tac or dose dense for trip neg

Options
saja713
saja713 Member Posts: 20

I just met with my oncologist today, and I found out I have Grade 3 idc with 1-3 node involvment and triple neg. He told me I have he suggests either tac or dose dense AC+T chemotherapy. Dose dense obviously has more SE, I really do want to treat this as aggresively as possible, but if that outcome of both would be similiar, than I wouldn't want all the side effects. Anyone else out there faced this or is facing this?

STaci

«1

Comments

  • Melissa1971
    Melissa1971 Member Posts: 60
    edited March 2009

    I am currently going through chemo and my protocol is dose dense AC followed by dose dense Taxotere...4 rounds of each total of 16 weeks. My onc. originally suggested 6 rounds of CT (not wanting to give me the A due to possible long term side effects), but after doing alot of research and consulting w/ many oncologists around the country and they all suggested the dose dense AC/T as the golden standard. The few women I now who have had similar dx and had the same treatment are all doing well many years later. Maybe the less aggressive protocol would be just as effective, but I felt better being more aggressive. I am worried about the possible side effects,

    I have undergone 2 treatments so far. It's not horrible, but I am certainly looking forward to being finished w/ it.

  • dunner1
    dunner1 Member Posts: 49
    edited March 2009

    Dear Staci - I went with dose dense AC followed by modified rad mastectomy then dose dense taxol, then 6 1/2 weeks radiation. I am 6 yrs out from diagnosis!!!!! Best of luck to you! Dunner

  • lexislove
    lexislove Member Posts: 2,645
    edited March 2009

    Staci..

    I'm not triple neg, but I know some woman who are and they all had the Dose Dense. I think that is the "gold standard" as of today.

    And yes..you are right by wanting to be aggressive with this breast cancer. Do all you can do, so YOU know you have done everything to fight it.

    Good luck on your journey and you will be fine. Come here for support when ever.

    Sam

  • jaciruth
    jaciruth Member Posts: 10
    edited March 2009

    Staci

    I did the TAC regiment.  You actually get 6 doses of all 3 instead of 4.  The difference is that usually they are 3 weeks apart instead of 2.  The side effects are comparable because you are getting 3 drugs instead of 2 at a time.  The research is pretty much the same for both regiments so choose the one that works best for you.  I had kids at home and was glad to have 3 weeks between treatments so I could feel well enough to attend some of their events.  I am now 4 years out and everything is still looking good so far (keeping fingers crossed)

    Jackie

  • saja713
    saja713 Member Posts: 20
    edited March 2009

    Thanks you all for your support, it means sooo much, I'm 35 so would one be better than the other because of my age? Right now i think I'm leaning toward dose dense but still havent made a decision. I'm supposed to start at the end of next week sometime. My youngest is 11, and i have support around the house, Thank fully!!

    Thanks all,

    Staci 

  • MicheleS
    MicheleS Member Posts: 937
    edited March 2009

    The gold standard is DD (the cells don't have time to take hold between treatments).

    Buy, the newest recc is DD ACX4 plus 12 weekly taxols.  Seems like with TN disease the frequency of chemo is as important as dose:

    Comment on:
    J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1275-81.

    Dose-dense and/or metronomic schedules of specific chemotherapies consolidate the chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer: a step toward reversing triple-negative paradox.

     
    IMHO~ The major fault in this paper is that he doesn't compare weekly to the typical DD schedule.  Nor do they look as the difference in DD to every 3rd week.  There is a relatively big spread in the #'3 when you compare every 3rd week to weekly.But the author makes a statement in this paper (I'm paraphrasing becaue I can't get to the pdf as home...) that DD AC + 12 weekly T sould be the new standard. 
     
    When I was thinking of changing my plan for DD T to weekly T there was a discussion about in over at nosurrender (I started the thread).  Edge gave some good references in his reply:
     
     
    After that, I have to say that everyone is soooo different.  What worked in a study might not be the best for you .  Keep your chin up and keep asking quesions. *You* are your best patient advocate.
    Michele
  • Raye99
    Raye99 Member Posts: 1,350
    edited March 2009

    Hi Staci -

    I was not given a choice, and had DD AC and then Taxol, followed by rads. I was 39 and tolerated treatment pretty well; really did not miss much work at all - just my tx days (Fridays) and then maybe the following Monday. AC was definitely the worst of the two for me.

    Best wishes to you - Raye  

  • Melissa1971
    Melissa1971 Member Posts: 60
    edited March 2009

    I am going on my 3rd round of dd AC next week. After that the plan is 4 rounds of dd Taxotere. I asked my onc. about doing the 12 weekly Taxols and she said that 12 weekly Taxols was equivilant to the dd taxotere. Does anyone else have any info about this? I obviously would rather just have 4 rounds than 12, but also want to make the best decision for long term health.

  • HollyHopes
    HollyHopes Member Posts: 497
    edited March 2009

    Hello dear...I, too, had DD AC followed by DD Taxol.  I completed tx 8/07....I send love and wish you well....

