Gray area for chemo

Options
nina49
nina49 Member Posts: 5

Hi, this is my first post, but any advice will be appreciated.  I'm not sure where to post so you may see me more than once, but I promise I'll get the hang of it.  I'm 49 and am tying to decide chemo or not.  1.5cm IDC, grade1-2 (another gray area), node neg, ER/PR+, HER2-.  Oncotype dx score came back 13.  Onc says if it was 11, no chemo, 15 she would recommend chemo.  It is up to me, she said she would not be upset if I pass on the chemo, but if I want it, 4 rounds of TC.  No history of bc in family, I'm healthy otherwise.  This tells me if I read between the lines no chemo, but onc said the docs in her practice had a mock argument on my case and all voted chemo or no, the concensus was chemo.  With my oncotype dx of 13, I have an 8% risk factor.  Chemo drops it by 1/3 and meds by anoter 3, correct?  I may not be able to take tamoxifen due to blood clot risk. But the risk of leukemia must be 1%, hard # to locate.  Anyone else in my position?  Thanks in advice Nina49

Comments

  • doggirl25
    doggirl25 Member Posts: 10
    edited January 2009

    Hi Nina,

     This is my first post as well. I'm 25 and was diagnosed 11/08 with double mastectomy 12/08. IDC .8cm, node neg, ER/PR+, HER2-. My oncotype score was 24--believe it or not, my onc said chemo was up to me as well. She said my distant recurrance risk was 15% with tamoxifen and no chemo. Chemo would put me at 11%-15% chance of recurrance (unfortunately, she could not tell me whether chemo would provide a benefit for me). My first instinct was no chemo. I asked her what she'd do in my situation, she said she would have it. Then I thought about if somebody close to me was going through this, I'd want them to have the chemo. I decided even the *possible* benefit was enough for me to choose to go for it if it reduces my chances of a distant recurrance, and figured I'd regret not doing everything I could now if it came back. I found this out 1/28--yesterday I started the IVF process and will start chemo at the end of February--4 rounds of TC. Best of luck with your decision!

  • jude14
    jude14 Member Posts: 293
    edited January 2009

    Hi Nina....I had a 1.5 cm but was a grade 3, er/pr + and her 2- just like you.  My onco score was an 18 but I am also older then you.  I was 58 at the time and will turn 60 here on the 14th of Feb.  My onco told me with the benefits versus the side effects he would not insist on chemo.  He told me if I were his mom or sister he would tell me to go home and do the radiation take the pills and let it go.  I think it is solely up to each individual and what you can live with.  I know the chemo does not guarantee a non recurrence either and it does have side effects.  I have also read they are way overdoing chemo with breast cancer patients giving where it is really not needed.    I have an 11% chance of a recurrence over the next 10 years with the pills.....Best of Luck and I am sure you will make the right decision....Jude

  • Emily2008
    Emily2008 Member Posts: 605
    edited January 2009

    Hi Nina.  I know how tough this decision is for you.  I went through the same thing.  If you go to the Genomic Health website they have some great info on interpreting your results and how it all shakes down.  I think the fact that your tumor is larger than 1 cm, and that you're on the younger side all contribute to the rec. to do chemo. 

    My own situation was that my oncotype was 14 and I was 35 at dx.  I consulted with 2 oncos who both recommended AC x4.  I agonized over this decision, but ultimately decided to go with the chemo.  I finished in Nov and am glad I did it, though the longterm side effects are always a concern for me.  My advice: get a couple of opinions, do your homework, pray, and when you make your decision, don't look back.

  • byzalot
    byzalot Member Posts: 24
    edited February 2009

    Hi Nina,

    Your situation is very similar to mine. I was 49 at diagnosis and I actually had 2 tumors, different types, both had the Oncotype done and came back as 12 & 18. The percentage number given is a number based on women who were treated with tamoxifen. My higher score of 18 gave me an 11% chance of a recurrence with tamoxifen, with chemo, it would only lower it by 2-3%. The score of 12 gave me an 8 % chance of a recurrance, with chemo, again only lowering it by 2-3%. I was told the side effects could translate to a 2-3% risk long term. Making it a 'wash' as far as benefit. I chose not to have chemo and went with rads along with tamoxifen. I wasn't willing to risks the long term possible side effects for such little benefit of chemo.

