Accountability in a police state.
There is an issue that has been brewing here for some time. Let's bring it out in the open.
A handful of members have appointed themselves as the 'overseers' of the BCO discussion board. If, in their most humble opinion, they do not like a post they keep pushing the 'report' button so that it will be 'deleted by the community'. However, there is no accountability in this system. So I would like to propose some ideas and ask others to voice their opinions as well.
1. If you report a topic, post or poster, your name(s) should be posted as one of those responsible.
2. If you hit the report button, lets say 5 times, all of your own posts should be deleted. This should make you think twice before subjecting everyone else to your self proclaimed rules of conduct. Furthermore, if you have a history of hitting the report button, you should be asked to leave the site since it is clear that it is not a place where you belong.
3. If you report a subject, the moderators should immediately reissue the deleted post if the records show that you continue to visit the offending topic that originally upset you so much that you deemed it unsuitable for ALL of us.
Please, share your comments on both sides of this issue. Or just delete it if it hits too close to home for your liking.
Comments
-
Very well said, PIP. Some attention to this issue is long overdue.
I've suggested making the names of the "reporters" public in the past -- but I can envision a scenario where spammers then counter by deleting the comments of those who have reported them. So maybe during the time new posters are limited to 5 posts a day, they should also be unable to report posts and to view who has reported them? That could help to prevent retaliation by spammers.
I especially agree with your suggestion #3 (#2 I agree, if you're not talking about reporting spammers! If you include spam report, Beesie and I would be banned! LOL!)
-
I'll repost here my suggestion for how this should be addressed. I just wrote this in cherneski's thread, where the current abuse has most recently been taking place:
***
The Report This Post button is a very valuable tool for those of us who offer advice and support on the diagnosis and treatment threads. It allows us to get rid of spammers much more quickly than if we had to report the spam to the moderators and wait for the posts to be deleted - that was the old process, and it could take days for posts to be deleted. For this reason, I think that that Report This Post button is necessary. But it is being misused, mostly in "social" type situations. The solution to the misuse is, in my mind, very simple.
- Option one: Whenever the Report This Post button is pushed and a post is deleted, the names of the 5 or 6 members who pushed the button should be listed publicly below the "This Post has been removed by the Community" message. That would stop the abuse pretty quickly. As someone who uses the button to eliminate spam posts, I have no problem if my name is listed whenever a post is deleted.
- Option two: I assume that the moderators know who has pushed the "report this post" button when a post has been deleted. If it's determined that the reason for the deletion was strictly personal - i.e. the post was not spam - then after one misuse of the button, the member should be warned. After two misuses of the button, the member should be warned again. And after the third misuse of the button the member should be permanently banned from this website.
***
Something needs to be done. When the misuse of the Report This Post Button was restricted to the "social" threads, maybe the problem could be ignored (although it probably shouldn't have been since it caused so much in-fighting and angst). But now that this has invaded the Just Diagnosed forum, this situation cannot be allowed to continue.
-
I'm anxiously awaiting a response to this from one of the people who reported the post. Come on, show yourself!
-
Yes, I want to hear their side too. Now is their opportunity to convince us all that we need their input.
-
When I report a post from someone soliciting something I post a note saying that I did. I'm certainly not afraid to let anyone know what I'm doing. I usually post a response to the originator of the thread telling them that their subject is not appropriate and have they contacted the moderators?
So who's sneaking around being a bully?
-
There a thread in Help Me Get Through Treatment called "Not for the Easily Offended," barbe. Regardless of the warning, the easily offended read it and deleted the original post - in fact, they've deleted quite a few posts from the thread. Check it out.
-
bump
-
"1. If you report a topic, post or poster, your name(s) should be posted as one of those responsible.
2. If you hit the report button, lets say 5 times, all of your own posts should be deleted. This should make you think twice before subjecting everyone else to your self proclaimed rules of conduct. Furthermore, if you have a history of hitting the report button, you should be asked to leave the site since it is clear that it is not a place where you belong.
3. If you report a subject, the moderators should immediately reissue the deleted post if the records show that you continue to visit the offending topic that originally upset you so much that you deemed it unsuitable for ALL of us."
I AGREE WITH ALL COMMENTS!!
-
PIP---great suggestions. I agree!!
-
Sige, LOVE your new avatar!!!!!
I have reported more than 5 threads though. I roam around the boards and if I come on a solicitation and report it, I usually check their history and see that they've posted on a whole bunch of different forums. I go to each one and report it. Does anyone remember that woman with her breast pictures who didn't have cancer and wanted us to admire her boob job? She was a pain! Then there is a guy that is trying to promote this website for some strange reason...There has been a lot of that crap going on.
I don't think it's fair that you can report a post from a regular member! We are all here for the same reason. If someone has an offensive post (I read that one mentioned above, and it DID warn about being offensive, so why did someone read it if they couldn't handle it?????) then put on your big girl panties and ignore it. Holy crap, how old are these people??????????