  • MicheleS
    MicheleS Member Posts: 937
    edited March 2009

    Melissa~ Go to the link for nosurrender in my above post.  Edge explains it better than I can.  I talked to my onc about it to and his reply was 1. DD and weekly likely have similar outcomes. 2.  Weekly *may* be slightly better but there haven't been any studies specifically comparing those group.s. 3. Weekly taxol is easier to tolerate (and I had a really hard time with AC so easier is better).

    Whatever you chose... don't look back.  I'm sure it will be the right decision.

    Michele

  • Melissa1971
    Melissa1971 Member Posts: 60
    edited March 2009

    Wondering why some onc give taxol and others taxotere...

    Does anyone know any difference between the two?

    My dr explained it like this "not much difference, it's like being a republican or  a democrat"

  • outnumbered
    outnumbered Member Posts: 4
    edited March 2009

    I am going for a consult with one of the top TN research oncologists on Thursday.  I will let you know what he tells me...

  • Melissa1971
    Melissa1971 Member Posts: 60
    edited March 2009

    Thank you! I am node negative, but trying to be aggressive w/ this tn aggressive cancer.

  • zuffa
    zuffa Member Posts: 95
    edited March 2009

    I just finished 6 TAC - my oncologist chose TAC every 3 weeks for the reasons given by others above.  It was not too bad for me at all -- I actually worked through my treatment except for day of and day after (and then the weekend).  My treatment was neoadjuvant - which is common with triple neg.  My dx was locally advanced, stage 3 with some some node involvement.  My nodes have disappeared (one wasa 2.5cm) -- as has almost all of my tumor (15cm - of which about 6 was removed for excisional biopsy).  The oncologist says he doesn't know what they will find after surgery the mastectomy -- e.g., what little he can feel may be scar tissue from the biopsy, there may be some residual disease, there may be necrotic tissue -- but TAC seems to have beaten back the beast.  As for Taxotere v. Taxol - my onc says the SEs of taxotere are less severe (particularly the possibility of neuropathy) -- and for that reason, it is his chemical of choice. 

  • StefS
    StefS Member Posts: 157
    edited March 2009

    I did 6 TAC. We discussed DD, but my onc spoke with some other doctors and felt that in my case TAC was recommended. I'm not sure if it was because of TN or node-positive.

    I seem to recall reading back when I was diagnosed in 2003 that there were some studies showing Taxotere being superior to Taxol. But of course I don't remember details as to why. 

  • bevsteed
    bevsteed Member Posts: 30
    edited March 2009

    I had abraxane, epirubicin and cytoxin the first week, followed by abraxane only the 2nd and 3rd weeks, with 4th week off neoadjuvant.  My white counts dropped way low and I got pneumonia.  I couldn't finish the regimen.  My post surgery staging is IIIC ILC, TN.  I don't know the grade, but since I'm getting avastin, I know it's developed the abililty to make it's own blood supply.  Seems like on these boards everyone thinks being her2+ is better.  My onc says her2+ is less predictable than TN, that's he's had her2+ patients in early stage suddenly go to mets.  What are you all being told by your oncs?  At mast. I had pieces of tumor in every quadrant of my breast, surrounded by lots of dead cells due to chemo, 27/29 positive nodes.  We're now hitting the chemo hard again, but this time abraxane, gemsam and avastin, every week for 3 weeks, 1 week off for the next six months.  Since I just started this regimen, I don't know yet how I'll tolerate it.  Been thinking about going to MD Anderson to Dr. Christofannelli for a second opinion.  Any comments anyone?   

  • saja713
    saja713 Member Posts: 20
    edited March 2009

    Thank you everyone for their advice and suggestions!

    I just had my first treatment AC Friday, so far the only side effects is nausea , I have Compazine and Ativan, but I still feel nauseas even taking those. I guess on the plus side no vomiting but of course i have no appetite either. 

    I decided that even though the benefit is about 3 % more effective. I'll take the 3 %

    Staci

  • MicheleS
    MicheleS Member Posts: 937
    edited April 2009

    Staci~ Are you going with DD taxol or the 12 weekly when you get there? Just curious...

    Also, do you have Zofran or Emend for the nausea?  That might help you a lot.

    good luck!

    Michele

  • ibcspouse
    ibcspouse Member Posts: 613
    edited April 2009

    bevsteed,

    Dr. Christofanilli is my wife's doctor at MD Anderson...I believe he has now devoted full attention to IBC.  May be wrong..but We see him Tomorrow (Apr 1) I will ask because the question has come up before. 

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited April 2009

    I'm finding out any kind of breast cancer can be unpredictable.  See the girls on the mets site.  Some had early disease of any kind and still have recurrences and than I meet girls that had very involved nodes and never have a recurrences.  My oncologist says it is the luck of the draw.  Each of our bodies are different and respond to treatment differently.  Also remember TN disease is not the same for us all.  This is just a generic word for bc that they can't find the receptors for. I've learn we are each individuals and watching someone else's treatment plan really does not mean a lot.  The questions is how your body responded to the tx you had.

