John Edwards

Options
24567

Comments

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited August 2008

    Ok first of all I think this is a public forum and I think that you can express personal opinions about whom ever if they are in the public spotlight............with that said I was watching Fox News and they had the lead guy on from the National Enquirer and he said that the story is going to coming out in the next few days that this women is totally in love with John Edwards and is just waiting until she can become his wife............So let me get this straight.........John Edwards has already started a new family while is present wife is still alive..........and could be for years..........lets face it we see it here all the time that many of our stage 4's live for a long time............she has bone mets right.......they are pretty treatable............ok I am a Republican and no I have not cared for John Edwards for the most part but I did think he loved his wife...............I did admire that the Edwards had not had the easiest of times losing a child and then Elizabeth first of all breast cancer and then mets..........but this is really unbelievable........it's is just so so sad........oh and one more thing the stock market did gain over 300 points today...........Shokk

  • spar2
    spar2 Member Posts: 6,827
    edited August 2008

    Blue willow I agree with you.  Some men just can't be faithful.  My first husband (the father of my 2 kids) had affair after affair.  I would forgive, sell the house, move and start over and even had a new house built, lived in it one week, he said he was going to wash the new car we had just bought and didn't come back for days, come to find out he thought he had fallen in love with a much younger woman ( We had just had a baby 6 weeks before)  That was the final straw,  He ended up marrying her and she cheated on him and even got preg. by someone else and had an abortion and they divorced.  My husband now (married again at 40) is a very wonderful man and I would trust him with my life.  So I do know how Elizabeth feels and the public humiliation is going to make it much worse.

  • flyrzfan
    flyrzfan Member Posts: 557
    edited August 2008

    Shokk...let me clarify. The Obamasaih (sp?) comment - to me - came across as racist and demeaning. Out of respect for the vast array of cultures represented on these boards, I do not think there is a place for ANY such sentiment. Under any circumstances. Debate someones morals, choices, character, whatever...I have no issue with that. I do take discrimination as being offensive and don't believe this board above any other should partake in that.

    For what it's worth, I'd like to rack him in the nuts too for his cheating ways and stupidity in even trying to run for president. Does he not know anything and everything comes out when you run for public office? If he had admitted it from the start, and let us vote based on the true strentgh of his character, I would have had more respect for him. Hiding it and pretending to be something he isn't ~ is cowardly.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited August 2008

    One of the talking heads said today that it was not only the finish of John Edwards in politics but a finish for Elizabeth Edwards.  I hope not.  He was my first choice for president, mainly because he was the first to call for mandated universal health care.  I'm quite sure this was because of advice from Elizabeth Edwards.  And he was also the first I gave money to, also because of Elizabeth Edwards, when she took on that blonde Democrat baiter  (can't remember her name, which is good as she seems to have disappeared lately).  I wonder how many other women who were supporting John Edwards were really supporting his wife?  I know I was.

    I hope very much that Elizabeth Edwards gets a prominent position in the next administration, perhaps Health, Education, and Welfare.  Is it still called that? or am I showing my age?  I also hope she gets through this very painful time stronger than ever.  I admire her greatly.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited August 2008

    I'm annoyed with EE right now.  She's blaming the media for invading their privacy.  I'm sorry, these are two very, very public people.  he ran for President, in part on what a good man of character he was and how supportive he was of his wife.  Lies, public lies.  Their brand of politics has always involved making very private details of their lives public.  Too late to complain about this now.

     I'm sorry for her but she is a victim of her husband's behavior, not the media. 

  • flyrzfan
    flyrzfan Member Posts: 557
    edited August 2008
    I agree member...when it comes to public office - ALL aspects of your character are subject to public scrutiny. That's part of the deal. EE should not be mad at the public, the newspapers or reporters..she should be mad and HIM and his nasty a** co-hort. Still, she is in a tough position and my heart goes out to her for having to endure this at all let alone in the public eye.
  • LuAnnH
    LuAnnH Member Posts: 8,847
    edited August 2008

