Want to hear from ILC with positive nodes.

JudyO
JudyO Member Posts: 225

Looking at the posting on this sight I noticed most ILC seem large but don't have many positive nodes. Mine hit the nodes extensively...trying to figure out why?....

«13

Comments

  • HensonChi
    HensonChi Member Posts: 357
    edited January 2009

    I had one node and it was bigger than the original source.  My node was 5 centimeters and the spot in the breast was 1.2 centimeters.  Doctor said there is no rhyme or reason to it.

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    I'm on this one.  Tumor was 1.8cm, but all 4 nodes taken out were positive.  After my surgery I asked my surgeon how the nodes looks and her exact words were "nothing looked suspicious, they weren't enlarged or clumped together."  So at that I figured I was home free, until the darn path report came back.  Originally we thought my tumor was large from 8cm-10cm.  Now that it was taken out and on the smaller side my Onc. says I am in a better position with a small tumor with pos. nodes, then with a large tumor and neg. nodes.  Not sure about the rhyme or reason to that one either, but I guess he should know what he's talking about.

    Sue

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    Seems like no rhyme or reason. My surgeon told me he felt my 2.2cm in 7+/14 nodes, low grade was a sign it was a slow grower. Also stated if it comes back you will have time on your side since this probably won't more fast. My onc said size didn't matter the number of nodes was what did and I was in a bad position....50% chance of it killing me. My largest node was the same size as the tumor. No mention of clumped together this is suppose to also be a good thing. I have read that the ILC have a better chance. Many studies sound like they have a better biological makeup. That better be so...I never missed a mamo and this one was initially found as a shadow...glad to hear from everyone....so need of support right now...

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    HensonChi....Wonder if it has something to do with the Her+ status...

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Judy,

    I was reading some past posts and I am not sure if it was you who mentioned not being able to get on adjuvantonline.com cause of not being a medical professional.  I just tried and I was able to register and did the whole mortality/relapse calculator for my situation.  Just register as an RN or whatever your choices are and you can get in. I used my normal personal email address.

    By the way when I put in a large tumor with no nodes it gives a better prognostic rate then with a small tumor and pos. nodes... so this is just too confusing. Maybe we read too much!?? I do so value what my oncologist says, he is 30 years in the business and has come from one of the best cancer hospitals in the country.

    Sue

  • marshakb
    marshakb Member Posts: 1,664
    edited January 2009

    Henson, i had a large tumor, 5 cm and of the 13 nodes removed they originally (Dec 06) said none involved.  Upon microscopic they found 1 of the 13 had micro node involvement.  I was just recenly dx'd with mets to the femur bone. (Dec 08)  Heading out in a few minutes to the rad onc who will have my recent PET/CT results to go over and to start rad planning.  No rhyme or reason seems to be the answer. 

     I had mast, chemo AC x 4, taxol X4, rads and followed that with a prophy mast to the "good" breast which was cancer-free.  My HER/FISH was negative but the subclass of the lobular was pleomorphic which is suppose to be more aggressive.

    Sometimes this Lobular thread is quiet so hang in there.  We ALL need the support.  Hugs, Marsha

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    Susan13...yes I have not been on adjuvantonline. Guess I am afraid to. I did mention in another tread that I found a math sight from Harvard. They are doing some math research on the statistics of all of this. They add 1 point for each mm of the tumor and 6 points for each node. Then they make some adjustments for grade, type of cancer (lobular gets a little credit), ER/PR status and Her status. You can then add the treatment you had. They use the same treatment adjustments that adjuvantonline uses. They say they get a better score and can not match adjuvantonline but this may be due to several things...adjuvantonline is a little out of date...a few bad cases can make everything off...they are more detailed etc...it is a research sight and I saw that the head of it spoke at one of breast symposiums so he must be creditable....just google breast cancer mortality treatment...or life math cancer....I think all of this is a guess. I read so much about lobular not responding to chemo so wonder if it should be part of the outcome that adjuvantonline uses....all a guess I figure...hard to swallow...

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    I searched for the Harvard site and can't find it.  If you have the exact site name can you send it to me? I'll keep looking.

    Adjuvantonline did not put a factor in for lobular or ductal. You entered your age, tumor grade, er/pr status and node status.  I agree I think it's a bit outdated.

    You are right it's a real big guess.  You hear of stories of women, men who had cancer x # of years ago and are ok today.  I recently found out my mom's brother had breast cancer twice, way back when I was a teenager, almost 30 years ago... he's now well into his 80's.

