O.k. I am confused now about results

Options
runalot08
runalot08 Member Posts: 163

I have posted in the waiting forum before but read as much as I can on this site I love it.  O.k. prologue...personal history of biopsies 2005 excisonal, no cancer just a mass of white blood cells hanging out, no bacteria, no fungus.  2008 excisional biopsy of lump under areola, 3 specimen pieces, one was fatty tissue,  one was lobular inflamation, the other was trisected revealing unremarkable tissue inside?  Mom was diagnosed at 40 two of her aunts had it and have died (they were in thier 50's -60's and paternal Aunt was diagnosed at 40.  Her aunt had it.  Also ovarian cancer on paternal side but further back.  (I am 33)

Since I am a military dependant I guess it is easy to say that my continutiy of care is lacking.  Do not get me wrong NOT ALL military facilities and doctors are this way some are actually great.  The only problem is that they tend to move away.  Since this last biopsy fiasco and the upcomming US of lymph node I will have seen 4 docs out of the Gen surg clinic here. (In 3 mos period)

I had the genetic testing after 2005 Biopsy.  My results came back from Myraid showing a varient of unknown significance. (there was a number) I think that he said that I did not have the brca?They offered a profelactic mast and sent me on my way.  This was not explained well to me and I was never sent back to the onc for any folowups after the results visit.  I therefor believed that I do not have either of the BRCA types. Now I am questioning what I know.  I do not think they gave me enough information.

Is my impression that since I have a variant then I do not have either of the brca's or do they go together?  Or is it possible that my varient is of the brca but no the specific ones that they were looking for and that is why they call it a variant?  Can you have one with out the other I guess is what I am saying.  I am trying to get a copy of my results so I know exactly what my varient is but am now at another base (around the world).  Myraid won't release info untill I find another doc to have them send papers to. (I understand this) However, then it is no longer confidentail it will go to a regular doc because there are no oncologists here.

Wow was that a mouthful?  I am interested to see if any of you have insight on this.  I am sure it is hard with me not knowing the varient number.  I will obviously be able to do more research once I get a copy of the results.  That may take awile from here. 

Comments

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited October 2008

    This is just a mini-Biochem overview. 

    I have not been genetically tested, but I was genetically counseled.  I opted not to be tested because my family history is weak.

    This is what I understand of the BRCA situation (a little simplified).  Everyone has the 2 BRCA genes, BRCA 1 and BRCA 2.  Genes are made up of DNA. DNA is made up of many different nucleotides, which code for different amino acids.  (3 consecutive nucleotides code for one amino acid.) Protein is made up of many different amino acids. (There are at least 12 naturally occuring amino acids - I think there are a lot more than this.)(They can also have many complex sugars attached, and other proteins associated with them, etc.)

    If your DNA get mutated, or if you inherit a mutated gene from your mother or father, it has a different nucleotide in it.  This means it is different from the 'average'  BRCA1 or BRCA 2 gene.  Mutations can occur at hundreds/thousands/millions/billions/zillions of different places, and at each position can make a thousand/million/zillion different changes at EACH position.  Each mutation can be for a different amino acid, or group of amino acids in the protein. So you can have zillions of different mutations.

    From your mother you inherit 1 (BRCA1) gene and 1 (BRCA 2) gene.  From your father you inherit 1 (BRCA1) gene and 1 (BRCA 2) gene.  For most people, the BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 genes are what most people have - 'normal' or 'wild type'. We don't know precisely what the BRCA genes do, but they probably have something to do with repairing DNA mutations (I think-I have not looked this up.)

    *Everyone* has some mutations in their genes. If you are BRCA 1 and/or 2 positive.  There is no person who has 100% 'average', 'wild type' genes. So we are all 'mutants'.

    In some families, the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes can be different from the 'normal' or 'wild type'.If you have a mutation (difference), this can be called a variance.

    So there can be zillions of different mutations in the BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 genes. 

    Now, a mutation (change in the DNA), may lead to no change in function at all. 

    One of the basic principles of protein structure is that protein structure (shape, where there are positive and negative ions, etc.) can affect protein function.

    Proteins are often big huge molecules.  Some proteins are enzymes, which means they help a reaction go faster (or slower). Most enzymes are VERY picky what reactions they will do.  These reactions happen at very specific parts of the protein molecule.  At other parts of the protein, it won't make a difference.  So you can have one mutated enzyme that won't work at all, and another one that works fine, because the mutation was at an inconsequential place.

    So you can have a mutation that is 'significant' - it changes a place in the portion of the protein that makes reactions go, or you can have a mutation in a place that is insignificant - where it doesn't matter.  

    We often don't detect when we have an insignificant mutation, because it doesn't change the function of the enzyme.  (A change in the structure of the enzyme can change the function of the enzyme.  Also, for other proteins that are not enzymes, a change in the structure of the protein can change the function of the protein.)

