Herceptin WITHOUT Chemo?
Has anyone taken Herceptin alone without some type of chemo? I had my lumpectomy in December and it was prescribed that I have radiation and Tamoxifen as a follow-up. That was all that was mentioned as far as follow-up treatment. No doctor ever told me my HER2 rating... I asked my radiation oncologist last week and he said I am HER2+! Shocker! Now my world is spinning again. I thought I would get by without chemo with a small, early stage cancer with no lymph involvement. Now I find I will certainly need to have Herceptin and maybe chemo of some type... did anyone have Herceptin without chemo? I'd love to know if that is even possible -- if not, I'll join the ranks of those who need chemo. (I'll do whatever it takes to significantly reduce my chances of recurrence!). Any thoughts?.....
Comments
-
Bradswife,
If you have not already found their site, please visit the Her2 Support Group. http://her2support.org/ There is a thread that is now 2 pages long which is devoted to the topic of your post. Here is the link to that discussion. I think you will find it very helpful and informative.
http://her2support.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=37875
I am sorry you have joined our ranks, but you are among friends and fellow fighters on this site and on the Her2 support Group site.
-
Thanks Laurel -- I'll check it out tonight. I am confused because several friends who have been diagnosed were told by their doctors that if they are HER2+, they MUST have herceptin and chemo no matter what their other statistics on the tumor. I was told by my doctor that I don't need it based on the fact that it was caught early, small size and no lymph nodes. I don't want chemo and herceptin, but I don't want to increase my chances of a recurrence or metastisis by NOT doing what is necessary. I'll check out the sight you recommended... thanks!
-
Hi Brads Wife,
Sorry that your Rad Onco told you the news & not your Reg Onco.
I think there is 1 or 2 Women I recall that had Herceptin without Chemo. I am sorry I dont recall who or the size of their tumor. I think One may have paid for their herceptin & the other one was covered by Insurance- as that is an issue sometimes if you dont do Chemo but do Herceptin.
Usually The Guidelines are 1cm & larger Chemo if you are Her2-.
The guidelines for Her2+ Some Oncos will say Chemo & Herceptin at .5cm
I would ask your Onco about the OncoDX test. That would help you decide for or against Chemo.
Pam
-
Hello Brads Wife -
Your post brought a lot of memories back for me as I was in a similar stuation. There are some other factors that also may be playing into this that were not obvious from your post. For example, your age and your level of positivity for ER/PR receptors can also impact your decision.
Anyway... I will tell you my sordid story to see if it helps give you any additional perspective you can consider. I had a relatively good size DCIS lump, but unfortunately a little tiny IDC portion that was 0.4 cm. The biopsy of the 0.4 cm tumor was weakly ER positive (22%), PR negative and HIGHLY Her 2+ (10.0 as confirmed by FISH - the ICH test also said it was 3+, but it was sent out accidentally - long story). Also, I am 43 years old and pre-menopausal. Evidently, 43 is "young" by breast cancer standards - a rare positive I have found out of this experience.
I had two doctors that were on opposite sides of the fence on this. One doc, because of my age and relatively low ER score and high Her 2 score wanted to throw the book at me in terms of chemo - really tough regimen. The other one wanted to do no chemo, but interestingly did offer up Herceptin without chemo. Of course, I latched onto that and took it back to my other doc (she was local) because I really did not want to do the chemo. Well.. I knew that technically herceptin was not "indicated" without chemo, but since this one oncologist leaned forward on it, I thought I could go that route. My local doc, however, hit a nerve with me when she told me "Why on earth do you want to put your heart at risk for something you don't know for sure works". (Keeping in mind that herceptin CAN be a heart risk if not monitored closely). Hmmmm... That was a good point. But, because of this other doc, I did manage to talk my local doc into a lighter chemo regimen than she originally wanted to give me. So, basically, I did the "chemo light" in order to get herceptin.
