Is it now protocol for oncologist to recommend genetic testing?

Options
Anonymous
Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
edited June 2014 in Life After Breast Cancer
Is it now protocol for oncologist to recommend genetic testing?

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    Its been awhile since I've been on these discussion boards but a friend's anxiety has me on today. She is now 56 and was diagnosed when she was 37-38 and had a lumpectomy, radiation and chemo. She is vigilant with her yearly appointments with oncologist. On her recent visit with him, he recommended her to see specialist regarding genetic testing for two reasons:  She was young at diagnosis and she is 1/2 of jewish decent (father). She was quite taken back as this topic has not been discussed with her in her yearly appointments until this recent one. Is this discussion now protocol for oncologists and patients.

     Thank you for any comments that I can pass along to her.

  • tos
    tos Member Posts: 376
    edited March 2009

    I do not know if it is protocol, I doubt it from the posts that I read, the word is probably getting out more to the medical world to inform patients but your friend is lucky her Onc suggests being tested for the brca 1/2 mutations.  I think more Oncologists should do this, too many women are not aware they should be having this done.

    I have had triple negative breast cancer twice since 12/02 and neither time was I told what kind of breast cancer I had nor that w/my family history I should be considering counseling.  Many triple negative breast cancers are postive for brca 1 but not all.  The second time I was diagnosed I had become smart enough to ask what kind of breast cancer I had and smart enough to realize after my daughter had just been diagnosed that the yellow light came on!  Not one medical staff person said a word even though they knew exactly what was happening to me and my family.

    I have since fired that Oncologist and partly blame myself for not being more educated.  We have to be our own advocates in tackling this disease and that requries education, research and standing a firm ground with our medical staff whom we hire to heal us.

    I do not know what kind of breast cancer your friend had but she was young and is from Jewish descent so that is something to consider.  I am not, was not young or atleast was not under 40, was 56 and 60 when diagnosed and not Jewish history so we are all different but please have her go to http://www.facingourrisk.org and see if she might want to consider genetic counseling.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2009

    Thank you for your response gainok.  My friend has been going to the same oncologist annually since her diagnosis and treatment at age 37-38 and has been cancer free for all these years. She also does not have children. She just doesn't understand why the doctor recommended genetic counseling now at this time.  When we were talking about this, we just wondered if there is a new protocol now about doctors advising patients that have been cancer free for almost 20 years.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited March 2009

    I don't think this is new.  When i was diagnosed four years ago I was told to get the test because I am Jewish and was 42 at the time, even though I had no family history.  Since she still has her breasts and presumably her ovaries, she is still at risk for breast/ovarian cancer if she does have the mutation.  I suspect that it is unlikely that she does.

  • BethNY
    BethNY Member Posts: 2,710
    edited March 2009

    genetic testing has finally become "mainstream" so to speak. Before May of 2008, there was a lot of fear regarding discrimination from genetic testing. Then Bush passed the GINA law, which stands for the Genetic Information Non Discrimination, and it means that insurance companies cannot discriminate based on your test results.

    Being of Ashkenazic Jewish descent ups your BRCA risk by about 25%. Gernally when you are jewish and dx young (like me) even with no family history, testing is recommended. The genetic counselor will go over her % risk prior to the blood test.  She will give a detailed family history that includes ages of any types of diagnosis, and death... once they go through that you take the blood test, and four weeks later you've got your result.

    She shouldn't be concerned that he's recommending it now after all this time.. when now it's readily available... many breast surgeons are doing it right in their office.

    Definitely direct her to the FORCE site listed above, for great information regarding BRCA testing.

  • car
    car Member Posts: 492
    edited March 2009

    This thread interested me because I saw my PS in a OB-GYN's office at UCLA Medical Center that had suggestions for genetic testing prominently posted. I checked the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and came up w/a 6/08 committee opinion report:

    http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ethics/co410.pdf

    If it's not protocol, it sounds as if they're moving that way for many pts.

    Hope this helps.

Categories