Has anyone taken Herceptin for less than a year?

Options
GointoCarolina
GointoCarolina Member Posts: 753

I saw today where a study in Finland showed that only 9 weeks of Herceptin was effective,when combined with chemo.Has anyone used this regimen or had to stop Herceptin early due to heart problems and still had a good outcome?? Jackie

Comments

  • snowyday
    snowyday Member Posts: 1,478
    edited November 2008

    Any chance you could find me the link to the study, they aso do that in New Zealand and I am really curious to know why.  If Hercptin can work for 9 weeks rather than a year, I would sure prefer that to a heart condition.  Thanks So much in advance!

  • GointoCarolina
    GointoCarolina Member Posts: 753
    edited November 2008

    I hope I copied this link correctly,I just did a search for Herceptin 9 weeks and got a lot of info.Try this   http://professional.cancerconsultants.com/oncology_main_news.aspx?id=35639 I see my onc on Thursday and will be asking him about it. Jackie

  • snowyday
    snowyday Member Posts: 1,478
    edited November 2008

    Thanks Jackie, I tried the link but it won't paste properly and I'm to tired right now to type it in but I will later.  I also want to know more aabout the 9 week study and doing Herceptin sequentially, not concurrently with chemo and what kind of difference it makes if any boy my doc already has a problem with me but he is going to be really sick of me after this conversation.  Good luck with your onc as well.  Hugs Pearl

  • GointoCarolina
    GointoCarolina Member Posts: 753
    edited November 2008

    From all I have read,it is best to do the herceptin with the chemo .My onc told me the effectiveness goes way up.I also saw where they do the herceptin for 16 weeks.I will try to let you know what he says tomorrow,if I am not too wiped out from the chemo.Jackie

  • bluedasher
    bluedasher Member Posts: 1,203
    edited November 2008

    My oncologist said that they usually do Herceptin for 16 weeks in Europe and that still seems to have most of the benefits but I haven't seen a formal study. She has me on it for 1 year but says that if we have to stop early (due to heart problems or whatever) that I shouldn't worry - I probably have most of the benefit by that time.

    I think if there was a completed study she would have used the shorter time or at least offered me the information to decide.

    There was one study, NCCTG N9831, where they did three arms - no H, H starting with chemo and H after chemo and in that study there was an advantage to Herceptin with chemo. In that study the disease free survivial for H after AC-T wasn't much better than AC-T up to 4 years after. And the AC-TH (with H continuing for a year) was better. It looks like it goes form 80% to 90% disease free survival.

    But there is another study, HERA, where H was given in sequence with any chemo and that showed a similar increase in disease free survival as the AC-TH arm of NCCTG N9831. I haven't seen any explanation of the difference.

  • Deedee79
    Deedee79 Member Posts: 52
    edited November 2008

    Hi! I'm having chemo with herceptin for 4 treatments and after that I will have herceptin every three weeks for a year. Meanwhile I'll get a 3 week break and than start 5 weeks radition everyday. I'll have my 4th chemo Monday. So far I've been doing well, but have a long way to go. Hope your all doing well. Hugs, Dee

  • lisa39
    lisa39 Member Posts: 255
    edited November 2008

    I think the HERA  trial had one branch where they gave H. for a year and another where they gave it for 2 years.  I read somewhere recently that the results of the 2 year model are due late 2008/early 2009.  So in the next few months....  I am looking forward to reading some new stats on Herceptin.  I'm tired of reading all the outdated stuff about HER 2+ tumors being "aggressive with a poor prognosis."  I cannot tell you how terrified I was last year when I was first diagnosed and kept reading that!

Categories