Accountability in a police state.
Comments
-
Noh8, I recognize the avatar but not the name.....What did you go by before?.....Just curious.......I love the NoH8 name by the way.......We all need to not H8 each other.....Especially now that we are all ill and need support.............
As for the PM's .....Someone was PMing Mazy and bullying her that way telling her she was not welcome on certain boards............
-
Then Mazy should copy the PMs and send them to the moderators.
I've been NoH8 since prop8 passed. Noh8 is the campaign against homophobia. I was Obama4President before that;. I post mostly in the Lesbian Forum these days, since most of my friends left the boards because of the rancor among a small group of troublemakers.
-
It passed??...ALRIGHT! So glad to hear......What was your name before in 2002?......My daughter is a member of GSA at her school.....I am hetero but I am not a homophobe.......I believe we all should live our oives the way we want to and if it offends then look the other way.........My daughter actually told me she was bisexual..I was taken aback by it cause noone in my family ever admitted such even though we have a few homosexuals in our family.....Doesn't bother me one bit that she is.........I am proud that she is comfortable in her own skin and can admit it to me and whoever will listen..........
-
Holly,
The hate email was from ladies who have my email...and of course none of them used the PM features here. So we cant blame the mods for that part of it. They could see what was going on etc. I did tell them I had received some hate email. Someone pointed out that we take a risk when we give out our email addy. I don't know if anyone got reprimanded but the mods took action on the problem that started all the trouble in the first place. I can tell you that one of the posts is gone..or at least I cant find it. Holly, it was one of those deals that at first the responses were all positive but then that one person jumped in who disagreed...and all heck broke loose. I felt like I was in Jr High. It's all over now but I learned from it I guess. I had hoped with time it would pass but it didnt. I dont want to go where I am not welcome so I am letting it go for now. I did want to share this with you ladies tho. There are some cliques that no matter how right or wrong...they stick together like glue.
-
You told me before about your daughter, Hollyann. I think it's great you raised her to be so open at such a young age! My first name on here was PinkRibbonAmy--- that seems like a LONG time ago.
-
LOL well that explains where you went, Amy!.....You changed your name to portect the innocent!....LOL.......
Mazy I know what you mean about jr high here....I have seen so many acting like children I thought I WAS back in jr high!.......
Ladies have a wonderful day!.......
-
Ok who is this guy 00markanderson who keeps posting these nasty posts about female sexuality and our men?.......I looked on his bio and he has a pharmaceutical website........He is soliciting on two boards.....And yes I have contacted the moderators cause he is creepy!..............I let him know in a PM that i was notifying the Mods too..........It is hard enough to find a supportive thread without the site being hijacked by solicitors.....SHEESH!......
-
LOL Hollyann...
-
I need to put a note in here and apologize to someone who I thought may have instigated the anti-Dr. Massey smear. I was wrong, dead wrong, and I own that. It's a lesson to me about trying to figure out what I don't really know and putting my foot in my mouth. I hurt someone who I really care about and who is having enough issues on her own without me falsely accusing her in a roundabout way.
My, the lessons we learn in life.
Anne
-
Amy...I used to read yur posts LOL...I didnt know you changed your name. Anne we all make mistakes....you have taken the right action to correct it...I admire you for that. HUgs, Mazy
-
I never knew people didn't know my new name-- since it was the same account.
I didn't mean my post to address anyone. I've seen many posts where folks talk about their negative feelings about someone else or taking problems that should have been handled off the boards and been on the receiving end of that. It's not a fun place to be. Once I stared ignoring the BS I enjoyed the boards a lot more. It's easy to stay away from those folks unless they start what I call "post stalking".I found that emailing the moderators when talking to the person off the boards didn't word eventually was helpful. More hands on moderation would be an ideal solution to the problem, in my opinion.
-
And here we go again. It is so good to know that we are being looked after by those who want to keep outrageous opinions and thoughts from our tender ears!! Whatever!
Are those that want to tell us what we can or cannot say, are they the same ones that go on and on about the constitutions and all its God given rights?
