Axillary dissection vs. sentinel node biopsy?

Options
Kate2z80
Kate2z80 Member Posts: 66

Am scheduled for mastectomy next week and surgeon proposes to do axillary dissection.  However, I met with the oncologist and he assumed that sentinel node biopsy would be done.  I will put in a call to the surgeon with my (growing) list of questions, but I'd love to hear from anyone who knows whether sentinel node biopsy is an option after simple radical mastectomy.  I've read a lot of literature about sentinel node biopsy vs. axillary dissection and it seems like sentinel has become more and more accepted as an alternative.  Have to admit I needed a break from doctors for a few days, so I haven't called the surgeon yet.  I would like to avoid the worse recovery and possible complications of dissection if I can do so without sacrificing the outcome.  Any info would be appreciated.

Comments

  • achen2iron
    achen2iron Member Posts: 64
    edited June 2009

    The surgeon needs to be skilled in doing SNB and some aren't. Also if you have swollen lymph nodes already they do axillary dissection. If your nodes aren't for sure involved the SNB is a much less invasive way to go.

  • Kate2z80
    Kate2z80 Member Posts: 66
    edited June 2009

    I did s/w the doctor today and she said that because I have likely multifocal lesions (one definitely cancer, the other likely), axillary node dissection is the way to go, not SNB.  If the second turned out to be Ca (which she believes is the case), would have to go back in take the rest out, anyway, which means more surgery.  I am bummed, but at least this makes sense now.

  • achen2iron
    achen2iron Member Posts: 64
    edited June 2009

    I'm still not sure why they would need to take them all. I was multi focal although we didn't know that until after my lumpectomy and they were all really close together. They left my nodes after the mastectomy though. Mabey someone else can help with this question. My preference was certainly SNB but is was also my surgeons preference.  Mabey I'll look around on the internet and see what I can find. When is your surgery? 

  • Kate2z80
    Kate2z80 Member Posts: 66
    edited June 2009

    Surgery is 6/19.  Thanks for your help!

  • baywatcher
    baywatcher Member Posts: 532
    edited June 2009

    Kate-

    Is your surgeon a breast surgeon or a general surgeon?

    I agree with the poster above, get a second opinion. I'm afraid you will be sorry if you don't.

  • precious1969
    precious1969 Member Posts: 16
    edited June 2009

    Kate,

    I had a bilateral mastectomy with sentinol node biopsy (dissection) on April 30, 2009.  I had three lymph nodes removed.  Two of them were positive for cancer (one had microscopic amount, other had .27 mm amount of cancer cells).  My oncologist wanted at least six lymph nodes so that he could acurately stage the cancer.  Check with your oncologist to see what he wants.  I had to go back for an axillary node biopsy on May 26, 2009.  My surgeon did tell me that this might happen but he likes to take as little as possible when it comes to the lymph nodes.  If my sentinol biopsy had come back negative I would not had needed the axillary node biopsy.  Check with your oncologist and surgeon.  Axillary node biopsy will be tougher than sentinol node but it is doable.  It just takes a little longer to recover from axillary node biopsy because the surgeon has to go deeper into your armpit.  Good luck!   

                                                                        Ruth

  • Teild
    Teild Member Posts: 58
    edited June 2009

    Plus lymphodemia is a much greater risk with an axillary node biopsy, . . to be avoided if possible.

  • achen2iron
    achen2iron Member Posts: 64
    edited June 2009

    Kate, I sent you a private message. I also noticed you posted about running. I'm really thinking you should push for the SNB now.

  • rgiuff
    rgiuff Member Posts: 1,094
    edited June 2009

    Kate, I second what many others have said.  Get a 2nd opinion.  SNB is still relatively new, so some surgeons may not be comfortable with it.  You may find one who is experienced with doing it and therefore may be more prone to recommend doing it.  Lymphedema is a much greater risk with full Axillary Node Diissection.  During the surgery, the sentinel node gets sent for pathology, so the information  needed to decide whether to go further with an AND is received while you are still on the OR table.

  • bluedasher
    bluedasher Member Posts: 1,203
    edited June 2009

    With an SNB, they do an injection around the tumor of blue dye or radioactive material to find which node(s) the area drains to first - that's the sentinel node. The issue for multi-focal may be that the different spots may have different sentinel nodes. They might have to do the injection twice and take out two spots of nodes to be accurate for multi-focal and perhaps that's not done.

    But another advantage of an SNB is that the pathologist can concentrate on one or a few nodes that are most likely to have cancer cells if it has spread and examine them very carefully instead of having twenty some nodes to examine and not being as thorough with each one. It would be worth checking with another surgeon.

  • Kate2z80
    Kate2z80 Member Posts: 66
    edited June 2009

    Ruth, thanks for your input.  Sounds like we have/had a similar situation.  The thought of going back in a second time for surgery if the SNB is not enough is not very appealing at all.  How bad was it to go back and have the dissection?  I would assume there was a separate incision for the second surgery (my surgeon said I will not have an incision in the armpit if I do axillary dissection at the same time as the mastectomy).  Was it worth it to take the chance by not having the dissection initially in your opinion?  I have a call into the oncologist to see what he thinks about dissection vs. SNB. 