    I've been watching TN treatment for almost four years now.  There still is not any set protocol for TN.  Doctor's are moving and trying new things with us but right now they just don't know what is best.  The oncologists I've meet said it will take about five years to see how they are doing. 

    MD Anderson is not treating TN ladies any different than other places in the country.  Actually they are still playing with old drug combos.  I would do my research for local oncologist who has access to new drug and will read the latest studies. Since there are no new chemo's your local doctors can tx the same as MDA.  Everything new is not about chemo but about protein and enzymes inhibitors for the future tx of TN.  Right now they are only in very small trials for stageIV bc.

    Flalady

  • Marda1
    Marda1 Member Posts: 4
    edited April 2009

    I am also triple neg - Had a dbl. mastectomy in Feb. with 4 nodes removed also and found out it traveled to my liver, which they say is treatable.  Had my 2nd chemo last Thurs (carboplatin, taxotere).  The first treatment wasn't that bad and the 2nd easier than the first.  The side effects for me seem to be the usual tiredness and achiness.  I firmly believe my side effects are minimized because of healthy eaitng, exercise and weight loss.  My hair really started coming out right at the 3rd week, so I shaved it off, which was a HUGE relief.  It's so messy!!!   So far so good, as it will be for you.   

  • Indomitable1
    Indomitable1 Member Posts: 253
    edited April 2009

    Thanks again for the great info guys.

  • patsfan
    patsfan Member Posts: 72
    edited April 2009

    I just started DD AC on tuesday to be followed by dd taxol.  Mostly all I am having for side effects are nausea and a headache that just won't go away.  The antinausea meds really do help but still have no appetite.  Is this the way I can expect to feel every cycle or am I likely to feel worse as I get into this further?  Also am I more likely to lose my hair earlier because of the DD?

    Gayle

  • Raye99
    Raye99 Member Posts: 1,350
    edited April 2009

    Hi Gayle,

    You should start feeling better tomorrow or the next day. I  typically felt icky my 2nd and 3rd days after A/C tx- same side effects as you are having: nausea, headaches, dizziness, lack of appetite, icky taste in my mouth.

    Unfortunately, for some, it does seem to compound and each tx can get a little worse, but still manageable. This was the case for me.  I lost my hair after my 2nd DD tx of A/C - about day 19 I think. On the bright side, Taxol as a piece of cake compared to A/C in my opinion. No nausea, just some minor bone pain in my legs at night. Hang in there sweetie.

    Raye

  • patsfan
    patsfan Member Posts: 72
    edited April 2009

    Raye-

    Thanks for the info.  So hard to know what to expect.  If my schedule stays on target, I am due to have a round of taxol on my son's HS graduation.  Hopefully the taxol will be easier as it was for you.

    Gayle

  • cheranthia
    cheranthia Member Posts: 65
    edited April 2009

    Hi Gayle,

    I had Taxotere not Taxol, but the two are very similar. My chemo experience was much like Raye's. I thought the Taxotere was much easier to take than A/C. Also, I usually felt fine the day of tx. With A/C I started feeling cruddy toward the evening of the second day after tx. With Taxotere, I didn't start feeling bad until the third day after tx. Mostly, I had headaches and bone pain. It's unpleasant, but really very doable. The time goes by more quickly than you might think and you will be glad you  did it once it's over.  Hang in there!

     Cherie

  • saja713
    saja713 Member Posts: 20
    edited April 2009

    I started DD chemo on the 27th. I had really bad nausea for 3 days,  I was prescribed Ativan and Prochlorper? for it, I had a neulasta shot and did feel a bit of bone pain and weakness and got vicodin for that. I also have fibromyalgia so the pain and weakness could have been attributed to that and the shot excaberated it. Today i started having eye problems, with pain and blurriness, and I had to change my toothpaste because my mouth is starting to get sore, but other than that, I feel fine. It's the one week mark does it start getting better?

    Staci

  • pppinaz
    pppinaz Member Posts: 9
    edited April 2009

    Saja,

    I had dose dense AC in the neoadjuvant setting (prior to surgery)  it was 4 rounds biweekly.  I then had a 6 week healing time before bilateral mastectomy on dec 1, then had port placement surgery dec 23 and ended up in hospital for complication.  I then started 2nd round of chemo with Taxotere 4 rounds at 3 week intervals.  It seems to be a good protocal - my oncologist doesn't lkek to do the ACT becuase it is so much harder on the body. Just started 30 rounds of radiation...

  • meylerjr3
    meylerjr3 Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2009

    Staci, I had Aloxi with my AC tx's. I had minimal nausea and never once vomited.  Ask for Aloxi!

  • CaroleAnn
    CaroleAnn Member Posts: 7
    edited April 2009

    Melissa, I cannot have the A part of A/C because of health  problems so I am getting 2 extra round of Cytoxan.. Nothing else he could do. I don't know if there is any research on the topic or not. I have been told that the A part is the worse as far as side effects. I wish I could have taken it and hit this cancer with all that is available.

Categories