Ovaries removed???

Options
DianaT
DianaT Member Posts: 532

Has anyone been told to get your ovaries removed even if you are ER-/PR-???

My Gyn said this to me today and my onc said only if I was sure I was done with children, but ultimately he would encourage me to have them removed as well.  This is the first I have heard of it, and honestly I am upset.  My boobs were one thing, but this is upsetting.

Thanks 

Comments

  • coonie
    coonie Member Posts: 7,618
    edited January 2009

    Hi Diana----

    Personally, I was very anxious to have my ovaries removed (done at the same time my mastectomy was done). The way I look at it, that's just one less place to get cancerUndecided It's such a personal choice for everybody though. The price us FEMALES have to pay, huh?

  • Estepp
    Estepp Member Posts: 6,416
    edited January 2009

    I "thought" I was told I did not have to have them out... geezzzzzz.. I will be asking my onco this with two weeks when I see her...

    My gene test was negative too...

    I hope someone who is her+ only know this answer on her...

    BethNY??????? I know she is or was her2+... Lets keep this bumped Diana to make sure everyone her2+ sees it...hoepfully we can get an answer.

    Blessing

    Laura

  • kimf
    kimf Member Posts: 334
    edited January 2009

    I had mine removed and I'm er/pr neg. I did have a history of ov cysts and was freaked out when my period returned after chemopause and it was like I was 14 again. Then I had a thyroid cancer dx and had a thyroidectomy...As a result, I was having my period more than I was not. So, my Ob/gyn suggested it when I approached him about ablation. He said that I had plenty of medical reasons to do it, so I told him to sign me up asap. I did have my 3 children by then, but I was only 39 at dx. I haven't regretted it for a second. Its one less thing to worry about in my book. And no periods is pretty nice, too.

    Do what is right for you.

    Kim

  • DianaT
    DianaT Member Posts: 532
    edited January 2009

    Kim ~ so the reason you had yours removed was not due to you having breast cancer, but numerous medical conditions, right? I just can't wrap my head around it all, I do have children already but at 31, I am a bit nervous as to doing something like this right now.  Did you have any physical changes when they were removed?

  • JoniB
    JoniB Member Posts: 346
    edited January 2009

    I was told that if my genetic testing turned out positive, I would be encouraged to have my ovaries removed (I am ER-/PR- and 55 years old).  I questioned whether I needed them removed since I was in menopause, and was told yes.  I am scheduled for testing in March.  I am older and have children.  If I were younger and interested in adding to my family, I wouldn't have them removed at this time.  The reason for having your ovaries removed if you test positive for the gene, is that you may be at an increased risk for ovarian cancer. 

  • kimbly
    kimbly Member Posts: 398
    edited January 2009

    I am at this point now.  I just finished my herceptin treatments and my dr wants me to have my ovaries removed.  I am er/pr + and her+.  I did the genetic testing as well and it was negative but my onc said that we don't want the ovaries to start producing estrogen again at all so that is why they are to come out.  I am on Tamox. now but then will switch to Arimidex I guess. 

  • kimbly
    kimbly Member Posts: 398
    edited January 2009

    I am at this point now.  I just finished my herceptin treatments and my dr wants me to have my ovaries removed.  I am er/pr + and her+.  I did the genetic testing as well and it was negative but my onc said that we don't want the ovaries to start producing estrogen again at all so that is why they are to come out.  I am on Tamox. now but then will switch to Arimidex I guess. 

  • Sassa
    Sassa Member Posts: 1,588
    edited January 2009

    I am ER/PR - and 58 yo.  I was just deemed postmenopausal this past May (my periods returned briefly after finishing chemo in Feb 07 - my onc laughed and said I had cast iron ovaries).  I know from various scans that I have a small uterine fibroid and a small cyst on one ovary (both are non-symptomatic).  My onc sees no reason for me to have my ovaries removed.

    My female PCP has left her practice so I will be seeing a gyn for my PAP smear in May. I hope she doesn't suggest removal as I have no problems in that area and can't see losing normal healthy organs.