Now... a couple of other things. Why did I not do Oncotype DX ? Well, with my very high Her2 score coupled with my low ER/PR score, we pretty much knew the answer already - the score would be high. Genomic Health (the makers of the test) confirmed this for me as I wrote them on it. The reason why is that the Oncotype test is based on a number of factors (about 22). Her2 plays a big role in boosting up the score, and ER/PR positivity play a big role in bringing it back down. I was on the wrong side of both those big prognistics. So, no reason to run the test if we know the outcome.
So.. fast forward... I ended up doing a regimen of what I call "chemo light". I am just finishing up my radiation course - got 8 more to go ! And have number 3 (of 18) herceptin treatments next week. Will get those every three weeks for a year.
In the meantime, there was a watershed study released by MD Anderson at the San Antonio Breast cancer conference in December that studied 1000 women from 1990 - 2002 with tumors of less than 1 cm. This study had a very strong recommendation that any Her2 positive woman be "considered" for systemic treatment, specifically anti-her2 agents (i.e. herceptin) as the retroactive study showed recurrence rate to be about 3-4 times higher - regardless of tumor size. Interestingly, there was not difference between tumors 0-.5 cm and -.5-1.0 cm in terms of recurrence risk. This particular study broke some paradigms that exist.
The bottom line for me was in that looking at this study, I was on the wrong side of all the prognostics, which meant, for me, I had made the right choice in doing what I did - at least by the stats in this study. You should have seen my doc thumping her chest about this when I showed her the study.
Anyway, I will find the link for the study and post it here. I don't want to lose this particular post by going to hunt for it now.
Take care, and I hope you find this helpful. Please feel free to send me a Private message on this if you want additional information as well.
Jill
-
Brad's Wife -
As promised, please find below the links I told you about.
First, the link to the abstract
http://www.abstracts2view.com/sabcs/view.php?nu=SABCS08L_444&terms=
Second, the link to the poster (the one you want is number 2 on this page). When you go to the second poster, it will bring up and Adobe image of the poster.
Best of luck with your decision.
Jill
-
Hello bradswife-
Since you and I look to have the same cancer stats I thought I'd chime in. I did not even have an Oncotype test as my Doc's (breast surgeon and Oncologist) said chemo was a given with Herceptin. Reading Jill's post was interesting to me as I was unaware of the role ER/PR played in the decision. I was 90% pos for both and had just "celebrated" a year without a period when diagnosed. I'm 53, still considered on the younger side and still considered peri menopausal even though I thought one year meant I was post menopause. So many little facts to learn!
Anyway, bottom line is that there was no discussion at all that I was going to have to do chemo with Herceptin until April and then Herceptin alone until Jan. 2010. I was devastated thinking that if I were Her neg, I could have avoided it. I've come to accept it (though chemo is no picnic) and just keep in mind that I am doing everything I can now while in the early stage to beat this. I don't know if I could do chemo with the thought that "maybe it's working." I figure it is...my Onc. gave me a 95% figure that with chemo and Herceptin, I will have a cancer free future. With those odds, I'll deal with this currently unpleasant life and pray that it will be a distant memory forever!
Best of luck to you.
Ellen
-
I'm sooooo confused!!!! Oncologist recommends chemo followed by Herceptin. Do I want to deal with the chemo side effects? I have to work and support myself.
She said I could do Herceptin without chemo, if I prefer.
Am I foolish at age 56 to NOT consider chemo?
My cancer is IDC stage 1, 1.4 cm, er-/pr-, her2+ grade 3. Had lumpectomy, no node involvement, finished radiation today.
-
Bradswife and bwbly,
Sorry for the bad (or really good news in the long run), but chemo is recommended with this type of BC even if the tumor is small, nodes are negative and grade is low (1 out of 3). I have been researching this extensively to verify the recommendations of the two oncos I consulted. I have now been seeing numerous (ALL of them) studies consistently stating that the prognosis for HER2+ is basically almost as bad if you are Stage I as if you are Stage III. The reason is that this cancer spreads EARLY. By the time you have a tumor big enough to be detected and surgically removed, it has OFTEN spread. If you don't have chemo plus the Herceptin, your odds are much worse. With the two, your odds are really good.