I am just so disappointed and angry right now. And very sad.
-
PiP, I think mostly they just want to talk to us about (their) God......you know, the vengeful one.
-
I don't think it has anything to with God or politics .. this latest thing is a personal vendetta going back to the Wagon and beach thread .. stop blaming religion and politics for everthing, some women are just plain mean for meanness sake.
-
And what's TOTALLY CRAPPY is that bc org has not made a way for people like Nicki to come back!! I mean, even if she cut off her arm they wouldn't let her back. She didn't do anything wrong yet someone outed her rather than let her be here for support!!!!!!!!!!!
-
The world has indeed become a sad and bizarre place when Michael Vick is being given a second chance to play football in the NFL (bad decision Eagles) after running a dog fighting ring, and participating in killing innocent dogs, but a breast cancer support site can't give a woman fighting for her life a second chance to get support!
How heartless!
-
jader, you're right that the current situation has nothing to do with religion or politics - it is an old vendetta that keeps being played out over and over again. But it does seem odd to me that some who claim to be the most pious do the worst acts. Whatever happened to "do unto others...." and "turn the other cheek..."?
Patmom, I was thinking exactly the same thing! Sad, isn't it? And impossible to understand.
-
I don't understand why the bc.org mods take such a stance against her and listen to whoever is stirring this pot. There have been other situations like this and the mods seem to choose one side over the other rather than be biased. I think it's really because they get a "favorite" and becuase they are NOT fellow posters, rather distant in fact, they don't have all the facts. In fact, I believe they have a very limited view of the situation.
-
I agree wholeheartedly:
with Jader -- "some people are just mean for meanness' sake"
with PatMom -- "sad and bizarre when... a breast cancer support site can't give a woman fighting for her life a second chance to get support" -- a woman whose posts deleted yesterday were exemplary for their fairness, clarity, warmth, kindness, courtesy to all viewpoints, honesty...
with Beesie -- "Whatever happened to 'do unto others....' and 'turn the other cheek...'?"
I really hope the Moderators will reconsider.
-
I missed what happened recently ... but am saddened beyond belief that this CRAP continues to go on here and happens over and over and the base problems are not addressed - I don't spend much time here anymore because of the lack of moderation on this site - and the fact that the community is allowed to run amok ... It's very very sad.
Doreen
-
I think I may be able to offer a unique perspective about what goes on around here, because other than three women I was particularly close to in 2007, I haven't formed any personal relationships with anyone else on the board. We've since lost those beautiful women, and that's pretty much when I stopped reading and posting because they're passing affected me greatly. After a long break, I decided to come back. I saw early on that things like this happen. Was I surprised? No, that's the nature of women, IMO, you can always count on one of them to turn on you at some point in your life for whatever ridiculous reason. If you think that what you say doesn't get back to someone else....well....really? We're women, that's what we do. (Part of the reason I've never worked for one). What I am surprised about though, is that it happens on a bc support board. CANCER people.....how can you say something rude to anyone fighting this disease? Shockingly, some people have no problem being rude to someone else fighting cancer. I find it particularly distasteful. I've been reading these boards for a long time and, since I don't have a vested interest in what anybody says to anyone else's "friend" I do have to admit that I am shocked by some posts that are made by women who for whatever reason, have no filter or moral compass.....just an incessant need to be heard and to be right. Just thought I'd throw that out there and you can do what you want with it. If you want to allienate each other....go ahead, it doesn't matter to me. I care about all of you as a fellow bc patient, but if you continue to do this to each other, I swear, this board in it's entirety is going to go away. Where will you be then? Look what's happened on the mets board. How many women have they lost because of the bickering? It's really, really, not worth it.
Edited to add: I find it weird that the "mods" keep getting blamed for this kind of junk. Sounds more like a problem amongst cliques, which is kind of childish and immature IMO.