    You didn't say if you were pre or post menopausal. If you are post menopausal there are other drugs that you might be able to take.

    Only you can decide what is best for you. Are you the type of person who would be angry at yourself if you don't do chemo and you get a recurrence? Or are you the type once you make a decision, you live with that decision.  I had someone ask me that and it really helped me make my decision.

    Good luck and whatever you decide won't be wrong, it will be the right decision for YOU.

  • noellech
    noellech Member Posts: 86
    edited February 2009

    Hi Nina, We are a little different. I am Her2+ but grade 1, low Ki-67, negative nodes and 5 mm tumor. My onc didn't do the oncotype test. There wasn't anymore cancerous tissue available at the mast, but she did say that my risk of spread was about 10% - similar to your 8%. I went ahead and did the chemo for two reasons. One - I am 42 and have 3 small children under the age of 10. Two - I didn't want to pass on the herceptin. So chemo plus herceptin plus tamoxifen takes my 10% to ( chemo -3%, herceptin -3.5%, tamox -1 ) 2-3%. If you are her2- you wouldn't get the herceptin so you would just get the 3% chemo and then whatever hormonal you would take. My onc actually said she hoped I wouldn't do the chemo and that she only offered because of my age. I think generally 10% or less risk is considered low. I told her I had to do it because of my kids and she understood. Now I am out two months and it just seems like a bad dream. I am on tamoxifen and feel that I have done everything I could to help my kids grow up with a mom. But I must say that chemo is hard and that had my kids been older I probably would have passed.

    I think your decision would depend alot on how ER+ you are and whether you could take tamoxifen or an AI. I think the more strongly ER+ you are the better insurance you get from those meds. AIs have a better result, so possibly your onc could put you in chemical menopause with a shot and prescribe an AI. Many studies I have seen say that hormonals work as well as chemo for ER+, especially someone whose tumor looks pretty low grade like yours. Good luck with your decision. I don't think there is a right answer.

  • buffy
    buffy Member Posts: 73
    edited February 2009

    Nina, my situation was very similar to yours.  I was 47 no node involvement, 2 cm, grade 1-2.  My oncologist was wishy washy; gave me some stats, and said it was entirely up to me.  I consulted my good friend who is a pathologist and she was shocked he even offered chemo.  She said that with a low grade tumor the chemo would do nothing to those cells, they would bypass those cells becaUse they are not "crazy" enough for the drugs to kill.  She advised me NOT to take the chemo, but due to being er+ to try and take the tamoxifen or another AI because studies have shown that those are more successful then the chemo at times, especially, with low grade bc.  Good luck with your decision....gather all the information you can find and go with the decision....unfortunately, there are no guarantees no matter what we do, just go with your gut....

  • audreynyc
    audreynyc Member Posts: 21
    edited February 2009

    Hi Nina - I agree with Buffy that you should go with your gut - I've been to 3 of the best cancer centers in the county (I'm in New York) and after two wishy-washy oncologists, I consulted with a third who is highly respected and he said "no chemo" very confidently. I'm pre-menopausal and in my late 30s. I'm stage 1, grade 1, <1cm, ER+, PR+, Her2- and node neg. I had a lumpectomy and am currently doing radiation and plan to take tamoxifen. However, I'm also getting the 2d6 test to make sure I'm able to convert the tamoxifen properly (there was a story in the NY Times recently about women being on tamoxifen for years without any real benefit). So, best to get all the data you can - I'm now a firm believer in personalized medicine. Best of luck to you!  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2009

    Nina

    My dx is very similar to yours as well, and my onco NEVER even mentioned chemo due to, like Buffy said, low grade tumors do not respond well to chemo. I was 46 yrs when dx'd and my oncotypedx score was 12.....