    So you can have a mutation of significance - where the BRCA 1 or 2 genes is mutated.  So, for a hypothetical example, at amino acid position 493 there is one amino acid called alanine instead of  the amino acid tyrosine.   (Its been too long so I don't know if they name the mutation in terms of the position of the amino acid, or the position of the nucleotide. )

    So you might have a mutation called '493 ala' ( ala is short for alanine).  That means (I think) you have alanine at that position instead of, say, a tyrosine (tyr).

    Now that mutation may or may not be 'significant'.  There are some mutations that we know are associated with a high rate of breast cancer and ovarian cancer.  Those people have a known mutation.

    Other people might have another mutation, say at (hypothetically) position 2857, the 2857th position in the molecule, that has been changed from the amino acid leucine (leu) to isoleucine (I can't remember the abbreviation for isoleucine.) (These are names of amino acids).  Maybe we don't know of any families with this particular mutation.  Or maybe we can't tell whether this mutation causes problems.  So this might be a varience of 'unknown significance.'

    There are many different types of mutations.  For example, you can have a nucleotide missing, which messes up not only that amino acid, but also all the following readings of amino acids.

    When you find what your variant is, one place you may want to search out is the FORCE website (if you haven't already).   http://www.facingourrisk.org/

    I know this is long winded, but I hope it gives you a mini-Biochemistry 101 overview.

  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Wow Leaf!  I was hoping you would be one to reply to my post.  You as well as many others on this sight share your wealth knowledge so well.  I hope you know that it is appreciated.  I think that I followed you on your impromptu classLaughing  I have been on the Force site but I can't really do to much with it till I find out more about my variant name.  I was really mainly confused as to if it was a BRCA mutation or some other mutation.  (Or if they were one and the same)  I was also confused why he would offer the prophylactic mastectomy if I did not have the mutation they looked for. 

    So if I understand you...we all have BRCA 1 and 2 genes.  Some people inherit a mutation on those genes.  Some of those mutations are known to increase chances of BC.  Some for example mine are found to be different but no concrete relation is found to confirm or deny an increase in chances.  This would be because there are not enough persons found with it to form an opinion?   Did I pass?  Now I really can't wait to find out what it is and if they have learned any thing new on my "variation". 

    Thanks again Leaf. I enjoy reading your replies I am sure many people have learned a lot from your posts.

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited October 2008

    Oh yes, you understand!  (I sometimes say I speak Martian because I often don't communicate well.)  They probably don't have enough information to know if your mutation will cause more breast cancer or not.  Since there are zillions of different possible mutations in a gene, a lot of mutations may fall into this category.  (I am speaking in general here; I don't know specifically about BRCA.  I am NOT a genetics counselor.) For some genes, a mutation in a certain place may not only cause disease, it may cause death of the cell.  For example, if the gene coded for an enzyme that was necessary for the cell to get energy, and there was no other  alternative gene or pathway, that would cause the cell to die.  So, if this happened prenatally, the cell or fetus would die/miscarriage.

    The VAST VAST majority of the known single gene inherited breast cancer mutations are in the BRCA 1 or 2 genes.  The genetics counselor said I might have a PTEN mutation, but needed to check with her advisors.  I later found that there have only been about 300 people, worldwide, ever, that have been diagnosed with a PTEN mutation.  (However,  its undoubtedly under diagnosed.) They said it would 'not be medically necessary' for me to be tested for PTEN. There were only, say, 6 different boxes (about 6 different genes) for the MD to check off on my  preprinted genetics referral in 2006.  

    There are undoubtedly undiscovered breast cancer gene(s).  We can't say a whole lot about them because we don't know much about them.  So there are families where almost every single female gets breast cancer, yet they test negative for BRCA1 or 2.

  • ASL
    ASL Member Posts: 202
    edited October 2008

    My mother's 2003 BRCA test came back as Variant of Unknown Significance. Then this past January her genetic counselor contacted her and told her Myriad had determined that her particular variant was not linked to cancer--they had enough people tested with that particular variant by then to rule it out. You should check every year to see if they find out anything new about your variant. It would be best if you could work through a genetic counselor on this--you can find one through the Force website. (Sue F can help you find one in your area if you don't know of one--call or email her.)  I think Myriad might give you this type of info directly, but I might be wrong about that.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2008

    I was tested for the P53 gene and they found a variant that was not suspected in my cancer.  But I was told to call once a year to check on the info as it is an area that is rapidly changing.

  • Elora
    Elora Member Posts: 6
    edited October 2008

    Hi there.  I'm BRCA2+ and also have a variant of unknown significance.  My understanding is that the majority of hereditary breast cancers are neither BRCA1 nor BRCA2, and their origins are still waiting to be found.  I too suggest seeing a registered genetic counsellor.  This is the one person who can both maintain your confidentiality while also having a clear, in-depth, knowledgeable discussion with you about your specific hereditary cancer concerns. 