-
Hi all! I just found this tread. I have to tell you I was amazed when I got banned. I am pretty sure I know the sick skank that reported me. I feel sorry for her as she clearly has more problems than I will ever have. For anyone to report me for that post when I was CLEARLY in so much pain amazes me! The only reason they let me back on was because I called the site crying several times and kept sending them emails. I was out of my mind with fear, anger, and greif, and they banned me. Women that supported me on the thread got banned too. Amazing.
I agree that it is sad that we come here for support and instead have cat fights~ ridiculous. If you dont like what you read, click away.
Edited because I am learning the moderators have a job that clearly stinks that they must put up with childish games.
I take back all of the negative things and thoughts towards the moderators, as I am seeing a bit more how difficult their jobs really are. Here we are going through major trauma, raging hormones, and the majority of us are women (that makes it tough enough to begin with). Then for them to have to read countless complaints, and most of them are probably really about nothing. Sometimes I need to take a step back and try and walk in someones shoes.
-
Deborah, your banning was absurd - I remember it well. You were a scared and angry newbie expressing your feelings, and because of a few words that you used, a narrow minded group of women reported you and you were banned.
The current situation is absurd as well. What happened in the past is in the past; it's ancient history. Paprika broke no rules and should not have been banned. And I too blame the moderators, because they allow certain members to play the system in order to get other women banned. That's wrong and it should not be allowed.
gracie, I agree that it's natural to expect that bickering is going to happen when you have a large group of women from very different backgrounds and with very different standards and beliefs, all communicating together on a discussion board. Where I disagree is that I think the moderators should be stepping in to nip these situations in the bud when they first start, rather than let them build and fester. We have cliques on this board because they've been allowed to stay and wield power. I also believe that rather than treat everyone equally when these situations develop, there are times when the moderators should be making a judgement call. If that had been done in Deborah's case, she wouldn't have been banned, because it was clear that her use of "improper" language was simply done in frustration because of her diagnosis, it was not done with the objective of offending anyone. This is a breast cancer support board, and the primary objective of the moderators should be to ensure that women who come here with a diagnosis of breast cancer get the best possible support from the community. Allowing one small group to get someone banned because of a few words seems to me to be contrary to that objective.
But maybe it's just me.
-
Beesie, I just want to make sure I understood your post correctly. Are members upset because the mods are not making judgement calls when someone breaks the rules, or are they upset that there are rules. That's where the line gets fuzzy for me. I think as far as the mods are concerned, rules are rules...you break 'em, you lose your privileges. I can't imagine they could moderate properly or fairly any other way....but again...that's just me and I mean no disrespect to either you or Cherneski when I say this.
Edited for spelling.
-
I think there should be "time outs" not permanent bannings.
-
gracie, In my case I blocked out most of my words and by mistake I missed a few. The "rules" that the moderators sent me had nothing to do with those rules. They never gave me a clear anwser as to why I was banned, like I said they hid behind the emails. And if they in fact banned me for my bad words, then they really are not doing their jobs as we all see so many cuss words on here. And why would you BAN someone for a cuss word? How about a simple message to the person asking them to edit their post. If they dont do that then remove the post, dont ban the person! I dont know if you read my post that got me banned but I can tell you MOST ppl here were amazed. They understood my pain and fear and MOST ppl did not report me. I was not rude to anyone. I was not hateful.
This is a place for support. When my husband is supporting me and I am running off at the mouth, sometimes he has to calm me. And that is what he does. He doesnt go running to my mother to not allow me in her house anymore.
This DIS EASE is a terrible thing that brings up emotions in all of us in different ways. A roller coaster ride with no fun.
Plain and simple the moderators DO NOT do their job.
-
We don't really know that the moderators DO NOT do their job - as we don't actually know how bc.org defines their job ... I think what most of us are saying is that we think much more moderation is needed ... and that bc.org isn't stepping up to really moderate the discussion boards - the moderators need to be actively reading and dealing with things here .. not simply reacting once a post get flagged/reported ... this site is on auto-moderate ... and plain and simple - it's not working. More is needed ... many of us have been saying this for a long time - and some even volunteered to help ...