    I can't believe the bimbo stated she can't wait to be his wife (or something to that effect).  Does she plan on waiting for his wife to die so she can become his wife?????  Something tells me that is some bad Karma and I would not want to be on the receiving  end of what is waiting in the wings for the both of them.  It is just sad for EE and their children.  Politics is public and your life is public but you don't have to destroy young children for a story which is what is happening here.  He isn't running for office right now and I doubted he would have been the pick for VP so why all the interest in him.  Must be slow news days.  Since Brittney started laying low these rag papers really have to dig for their stories.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    I rarely post about heated or controversial issues, but my view in this case is rather "non-partisan," I think. This entire thing just breaks my heart. I had my reservations about Edwards as president, but liked many of his ideas and political opinions. And, of course, I'm a HUGE fan of Liz's. This re-opening of the wound has got to be so very painful for her! In fact, I just saw the news report of her statement in response and all I can say is that she has risen even more in my estimation. She is a strong, loyal, loving and courageous woman. Huh, ya know, maybe she IS a freakin' saint! Probably not, but she sure is an inspiration to me. Him? I just feel very sorry for him....

    ~Marin

  • iodine
    iodine Member Posts: 4,289
    edited August 2008

    I usually stay our of these conversations as well, but I've never liked the guy and this just adds to that dislike, even tho I admire his wife's courage with her diagnosis.

    Edwards is no ambulance chaser.  He is a multi-multi millionaire by chasing huge deals against anyone in the medical profession.  You know I am in the medical profession and have seen what this kind of atty can do to a person.  I've no respect for him and even less so now.

  • Calico
    Calico Member Posts: 1,108
    edited August 2008

    MOTC,

    I agree whole heartedly....EE blames the media....wrong!!!!!! Her hubby did the cheating. How can she support this di** who cheated on the country she loves so much? and yes, he did cheat on the country too.

    As a matter of fact, it would be justice if all his campaign contributers would start a class action suit to get their funds back Cool (just kidding.....or maybe not).

    If what was told by the Enquirer dude tonight is true, a lot of money had been going to the mistress who lives without a job in a multi million house, she had been visited at least twice by JE since the birth....I bet my silicone boobs on the fact that he is the father!!! 

    LuAnn,

    talk about Karma....he admits to not love the object of his desire.....so why would she want him? Money or Politics....must be...it's said to be a aphrodisiac (sp?).

    Gosh, I am sick to my heart for EE, but I really don't understand her....I see a mother figure rather than a wife in her.....nurturing a spoiled little boy....again.....and I say again since I read somewhere back then when he was 'running' that she build him up and managed everything....what a loser....Elisabeth, go get yourself a real man!!! You sure deserve one!!

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited August 2008

    Shokk,

    What he has done it horrible. We don't know if he is the father of the baby; one of the other campaign workers is claiming paternity. I have to give him the benefit of the doubt until it's proven one way or another. I don't like uncorrobarated (sp?) charges thrown around. It happens all too often, then no one bothers to say "oops, I'm sorry." Just the opinion of a disillusioned liberal Democrat.

     Cherryl

  • Nico1012
    Nico1012 Member Posts: 1,492
    edited August 2008

    I'm with livestrong.................. DOUBLE SCUMBAG!!!!

    Nico

  • fire
    fire Member Posts: 153
    edited August 2008

    I'm very upset...

    It is disgasting...

    Sorry, Elizabeth.

  • Daffodil
    Daffodil Member Posts: 829
    edited October 2008

    Elizabeth spoke at a dinner benefitting a DC center for grief and healing.

    Everyone in the bi-partisan audience was awed by her courage, faith, honesty,

    and optimism as she related the story of coping with her son's death.

    I imagine her thoughts and loyalty lie with her children, and her concern

    is for their future. What a sad situation! John described himself quite well today.

    Varmint!!!

  • gsg
    gsg Member Posts: 3,386
    edited August 2008

    I'm sorry for their whole family.  I believe him when he says he has always loved her and still does.  That kind of power and privilege can undermine the best of people.  I hope for Elizabeth's sake and their children's people will allow this to die down.  I refuse to judge him for what he's done....or her for staying.  It's a private matter.  They're all in a lot of pain. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited August 2008

    Shirely, of course there are two sides to your example of the brother-in-law. Why did his wife tolerate him hating fat people when she was fat? I'm sure him leaving her for the skinny woman wasn't the first time he expressed this preference. Her side of the story may be he left her because she was fat, but he also has a side in the story and there was more going on than just her side. Even if he said, I cheated because you're fat and she's skinny, there's still more to the marriage and the story.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited August 2008

    Marin, I agree this is a nonpartisan issue. There are many many examples on both sides of the aisle of cheaters. Republicans have made more news lately for their extramarital escapades, but democrats have also had their share of so called scandals.