    Hang in there Judy!

    Sue

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    susan13....it is cancer.lifemath.net....I am a math nerd...Math BS and worked as a systems analyst...so numbers are my game...interested what you think....this sight I think is also a little outdated since they don't have anything on herceptin...guess that may because no 5 year etc figures out yet

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Judy, thanks for the site info. I just plugged in #'s.  The % rates are not much different actually then adjuvantonline. Difference is you get to put in the histological type of the tumor , but I did both lobular and ductal cause they say ductal is more aggressive and yet the rates were pretty much the same.  Sometimes it makes me crazy looking at this #'s.... I mean really who knows!?!?

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    susan13...I think that is where these systems have problems. I read a study about lobular and chemo where they stated that lobular does so much better. Than I read another study and the outcome is different. I believe this has to do with the unknown. The classical lobular sounds better..it is usually grade 1, estrogen positive and her-. I think the her status is one of the areas throwing these systems off. Pleomorphic lobular sometimes does worse than classic...and also her + probably does worse than her- classic. I think that is one of the areas that affect all of this. Many of the studies were done years ago and who knows what lobular they were working with. Have you started your treatments? What are you doing? I did mastectomy.dose dense 4AC, 4 Taxol, then just finished 25 radiation...also started arimidex since I am post-meno. I read a lot on the effectiveness of the chemo for lobular...lot of questions there. I see on this sight some people opt out of it...wasn't an option for me since I had so many pos nodes. Just a thought have you been tested for brac gene...rare that an uncle had it....I sometimes wonder about me but they said no...grandmother died of stomach cancer at 55...I know lobular moves to the stomach and my aunt died at 55 of breast cancer....my dad only had one other sister ..she didn't get it.

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Judy,

    I did neoadjuvant, dd CA+F prior to my bilat. mast which I just had on 12/9 with tissue expanders.  Originally they thought my tumor was extremely large just on clinical exam. So we were out to shrink it to get a better outcome, ie: clear margins after surgery. I always knew and would have opted for anyway, a mast.  So I did 4 CA+F from Sept-Oct.  Nothing lit up on my scans including nodes so we always thought my nodes were ok.  The path from surgery came back with a 1.8cm invasive lobular along with a whole list of abnormal cells... schlering adenosis, stromal fibrosis with hyalinication, columnar cell hyperplasia, ADH, and LCIS.  So with all this my breast got enlarged and hard. So all my doctors thought this hardness and swelling was the tumor.  I see my onc. tomorrow morning for the exact treatment plan, this is cause of the darn nodes.  He mentioned Taxotere or Taxol and possibly adding carboplatin on to that. I'm not looking forward to Taxotere if he chooses that cause I have heard horror stories about it.  I probably will start at the end of next week.  Then after that I start rads. Also had extranodal extension so they'll zap my supraclavicular(sp?) node area.  Oh and between all this I go for expansion fills to my plastic surgeon.  How did you do on the Taxol??

    On the BRCA testing.   I always forgot about my Uncle, so we always said I had no family history so my insurance co. did not want to pay for the testing. But I will tell them now about my Uncle and see if they will pay for it now.

    Sue

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    I have a question for you....since you did neoadjuvant chemo is the 1.8 and 4 nodes after this. I didn't get the chemo until after the surgery. I did well on the taxol. It was a lot less harsh on me than the AC. You do lose the rest of your hair...eye lashes and eye brows etc. My sister-in-law was diagnosed a month after me. She ended up in the hospital with pneumonia from the AC...decided not to do taxol...she felt the chemo would kill her before the cancer....I believe you go after this with all of the mega guns they offer. The treatments may be awful but the alternative is worse. If you have a good onc they should know what you need. I found radiation a little hard. I am fair skinned and burned a lot. I ended yesterday so hope it will heal soon. Some tiredness too...but not bad...managable. Judy O

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Yes the 1.8cm and 4 nodes were after the 4 rounds of AC. The AC was tough especially the last one.  They assume the 1.8cm was larger prior, but no one could say how large it was.  The breast got a little smaller and a little softer after the chemo, but not much.  From what I have read I think the taxol is the stuff that will get anything that is lingering on.  My eye lashes and brows JUST came back too... oh well.  Hey I have 3 wigs that should last me another 6 months anyway. Ho Hum.

    Congrats on your last rad!

    Sue

  • Alyson
    Alyson Member Posts: 4,308
    edited January 2009

    Just saw this thread.

