John Edwards
Comments
-
Good question..........I'm not sure.............of course him running on a platform of family values makes him a bit of a hypocrite..............I really don't remember the relationship of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton..............I am going to have to ponder that question and I will get back with you.........Shokk
-
Jelly, I agree with most of what you're saying. I certainly would never take a lie detector test. There are ways to cheat lie detector tests, so even if you're shown to be telling the truth the examiner can say that you so much of a sociopath that you've either tricked the test with breathing or lying comes so easily to you that it wouldn't register on the meter. I would never take a lie detector test for the sheer humiliation of being asked. Of course, I wouldn't lie or be caught in a scandal that would necessitate that. You ask why no one spoke out-- because too many people are afraid to scream "the emperor has no clothes", this goes for republicans and democrats....
I don't think that JE is a hypocrat for speaking out about Clinton lying to a grand jury about sex he had as president with an intern because it happened prior and because there were much slimier and illegal Clinton elements. Shokk, I do not think he will get back politically necessarily, but I do think that he CAN get back to some type of public service job if he changes and does what he needs to do, even if that means deciding to divorce and move on. Americans are forgiving, although the age of 24/7 media makes it more difficult since we're bombarded with that. If Edwards used campaign dollars for the coverup or affair, then he is finished. If it's just sex and lying about the sex, maybe.
I thought the PEOPLE article was tamer than the author led us to believe. I thought much worse things were going to be said. I'm not surprised her friends seem angrier than she is at this point, because people are sometimes better able to be in touch with their anger in defense of someone other than themselves. i wish EE had been the one to speak out and I take back that I lost respect for her for doing so since the article wasn't a hatchet job.
Shokk, I agree with you about Bill's shenanigans in part preventing Obama from being the nominee. When people viewed his statements as marginalizing Obama as a black candidate, whether or not that was his intent, by responding so defensively and angrily, he further alienated many blacks. If he response was a tempered apology w/o negativity toward the obama campaign (if he responded more rationally) he could have mended some hurt feelings. He obviously holds a grudge and his comments got worse as the campaign went on. I think in part he is still resentful of monicagate. In the beginning I was equally appalled by the sex and the lie-- the visual of him getting a blow job while talking to a foreign leader was too much for me. As I've aged and mellowed I care less about the sex but still care about the lie. A lie about sex is still a lie. I agree that the bigwigs are tired of the Clintons and Hillary's campaign didn't help with that. I still think that there is a medical component to Bill's anger, since people with as many bypasses as he had often become more angry-- either that or he was always that way and is now not as good at hiding it. I heard the dating rumors too. Not sure if they're true, wouldn't be surprised if they were.
I'm trying not to get hung up on the slime of the situation. I think it's weird that people who are speaking out about Reille publically, like the sister who's been estranged for 10 years and the Pigeon chick (how can anyone named Pigeon be taken seriously just on the point of her name. If you're going to name a kid after a bird, is Pigeon the best her parents could come up with--) gives me the willies.
-
Oh, Amy,
LOL, I thought the same thing about that woman when I saw her name. Pigeon, please!!!!
Cherryl
-
It wasn't JUST her name for me. He was her whole demeanor. I was trying to figure out why anyone would take her seriously. She acted like a ditz!
Shirley
-
This article I found sums up JE pretty good! I love the soap metaphor in this!
WASHINGTON -- Every sex scandal, it seems, comes with its own catchphrase, a linguistic contortion destined to outlive our memory of the seamy details: "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is." Or "wide stance." Now comes former -- and, I think it's safe to say, not future -- presidential candidate John Edwards with his own distinctive concept: 99 percent honesty.
In Edwards' exact words, explaining why he denied tabloid stories about his affair because, he says, they weren't completely true: "Being 99 percent honest is no longer enough."
He was once derided as the Breck girl. Now it turns out we're talking Ivory soap, 99 and 44/100ths percent pure.
But the thing about honesty: It's the last 1 percent -- even that last 0.56 percent -- that's the tough part.
And, to continue the soap metaphor, if there's anyone out there who believes Edwards is coming entirely clean now, I've got a job for you in the Edwards 2012 presidential campaign.
You don't have to be an Edwards-caliber trial lawyer to know the right questions to ask on cross-examination here: If you lied then, why should anyone believe you now?
He'll be happy to take a paternity test but, conveniently, now she won't? She's getting $15,000 a month from his top moneyman but he doesn't know about it? A picture with the baby -- who can remember?
Elizabeth Edwards, mercifully, didn't stand -- or sit -- by her man during the "Nightline" interview. This was a good thing. Was there a wife in America who didn't want to slap him right across his smug face when he pointed out, "first of all," that she was in remission when he cheated?
In a posting on Daily Kos, Elizabeth Edwards pleaded for an end to "the present voyeurism." No one wants to add to Elizabeth Edwards' misery. She's been dealt a terrible hand.