  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Thank you all for your great insight.  I am trying to check on my variant but like I said I can't get info till I find a Dr who does not mind me coming in for this type of thing.  Being with the military you really have to have a valid illness to see someone other than a GP.  I think that is where I am going to head though to my general practitioner.  I guess I could go to OBGYN.  I have the papers to fax to Myraid I just have to find someone to receive the results. 

    There are no genetic counselors here. As well as no oncologists, and no way to get an MRI done (on breasts) if needed.Yell  If they found something the doc said they would go back in make sure margins were clear then send me to a place where they have onc and technology.  I told my hubby that if they found BC I would not let them go in again I would move back to the states then find someone who was a specialist in breast health.  Here they go on US, mammo, and Braille (ha).  Thanks again I will keep trying to find my numbers (makes me think they are like a race banner on the front of my shirt that I will carry always) 

  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Elora,

    You are BRCA2+ and have a Variant or you have a variant on your BRCA2?  Can't wait till I can use your advice and find a Genetic counselor.  By the way I see you have Vancouver, BC listed that is a beautiful area.  Thank you for your advice.  I will post my variant when I find out what it is.  Thanks to all.

    BTW does my family tree look scary or is it not really that bad?  I have seen some that talk about all women in the family having cancer.  Not the case here but I feels like it is immanent  or likley if you know what I mean.

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited October 2008

    These are the Prevtive Task Force guidelines for BRCA testing.  They may not be very accurate if you have some unusual patterns in your family tree, such as all sons in a generation, or only a single  offspring in a generation.

    "These recommendations apply to women who have not received a diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. They do not apply to women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer that includes a relative with a known deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes; these women should be referred for genetic counseling. These recommendations do not apply to men.

    Although there currently are no standardized referral criteria, women with an increased-risk family history should be considered for genetic counseling to further evaluate their potential risks.

    Certain specific family history patterns are associated with an increased risk for deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Both maternal and paternal family histories are important. For non-Ashkenazi Jewish women, these patterns include 2 first-degree relatives with breast cancer, 1 of whom received the diagnosis at age 50 years or younger; a combination of 3 or more first- or second-degree relatives with breast cancer regardless of age at diagnosis; a combination of both breast and ovarian cancer among first- and second-degree relatives; a first-degree relative with bilateral breast cancer; a combination of 2 or more first- or second-degree relatives with ovarian cancer regardless of age at diagnosis; a first- or second-degree relative with both breast and ovarian cancer at any age; and a history of breast cancer in a male relative.

    For women of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, an increased-risk family history includes any first-degree relative (or 2 second-degree relatives on the same side of the family) with breast or ovarian cancer.

    About 2 percent of adult women in the general population have an increased-risk family history as defined here. Women with none of these family history patterns have a low probability of having a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes."

    http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf05/brcagen/brcagenrs.htm
  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Wow you guys are full of info.  I checked out the site you listed Leaf and I really enjoyed it.  My family is from a area of Europe that I guess is of greater risk genetically speaking if I understand it right.  The Netherlands area actually Friesland. I have an e-mail in to our family history guru about whether or not we have Jewish back ground.  I am guessing not because that is something that I think would be passed down.  All I know is that when I get back to the states I am going to insist on a civilian doc (maybe a breast specialist too) one that can follow up and not move around.  Get some consistency and find someone who I will be able to trust if I have another lump.  It is scary enough I don't want to add the worry of whether or not the DR is competent.  I will try to post soon with my variant.

  • Mutd
    Mutd Member Posts: 148
    edited October 2008

    Elora, with the hereditary cancers, the majority is BRCA1/BRCA2. But it is often impossible to tell with confidence if the cancer is truly hereditary in a family (rather than several unfortunate but random events). It takes a real large family, and lots of ca cases, to be absiolutely sure. Otherwise, the geneticists would say that it is "familiar" but stop short of saying "definitely hereditary". And for families with regular-strength cancer history, suspicious but not extraordinary, sometimes no more than one patient out of 10 tests positive! Most of the rest of them aren't high-risk genetic.

     Some Uncertain Variants are contributing to cancer risk (although the majority of them are benign, just not yet proved to be fully benign). It is a huge burden of proof for a lab to declare a variant hazardous, so for a while, the indications of danger may be growing stronger and stronger, but the variant still remains oficially "uncertain". If you are OK with handling your own Variant with the help of still-incomplete data, then do some research about the particular variant you have. Google is a good to place to start. Myriad has some info to share. And of course there is an active discussion of various variants at the forums of facingourrisk.org !

    Runalot, same advice to you. Find out which variant is yours, and start looking for clues about it. There are some "uncertain" Variants with zero info about them, but most of them have some helpful studies already.