I had only a single micrometastases to my sentinal node, which was just barely over the size (0.25 mm vs. threshold of > 0.2 mm) that qualifies for a positive node. As a result I have looked at both the node negative and node positive studies. Either way, this is a type of cancer that has HIGH risk for recurrence.
I don't want to scare you but rather tweak you to bite the bullet now. This cancer CAN be killed quickly with these chemo/Herceptin combos and then it doesn't come back. However, if the cat has gotten out of the bag and you aren't killing it now, you are talking very short lifespan. So this is GOOD News / BAD News. The treatments are VERY effective. The prognosis without them is NOT GOOD.
Yours, E / Ipursuit
-
I was shocked to learn that I needed chemo and Herceptin - this after my BS and oncologist both originally told me that after a mastectomy I'd be fine with just Arimidex (I was 53 and post-menopausal.) My Oncotype DX score was 23 - which my onc said was "low" - but then he got the results of my FISH report (late because my BS failed to follow-up!) and it showed my tumor was Her2++++. I was devastated.........but felt better when he told me that my chemo would be "light" since Herceptin works with ANY chemo. He put me on 4 months of Navelbine and Herceptin every two weeks..........then I continued with Herceptin for a year (the year is up in April, yay!) I didn't lose my hair from the Navelbine (just a little) - and I didn't have to worry about the dangerous side effects to your heart with the other chemo drugs. I still worry that my treatment was very unorthodox.........but 3 other oncologists agreed with mine, so that makes me feel less anxious. He told me that my risk of recurrence was 14% - but this treatment would reduce it to 7%. Considering my overall risk for BC was only 2% at the very beginning - and feeling like I was already on the "bad-luck roller-coaster" I decided I better hit this beast with all the weapons at my disposal. I hope this information helps .........it's such a difficult decision........try to get two or three opinions before you move forward. Good luck!
-
Hi again - just ran into another study supporting earlier point. Here's a quote from the following presentation at SABCS this past December (2008):
- "HER 2 positivity alone confers high risk irrespective of pathological stage."
By pathological stage, they mean the standard staging of tumor size, node involvement, etc. This study was actually trying to find out why so many of their patients (in Glasgow, Scotland) had NOT had Herceptin in addition to their chemo. Turns out it was their age - average age was 79. Here's the link: http://www.posters2view.com/sabcs08/viewp.php?nu=3159
Hoping this helps, But swimangel72 is right, don't trust me, see one or more additional GOOD oncologists. You owe it to yourselves.
All the best, E / ipursuit
-
bwbly -
Hi. I know this is hard. Been right where you are.
But, I also hope I can give you a little hope. As I mentioned in my note above, I did do the chemo- AND I did work during treatment. I am the breadwinner in my family. So, not working would be really difficult, although I could have done disability. I also won't lie to you - working through treatment was damn hard. I barely remember October - December this year. I am very lucky to have a work place that allowed me to be somewhat sub par and still contribute, despite a very demanding job (I am a Research and Development manager for a major Fortune 500 company).
I don't know if your situation will allow it, but there are some tricks you can use to get through working and chemo. If you get to that point, Private Message me and I will let you know some of the things that I did.
That said, while I am sure you don't want to hear this, I have not seen a woman yet with your diagnosis that did not do the chemo and herceptin - although to be clear - it is YOUR choice. There is no wrong or right answer. It is a very personal thing. So.. no.. there is also no "foolish" answer as well.
However, the recurrence stats are pretty clear with a tumor over a centimeter and is her2+++ - they are not great. But, the stats do improve significantly with chemo/herceptin. I would love to say that it is the same for just herceptin alone. But, there is not a lot of data about herceptin outside a context that also contains chemo (unfortunately) - trust me, I looked. In addition. since you are ER/PR negative, hormone therapy won't be an option for you. So... gather as much information as you can, get those second opinions, and decide how much risk is worth how much benefit for you.
