Hillary will rise again!

Options
16781012

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    And Greta is still getting emails from all the Hillary supporters saying they were so proud of Hillary...that she should have been the nominee....and they were STILL voting for McCain.  Susan Estrich is getting the same emails.

  • djd
    djd Member Posts: 866
    edited August 2008

    Hillary is an amazing role model.

    She makes me proud to be a professional, Democratic middle-aged female American.  We have really made huge strides in the last 40 years.  And we ROCK!

    God forbid a Republican makes Supreme Court appointments in the next 8 years - we would be doomed.

    I haven't felt so happy about the prospects for this country in nearly 8 years, and I can't wipe the grin off my face!

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited August 2008

    Hillary sure made us all feel proud last night.  When she brought up health care, I was talking out loud to my TV.  YES!  I do feel Hillary will still take the heat when Obama losses this November.  Somehow it will be her fault.  They're already setting her up for it because she can't bring her supporters back into the fold.  It doesn't matter what we think or feel about this, it will be the media again convincing themselves they didn't back a dead horse, it will be Hillary's fault.  She has nice broad shoulders, she can take the heat and move on.

    I'll be watching today to see if they allow a full vote for her, though after last night's performance, they'll be biting their collective nails hoping they can keep the delegates in the Obama camp committed to him.  If they don't allow the full vote for her today, then the rest of the country will know that the dems are only backing a couple of cowards not fit for the Presidency. 

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited August 2008

    Obama's people have decided they will let the roll call go from A to Z for the sake of party unity.........P.U.M.A.  They won't forget what happened in the caucus states.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    A fitting last post:

    It was yesterday (the same day that Hillary showed us that women still have a long way to go to get true equal rights) in 1920 that the 19th Amendment was formally incorporated into the U.S.  Constitution.  It proclaimed, "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."  It ended more than 70 years of struggle by the suffragist momvent.

    It had passed the House and Senate.  At first, it looked like the amendment was not going to make it.  And then a 24 year old legislator from Tennessee, Harry Burns, decided to vote for the amendment at the last minute because his mother wanted him to.  And Tennessee became the 36th state to approve suffage for women.

    The certified record of the Tennessee vote arrived in Washington on August 26, 1920.  Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby signed the proclamation that morning at 8  a.m. at his home.  There was no ceremony  of any kind, and no  photogrpahers were there to capture the moment.  And none of the leaders  of the woman's suffrage movement were present to see him do it.  He signed the document, declaring "I turn to the women of  America and say: "You may fire when you are ready.  You have been  enfranchised."

    Courtesy of a Hillary supporter and a New York delegate.  She's still fighting!   Good for her.

    Anneshirley
  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited August 2008

    Thwarted--One half an hour before the roll call Hillary just released all her delegates to vote for Obama-----------------------

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    One more time! 

    And if Obama had the courage to release his delegates, do you think we might get an unexpected result?  Do the pledged and super delegates know about the Greek God staging? If he loses the election, the following will have been big contributors:

    (1) Not picking Hillary as VP

    (2) The speech in Berlin

    (3) Mile High Stadium

    And none of the above can be blamed on anyone but himself. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Okay, so I was a stay at home mom.  I'm trying really, really hard to understand women not getting payed what men do. 

    My dh worked for Bell South as an Engineer.  He was extremely good at what he did.  Women were also hired.  Some of them were horrible.  No, he wasn't being sexist when he'd come home to complain.  He'd also praise the ones that were good.  They didn't start these women off with lower salaries when they were moved up.  And, since this was management they didn't belong to a Union. 

    Then, there were the clerks.  He'd go over to tell them something about what he needed done.  There were a couple of them that loved to call their moms and talk during work hours.  He'd stand there waiting for them to finish their conversation..maybe a..ahem!  He's not the most patient man around.

    And, when my dh worked as an installer there were women who worked climbing poles and installing.  Their problem was they weren't strong enough to lift the heavy lines or ladders.  They had to have a man to come out and help.  I'm not telling you lies.  It's the truth!

    So, since I've been a stay at home mom will someone please clue me in.  I see women in high positions.  Do they get payed less?  My dd worked for a very large law firm.  She could have made partner if she had stayed longer and billed the hours they wanted.  She, however, recently chose to go out on her on with another gal from the firm.  She's doing just fine.  It doesn't seem to hurt her business because she's a woman.