    My tumor was 2.8-3cm but very hard to distiguish as many of the cells were tubular. Anyway I had 23 of 24 nodes positive and the was evidence of cells outside the nodes. Have been warned that I have a very aggressive form. So far so good, next week will be two years since the operation. I had FEC then Taxol so Susan I have been there. Bone pain wasn't good but pain relief helped. Had rads to whole area including right up my neck to zap those nodes as well. Now I am on Femara.

    Hang in there everyone we are all here to support each other.

    Alyson 

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Alyson,

    What did they say was aggressive? I see you were Grade 2 which is supposed to be a low grade and less aggressive cancer ... was it because of the nodes.. 23.. wow. This is all just too much!  Glad to hear you are doing well today!

    Sue

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    Marshakb....What exactly is pleomorphic lobular? I see it mentioned on this sight but never heard of it before this. Nothing was said to be about mine being pleomorphic so I assume it isn't. So many things to know..Good luck on treatments...friend of mine is stage4 lobular...she has been for 2 years just on arimidex or femora...don't know which...nothing is growing so she is happy....

  • Alyson
    Alyson Member Posts: 4,308
    edited January 2009

    Hi there

    There has been debate about the grade but the cancer cells in the nodes were said to be very aggressive! You couldn't feel the tumor- it was just like a shadow. It is all a very strange thing and each of use is different.

    I do agree about taking all the treatment you can get. I want to live till I am at least 80.

    Alyson 

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited January 2009

    My tumor was 5.1cm with 23/23 positive nodes and ruptured nodes in the axilla.  I had bilateral mastectomys first, then 6 rounds of Taxotere/Xeloda chemo, 6 weeks of 3 field radiation while continuing to take Xeloda and Aromasin.  I have been on IV Zometa for 2.5 years now. I just passed my 3 year mark since surgery this past December and had my 6 month CT Scan yesterday which is still all clear and NED! 

    I have been on the adjuvant online sites and others....most of them predict my 10 year risk of recurrence to be around 65-75% and 10 year survival rate around 50-60% with combined therapy.  I really don't pay much attention to those sites since they just cannot accomodate the unique individual differences in a person's pathology.  Plus they are based on older models that don't reflect the newest treatment strategies.  All I know is I am very grateful for each NED year I get.  My onc says with Lobular locally advanced like mine, we can't really let our guard down ever....but she thinks making it to the 10 year mark will be major good news.....so 3 down, 7 more to go!

    (Plus I am now 8.5 years out from my first BC diagnosis of Stage 2 IDC back in 2000!)

  • JudyO
    JudyO Member Posts: 225
    edited January 2009

    LindaLou53....Glad you are ignoring the stats...I am working hard at trying to do that. I am so glad you made it 3 years...hope for me too....I am hoping the grade 1 is what will pull us through...may not be aggressive enough to want to go anywhere.....I am interested in why you are on zometa...no one mentioned that to me....

  • nash
    nash Member Posts: 2,600
    edited January 2009

    Judy, I can't answer for Linda's onc regarding the Zometa, but my onc just started me on semiannual Zometa, citing this article that just came out of the SABCS 2008 conference in December:

     http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/585257

     There's growing evidence that Zometa can help prevent bone mets, in addition to treating existing ones. Then this study used Zometa with chemo in a neoadjuvant setting, with an increased pathological response due to the Zometa. So there's excitment about it, b/c it appears that Zometa can affect bc that isn't in the bones. I'm getting the Zometa off-label, though, as a bone mets preventative, and the insurance may not pick up the tab for the second infusion that I'll be due for in six months. It's $5000 per infusion, so my Zometa experience may be rather limited. 

    Linda--I'll be interested in what your onc had to say about your Zometa, and how you're getting the insurance to pay for it.

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited January 2009

    Nash, my onc has close ties to the research community and was well aware back in 2006 of the studies being done which were indicating Zometa might be a potential preventive not only for bone mets but possibly all mets. I began taking IV Zometa 4mg doses every 3 months starting in August 2006 after I completed my chemo and rads.  I did not meet the current criteria of documented osteopenia/osteoporosis or Stage IV bone mets but my onc was strongly urging me to take it based on what she felt would soon be statistically proven data of its benefit in locally advanced BC.

    Due to my pathology of all 23 nodes being positive it was medically presumed that my cancer had already spread but was not yet detectable by PET or CT scans.  Based on this medical opinion, I was able to have my infusions covered by insurance.  For all I know I did have microscopic mets and possibly the early intervention of Zometa has eradicated or prevented those cells from taking hold anywhere.  After 18 months on 3 month infusions my onc switched me to every 6 month infusions based on recent data showing the benefit is still provided at that dose schedule.  I will be getting my 9th infusion next week.