  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Thank you all for your informational posts!  I see the Dr on Friday to have him fill out the paperwork and fax it to Myraid.  The lady there said she would fax the info back to him right away.  However it is night there when it is day here:)  So hopefully next week I should have paperwork in hand and be able to tell you all what it reads.  Since there are no counselors at my location I will have to call Myraid back and talk to a counselor. 

    Again thanks, you all are a world of support for people.  We have a walk tomorrow night here on the base for breast cancer awareness and I will walk for my family, friends, and everyone here on the board.  You will be in my thoughts as I walk.

     Runalot08

  • Mutd
    Mutd Member Posts: 148
    edited October 2008
    Runalot, have you got the fax already? BTW, what do you run Smile?
  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Hello all,

    Yes, Mutd I just got the results about an hour ago and the paperwork reads that they reclassified my variant and now I am labeled as having no deleterious mutation detected. 

    The origional variant was in the BRAC2 "A75P (451G>C) is what the paper reads.  They write that an affected relative be tested to help clarify the significance. I tried going on the Force site to look up the variant and I can not find anything listing variants and such.  I may be looking in the wrong place. 

    I think it is time for my Mom to step up and have the testing.  As for relatives with Breast cancer I have 1 Great Great Grandma , 2 Great Grandmothers with , 3 Great Aunts, 1 Aunt and my Mom.  They are all on my Dad's side except for two of the Great Aunts and my Mom.  (((I am the only daughter from the two)))

    As for running I love to run.  This year I did my first Half marathon and am planning on getting my first whole marathon in December.  However, my boob hurts so much it is hard to get out and run latley.  (Usually I do 5 and 10k's)

  • Mutd
    Mutd Member Posts: 148
    edited October 2008

    Thanks for the update, Runalot!

    You know, since this BRCA2 A75P has been reclassified as benign, it's no wonder that you couldn't find it on FORCE boards. It simply doesn't bother anymore anyone who's been tested more recently. B9 is b9, no reasons to worry. And everybody who had this variant reported in the earlier years, when it was still "uncertain", has been sent a letter explaining that it's no longer uncertain & no reason to worry.

    But the catch is, there is no guarantee that the letters reached every patient. Doctors could have moved or stopped practice, patients could have moved or changed doctors... With your own base-to-base relocations, it's almost a given that the new info may never reach you. Lost in the chain of moves. Well, you tracked it now. Maybe we should all congratulate you with your newly negative BRCA result!

    In truth, it's great news but it isn't perfect. Between your biopsies and history of early breast cancer on both mother's and father's sides of the family, one negative result comes short of an absolute victory over the fears of genetic risk. Because there are some rare mutations which today's tests do not detect. Very uncommon mutations but they exist, and until there is better clarity about the mutation status of your relatives, some fears may still linger. If your mother, or your father's sister with ca, would get tested & a mutation is found there, then your level of certainty increases. Because you'd know that there wasn't any "invisible" or "undetectable" genetic mutation. You'd know that there was a "plain vanilla" mutation in your family, and you haven't got it, clear and simple.

    Good luck with your healing in time to train for December! Yes, I thought I run "a lot" but this year I met gals who run 100-milers and it just blows my mind....

  • runalot08
    runalot08 Member Posts: 163
    edited October 2008

    Thanks Mudt,

    There is a level of relief with the reclassification.  I see your point about the force site:)  I could not find any of the info on mutations there.  Mine or any other.   Oh well, I am on to try to get my mom to be tested.  I think really it would be more beneficial to have my Aunt do it because there is a lot more on her side.  But I do not see her doing it.  I am going to try really hard not to think of this cancer stuff so much.  I have every doc I see telling me something different about my boob and I am getting really tired of it.  Since right now it is just very painful and a tiny bit swollen I have to leave it alone and wait till there is some thing else that pops up that they can (I guess see) Don't worry I am not the kid of person who can sit on it long. It is just right now nothing else is changing.  It kinda got to this point and had been this way since August.

    I am with you on the amazing runners.  I am not fast my best race was holding just over eight minute miles but as they get longer my pace gets slower.  Sometimes I feel lucky just to finish but I have noticed with a lot of runners... they do not criticize you for not being fast or as awesome. They usually are genuinely pleased that you are just out there doing it.  I love the after run partiesTongue out.

  • Mutd
    Mutd Member Posts: 148
    edited October 2008

    FORCE? As always, the best parts are in the forums! Like this 20-page (really) thread about different mutations

    http://www.facingourrisk.org/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=15552

    Not that it's still important for you now that you are officially negative! But there is a lot more chatter and discussion there, probably hundred fold the traffic of this forum here. Yeah - the companionship of the running people is amazing, I mean not everybody's is nice but ... almost everybody.

Categories