    If the marriage is a strong one and the couple love each other, staying together and working through the marital issues is often harder work than just walking away. Stand by your man is closing one's eyes and simply saying it's okay without working on the reasons the marriage was so unstable at the the time that one of the parties cheated and the hurt that ensued as a result of the infidelity.

    The fact that Edwards cheated doesn't discount his ideas on poverty in America and all the positive things that he's done. If Edwards is the father of the baby after his denials, I will have no respect for him.

    I'm ambivalent about the interview he gave to Bob Woodward. John and Elizabeth have had two years to work through these issues and it's "old news" to them, which may have been the reason for his cookie cutter answers to the questions. Part of what disturbs me the most is that both John and Elizabeth seemed to believe he could run for president with his family and not thinking that this story would come out. John talked about his narcissism and egocentrism, but Elizabeth also signed on for this and was out there campaigning too and she doesn't appear to have the same egoism. From a political perspective, if John had been the democratic nominee, this disclosure would have put the democratic chances in november in jeopardy and there's no excuse for that, from either John or Elizabeth. I don't see her as a victim, and I'm not blaming her, just saying she had a part in the deception of John;s outward appearance.

    And.. what was John thinking about meeting with this woman a few weeks ago and NOT telling Elizabeth, even though Edwards said it was to discuss the rumors and nothing else. That's not a good way to rebuild trust in a marriage.

    Bancroft, I agree with your comments. Some on the right can't seem to help but name calling and politicizing. there was a thread on another message board about "hating others for their political views" and I say I don't hate others for their views, but I do hate how they choose to express those views.

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited August 2008

    Flyrz...as far as I know, this is not a dem thread, and I do not go on the dem thread (or the thread Amy started) so my comment is really none of your business, if you don't like it, don't comment. You don't own these boards nor does Amy or Bancroft and Amy you are a fine one when it comes to name calling and judging others for their comments...read back on the crap you posted to Shirley. My dislike for O has nothing to do with bigotry and if that is all you can come up with perhaps you might want to go back to class and learn more about bigotry/racism. Did it ever occur to you that a person's dislike for another person might be just that and have nothing to do with bigotry/racism? Perhaps you might want to take a closer look at yourself and find out why you take a comment and immediately slap bigotry on it...unresolved feelings?

  • abbadoodles
    abbadoodles Member Posts: 2,618
    edited August 2008

    Don't you think that politics breeds this sort of behavior?  The power goes to the head and from there straight to the pecker.  Gives the old boys plenty of ego reinforcement to push the envelope, so to speak. 

    He isn't so different from (probably) the majority of powerful/politcal men throughout history.  Even some of the ones that were so homely and boring you could never imagine them with their pants off were busy after hours.  As long as women accept it, it will continue.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Amy, my bil did not openly say that to all the family.  My fil and mil told me MANY times, Mike doesn't like fat women.  We allowed him to stay in our house when he left my sil.  My husband told him not to tell him anything because if they went to court my dh had to tell the truth.  We knew where he was going and that he was talking to "someone" who we had not met.  My sil came flying over here one night accusing us of "supporting" him.  I had to calm her down and explain that no, we were not.  She had caught him at the house of this person with whom he told her he was not having sex with and was just sleeping on the couch.  Anyway, my dh had to ask him to leave.  We had three daughters who did not like comments (and racial ones to) that he would make.  One of our very good newscasters is a black woman.  He would say things about her that was not kind right in front of my children.

    This bil left his home the day before or the day of (can't remember) of is oldest daughter's high school graduation.

    I can tell you that having family gathers at Christmas and/or Thanksgiving was very hard.  We had to accept the other woman.  All is well now after many years.

    Again, like I said.  Dr. Phil says, finish one relationship before you start another.  Either get counseling..work on your marriage and if that doesn't work get a divorce before messing around with another person.

    As far as the "Obamasiah" (sp) name..it's not racial.  It is about politics and how some people see him....this man who has come to save the world.  You really have to keep up with politics to "get" this.