    Then, my middle daughter is in Human Resources.  She has only worked in small companies.  The last company she worked for (before landing this job) she set up their Human Resources department.  The company wasn't doing well, and her job was not stable.  Therefore, she put out her resumes to other companies.  She was hired at a Fortune 500 company, Ingersoll Rand, as one of the Human Resource managers.  They have more than one Human Resource department.  She can grow with the company and make oodles of money.  However, what will stop her is she's not willing to move..she does have a dh and children to think about...she's not single.  There is so much opportunity in that company. 

    So, I'm wondering what everyone's talking about.  Please clue me in.  After all, I was just a mom.  Oh, and my youngest dd...she and dh are still traveling. LOL

    The Uneducated, Stay-At-Home, Country Loving (not seeing my country as bad but full of opportunities), Anti-Abortion, etc., etc, Mom.

    Shirley

  • Odalys
    Odalys Member Posts: 2,103
    edited August 2008

    Anneshirley -I agree the part about Harriet Tubman was great.  I think it's analogous to Hillary because no matter what happens she just keeps going.  Remember when her husband was being a pig?  She just kept going with such grace and dignity.  I do believe she will keep going forward winning more votes and convincing people she is ready for the white house in 2012.  

    Shirley - I agree with you; don't know what he stands for.  I'm all for action versus words.  Anyone can talk a good talk...all fluff. 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    Shirley--your post really annoyed me and I wrote what I can only describe as a very scathing reply.  I've decided to edit it, and leave you with this.  Honestly, it's true you don't have a clue. Your husband is permitting his male bias to take over.  I worked full time forty-five years and a number of those years were for telecoms, and women have consistently been treated unfairly, in more ways than I want to describe here.  As you admit, you've been at home and don't have the experience to talk.  Please, please don't comment on what you don't know about. 

    Thanks. 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    And this is my last post on this thread.

    Hillary started to reel me in; Bill completed the job.  What a speaker!  Everything Bill said about our current situation is true, so sadly true.  Hillary would have been a far better president than Obama, but he'll learn (and far better to learn on the job than to have a closed mind and learn nothing).  We can't survive another four years of Republican incompetence, arrogance, death and destruction!  

    If you need an answer to anything on this thread, please post on the Cindy Sheehan thread or send me a PM. Thanks for listening.   

  • LynnInCalif
    LynnInCalif Member Posts: 61
    edited August 2008

    Go Hilliary!!!!  This woman could lead the world to a better place without even trying! 

  • LynnInCalif
    LynnInCalif Member Posts: 61
    edited August 2008

    It appears to me, that the republican party has made a commodity out of America and that America's assets have been siphoned into the pockets of very very wealthy people who have subtly and intricately blended those assets (i.e., the worth of America) into their pockets and in exchanged leased the country to foreign nations, one in particular which is not friendly, in the name of  commerce and no bit government contracts.

    Follow the money, they say.  And they say it for a reason.  When huge sums of money move from one area to another, you must examine the people who write the check and who cash the check. 

     It is very difficult to believe that leaders would mislead you all in the name of getting richer (and more powerful), isn't it?  To call republicans conservative at this point of time is impossible.  Businessmen have taken over the party.  Better regroup, and in the meantime, let the country go forward into peace, paying off the debt and repairing the cables that hold this wonderful country together before we have to pass the job down to the grandchildren in the form of a failing infrastructure and excessive federal, state, county and local taxes.  The wealthy can afford to pay taxes.  They tend to have NUMEROUS write offs, and well, I just don't think a home abroad is all that necessary; pay your share and let us all get a taste of a bit of the good life.

     McCain is trouble.  Israel (Leiberman) is the reason.  Another war would break this country's back.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Anneshirley (edited to change names), I'm very sorry I annoyed you.  I can only speak of what I know.  I have three daughters who have NEVER been treated unfairly.  We have taught them they can accomplish ANYTHING they desire.

    I've said this before.  My oldest dd worked with battered women.  Later, she went to law school.  We weren't paying for that.  A few years before she really decided to attend law school, she and I went to D.C. and visited schools.  A few years after that we talked about which school she should attend...the more expensive ones or a less expensive one.  The less expensive one was a predominately black school.  I advised her (mind you she asked me) to go to a less expensive law school.  It was a difficult decision for her because, Linda, she had always gone to the best.  I told her that she would make HER OWN reputation.  She did that right here when she worked for the shelter as the court advocate.  She made her job as an advocate much more respectful than any other woman who had that job.  She knew how to talk with the attorneys and judges.  They adored her. Am I bragging?  Suppose so.  She dressed in a much more professional attire when she knew she was going to court.  She worked with police training them on what domestic violence is all about.  SHE IS A FEMINIST!  Perhaps her perspective on jobs and pay is different than mine.  Anyway, she finished law school as the valedictorian and graduated summa cum laude.  Right after graduation she was hired by a very large law firm.  Of course that was contingent upon her passing the Bar. 