Doreen
-
gracie, I don't think people are upset because there are rules - of course there need to be rules. I think people are upset because by not using judgement in applying the rules, the moderators are allowing some small groups to play the rules to hurt those they don't like or agree with, or those who use language they don't like. Consider this type of situation:
Susie disagrees with something that Jane has posted. So Susie posts in the same thread and talks negatively about Jane. Jane tries to ignore Susie but Susie continues to post, repeating the same insults and getting more and more offensive. Eventutally Jane is fed up so she goes to the Moderators and complains; they remove Susie's posts and give Susie a warning. Susie and her friends are angry that Susie was called out, so they gang up on Jane and report all of Jane's posts. All Janes posts show up as being "removed by the community" and this causes an automatic banning (I believe that's what happened in Deborah's case). Eventually, if more than a certain number of posts are removed, the banning becomes permanent.
In this situation, Susie was clearly the one causing the problems; Jane was merely trying to defend herself and keep the peace. But because the rules are applied without judgement, Susie and her friends are able to play the rules to get Jane banned, despite the fact that Jane didn't break any rules or do anything wrong.
That's just an example (and the names are not meant to represent anyone, honest!). But that seems to be what actually happens here.
-
Blue, I agree with you. So much suffering in this disease and fear. Anyone afflicted with this disease can fracture into a million pieces and personalities. If someone reads words written here by a person with whom they have breast cancer in common, that is the commonality. Not religious faith, economic equality, educational level, or even stage of breast cancer because that can change with a mammogram or scan. When people find this site, some pray, others swear, some offer humor, information, familiar conversation, poetry, pictures, others draw a blank, others draw a verbal sword. Many women don't have, or don't want to participate in a live group therapy environment where they live. BreastCancer.org has the potential to provide all women with varying personality types, a place to reach out for help. A place to find somebody with whom they connect to help them stay afloat in this turbulent sea. The movie industry has categories for films that are intended for viewers of certain ages. The "R" rating allows people over 17 to enter a film, but some people 90 years old might be terribly offended by a film intended for those over the age of 17. It's all relative. Breast cancer is just something so horrid. So cavalier. It messes with our minds and the drugs many take render them helpless to the words they may write - but they still need support. Where else can they go? If there needs to be an "R" rated forum, or an "X" type forum for them, then there should be. The mods said long ago this forum goes thru periods of flux, turmoil, etc., but things eventually settle down again like the feathers after a pillow fight. I'm worried about Diane "Badboob67". And Nicki. I haven't been here in a long while, but I see how women are passing away. Squabbles are so small compared to the loss of life, and the lost opportunity to help each other when we're scared. I don't know. I just wish we all had healthy breasts.
-
I think the "time out" suggestion is a good one. I am not keen on people being banned for all the reasons that have been eloquently expressed above.
There are one or two threads on here that I no longer go to because from an English perspective, much of what is posted is (as I say from an English perspective) racist and extremely right wing. I just don't want to have anything to do with that sort of thing.
I don't much care about swearing, although if someone did it all the time it would be a bit of a bore. But not more.
Speaking for myself, what I find really offensive is posters who use the phrase "God doesn't put upon you that which you can't handle" or words to that effect. I find that about as offensive as it is possible to be, not to mention insensitive. My type of chritianity isn't about vengeful gods and so forth. But this goes by all the time on this site. So I think there is a definite bius in the way things are moderated.
The time out idea is a good one, because couldn't a moderator merely point out sometimes that things are getting a bit too heated, please think twice. It doesn't mean they have to ban someone, or censor.
Interstingly, how/I first came here is that the dear, kind lady who first helped me on an English site was banned because she used the ocassional very mild swearword, but again, strange people posted against her who could not see past that to Judith's abundant sweetness of nature and unstinting provision of common sense advice. And it was in a couple of instances done in the name of sonme osrt of christianity.
Anyway, I firmly believe that people should not be banned.
Are we not capable as individuals of telling people to clear off? I thought I was a grown up.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team