  • 40somethingMom
    40somethingMom Member Posts: 168
    edited January 2009

    ask your onc about bone density, I remember my onc mentioning to keep them because of the bones...(I was gene neg) I did choose to have my other side(breast) removed when I had reconstruction because of my history of fibro cystic masses- I'm glad I did

  • lisettemac
    lisettemac Member Posts: 213
    edited January 2009

    Diana -- did your gyn say why this was recommended?  Are you BRCA +?  Like another poster, I was tested for BRCA mutation and told if I was positive, I'd be encouraged to have my ovaries out.  But I was negative.  Ultimately, I had my ovaries out, BUT I am both ER+ and had a history of significant endometriosis on my R ovary.

    Having an ooph will carry side effects -- you will be in early menopause with all that brings.

    Personally, I'd think about this one long and hard and I'd need a good reason why it was recommended.

  • DianaT
    DianaT Member Posts: 532
    edited January 2009

    My gyn said that it was a standard practice 15+ yrs ago, but was going to do some research for me since he wasn't an onc. I am supposed to have the BRCA testing started ~ was told I had to see a genetics counselor. I have NO family history of cancer (any type) at all, so I am pretty sure it will be negative (I have 3 sisters, 2 aunts, 5 female cousins) so I would think with all those females if it were genetic someone would have had issues by now. My onc said that estrogen helps move things along and that it may reduce chances of recurrence (but this was said thru my chemo nurse, didn't hear it directly out of his mouth).

  • Estepp
    Estepp Member Posts: 6,416
    edited January 2009

    Hi Diana.... :) I hope your day has been fun with the family!

    I am going to ask my BS about this on Monday. She may or may not know.. but she works with a team of cancer doctors. I will post what she tells me Monday!

    Laura

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Well, let me tell y'all what my onc told me recently.  We were discussing doing a biopsy to see if my receptors have changed.  A little background....I am triple +, had hysterectomy after my original bc treatment, have bone mets with recent progression with a pesky rib met and two new ribs on recent scan.  Anyway, she told me I would be on an AI (a targeted hormonal therapy) forever, even if my ER/PR + status changed.  Her thinking is that bc can be like prostrate cancer.  Even if your receptors have changed from positive to negative, there are always SOME ER positive cells still in the mix.  So perhaps that is why your doctor is recommending the removal of your ovaries.  Hope this info helps.

    Bethie

  • swimangel72
    swimangel72 Member Posts: 1,989
    edited January 2009

    Diana - I was hoping to get a hysterectomy and oopherectomy this summer when I must go in for open abdominal surgery to repair my large hernia. I saw an gyecologic oncologist who went over my scans and reports. His advice was "if it ain't broke don't fix it." I'm 54, post-menopausal, have an asymptomatic fibroid, tiny cysts on both ovaries, and an enlarged endometrium which is still within normal ranges. And yet the oncologist was very firm that it would be "unethical" to remove these organs. He even performed an endometrial biopsy on me just to try to find a reason, but it came back normal. I'm BRCA negative but I worry that once I stop taking Arimidex (in 5 more years) my body will start producing estrogen again. Even though I'm post-menopausal, I still was ER+ PR+ and Her2+++..........the estrogen came from other sources besides the ovaries, mostly my own body fat. I haven't lost any weight - so my worry is once the Arimidex is gone, the endometrium will start growing again. HOWEVER - I have decided to go along with the gynecologic oncologist's recommendation not to get a hysterectomy because he comes very highly recommended - and I'm afraid of more surgical complications (such as lack of bladder control - or another MRSA staph infection.) He told me with Pap smears and scans they can keep an eye on my uterus and cervix. I'm still not sure what I'll be doing about the ovaries - because ovarian cancer is very sneaky and they don't have reliable tests. He told me I'm at the same risk for getting ovarian cancer as the general population - does anyone know if this is true? I read somewhere that once you've been dx'd with BC - especially ER+ BC you run a HIGHER risk for getting gynecologic cancers, but perhaps that was only endometrial cancer? Maybe my risk for Ovarian cancer is really the same as the general population?