    Since Edwrards told "99% truth," I hope the 1% he lied about..the baby..the continuance of seeing this woman..why he saw the woman in July...and making sentences like Shokk..I like it..it's easier...is true.  What I said above with all the .....is I hope the 1% truth he told is true.  I hope this baby isn't his.  I hope he really didn't know about the money.  His explanation of why he saw her in July wasn't very good.  Perhaps since she thinks one day he'll marry him she's really upset and NEEDED to see him.  I mean, she sounds like a nut job.  I don't like the CHEATEES!

    It takes a very long time to work through infidelity.  It's sort of like having PTSD.  One can have flash backs which starts the pain over again although it doesn't last long. I've seen to much of this.  And when one's in politics there lives are an open book. 

    For the children's sake and for EE's sake I hope they can get through this once again.  I so hope he's now telling the full truth.  EE and their children do not need to be hurt any more.

    Oh, and one interesting thing he mentioned...John McCain..in his interview with Nightline.  I thought that was a big political statement.  Without him going into details he had to mention McCain's name to remind us of his affair.  But he didn't mention the President of the United States, Bill Clinton, for his sex affair that wasn't sex.  So, that made me mad.  Does he think we're stupid or something.  Does he want attention brought to McCain for his cheating days.  Although I do not think it was right that McCain did what he did, he wasn't running for office at the time.  And he wan't IN office.  Politics as usual.  McCain's statement about this situation is, I have no statement to make.

    I've rambled on too long.

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Oh, since I was talking about him telling the truth..when asked on Nightline when did this affair start and end he wouldn't tell.  He said he had told his whole family and I guess he was leaving it there.  So..that was interesing.

    Shirley (the copy cat of......Shokk).  Laughing

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Paulette, don't you know we repubs are the ONLY one's who do the name calling?  The dems and the Obamamaniacs never say any negative thing about we who are repups.  Yes, we are the guilty ones. Sealed

    Shirley

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited August 2008

    Shirley...didn't Lewinsky and Monroe think they were going to marry Clinton and Kennedy? (Disclaimer: For all you dems out there, I did not personally single out dem presidents, no repubs come to mind that were as newsworthy and public in their affairs.) And, what has McCain got to do with Edwards' affair, why would he even bring that up? I wonder if he really thought it would take the focus off of him and throw it on McCain? Politics makes strange bedfellows! (Or something like that)!

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited August 2008

    Shirley...it just gets REALLY old! If you say up it's down, if you say left it's right, if you say nothing it's something, if you say something, it's nothing...and always you are a racist or a bigot...SSDD!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    What I think Edwards was trying to accomplish by slipping McCain's name in there is to show us the the dems are not only the cheaters.  Heck, we already knew that.  But I think it was a low blow because McCain's affair was soooooooooooooooo many years ago.  Why not name someone, if he must, that's news worthy.  And then, of course, we have to hear from some posters about all the things Bush did with permission from the Congress.  But, of course, Obama will make it all better. 

    I think I need to go to my political thread to vent!

    Shirley

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited August 2008

    Shirley, I absolutely agree with finishing one relationship before starting another. I hesitate to believe EVERYTHING that the national enquirer said just because they were right about the affair because the rag has been wrong about so many things and they do tend to exaggerate when they are right about something.  The Enquirer was right about more than one percent, but that doesn't make them right about 99%.

    i don't think we can believe a friend of a friend who said Reille was waiting in the wings for Elizabeth to die. Even if that's true, would she have really said that and would the friend really have repeated it. Is the "friend" really a friend.  I don't blame Reille for the affair, she wasn't the one who was married, even though I don't respect that she slept with a married man (or men).

    No republicans come to mind Paulette, what about Larry Craig's wide stance Wink. I say this half in jest because I think that type of entrapment is wrong and disagree with how he was caught. I'm not going to list the republicans because I don't think it's a partisan issue and I don't care that the people you mentioned were democrats. I didn't take your comments as partisan, just as 2 blatant presidential examples.

    Whoever said Obamesiah was a racial comment? it's name calling and I won't stoop to that. It is possible to talk about politicians without slinging mud. McCain was wise not to comment because of his past even though it was long ago and because of the not so distant rumors. BTW, I was the first democrat on these threads to say that McCain's previous marital issues had no business in this election. Most of the republicans here probably missed that. Politicians sex lives should be private, unless they are with minors or nonconsentual. The USA is one of the only developed countries that pay so much negative attention to the sexual lives of politicians. Europe had a great laugh over the Lewinski debacle and I'm sure they're laughing now at how judgmental people are doing. I judge the lie to the public, not the public sex.