-
Don't know how old they are, but still haven't seen a single one of them come onboard to explain why they thought it was appropriate to report the post.
-
Maybe they don't have big girl panties?
-
I just lost 77 pounds...I have plenty of big girl panties to go around
-
CONGRATS!!!! How did you do it? Whichever one you are in your avatar, you're gorgeous! I am SO impressed...
-
LOL!
-
As someone who used to moderate large online forums, I have a few opinions about this from both sides of the coin.
First of all, moderators have thankless (often unpaid) jobs. It is very difficult to maintain a forum for hundreds/thousands of people and keep everyone happy. So the best/only way to manage it is to have hopefully a small set of rules/guidelines that everyone (hopefully) can live with. When the rules get to be too many or too complicated/complex, then you start having various interpretations of said rules and everyone seeing the same rule 12 different ways and arguments and conflicts arise.
That said, I don't know all the various rules at play in this particular situation, except that apparently it is a no-no to use explicit profanity in the titles of threads, the content of postings, and possibly in the images of your avatar. That's a simple enough rule. It's one that reeks of juvenility for a discussion board supposedly comprised of adults, but I can see how for the comfort of the "MANY" a simple "don't use explicit profanity" rule is appropriate, even if a few (or more) rightfully and justifiably disagree with it.
So, as a response to this, some people decide they wish to challenge the rule and gather a following to their side who happen to agree with them and their view. Then the other folks who agree with the rule rally their troops, and fights and conflicts abound, all around what should be a simple rule that all adults can abide by.
For what it's worth, I don't see anything wrong with being able to use profanity on an adult discussion board. I believe that if people are offended by seeing such words, they can ignore the users of such words or not visit those threads. That 's my PERSONAL opinion. I also despise censorship.
However, as someone who knows the pains of moderation, I realize that I have to balance my personal opinion on such matters with the rules of those who established and run this site. And just like I tell others they can simply "not visit an offensive thread" I can also choose not to visit the site that has rules I believe are unreasonable. It goes both ways.
In this instance, being a relative newbie to the whole breast cancer thing, I had to balance my need for the support and information provided here against what I believe to be a somewhat overbearing seat of policies for an adult group of women dealing with very sensitive, adult and often gut-wrenching issues. Ok, so I won't use explicit profanity straight-on-full-out. I can live with that. I don't agree with it and think it's silly, but I can live with it.
One thing people often forget is that private discussion boards (especially FREE ones!) are NOT democracies! Free speech doesn't apply here and we don't get a vote! And yes, sometimes power can corrupt, and if I believe the moderators are being unfair to me, then I have a personal decision to make about my time on this particular forum.
I think as women and as survivors of this disease have a wonderful opportunity to use situations like this to focus on what is really important and not sweat the small stuff (and I say that with the full understanding that I don't know what has transpired along these lines in the previous months/years).
I am THRILLED the moderators permitted Debi to return to us because I felt she needed what the majority on these boards have to offer and feel that in very short time, Debi will be paying that support forward by helping someone else get past these very challenging obstacles in this journey BC takes us on. I would have been extremely disappointed if the small band of merry-deleters had succeeded in not just censoring her (which by rules they may have had the right to do) but also in cutting her off from the support she needs.
As to the suggestions, the only one I can agree with (in terms of what's actually realistic for the moderators to take on and manage), is having your name show up if you report a post. I don't believe in throwing rocks and hiding hands, and if you're bad enough to report a post, you should be big enough to show your name. If you're reporting for reasons that are valid and rules-based, this should be no problem.
"Overuse" of the reporting feature is subjective. If the names show, it will be clear who has way too much time on their hands and is abusing the feature.
It's useless to try and control the behavior of adults. Asking moderators to make decisions based on whether or not someone "continues to visit an offensive thread" is just as overbearing as the people who continue to visit and report a supposedly offending thread! One, I'm not sure it's technologically possible (do I really want to know if the moderators can/do track/monitor every thread I visit/read but don't post in?) Let's not swing the pendulum all the way in the other direction trying to control the behavior of those who would desire to control our behavior.
I think that this situation, however unfortunate, was resolved in the best way possible, and if accountability and honesty/integrity in reporting behavior comes as a result, then at the end of the day, it was a good thing.
If nothing else changes from this, Debi is back here with us, with a fuller understanding of the rules, and getting the support and love and care from the community who will surround her as we walk this road together, and at the end of the day, that is the BEST thing!
Alaina
-
I don't see why free speech doesn't apply to this site....
Anyway, I got a personal email from someone else who has been suspended from this site until May 22nd, so the damage is not under control yet. She had responded in Deb's thread in a supportive manner and was also booted off. Am I allowed to mention her name?
-
Barbe says ~ I don't see why free speech doesn't apply to this site...