    I hope you'll be able to get some good advice from your doctors Diane - especially with a gynecologic oncologist.

  • Caya
    Caya Member Posts: 971
    edited January 2009

    I am triple +, highly ER+ and PR+, but I also have osteopenia, heading towards osteoporosis.  I tested negative for the BRCA genes, and my onc. did not recommend me getting out my ovaries and starting on an AI as they are bad for the bones, Tamox can be beneficial for the bones.  I was 48 at dx, now I am 50.   My second opinion onc. concurred with my own onc. to leave my ovaries in.  So I am leaving them in, I really do not want another suregery if I can avoid it.

    I am looking into having an infusion of zolendronic acid  - Zometa (4 mg./ 100 ml. in the US) but since I am in Canada it is Anclasta (5 mg./100 ml).  Good for the bones, and showing improved (lowered) recurrence rates in receptor + BC.

  • Zzap
    Zzap Member Posts: 77
    edited January 2009

    I've asked my onc several times about removal of ovaries and hysterectomy.  I've got ovarian cysts and fibroids.  She and my PCP do not see any benefit in removing them.  I also asked about removing my 'healthy' breast and she said I have a very small chance of getting cancer in that breast.  If I had my way, I'd have it all removed.  I'm PR-, ER+ and HER2+++.  I was 38 at the time of diagnosis and am BRCA neg.  After chemo and rads, I was started on Tamoxifen for the estrogen and will have completed 2 years of it come May.  I haven't had any real bad SE from the Tamox.  I have not had reconstruction, I'm not ready yet.  I may push for a prophylactic mast on my 'good' side when/if I get around to reconstruction.

    As far as I know, I'm not osteopenic, but am going to ask about Zometa the next time I see my onc in March.  I'm not sure if she'll give it to me, and since it would be for 'off label' use (reduce chance of recurrance) I may have to pay for it out of pocket.  If it reduces the risk by as much as the research shows, it'll be worth it.

  • kimbly
    kimbly Member Posts: 398
    edited January 2009

    I did recently have a bone density test and not osteopenic either, no official results but according to the tech she said don't lose any sleep.  My onc wants my ovaries removed because I am 90% ER+ and was starting to get irregular just before my diagnosis and chemo.  She said she does not want the ovaries to start working again and producing estrogen at all. She also said that Arimdex is much better with post menopausal women.  Since I am sort of in limbo I guess this is why the recomendation.  I too asked about removing the healthy breast and was told no medical reason to do this at all.  I still have not decided this completely. Breast surgeon appt on friday and I will ask her and see.  SHe has a really nice, knowledgable PA that works with her and I value her opinion as well so asking her.  I just kind of want to do everything to stop myself from worrying about this every coming back at all!!!

  • lexislove
    lexislove Member Posts: 2,645
    edited January 2009

    Zzap,

    Your diagnosis and mine have similarities. I was wondering what your onc meant by saying the chance of a "new" breast cancer in the healthy breast was small. I asked my onc as well, and he said maybe a 20 - 30% lifetime chance. I take that as a small chance, 70 - 80% it won't happen. I have been wrestling with the idea of removing the healthy breast AND the ovaries. I feel stuck. any advice would be appreciated. Laughing

    P.S. I tested neg for the BRCA genes

  • lexislove
    lexislove Member Posts: 2,645
    edited January 2009

    Caya,

    I am also in Canada, B.C. to be exact, and I get Zometa. I contacted Novartis for funding and was approved. Check it out with your docs.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    swimangel---Not to contradict your oncologist, but I've always read that the risk for ovarian cancer is doubled if there is a personal history of bc. (perhaps those articles were wrong?). I know my gyn was very concerned about the possibility of ovarian cancer when I had a large ovarian mass, due to my family history of bc and my high risk status (I have LCIS). Fortunately, everything turned out benign, but I had to have a TAH/BSO and immediate surgical menopause due to ovarian rupture. If you're very concerned, you could ask your gyn for a yearly transvaginal US (to monitor both the uterine lining AND the ovaries) and a CA-125 blood test.