Except, he was the one who told us that character counted. As in these remarks about Bill Clinton: "I think this president has shown a remarkable disrespect for his office, for the moral dimensions of leadership, for his friends, for his wife, for his precious daughter. It is breathtaking to me the level to which that disrespect has risen."
Or, in a March 2007 interview with Katie Couric discussing the return of Elizabeth's cancer: "I think every single candidate for president, Republican and Democratic, have lives, personal lives, that indicate something about what kind of human being they are. And I think it is a fair evaluation for America to engage in to look at what kind of human beings each of us are, and what kind of president we'd make."
What was Elizabeth Edwards thinking, sitting there with her husband the philanderer and Couric?
There are two especially creepy aspects to this story. The first is the reverential, almost messianic way Elizabeth Edwards spoke about "this fine man" during the interview with Couric. This was disconcerting at the time; excruciating, in retrospect.
"It's important that the American people have the opportunity to have a president like him," Elizabeth Edwards explained. "I didn't want it (her cancer) to take this away, not just from me but from those people who depend on our having the kind of president he would be."
Or this, just a few months later, asserting that her husband would be a better champion for women than Hillary Clinton: "She's just not as vocal a women's advocate as I want to see," Edwards told Salon's Joan Walsh.
"John is."
The second, even creepier part is John Edwards' resort to the exculpatory language of pop psychology to explain his behavior. "I went from being a senator, a young senator to being considered for vice president, running for president, being a vice presidential candidate and becoming a national public figure. All of which fed a self-focus, an egotism, a narcissism that leads you to believe that you can do whatever you want."
Right. The adulation made him do it. I don't think this man is anywhere in the neighborhood of 99 percent honesty. -
I think the article is off base.
I agree he wasn';t in the neighborhood of 99% but I don't think that Elizabeth's statement about John being a strong advocate for women flies in the face of his cheating. I don't see how cheating has anything to do with advocacy for women. His affair is more about the relationship with Elizabeth and the dynamics between the two of them than an expression of his beliefs about women. We don't know what was going on in their marriage, what dynamics were present that allowed the affair to take place, and the amount of healing that's been done since the disclosure of the affair.
I also don't think John was saying adulation made him do it. What he said was that having so much positive external validation changed how we thought about himself. That's not an uncommon phenomenon. Obama often jokingly says that his wife keeps him in line if he gets too big for his bridges. Ego is part of the persona of people who run for president and JE didn't have someone to give him that reality check. That doesn't means JE is a victim of adulation, but it's an insight into some of the dynamics of his life that allowed him to believe cheating was ok.
Again, we don't know what kind of work the two have done in their marriage since the affair and since her dx with mets. Elizabeth can believe with all her heart that JE would be the best president ever. She probably does since they've been together 30+ years they probably do share a vision for the country and the world.
For me the biggest issue is the lies to the American public and the naivete/arrogance of not having a better answer but a lie when the questions about the affair arose. Even if the Edwards thought that the affair would be kept hidden, they still should have had an honest answer for if the affair became public.
-
Shirley-- a moment of agreement for us? I agree about her demeanor. If she wanted to be taken seriously her first mistake was being paid for the interview. Her second was acting like being about to talk about this on national tv was the greatest thing that ever happened to her. When people think of pigeons they think of crap, pigeon crap-- not someone who is giving a serious interview. I don't rely too heavily on what other people say about the principles in a story like this, especially if they're being paid.
-
I wonder how much publicity Pigeon wanted. If that's what she wanted she absolutely got "pigeon crap." Who would take this woman seriously? She had no facts. I'd hate to think she was a friend of mine. At least EE gave her "permission" for the People's article. I just hope that child will know who her real father his. Her mother will HAVE to one day have that paternity test. She won't want her dd reading about this in the history books!
Shirley
-
How about if JE and his rich cronies purchase the National Enquirer?? LOL
If anyone is interested in seeing a photo of Pigeon (can't believe that's her real name) go to deceiver.com.
-
Jelly, lol--they could afford surely afford the rag.
I think JE can compel a dna test if he really wanted to, particularly since Rielle didn't list a father on the birth certificate. That's done all the time in family court. He's a lawyer, he knows that. He might have even done so, although not sure whether he would do it publically, particularly if he knows he is or suspects he is the father.
-
A liar is a liar and a sneak to boot. My father cheated on my mother, and she up and left him in the dust., pregnant and with four other children- she decided to go it alone. And that was the 50s.My mom was a strong woman. I don't know what makes woman stay with a spouse like that-I mean you get drawn into it-your life becomes a lie, and your childrens life-what a mess. Better evryone should know the truth and get on with it.I am not shocked at all-lots of politicians,priest,bishops have been exposed to the public. But I don't care who it is, the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker there all *******liars.There no good to their children anyways-how can they be an example of honesty and integrity. No sympathy for men like that and no sympathy for the women who stand by them.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team