    This is a very hard decision to make....I choose no chemo (the onco said he would if I wanted), lumpectomy, snb, 37 rad treatments and tamox.....Im almost 2 1/2 yrs out now and doing well with no sign of its return or anything new showing up...

    Best wishes

    Jule

    PS-I would also take a look at Geonomics website and study things so that you can feel comfortable with your decision...you could also get a second opinion from another medical team as well.

  • thegoodfight
    thegoodfight Member Posts: 560
    edited February 2009

    Nina,

    Here is just another case study for you to add and hopefully it will help you make your decision.  Most importantly, remember, IT IS YOUR DECISION.

    I am 63 and still consider myself quite young with many years of living left to do.  I had a 3.5 cm tumor and after my lumpectomy found myself with grade 3 IDC, er/pr positive her-, stage 2A, and oncotype dx of 17.  At first the decision was no chemo just radiation.

    I then had an MRI, just to check out the other breast, since nothing (even a 3.5cm tumor) never showed in any of my mammos.  The MRI showed "something" in both breasts and I had surgery to remove those also.  The "good" breast had some atypical cells, but lo and behold the already dx'd breast had another primary cancer in another quadrant of the same breast.  It was much smaller and 90% contained DCIS, so very early stage and grade.   They were not really so concerned about the second tumor, but it was enough for me to reconsider my chemo decision more as an insurance policy.

    I knew, for me, I could never look back if I had a recurrance and be okay that I didn't do everything I could have to fight this thing.  I personally thought about if it happened, could I face my husband, my three children and my first grandbaby,  who was only 6 weeks when I was diagnosed.  So for me it was chemo.

    I did fine and finished Jan 6th.  Yes, some side effects, but nothing I can't handle.  Do I worry about something it may have caused for me to deal with down the road, yes, but I was at peace with my decision.   That is what you need to do, find peace and then move forward and do not look back.

    I am now in radiation, #6 today out of 35.  I worry about that too in terms of long term damage.  But I am marching forward.

    You will know when the decisions are right for you.

    It is so much to handle at times, but somehow we all keep going forward and this thread is one of the big reasons why.

    Caren

  • Mamie2
    Mamie2 Member Posts: 108
    edited February 2009

    Hi Nina. 

    I'm still a bit confused as to what treatments I am supposed to do. The doc originally said radiation and arimidex. I was supposed to start that after a few weeks of healing. I had diagnostic lumpectomy on 12/10 and a re-excision and SNB on 1/21. I was reading in the NCCN guidelines about how to stage cancer. I think its mandatory reading for anyone going through this. Even though my tumor is 2.3 IDC and DCIS, no node involvement, the guidelines say to classify any mass that has direct extension to the chest wall as T4. I'm waiting for a phone call now from my Med Onco to discuss. So. Depending on how we classify my stage with this added information, I will need to decide on chemo or no chemo. She told me they don't really know the effectiveness about the hormonal therapy and chemo at the same time. For me, the risk/benefit ratio has to be reasonably more beneficial than not. I am thinking if all goes well, that I can assist in killing the cancer with what I eat, (and don't eat.) My onco test scores are not back yet. Best of luck with your decision.

  • Lories
    Lories Member Posts: 351
    edited February 2009

    Hi all, I like you Nina, just got my Oncotype scores today - 19.  I really appreciate all the good thoughts on here, dang here I thought all my decisions were made.

    Caren, I read your post with interest, I am feeling that way as well.  thanks all.  Lori

  • Bethie1
    Bethie1 Member Posts: 393
    edited February 2009

    What does onco score mean?  I had a 2cm tumor with 5 out of 24 nodes, and because it's IDC grade 3 aggressive, they're recommending chemo.  I asked what factor does stage play, and they said stage is not as important as grade because you could have an aggresive grade with a low stage.  Example stage 1 grade 3 aggresive they'd recommend chemo and radiation. In my case, it's a stage 3 and a grade 3. These doctors are specialists, and know cancer, but also ask questions and be your own advocate

Categories