    Anne

  • swimangel72
    swimangel72 Member Posts: 1,989
    edited January 2009

    Thanks so much Anne for your kind advice - I've been getting yearly transvaginal untra sounds for the past 2 years and my ob/gyn continues to say the endometrial lining and fibroid are still within "normal" range and that my ovaries are very small and the cysts there very very tiny, so I shouldn't worry. Originally I thought "get it all out and over with" to end the scanning and worrying, but I have come to start doubting myself after several doctor friends have told me "less is more" - and after realizing my own agressiveness in getting a mastectomy and reconstruction landed me in such a bad situation (with the MRSA infection). Surgery is so fraught with risk - the outcome can cause such life-altering problems - that I'm opting out of doing anything more than what is absolutely necessary for now. Deep down I'm very afraid of getting uterine or ovarian cancer - but I'm more afraid of surgical complications. It's enough to worry about getting my hernia repaired and gall bladder out this summer (open abdominal surgery including drains and pain, yuck!). I'll just have to deal with whatever comes my way later in life - hopefully this will be the last time I'll every have to worry about cancer or surgery.

  • Zzap
    Zzap Member Posts: 77
    edited January 2009

    Lexislove,

     It was almost 2 years ago that I my onc told me about the chances being small of a new cancer in the other breast.  I don't remember the exact number she gave me, but I remember it being very small, definately under 10%.  I wish I had taken notes that day because she gave me a bit of an explanation and after this much time has gone by, I don't remember her rationale.  Plus I was going through chemo at the time so I'll blame it on chemo-brain. Wink 

     One thing I do remember is that she said that taking Tamoxifen would cut the risk in half of what it would have been otherwise.  I'm not sure about the other anti-hormonal drugs, but I would think they would have just as good, if not not a better effect on the odds.

    You've given me a little more hope that maybe I can talk my onc into giving me Zometa even if my insurance doesn't cover it.  Maybe I could get the druc company to help me out.  Thanks for the tip.

  • lexislove
    lexislove Member Posts: 2,645
    edited January 2009

    Thanks Zzap for responding. Smile

    I wish too that I made notes at my onc appointments. I'm sure that I do repeat myself with questions. Meh...who cares thats what hes paid for.

    The Tamoxifen rationale that you mentioned makes sense, and that is why I am choosing to keep my healthy breast. I must admitt if I was TN, I would have reconsidered. I also read that if  the average woman is at risk 12% of BC during her lifetime, and a woman with a history of BC has a double risk then it would put us BC woman with a say...25% chance. the Tamox takes that in half. So your docs rational seems reasonable.

    I just had my second Zometa infusion this afternoon, little achey but good.

  • Annabella58
    Annabella58 Member Posts: 2,466
    edited January 2009

    Hi gals:

    Swim angel, hi!  It's your surgery buddy!

    My onc has given me a full blessing to have the oopharectomy/hysterectomy in March.  OB/GYN thinks it's a smart idea...reason being waaaaay too much estrogen.  I have had BC two times both highly estrogen ++++ BRAC negative, so we are now on Lupron to keep me in menopause (did your onc mention that 20-30% of all women start up again after chemo?) and I'm one of them.  Also the adrenal glands produce estrogen, so I am getting it all out.  And I tell you after just getting an MRI to check for the other girl for BC, I am so done with all this.  I think the stress it causes is so bad for me that getting everything out will only be a blessing.  I will never look back even once.  I will be getting a prophylactic mtxmy ASAP.  I'm just so over dealing with this.

    I am fine with the bones.. any drug they give you, like lupron, arimidex, etc., will just mimic the same exact bone loss you'd get with menopause.  At 53, I am entitled to menopause, my body just has not cooperated.  I'm not afraid of surgery at all, but I am of a recurrence, and I'd feel like a ticking time bomb if I did not do this.  So for me, no choice at all, but a full speed ahead.  Each woman must weigh what is important to her.  To me, the risk of leaving things in there (esp. organs Im not using anymore) to get cancer, was more important than removing a possibly healthy organ that could develop cancer down the line.  They told me that with HER2Neu , which I had, that it's a qustion more of when, not if.  So I am taking a hard line.