Hang in there and let us know where you come out. Our cases are somewhat similar. You are a little older than me (which would help your stats vs. mine), and my tumor was smaller than yours (which would help my stats). While I was ER positive, it was very weak to the point the doc was treating me as if I am ER negative. So, we are even similar in that regard. Accordingly, feel free to send me a PM if you want additional information.
I wish you the very best.
Jill
-
Dear Bradswife and bwbly,
Here's one more thing for you to ck out. I am sorry I don't have time now to ck it for you. It is a current trial called MINDACT that is studying this very question you pose. In addition the report cited below talks about the use of the Mammaprint testing (like Oncotype DX only used mostly in Europe). I think this was recently approved for use in the US. Maybe you can ask your oncologists?
Here is a quote from the SABCS poster (link: http://www.posters2view.com/sabcs08/viewp.php?nu=4171)
"The 70-gene MammaPrint signature turned out to be a strong and independent prognostic indicator, that can identify a subgroup with good clinical outcome in Her2-positive early breast cancer even in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. In genomic low risk highly endocrine responsive tumors, no relapses or cancer related deaths were observed This subgroup will be further studied in the ongoing MINDACTtrial (MIcroarray for Node-negative and 1-3 positive node Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy) and beyond. The MINDACT-trial will prospectively evaluate whether it is acceptable to withhold chemotherapy in Her2-positive, genomic low risk patients." Once again, hope this helps. E / ipursuit -
Hello again !
I was intrigued by what ipursuit just posted and checked out the MammaPrint status. I found the following from the FDA:
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01555.html
My take is that this test has been cleared (for about two years), but is still not widely used yet in the US. The Oncotype test uses 22 characteristics/genes and this one claims to use 70 to evaluate prognostics. In my conversations with Genomic Health - the makers of the Oncotype test - usually, but not always, Her2 positive tumors are high in Oncotype given the algorithm they use. I find it very intriguing that there was a small Her 2 positive sub-group identified in that Mammoprint testing that had a lower recurrence prognositc.
I will ask my onc. next time I see her about why this test is not more widely used yet. But, based on the poster, it appears to be a work in progress of sorts.
Jill
-
Dear Jill & ipursuit,
Thanks so much for the info/links. In doing my research, I had found about the same info .... it seems that chemo is "always" indicated with Herceptin. I too could find very little information about Herceptin alone.
In my head, I know that chemo+Herceptin is my best route, but in my heart, I sure don't want chemo. But then, who does??? I'm also very afraid because I live alone and will have to do the side effects/treatments with very minimal support.
And, I have additional very significant stressors .... my husband is dying with end-stage Huntington's Disease. He has been in a nursing home (200 miles away) for 3-1/2 years and in Hospice care for 4-1/2 years. And, no, moving him is not an option. It would kill him.
As for my job, they are very lenient, thank God. I could take disability, but I would rather not .... I'm afraid that staying home alone during chemo would be even more depressing/debilitating than trying to maintain a regular schedule/lifestyle.
I think that what I REALLY want is somebody to say you HAVE to do this. I'm tired of making such difficult decisions.
Again, thank you both ... for your responses and for letting me vent.
Bunny, League City, TX
-
Bunny -
Oh my... you do have stressors ! I am sorry about your husband.
OK... here is the blanket truth since you want someone to tell you what to do. The truth of the matter is that given the data on the table and current statistics, your recurrence statistics are not so hot. Hormone therapy will buy you nothing. Her2+++ cancer has a 3-4 times recurrence vs. Her 2 negative. The stats in adjuvant show at least a double digit chance of recurring. Chemo/herceptin can probably get you down into single digits.
You have already had one doctor recommend chemo/herceptin given the above. There is very limited data to the efficacy of herceptin alone - and it can be a heart risk. (So... my doctor did asked me the question about why do you want to risk your heart for something you do not know for sure works. I found that a good point).