    I know you're probably tired of me talking about my children.  I know how we raised (reared according to my speech teacher a hundred years ago) our girls.  We always taught them the value of education.  We  taught them to go after their dream.  They worked hard to get where they are today.

    My dh was passed over for an advancement many years ago because of EEOC. Instead, a woman was hired that did not have the qualifications he had.  No, I'm not being biased.  He is a very intelligent man.  That's where my girls inherited their brains. So, it works both ways, or it did then.  And I cannot remember my dh telling me that women were mistreated or were not being paid according to their jobs.  Also, besides my dh being a man, he's also extremely sensitive and would NEVER want anyone to earn less than were entitled to.

    I do imagine you have stories you can share.  That doesn't mean I'm wrong, or you are not right.  It depends on our experiences.

    I'm not here to argue that women were always treated fairly.  I know many women have fought for where they are today. 

    Oh, BTW, my dd practices Employment Law.  Ironic, huh?

    I hope I didn't chase you off this thread.  I'll be glad to no longer comment here.

    Shirley

    Edited again for using the wrong name.  I don't know why I get you, Anneshirley, and Linda mixed up.  I need to go back and make sure I'm addressing the poster to whom I'm SUPPOSED to be responding to. 

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited August 2008

    Lynn, I am really offended by your post equating Israel with Leiberman.  There are many Israelis and American Jews who take a different view of Israel then Senator Leiberman.  He is one man, thats all.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Anne,

    your comment ...

    <<Do the pledged and super delegates know about the Greek God staging?>>

    it was spectacular  ...  i watched the closing night on the bbc channel and the reviews were all raves ...

    i had read the press and was holding my breath about the venue and staging, but it was a  good thing for the democratic party, a very good thing, in the bbc opinion  and  spectacular in my opinion...

    the person who developed the concept will get many jobs from this

    certainly not fired ....

    i hope you enjoyed it. i am sure hillary did...:) 

    laurap

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    How can you speak for Hillary?  I quit this thread after she endorsed Obama because I can't speak for her since she's spoken for herself.  I think she would feel as I do--irritated by the show, but again I don't speak for her.  I found it less offensive than I expected, mainly because we didn't see that much of it while he spoke.  Hate the Hollywood glitz, but then I always do.  Not easily affected by subliminal appeals.  Perhaps my age, maybe my innate cynicism.  Whatever.  I posted my notes about the whole thing on the other thread and won't be posting on this one again. .

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    <<How can you speak for Hillary? >>

    her words ...

    Hillary Clinton react to Obama speech

    By Lynn Sweet on August 28, 2008 10:30 PM |

         

    STATEMENT FROM SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON IN RESPONSE TO SENATOR BARACK OBAMA'S ACCEPTANCE SPEECH

    "Barack Obama's speech tonight laid out his specific, bold solutions and optimistic vision for our nation and our children's future.

    "His speech crystallized the clear choice between he and Senator McCain. Four more years of the same failed policies or a leader who can tackle the great challenges we face: revitalizing our economy and restoring our standing in the world. I am proud to support Senator Obama, our next President of the United States and Joe Biden, our next Vice President of the United States."

    .....................

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    <<Hate the Hollywood glitz, but then I always do.  Not easily affected by subliminal appeals.  Perhaps my age, maybe my innate cynicism. >>

    perhaps, anne, you are out of touch with the big picture ...

    as you said...

    <<Whatever.>>

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Uh, Laurap, it's all politics.  I taped the speech because I just couldn't watch it tonight.  Was Hillary there?  I know Bill said he wouldn't be there.  Wouldn't you think if someone REALLY was supporting a candidate that he would have been at this huge spectacular spectacle?  I wonder how much it cost to put this on this "show."  How much did it cost for security.  No airplanes were allowed to fly over the stadium.  The interstate or whatever major road that went by the stadium was closed.  The security must have cost a fortune.  What can I say?  I will finish watching the "show" tomorrow.

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Shirley,

    as i look through major and indy news, political blogs, the last night of the democrat convention is receiving high marks ... I do not know where Bill and Hillary were at the time of the speech, she only issued a statement.

    indeed it was a very expensive event befitting the 70,000 in attendance and being broadcast throughout the world. it produced very powerful images.

    i agree with the bbc commentator who said it had more of a west wing look than greek temple.

    on the early show this morning former FBI agent Joe Navarro, author of "What Every Body Is Saying," said "It "absolutely" worked, Navarro told co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez. "This was democracy at its best. It was open... You look at ... everything -- the people, the surroundings, the colors, the imagery. It reminds you of Athenian democracy."