    That said, everyone has to make their own personal choice and I shall get off my soap box, that's just my two cents and story.

  • Annabella58
    Annabella58 Member Posts: 2,466
    edited January 2009

    p.s swimangel, I was told much higher risk of ovarian, colon and other cancers as well if BC survivor.  Another reason.  Also lungs

  • Carolina59
    Carolina59 Member Posts: 232
    edited January 2009
    I am triple positive with very high (95%) ER/PR. My BRCA2 test came back with a variant of uncertain significance. Ovarian onc. recommended ooph, and I agreed. I was 48 at diagnosis, but was in pregnancy/nursing/chemo-induced menopause anyway (I was diagnosed while nursing). Even without the ovaries, I have to take Arimidex to block the adrenal-produced androgen from converting to estrogen. And I did have osteopenia before starting on Arimidex. 

    The HER2+ aspect of this cancer really scares me. (And anniealso, the "when, not if" for HER2+ really sucks, doesn't it?) 

    Diana, if I were 31, I would have to think long and hard, too, esp. being ER/PR neg. I would consider whether I might want more children in the future. I would definitely get a 2nd opinion, and I would ask then to direct you to studies that show that this would benefit you.

    Good luck with your decision.   
  • DLL
    DLL Member Posts: 14
    edited April 2009
    Hi, I am now facing this decision as well -- gyn & onc recommend removal of ovaries (I am triple positive, HIGHLY ER+, though BRAC negative). I have some estrogen-caused uterine issues, which has tipped the scale for the docs to recommend removal (thick lining, polyps, also apparently benign cyst on ovary, all of which resolved during chemopause but would presumably return when the ovaries' production of estrogen kicks back in). My question is -- should I push for chemical ovarian ablation (e.g., Lupron)?   Has anyone chosen the non-surgical ovarian ablation route?  What are the pros and cons???  (I am 48, premenopausal, but done with having children so the fertility issue is not a factor for me.)
  • ChristinaHope
    ChristinaHope Member Posts: 1
    edited April 2009

    Hye Kim, I am at a loss, how come, something is missing!  I had my ovaries out on the 14th of February 2008 and within two weeks went into medical menopause.  Shaking, breathing problems, nausea and hot flashes every 6 minutes non stop, 24/7.  Then I was put on an SSRI, ie an antidepressant in small doses to stop hot flushes.  This made me feel like I was on an anaesthetic, I couldn't eat, nausea made me gag, hot flushes still there for about 10 hours per day, I was loosing a pound a day, getting weaker, still with breathing problems.  After four weeks waiting to adjust to the drug, still loosing a pound a day, I demanded to be given estrogen.  And now I am living in fear.  I am just amazed that so many people seem to be able to be fine. Christina xxx

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited April 2009

    I am just in the process of scheduling an ooph. My Onc gave me the choice of that or monthly Lupron shots, but as I am done with having more kids, thought I may as well just remove them. She said the shots are not as effective as removing all the estrogen from your body. I am 100% ER +, and so want to give my self the best shot possible. She is also wanting to put me on an AI instead of Tamoxifen,. and couldn't do that unless I had the ooph.

    DLL - as your risk of reoccurance is pretty low, I would be inclined to start with the shots and see how it affects you, you can always ooph later on.  

  • kimbly
    kimbly Member Posts: 398
    edited April 2009

    I too am highly ER+ and had my ovaries out just two weeks ago now. I so far have not had any added menopausal symptoms.  I am still on the Tamoxifen until the prescription runs out and then am trying Arimidex.  I told my onc of my apprehensions on the Arimidex and she said most of her patients do fine and that most likely i should too.  She said if not there are other options.  So I came home from my most recent appt with a clean bill of health and 2 free packs of Arimidex and a coupon for a free 30 day supply......

Categories