Net, if I were in your shoes (and I was), I would do the chemo/herceptin given what it can buy in terms of dropping recurrence risk. That said, ask your doc about "lighter" regimens of chemo given your node negativity. The 12 weekly Taxol/Herceptin appears to be a regimen that is doable for most working women. I know several that have gone that route. It is being prescribed more and more. Herceptin has been tested in a forum that contains "chemo", but there is no prescriptive chemo regimen per se.
Now... in terms of help. Most centers have available transportation services to get you to and from. In addition, local church groups, wellness community centers and the like also have meal services available for those on treatment. Your doctor's office should know about what is out there. However, sometimes the hardest part is asking for help. Not something we are used to doing, eh ?
In addition, I worked for largely the reasons you gave. Work was a positive distraction for me. I may not have been too effective, but I was occupied. I know myself well enough to know that if I did not work, me and my uber-hyper Type A personality would just obsess about the cancer. To that end, work was a blessing.
I really hope this helps. I know it is tough. You come back and vent any time.
Jill
-
bwbly-Other than my ER/PR status, our dx is the same. I did 4Taxotere/Cytoxan/H every 3. Now I am doing H alone for a yr. I am a Dental Hygienist. I worked thru treatments. I only took off 1 day per cycle (day 4). It isn't fun but it is doable. I would do it again if I had to. Good luck with your decision. You have so much going on in your life, I know this is very difficult. BTW, my DH was out of the country and I was also alone for a lot of this...you CAN do it!
-
I so appreciate all of you.
My port will be put in on Monday, with Taxol/Herceptin to start 3/24.
-
Bunny -
I see you made your decision. I wish you the very best. Good luck and let us know how you are doing.
Jill
-
During the Stand Up to Cancer Program, there was a young woman that only had Herceptin. I believe that is the first that anyone had heard of that. Her cancer was so aggressive that it broke through her chest wall! Sorry I can't provide more information but I was really stunned by that information!
-
What we do not want is to make the tough decision, and do the time (go through the ugliness of treatment), and then recur anyway. It is hard enough just doing the treatment, but please don't stop there. Two really important factors that help a lot to limit recurrence are 1) regular exercise, and 2) avoiding weight gain.
-
Bunny,
I want to tell you that I did the Taxol/Herceptin treatment if you have any questions about side effects, etc. I would be happy to share my experiences with you. I was also so scared about chemo and didn't know if I would do it. It really wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. I didn't start feeling too bad until the 4th week. At first it was all the pre-meds that got to me.
I had a 1 cm, Stage 1a ER/PR + Grade 3 tumor that tested equivical for Her2. The oncologist kept doing the tests over and finally decided it tilted just enough to go the positive route. My Onco score was 23 not counting the Her2 status. I am glad you decided to do the chemo with the Herceptin. My understanding is that Taxol and Herceptin have this "synergy" that makes it an effective regimine that is easier tolerated. However, you probably already know that the Herceptin is tough on the heart. I did the Taxol with the Herceptin weekly for 12 weeks and then the Herceptin only every 3 weeks for 9 more months (total year of Herceptin). I just finished February 27 of this year.
I believe you made a good decision. I will keep you in my prayers as you start begin this journey. Stay in touch!
Pam
-
Pam,
I am extremely interested in how I'm going to feel! I start on Tuesday next week.
I have already taken vacation time for next week, since my mother will be here with me. After all, I'm only 56 and she still has to take care of me LOL.
My job wants me to take short-term disability, but I'm not really interested in doing that. I know myself .... I'll just sit at home and feel sorry for myself.
Any info you can give me will be greatly appreciated!
-
As a hormonal postive gal, being her2+, your prognosis at stage one is better than hormonal negative. How big is the invasive exactly? You only said less than 1cm.
-
Hi Bunny,
I'm glad you took the week off and that your mother will there for some support. Just the anxiety of beginning the chemo can be draining and it will help just having someone there for you I am sure.