    Rodriguez pointed out that one of the charges made by critics beforehand was the columns on the stage made it look a little bit too much like a temple, like this was meant to worship Obama as a god.

    "Not at all," Navarro responded. "This is about that, you know -- we use images of these columns from Athens to tell us about our history of democracy, about openness, about the people. And we have a great example of this where this has been opened up, I think, for the first time and may set a precedent for future conventions. Very powerful."

    Navarro added that columns are used in structures throughout Washington: "They're at the White House, they are at the Library of Congress, they are at the largest memorials, and they draw us in, and they remind us, this is about democracy. Extremely powerful images."

    One part of the night Navarro says he particularly liked was afterwards, when the Obamas walked off, as a family. He said the setting looked like that of "the White House. And you see them walking off into (it). ... (It showed that), 'Hey, we're normal. Just like you. We are a family.' Very, very powerful images here. We haven't seen these, by the way, since the Kennedys. ... And when you see them walking away, you see that they fit in. They're comfortable here. We're comfortable with them. This is extremely powerful. They're going to be talking about this for a very long time. Very tough to top."

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/29/earlyshow/main4395335.shtml

    .........................

    i think you hit the nail on the head when you said ....

    it's all politics.....

    and last night the democratic party took it up a notch in my opinion.

    laurap

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    So who are the women who might give McCain another look now that Palin will be at his side?

     "It's the independent woman who has seen McCain as too old or too stodgy, but who isn't ready to vote for Obama. Some of these are the soft or skeptical Republican voters who might sit it out. Some of these may be evangelical women who may see in Palin something of themselves, but who aren't energized enough to vote.'"

    Time Magazine   Friday, Aug. 29, 2008

    Will Women Vote for Palin?

    By Michael Duffy

    There is little doubt that John McCain's unexpected choice of 44-year old Sarah Palin as his vice presidential nominee is aimed squarely at female voters.

    As Alaska governor, Palin said Friday, "I stood up to the lobbyists, the big oil companies and the good old boy network." And she tossed an unmistakeable garland to Democrat Hillary Clinton "for showing such grace and determination in her campaign ... The women of America aren't finished yet."

    But if female voters are the targets of the Palin pick, the question is: which kind of female voter?

    Not Clinton voters, said a senior adviser to the Clinton campaign Friday morning. Palin may get women to the polls, the adviser said, but it will not be Democratic women.

    The only women the choice might move, she contends, is unexcited Republican women who have been leery of McCain thus far.

    "Hillary had a lot of support from three groups," the adviser said. "The first - middle aged, non-college woman - should be Democrats, but they stayed home instead of turning out for Al Gore and John Kerry. They are all about the economy. Those women are not social conservatives, nor are they pro-gun. They are definitely security conscious, and so they may have an issue with someone who has two years experience being a heartbeat away from a 72 year old man. That's asking a lot. That's a big ask."

    The next group, according to the Clinton adviser, is older female voters who, she said, backed Clinton in large numbers because they believed "experience should trump change. They really wanted a more experienced person as President. It was a bonus for these voters was that Hillary was a woman, because it made them proud of her and themselves. But those women are social progressives. I don't see them turning to McCain because of Sarah Palin."

    The third group - and some of the most diehard Hillary voters, the adviser admitted - were affluent women who had risen in their professions at the same time that Clinton did. Those voters too, she noted, tend to be quite liberal and unlikely to move to McCain-Palin.

    So who are the women who might give McCain another look now that Palin will be at his side?

    "It's the independent woman who has seen McCain as too old or too stodgy, but who isn't ready to vote for Obama. Some of these are the soft or skeptical Republican voters who might sit it out. Some of these may be evangelical women who may see in Palin something of themselves, but who aren't energized enough to vote.'"

    The Clinton adviser's final verdict on McCain's pick of Palin? "The whole thing strikes me as utterly ludicrous," she said.

  • Jaybird627
    Jaybird627 Member Posts: 2,144
    edited August 2008
    Well said Anneshirley! Wink
  • djd
    djd Member Posts: 866
    edited August 2008

    Wow!  I watched Obama last night with my Aunts and Uncles and Cousins in California.  We were all blown away at how effectively Barack countered every charge that has been shot at him by McCain.  It was such an intimate, memorable moment (hour actually) that I will always treasure.  I have talked to several friends and my parents this morning, and they are all so friggin happy.  And we are laughing our arses off about McCain's VP pick.  In  football terms, Paulin is a 4th quarter, nothing to lose, Hail Mary pass, thrown wildly, desperately toward the end-zone in hopes of a miracle.

