185
    edited July 2009

    Marie,

    Your score of 16 is the same as mine- which is, as PatMom stated, low. Granted, it is at the "high end of low" with the cutoff being 17. But, nonetheless, my doc said that for me it confirmed in his mind that I did not need chemo. Maybe the difference for you is the tumor size- still considered small, but also at the "higher end of small."

    I agree that it is such a tough decision. When my score came back low, I was relieved but yet had a nagging feeling of, "if I don't do chemo did I do EVERYTHING that I could?" That thought, though, was fleeting! :-) I did my research and decided to go with what my doc recommended. Once I made the decision, and started the radiation that had already been planned, I didn't look back. I think that is the key- make an informed decision, and then don't look back. We could drive ourselves crazy with all of the "what if's." Not only with cancer stuff, but in life in general. And, regardless of whether or not we die from cancer, life it too short to worry about that stuff. We've got too much living to do! :-)   

  • marie111
    marie111 Member Posts: 119
    edited July 2009

    I'm off on vacation for 1 week and will use this time to ponder my decision. You are right LoriL my age and tumor size seem to big factors in my ONC's recommendation, ultimatly I have to do what feels right for me but I find it hard to make such a big decision without it being emotionally charged.

     Yoyo44:

     I see we are from the same neck of the woods. Hope all goes well for you. I know the beginning of this journey is very stressful because I am still there. Stay stong and positive and have good thoughts, things will work out. Let's stay in touch, you can PM if you want.

    Marie

  • carollynn79
    carollynn79 Member Posts: 654
    edited July 2009

    My score was a 21 and I decided to go into the tailorx trial but may have backed out if chosen for the chemo arm, my onc told me I was eliglible for the chemo but felt that the rads and tamox would be adequate and without the trial that is what he would reccomend.  I was chosen for the rads  and tamox arm so am in the trial.  I feel confident with the decisions and treatemnt.  I have had 10 radiation treatemnts and have been on Tamox for 2 weeks.  I am doing well a few side effects but all livable.

  • YoYo44
    YoYo44 Member Posts: 203
    edited July 2009

    Thanks Marie,

     I understand the emotionally charged part.  I am 95% OK with the chemo first I will have and the other 5% will just have to be faith in the doctors I have found.  I am hoping I will adjust to the new normal quickly and come to peace with this whole thing soon.  I am staying positive and looking forward but, as you probably know, the new reality has a way of sneaking up on you and taking you for a ride. I start chemo next Wednesday.  Great!/the horror!!-the new normal...Undecided

    Have a good vacation, hope you have lots of distraction. I go back to work Monday.

Categories