The first infusion you are usually given steroids in case of allergic reactions to the drugs. I was also given Benedryl and an anti-nausea pill. I know I became really hungry during the treatment which surprised me. I then found out it was the meds. The pre-meds made me very sleepy and jittery at the same time. The steroid/Benedryl combo does this I guess. I felt like I had to get up and move around which they let me do - it definately helped. I didn't get sick or have a mentionable side efects that first week. Like I said before, just the anxiety of it all and the reality of taking "chemo" was a tough transition for me.
I slowly weaned off of the pre-meds after they knew there wouldn't be an allergic reaction and that helped alot! By the third and fourth week I was starting to feel the effects of the chemo. I would get muscle aches 2-3 days after the treatment and just started tiring much easier.
My hair started thinning about half way through and I finally just shaved my head because it looked so horrible. What a step that was! Reality really sunk in at that moment!
I made sure to allow myself time to get good rest and always tried to walk each day no matter how bad I felt. This treatment is usually well tolerated and I guess alot of gals keep working during it. Listen to your body and don't expect too much from yourself during this time. Keep me up to date on your progress. I'll be thinking of you!
-
Pam,
Thanks for the info and of course, I'll keep you posted.
I will be cutting my hair this weekend, in preparation. My local cancer store will cut it for free and then, I can get hats etc right there. Being bald doesn't bother me, but the act of losing it does, I think. I tell people that I have enough dog hair in my house, don't need human hair too LOL.
Seems most of the people on these boards say the anticipation of the chemo is worse than actually getting the 1st one, so that's what I'm working on ..... attitude adjustment. Since I'm on vacation next week, I plan on getting out and doing stuff with my mom. We don't get to do that very often any more.
-
Had my 1st tx of Taxol/Herceptin on Tuesday. No reactions and very minor SE's ..... minor itching of head and upper torso Tuesday night and dry mouth for 2 days.
My mom was here with me (she worries, you know). She's decided I'm ok and she went home today.
I feel perfectly fine and ready to go back to work on Monday (vacation this week). 11 more tx of Taxol/Herceptin, then switch to Adriamycin and Cytoxan.
Good luck to everybody else and hope you all do as well.
Bunny
-
Bunny-
I was thinking of you this week! Glad to hear that your first treatment went well and that you're able to go to work. How long do you take the AC for? Will you also continue the Herceptin?
Be good to yourself - eat well, get lots of rest, and a try to keep a posiive attitude (can be tough at times!) I'll be thinking of you!!
Pam
-
Pam,
Thanks so much for the good thoughts! Every little bit helps, as we all know.
I don't know yet the schedule for the AC .... think I've been afraid to ask LOL. At any rate, it's still a few weeks away. I think I've decided to concentrate on what I'm getting now .... worry about the other later.
Bunny
-
Hi! I was officially diagnosed stage IV - IBC with mets to liver in October, 2008. I am 53 and postmenopausal. Initial biopsies and testing showed I was ER+/PR+/HER2neu+. My doctors naturally told me that the protocol would be for me to receive chemo with herceptin, then surgery, and then external beam radiation. They also suggested I have a portacath inserted. Needless to say I was in shock, but did a TON of research before making my decision for treatment, which was probably the most difficult one to date. I opted NOT to take chemo (this was an extremely personal choice, as I did not believe it would help in the long run except to complicate matters more). I instead agreed to receive Herceptin every three weeks beginning December 1, 2008 and continue every three weeks from then. I also started on a regimen of Arimidex every day. Much to my onco's surprise, my tumor markers and CT scan from 2 weeks ago showed a DEFINITE decline in size of all tumors, including the one on my liver--all down approx. 20%. I am extremely thankful that I did not go along with their protocol which is a guesstimate at best, as I am confident that over time I can eventually have a cleaner and not so drastic surgery. BC is not new to me insofar as I have many friends who were diagnosed at various stages--some opted for chemo and others chose not. Herceptin is fairly well tolerated and manageable. Arimidex however is not so manageable for me, but I will take it as long as it works. Would love to hear from others in the same circumstancess! Best of luck to all---
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team