    The insinuation that women who voted for Hillary will vote for any woman regardless of her policies and experience, is laughable and shows just how truly out of touch the Republican party has become. 

  • djd
    djd Member Posts: 866
    edited August 2008

    Oh, and about the COLUMNS on the stage (OMG - THEY HAVE COLUMNS!!!!) - if this is all that Rush and Sean can come up with to prove we shouldn't vote for Obama, that is the most hysterical thing I have heard in a long time!   And people who listen and believe these guys should try out teh googles and see how COLUMNS, COLUMNS I SAY!!, were the backdrop behind W. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    donna,

    lol the columns ....just read that there were 38.3 million viewers ....."Mr. Obama's speech reached more viewers than the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing, the final "American Idol" or the Academy Awards this year, the Associated Press notes"....

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/29/politics/animal/main4399951.shtml

    .....

    palin ...i agree with this GUY, steve brenen... ...

    (Political Animal) PALIN ON HRC.... One of the more offensive angles to the McCain campaign's running mate announcement is how breathtakingly cynical it is. As the McCain gang sees it, supporters of Hillary Clinton are driven entirely by gender concerns -- the notion that Democrats may have actually liked Hillary for her record and agenda apparently isn't a consideration -- so picking a woman, any woman, even a far-right anti-choice woman, will necessarily drive Democrats to vote Republican.

    I suspect this will backfire. No one likes to be played for a fool, and these crass tactics will probably be perceived by Clinton backers as more insulting than anything else.

    And yet, in a move that was about as subtle as a sledgehammer, Sarah Palin praised Hillary Clinton during her first appearance on the national stage today, referencing the "18 million cracks in the glass ceiling" quote. Before anyone's fooled, though, keep in mind that Palin is not a Clinton fan.

    Newsweek reports that back in March, at a Women and Leadership event held by the mag, Palin's view of Hillary wasn't quite as charitable: "She said she felt kind of bad she couldn't support a woman, but she didn't like Clinton's 'whining.'"



    I'm sure that'll impress Clinton's most ardent backers, right?

    McCain has taken the most patronizing attitude imaginable, and it's likely to fail. Note to the McCain campaign: we know Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a friend of ours. Senator, Sarah Palin is no Hillary Clinton.

    ..................

    i too walked away from the tube last night knowing that i had witnessed one of the most memorable events in modern day politics/government... amazing, wonderful times ... and i hope hillary is around to sign a new healthcare plan ..................

     laurap

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    <<What can I say? >>

    all i can say is ...

    wow... mccain acceptance speech is same night as first nfl game of the season ...

    looks like the washington post already interviewed walter monegan, the guy sarah palin fired...

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/08/exclusive_chief_fired_by_palin.html?hpid=topnews

    looks like the same person doing the vetting was doing the calendering...

    just politics...lol Surprised

  • djd
    djd Member Posts: 866
    edited August 2008

    I am sleep-deprived, ladies!  I have been so inspired and my hope has been restored all week watching the convention, I have barely slept and have been showing up at work with a $hit-eating grin on my face everyday :)

    [Editing to add]

    TheresaPW - this one's for you, my dear cyber-sister!  I remember talking to you just days before you passed over to a better place.  We discusssed Barack, and I remember you liked what you were seeing.  It was 3 years ago that we cried together as an entire city was drowning while the current administration was asleep at the wheel.  I'll never forget you, Theresa.  On November 5th, I will raise a glass of champagne to toast you, this country, and the future world for your children.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    donna,

    i will join you on november 5th with a toast to theresa.  i too feel energized, hope restored and enthralled with these history-making times.

    thrilled to know an african american or a woman will be holding top office come november. the best part will be no more bush.

    i think mccain made the wrong choice with palin but i think she will help him

    get the clinton pro-life votes.

    all two of themLaughing

    the internet has so evolved in the last four years, i am amazed at the information available..it is facsinating and has shaved a few hours off my sleep,also,but there is just so much out there!

    donna, i was thinking of you last week when i was remembering what i was doing three years ago. i am so thankful all is good in your world.

    have a wonderful weekend, i am heading south to san diego to help my son move this morning, makes me feel like a college kid ...lol

    like sierra, i absolutely love this time of year and all the goings on just makes it even better!

    laura

Categories