  • susan13
    susan13 Member Posts: 732
    edited January 2009

    Just got back from seeing my onc.  I'm going with the "ignoring" the stats too!  I READ TOO MUCH!  He is very pleased with everything and giving me a good prognosis.  Says that with the additional treatments of upcoming Taxol I have a 10-15% of this stuff coming back.  So I'm taking that with everything I got and going into the next treatments with GUSTO!

    Sue

  • Seabee
    Seabee Member Posts: 557
    edited January 2009

    OK--I had 3 positive sentinel nodes. The next 20 were clear, but no one could know that until they were out, so bye-bye. One of the three positives had a 6mm mass in it--the other two had much smaller ones. I suspect my tumor has been there for some time, and is one of those "indolent" ones, to use a wonderful word that I found in one study, because it takes a while to get a mass that size in a node.

    The first oncologist I was referred to insisted that if I had posistive nodes, chemo was a "no-brainer," and he proposed an aggressive AC+T regimen.  By this time I had already read enough to know that A is not particularly effective on HER2- tumors, and is also cardiotoxic. I proposed TC.  He wasn't enthusiastic. So I asked to be referred to another oncologist, and also requested  the Oncotype DX test, which is now available for node positives. The score came in low-risk-- probable zero benefit from chemo. So if you have 1-3 node involvement or even more, chemo is not a no-brainer, according to this method of assessment. Chemo benefit kicks in around the score of 20 and increases with the score.

    I'm doing rads and some form of hormonal therapy, which I think has a better chance of working for me. I wouldn't recommend that anyone stop reading, because reading probably saved me a long period of ineffective, unpleasant, and risky treatment.  Just don't get too hung up on hypothetical number games. Adjuvant Online is seriously outdated, as some of you have noted, and so simplistic that I wouldn't consider it serious science.

  • medommer
    medommer Member Posts: 22
    edited January 2009

    I had a 5cm. mass and 9/20+ nodes.  I'm coming up on my 7 year anniversary and doing great.

  • karen1956
    karen1956 Member Posts: 6,503
    edited January 2009

    3 tumors in breast and 8/12 positive nodes.  Next month is my 3 years since Dx.  My Tx include bilat, chemo, rads, ooph and AI's. I think we always fear a re-occurance or mets - or at least I do.

  • Rhonda1966
    Rhonda1966 Member Posts: 52
    edited January 2009

    My tumor was 4.5 cm and 8/23 positive nodes. My treatment included bilateral, chemo, rads, ooph, and tamoxifen. My onc said he will probably change me over to an AI soon. I will be going to see the PS on Thursday to see about implant exchange surgery. I have to admit ... I am scared because of the risk of operating on radiated skin. Also, like karen1956 wrote -- we always fear a re-occurance or mets. We just have to put our faith in God and believe he will get us through this!

  • SpunkyGirl
    SpunkyGirl Member Posts: 1,568
    edited January 2009

    Rhonda,

    I don't know if it helps, but I had an immediate mastectomy with expander and went through the implant exchange a year later. I'm a total of 2.5 yrs out from the initial surgery and 1.5 yrs from the exchange, and my radiated side held up just fine.  Hopefully, yours will too.

    Peace

    Bobbie

  • Rhonda1966
    Rhonda1966 Member Posts: 52
    edited January 2009

    Bobbie,

    It's great to know you had a similar experience and everything went well for you. I hope I will be as fortunate as you. I am wondering if you or anyone else that has radiation experienced the fibrosis like I have. I know expanders are hard, but I'm not kidding. With the fibrosis I have, my chest feels like a brick wall! I can't help but wonder if the new implants will help make a difference.

    Dx 4/24/2007, ILC 4.5cm, 8/23 nodes, ER/PR+, HER2-

  • robinri
    robinri Member Posts: 40
    edited January 2009

    I fit in here as well.

    I have a 2.2cm tumor and 4/10 nodes possitive.

    I had a bilateral mastectomy on Dec 3rd with expanders.

    I just had my first chemo jan 6th.

    I will have radiation and ooph (and who knows what else)

    My oncologist is very possitive...she just thinks AHEAD which is very nice. I believe we all have a great outlook for the future now, with all the new research.

    I am on TC...had minimal problems with round 1...5 to go.

    On a slightly different note...how numb are you all with expanders? I am stilll pretty numb.

    robin

Categories