  • ddlatt
    ddlatt Member Posts: 448
    edited June 2009

    i had a bilateral mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy. i do have an incision below the armpit for the SNB. i had two nodes removed, both negative. i agree with the above comments about getting a second opinion.

  • achen2iron
    achen2iron Member Posts: 64
    edited June 2009

    Some surgeons do not send frozen sections they take the sentinal node and it goes to pathology and you get the results in 3-4 days,   

  • jacee
    jacee Member Posts: 1,384
    edited June 2009

    I had one tumor that had 2 sentinel nodes identified with SNB. One was removed under armpit, one was an internal mammary node. Both were removed, and sent to pathology..so results were not immediate during surgery. 3 days later, I got results that both were positive. So, then unilateral mastectomy & AND were done. Just got home today.

    Joni

  • momgovero
    momgovero Member Posts: 28
    edited June 2009

    This may seem like a silly question, but you would be amazed at how many people have told me just how horribly painful the procedure of putting Dye into the breast to check my lymph nodes is going to be.  I figured I would come to you girls and ask.  Any comments??  These "friends" trying to scare me?

  • Dawnbelle
    Dawnbelle Member Posts: 696
    edited June 2009

    momgovero~I had my SNB on Monday. I was terrified because I read horror story after horror story on these boards. I felt one pinch from the lidocaine & that was it. NOTHING!!!

    Now, I am sure each hospital does it differently, ask your bs, I did & he told me I would be receiving an injection. Keep in mind I had just had a lumpectomy 5 days earlier and still had stitches in my nipple, my breast was already tender & swollen & painful.

    2tzus~I had a mastectomy & I still have an incision below my armpit from my SNB. 

  • don23
    don23 Member Posts: 512
    edited June 2009

    momgovero - I had a SNB done at the same at my bilateral mastectomy. I had to go to the hospital a few hours before my surgery time to they could inject the dye. The nurse put on some cream (EMLA sp?) around the nipple area and then put a piece of plastic tape over it. It had to sit on there for about an hour. After that time they did the dye injection. I had four injections and I can honestly say they didn't hurt that bad. Don't get me wrong - they do sting a bit but it was very tolerable. I also had heard some horror stories about this and was very nervous. The nurse told me that the while the cream won't take all the pain away - it will help and I think it did. See if you can ask for that cream. Good luck!

  • ktn
    ktn Member Posts: 181
    edited June 2009

    Your MD needs to be skilled in SNB so maybe he doesn't do them. I went to a breast cancer surgeon specialist and he told me upfront that there can be false negatives which would require more surgery. I had a tumor in each breast so had a SNB on both sides last july. I really don't remember it being too painful. The SNB on the right was + so he removed 15 lymph nodes and 5 were +. The left SNB was neg initially but pathology came back + days later. I went back in and had 9 nodes removed, 3+ in the sentinel node and 1 additional+. I later had radiation to both sides. At this time I am waiting for reconstruction exchange in Aug. I fortunately have had no lymphadema problems but did go to PT for a few months after surgery. They often don't remove a large amount of nodes like in years past. Talk with your MD and get more info. Good luck!!

  • Kate2z80
    Kate2z80 Member Posts: 66
    edited June 2009

    Ladies, thanks for the input.  I did seek a second opinion, which confirmed that axillary dissection rather than SNB was the way to go, since I have multifocal lesions.  The third opinion (my oncologist) told me there is disagreement among surgeons regarding whether sentinel node biopsy is truly accurate for more than one lesion and that is why some surgeons take the more conservative course, as mine has here.  While I was hoping for a different answer (and less invasive surgery), at least I won't second guess the decision now.

  • brooklynchickens
    brooklynchickens Member Posts: 2
    edited June 2009

    Kate, I am facing this question too, with further surgery tentatively scheduled for 6/22. This is a very controversial area without a overall clear answer.

    I had a simple mastectomy with SLNB on June 1st, and one node came back microscopically positive.  

    There are many doctors convinced that this surgery is overdone, because there almost always turns out to be no more detectable disease in the other nodes (sentinel node biopsy is very accurate). And there are side effects that may matter most to women like you and me who highly value physical activity.

    But there is a a large and influentional group of doctors who believe that not removing the lymph nodes once one is positive may leave undetectable disease that will one day be shown to be a major factor in recurrence.

     The  best advice I have for you -- the advice I am following myself -- is do NOT get all your information on this from a surgeon. Surgeons are biased to surgery, and doing this surgery is considered state of the art -- it's the decision to skip it that needs to be defended.

    You need to sit with an oncology, get oncodx, and look at the totality of your risk and your overall treatment plan before deciding whether this surgery is the right individual choice for you.

    If you can't get this done by 6/19, postpone your surgery.  You can always say yes later -- it's a short outpatient operation -- when you are clearer in your mind.

    Again, this is my same situation, and my plan to handle it.

     Judith

Categories