Well I can only offer my opinion based on years of working as a moderator for various large and small internet forums. Most of these sites are privately run by private citizens. None of us pay a fee to post here. We can donate at our personal discretion, but this is a service being provided free to us, being run by a handful (?) of people who may or may not be getting compensated for their time keeping the site operational.
Because it is private, it has a private set of terms of use that I suspect we had to agree to before being permitted to set up an account to access these boards. Most of us gloss right past the terms of use and never give much thought to what we're agreeing to in an attempt to get our access and start posting.
And even with free speech being a hallmark of our personal freedoms in public America, it still does not mean one can yell fire in a crowded theatre or say one has a bomb in their suitcase with no consequences (and I am not implying Debi's post was of that nature).
As much as we would like them to be, online forums are not democracies. They run/operate at the will of the person who can turn it off with the flick of a button (and then where would be? on another site run by someone else with the same power...) We want things to be democracies as long as we believe our opinions and agendas are in the majority. When we find out we're surprisingly in the minority, then and only then are we willing to bend to the discretion of those who hold the absolute power to make a decision.
I don't want to belabor the point, I just want to add perspective learned from years of observing all kinds of online behavior and group dynamics. It doesn't matter what the theme, topic, or purpose of a discussion board is, the behavior/dynamics are the same across the net.
The only place you get free speech on the net is on the site you own/operate and run. :-)
-
I don't see why you can't mention the name.
-
Barbe...I joined LA Weight Loss, but to be fair I pretty much learned to eat right (less!) and get some exercise. I'm the one on the right btw
and thank you!
PS: I still don't agree that just anyone should be able to delete a comment...I'm just sayin'
-
Barbe - I know the one you are talking about the idiot with the Boobs, posting all over threads a few months back, I also reported that, and like you I always leave a comment - that I reported it.
Anyway her post was deleted - but her Avatar is still there. So anytime someone stumbles across it - they get to look at her discusting picture, I think those who feel compelled to 'police" would serve us all better by finding ways to get rid of REAL garbage (SPAM) like that.
This is a BREAST CANCER forum for gosh sakes, emotions run wide and deep, and if a good CUSS word (or several) helps any one through the journey - then so be it. If you don't like what you see on TV you turn the channel if you don't like a certian topic here - DON'T READ IT.
Pretty simple MATH 1+1=2
-
It was Baywatcher that got booted. She is very upset, her email to me is heartfelt. She was only commiserating with a fellow sister and got the boot....so sad.
Cathi, I too, still come across that boobs' avatar. Too bad they can't delete it too!
I guess the real deleters aren't going to post here. I keep making comments to keep it at the top of the list....
-
I agree wholeheartedly and have posted my own threads requesting that the report this post function be modified. I have not heard anything back from the moderators, so I am beginning to suspect that the software doesn't leave a footprint of who has reported a post. People get tossed and suspended when their own posts are removed "by the community". For all we know, this is just one person - how about upping the number required? I know a large number of women would report spammers, but to have the fate of individuals in the hands of only a few is more than unfair.
-
I do think the software leaves a footprint. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a lot of reviewing of deletions by the moderators. I understand they have a big job, and perhaps they are underpaid -- but still...
On occasion the mods have restored deleted comments and "penalized" people who reported posts that didn't merit deletion. But they haven't done this in quite a while.
Still, if we all email the moderators about baywatcher, maybe they'll restore her good standing AND her comments...
-
Alaina thank you for your thoughtful and educated response to this situation - I found everything you wrote about the internet and group dynamics to be very interesting. I have been a member of other forums over the years, and you are correct - the power lies with the individuals who "own" the site...........I have seen wonderful sites shut down overnight without explanation and hope that will never happen to bc.org!
-
...still waiting for a deleter to own up...
-
The deleter or deleters are not going to own up - they like to remain anonymous - this situation is escalating out of control and needs to be addressed by the moderators. There is nothing to stop someone from creating many IDs - then logging on to each one to report the post they don't like - they don't even have to have posted before to report the post. This is going to continue until the moderators/owners of this site do something to address the underlying problem.
I'd have absolutely no problem having my name appear when I use the report this post to report spam.
Doreen
-
I am beginning to believe that this board is running on automatic - why don't we hear anything back from the mods on this subject? Clearly, a wide variety of people are upset and yet, we don't hear a peep from the mods. The e-mails sent to the people whose posts are deleted are automated and canned. I suspect that when people are banned, it is also an automatic process. I suspect this board needs a little more attention than is being devoted to it. JMHO
-
PIP, good points and I couldn't agree more. I would not mind in the slightest if my name appeared if I reported a post.
Sige, make sure with all that weight loss your big girl panties don't fall off. Otherwise we may have to report you.
I remember the "boob" girl too........
-
PIP, you're on the right track, IMO. I had a post "deleted by the community" once. Nothing offensive in it, just an opinion that someone(s) didn't agree with. It was reinstated the next day (I guess once the mods had a look at it).
Button pushers, SHOW YOURSELVES! It's only fair.
Linda
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team