    One thing that's not political about the situation that's bugging me is that Elizabeth's health is being used to make Edwards' infedility seem worse. Breast cancer has nothing to do with how I see the situation, unless he was skipping her chemo appointments to have his liaisons or something similar.

  • LuAnnH
    LuAnnH Member Posts: 8,847
    edited August 2008

    I am politely asking to keep this thread on topic before mods delete it.  This is not a bash a party thread it is discussing what a jerk of a man did to one of our sisters and how in his position he should have known better.

    Someone commented that being a politician sets you up for this kind of scruitiny.  Actually, it is anybody in the public eye, actors/actresses, politicians, the very rich affulent people, several categories put you in the media's attention.  Knowing that you need to have discression.  But I guess the part I am having the hardest time with is this affair.  I am not concerned with the old one that they made peace with.  It is the fact he did this at a time in her life where she needs his support more than anything.  Not sure how many here commenting have mets, but we all know I do and at this time in my life I NEED my family and friends here for me.  The need to lean on them when I am scared of my future, dealing with what is going to be my new normal, the continued chemo and tx until my death, the changes all this does to the body.  Not only does the surgery disfigure if you have a masectomy but many other things change as you continue to pour these poisons into your body.  I just had another major surgery and have more scars to prove it along with more limiting capabilities.  I would hope my husband would be supporting, loving and being there for me to comfort as I go through this.  At 2:30 in the morning when he was in that hotel room, he should have been in EE bed drying her tears because that is when we try and hide our tears from the world.  I really am having a hard time thinking of what she is dealing with.  I don't care what science can prove or not but stress on the body weakens it which is going to all her cancer to take a running jump and get on the move.  It is just not fair to her.

    I know alot of these comments are unproven but someone else made a comment that another person working on the campaign said he could be the father.  What was this woman, the one woman political headquarters stress reliever and release station????  Just my outlook on rumors

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    Amy, I was going to mention that I bet the Europeans were laughing at us about our intense dislike of this behavior.  Ya know what?  I don't give a FLIP what the Europeans think.  This is OUR country, not their's.  I hope our country never reaches the level of accepting such low moral values.  Yes, it's a moral judgment.  And it's not only politicians or ordinary people, but it's in the pulpits too which makes me really, really angry.  Too many people get hurt.  It's wrong no matter how you look at it. I know what my vows were.  If one is not going to take that vow seriously, then, IMO, don't get married.

    "For better or for worse, in sickness and health" makes us angry even more for EE.  I don't care about her politics, but I care about her feelings.  I care that she is probably hurt deeply knowing that she has a serious illness, EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS IN REMISSION, and he'd cheat on her.  Yep, there's other people out there and on these very boards that have had this happen to them when they were going through a devastating illness and it INFURIATES most people with normal feelings. 

    I don't think we should, as a society, get so "used" to the idea that, well, it happens to the best of us.  Or, that it's OKAY.  It's not okay.  There goes our moral decline in this nation.

    I do believe we should "forgive" people for their indiscretions.  However, this type of behavior should never be acceptable.  I hope we NEVER become like the Europeans if that's how they think about infidelity.  JMO

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2008

    How can he even say she is in remission?  She has mets ...

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited August 2008

    I didn't realize that EE had had fertility treatments. I have heard others say that they thought their BC was caused by this. I just cannot understand how she could back him for pres. for the past 2 years, knowing he had cheated. And "the Breck girl" as Rush would say, has always seemed like an egomaniac to me, so his behavoir is not surprising. As much as I feel deeply sorry for his wife, I just willl never in  a million years understand why women stay with cheaters. I would have been more supportive of Hillary if she had given Bill the boot, and I feel the same for EE. He should have been home taking care of her, not parading himself around like some prima dona. He is disgusting!!!!

    And yeah Republicans do the same thing, but no one makes excuses for them, even in their own party. They are treated like pariahs right away, as they deserve to be. Meanwhile the dems get reelected and everyone makes excuses. The press gives them the soft glove treatment. A bum is a bum!! I hope he rots in hell!

Categories